Canadian C-Spine Rule FAQ's
Developed by the BC Physical Therapy Cervical Spine Rule Advisory Group
Marj Belot, John Howick, Peter Francis, Sarah Hrabi, Carol Kennedy, Melina Kurtakis, Dr. Linda Li, Bill Lyons, Guido Wisotzki, Antonio Zenone, Alison Hoens
- 1 1. Why use the Canadian C-Spine Rule?
- 2 2. What patient population is it used for?
- 3 3. When the rule is not applicable, what denotes “known vertebral disease”?
- 4 4. Isn't my clinical judgement good enough?
- 5 5. If I use this rule, will I miss a serious C-Spine injury?
- 6 Project Information
- 7 Related Resources
- 8 References
1. Why use the Canadian C-Spine Rule?
The Canadian C-spine Rule helps guide clinicians as to the indications for cervical X-rays for alert and stable adults who have sustained recent blunt trauma and are at risk for clinically important cervical spine injury.
- Clinically important cervical spine injury is defined as any fracture, dislocation, or ligamentous instability demonstrated by diagnostic imaging which requires specialized medical follow-up and may need bracing or surgery.
- Clinically unimportant injuries do not require stabilization or any specialized follow-up and include isolated avulsion of an osteophyte, isolated fracture of a transverse or spinous process, or simple compression fractures (<25% of vertebral height).
2. What patient population is it used for?
The Canadian C-spine Rule was validated with patients who sustained blunt neck trauma within 48 hours of presenting to emergency, however, it may be clinically relevant in patients with acute neck pain whose traumatic incident was more than two days previous.
3. When the rule is not applicable, what denotes “known vertebral disease”?
Vertebral disease examples: ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, stenosis or previous cervical spine surgery.
4. Isn't my clinical judgement good enough?
The Canadian C-spine Rule was developed from high quality research and found to be highly sensitive (98-100%), reliable, clinically applicable, simple to use, and superior to both clinical judgement and similar decision rules.
5. If I use this rule, will I miss a serious C-Spine injury?
Serious clinically important injuries post-trauma are uncommon (<2% of cervical trauma ER visits) and in 98% of ER X-rays the findings are normal. Regardless, it is important as primary care practitioners to identify these injuries to ensure safe management of our patients and, once suspected, to selectively refer to the physician or emergency (ER) for imaging.
This is a Physical Therapy Knowledge Broker project supported by the UBC Department of Physical Therapy, Physiotherapy Association of BC, Vancouver Coastal Research Institute, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, and the Arthritis Research Centre of Canada. March 2014.
- Stiell I et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients. JAMA 2001, 286(15): 1841-1848.