Bankart lesion: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
== Epidemiology /Etiology  ==
== Epidemiology /Etiology  ==


add text here <br>  
The shoulder is designed for its mobility, with stability being sacrificed to achieve this mobility. Due to poor osseous congruency and capsular laxity, the glenohumeral joint is very unstable, which makes it the most frequently dislocated joint in the human body. It relies on dynamic stabilizers and the neuromuscular system for its stability. Anterior instability is the most common traumatic type of instability, representing approximately 95% of all shoulder instabilities. 2 Glenohumeral dislocations are mainly caused by an abduction, extension and external rotation movement. 1,2,3<br>
 
In many cases of anterior dislocation patients have a Bankart lesion. <br>
 
A reverse Bankart lesion can occurs in case of a posterior dislocation.<br><br>


== Characteristics/Clinical&nbsp; ==
== Characteristics/Clinical&nbsp; ==

Revision as of 18:04, 11 March 2012

Welcome to Vrije Universiteit Brussel's Evidence-based Practice project. This space was created by and for the students in the Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy program of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!

Original Editors

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Search Strategy[edit | edit source]

Bankart lesion, rehabilitation, operative repair, shoulder dislocation.

Definition/Description[edit | edit source]

add text here

Clinically Relevant Anatomy[edit | edit source]

add text here

Epidemiology /Etiology[edit | edit source]

The shoulder is designed for its mobility, with stability being sacrificed to achieve this mobility. Due to poor osseous congruency and capsular laxity, the glenohumeral joint is very unstable, which makes it the most frequently dislocated joint in the human body. It relies on dynamic stabilizers and the neuromuscular system for its stability. Anterior instability is the most common traumatic type of instability, representing approximately 95% of all shoulder instabilities. 2 Glenohumeral dislocations are mainly caused by an abduction, extension and external rotation movement. 1,2,3

In many cases of anterior dislocation patients have a Bankart lesion.

A reverse Bankart lesion can occurs in case of a posterior dislocation.

Characteristics/Clinical [edit | edit source]

We can distinguish to types of Bankart lesions: a soft tissue Bankart lesion and a bony Bankart lesion.
A soft tissue Bankart lesion is an anteroinferior labrum avulsion damage of the glenoid rim. The posterior capsule may be stretched and the inferior glenuhumeral ligament is torn.. 1,2


A bony Bankart lesion shows besides the soft tissue damage also a fracture of the anteroinferior glenoid rim. 1


Patients with a Bankart lesion are recognized by shoulder pain which is not localized in a specific point and the pain gets worse when the arm is held behind the back. They also feel weakness and instability of the shoulder. 11


The image below shows a spin echo MR arthrographic image. It shows contrast medium interposition between the glenoid rim and the capsulolabral complex, which means that there is a Bankart lesion.

Differential Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

add text here

Diagnostic Procedures[edit | edit source]

Many patients who sustain a shoulder dislocation will sustain a Bankart lesion. 4 Although Bankart lesions often occur in patients with shoulder dislocation, they are hard to detect in physical examination.


For the identification of a Bankart lesion you can use Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). It can be used to quantify the associated medial displacements of the inferior glenohumeral ligament underneath the glenoid. 1


According to some studies a Bankart lesion can be diagnosed if contrast medium is interposed between the glenoid and the detached labroligamentous complex. 4


The soft tissue Bankart lesion can be seen at arthroscopy and MR arthrography as a fragment of labrum attached to the anterior band of the inferior glenuhumeral ligament and to a rupture in the periosteum of the scapula. 5
A bony Bankart lesion can also be discovered by radiographs.

Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

add links to outcome measures here (also see Outcome Measures Database)

Examination[edit | edit source]

add text here related to physical examination and assessment

Medical Management
[edit | edit source]

add text here

Physical Therapy Management
[edit | edit source]

There are several options for interventions to the Bankart lesion. First of all we can make the difference between the operative and non-operative interventions.


Possible operative interventions include the arthroscopic Bankart repair and an open Bankart repair. In arthroscopic Bankart repair the muscle strength is regained faster, but the recurrence rates after open Bankart repair are significantly lower.8 It is proven by several studies that recurrence rate after operative Bankart treatment is significantly reduced compared to a non-operative treatment. 6 After surgery there is of course rehabilitation needed which can be slightly comparable to the non-operative rehabilitation program. 7


The conservative non-operative Bankart treatment had a significantly worse result with recurrent instability rates ranging from 17% to 96% in patients under age of 30 years. 6


Rehabilitation


There are 7 key factors that need to be considered in the rehabilitation of the unstable shoulder. These are:
• Onset of the pathology (traumatic, chronic)
• Degree of instability
• Frequency of dislocation
• Direction of instability (anterior, posterior, multidirectional)
• Concomitant pathologies
• End range neuromuscular control
• Premorbid activity level 2

Besides these key factors physiotherapist should also keep in mind that every patient is different and that we should never forget to personalize a rehabilitation program.

