Timed Up and Go Test (TUG): Difference between revisions
David Csepe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
David Csepe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
''Materials Needed'': one chair with armrest, stopwatch, tape (to mark 3 meters). | ''Materials Needed'': one chair with armrest, stopwatch, tape (to mark 3 meters). | ||
== Reference<br> == | == Reference<br> == | ||
Example score sheet {{pdf|TUG Score Sheet.pdf|Example}} | |||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == |
Revision as of 04:17, 3 November 2011
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Objective
[edit | edit source]
To determine fall risk and measure progress of balance, sit to stand, and walking.
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
This test was initially designed for elderly persons, but is used for people with Parkinsons, Multiple Sclerosis, hip fracture, Alzheimer, CVA, and others.
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
The patient starts in a seated position, stands up upon therapist’s command, walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back to the chair and sits down. The time stops when the patient is seated. The subject is allowed to use an assistive device, and a practice trial should be completed before the timed trial. Be sure to document the assistive device used.
Cut-off time for high risk of falls:
Cut-off times to classify subjects as high risk for falling vary based on the study and participants. By using regression analysis Shumway-Cook used 14 seconds as the cut-off.[1] Thus, if a subject took 14 seconds or longer he or she was classified as high-risk for falling.[1]
Materials Needed: one chair with armrest, stopwatch, tape (to mark 3 meters).
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Example score sheet Example
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Intratester and intertester reliability have been reported as high in elderly populations, from .92-.99.[2] However, reliability in community-dwelling populations has been found to be moderate (.56).[2] In people with Alzheimers disease reliability is high (ICC = .985-.988).[3] A study by Huang et al[4] reported an ICC of 0.80 for subjects with Parkinson's Disease.
Validity[edit | edit source]
Construct validity has been shown by correlating TUG scores with gait speed (Pearson r = .75), postural sway (Pearson r = -.48), step length (Pearson r = -.74), Barthel Index (Pearson r = -.79), and step frequency (Pearson r = -.59).[2]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px" />
[edit | edit source]
Links [edit | edit source]
Video: youtube video of TUG being performed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0nqzvt9JSs
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up &amp; go test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896-903.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Steffen T, Hacker T, Mollinger L. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, berg balance scale, timed up &amp;amp; go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002;82(2):128-137.
- ↑ Ries J, Echternach J, Nof L, Blodgett M. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the timed "up &amp; go" test, the six-minute walk test, and gait speed in people with alzheimer disease. Phys Ther. 2009;89(6):569-579.
- ↑ Huang S, Hsieh C, Wu R, Tai C, Lin C, Lu W. Minimal detectable change of the timed "up & go" test and the dynamic gait index in people with parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2011;91(1):114-121.