Focus of the rehabilitation program is on maximizing dynamic stability, scapula positioning, proprioception and improving neuromuscular control, as there are no specific exercises to improve the labrum quality. 2,9 Usually the rehabilitation program is divided in 3 phases. The programs for non-operative treatment and postoperative rehabilitation are very similar.


The first phase of rehabilitation consists of sling immobilization with a limited active range of motion for 0 to 4 weeks, this allows 20o of abduction and 40o of internal rotation. [1] This provides an earlier return to functional activity. [2][3][4][5] Immobilization in external rotation reduces the risk of recurrent shoulder dislocations. [6] After the 14 days passive movement is initiated in a pain free zone. Strengthening exercises are started as isometric contractions to initiate muscle recruitment of the rotator cuff muscles, mostly exercises in a closed kinetic chain, such as pushing your underarm against a wall towards exorotation. [7][8][9] The goals are to diminish pain and protect healing soft tissues.[10][11]


In the second phase a progressive passive motion is important, together with active-assisted range of motion exercises. 2,6 Strengthening of rotator cuff muscles is initiated in balanced exercises. Examples of exercises are movements of the shoulder executed with elastic bands or dumbbells as dynamic open chain strengthening exercises. 10 Rehabilitation should include both closed and open chain exercises. An example of a closed kinetic chain exercise is quadruped position with scapula protraction, progressing to tripod position. A patient can continue to phase three when a normal passive range of motion is achieved.


The third phase focuses on restoration of a full active range of motion. In this phase a progressively increasing resistance in dynamic exercises is stressed to regain full strength for ADL activities. Most imported in this phase is the return to full active activity of normal life. 6,10

Key Research[edit | edit source]

add links and reviews of high quality evidence here (case studies should be added on new pages using the case study template)

Resources
[edit | edit source]

add appropriate resources here

Clinical Bottom Line[edit | edit source]

add text here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

see tutorial on Adding PubMed Feed

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

see adding references tutorial.

  1. S-H Kim, K-I Ha, M-W Jung, M-S Lim, Y-M Kim, J-H Park, ‘Accelerated Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Selected Cases: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study’, Arthroscopy, 2003, Volume 19, Number 7 (Level of Evidence 1B)
  2. K. E. Wilk, L. C. Macrina, M. Reinold, ‘Non-operative Rehabilitation for traumatic and atraumatic glenohumeral instability’, North American Journal of Sports Fhysical Therapy, 2006, p 16-31 (Level of Evidence 1A)
  3. C.R. Bottoni, J.H. Wilckens, T.M. DeBerandino, J.G. D’Alleyrand, R.C. Rooney, J. Harpstrite, R. Arciero, ‘ Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Arthroscopic Stabilization Versus Nonoperative Treatment in Patients with Acute, Traumatic, First-Time Shoulder Dislocations’, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 30, Number 4, 2002 (Level of Evidence 1B)
  4. Y. Rhee, C. Lim, N. Cho, ’Muscle Strength After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization’, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 35, Number 11, 2007 (Level of Evidence 2B)
  5. ASSET consensus rehabilitation guidelines: Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization with or without Bankart Repair, (Level of Evidence 3A)
  6. K. Nozaka, E. Itoi, Y. Hatakeyama, T. Sato, T. Kido, H. Minagawa, N. Yamamoto, I. Wakabayashi, ‘Immobilization in External Rotation After Shoulder Dislocation Reduces the Risk of Recurrence, A Randomized Controlled Trail’, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007, (Level of Evidence 1B)
  7. Oefentherapie bij schouderaandoeningen, Ann Cools/Marc Walravens, 2001, Antwerpen, Standaard Uitgeverij, p 34-35 (Level of Evidence 5)
  8. C.R. Bottoni, J.H. Wilckens, T.M. DeBerandino, J.G. D’Alleyrand, R.C. Rooney, J. Harpstrite, R. Arciero, ‘ Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Arthroscopic Stabilization Versus Nonoperative Treatment in Patients with Acute, Traumatic, First-Time Shoulder Dislocations’, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 30, Number 4, 2002 (Level of Evidence 1B)
  9. K. E. Wilk, L. C. Macrina, M. Reinold, ‘Non-operative Rehabilitation for traumatic and atraumatic glenohumeral instability’, North American Journal of Sports Fhysical Therapy, 2006, p 16-31 (Level of Evidence 1A)
  10. K. E. Wilk, L. C. Macrina, M. Reinold, ‘Non-operative Rehabilitation for traumatic and atraumatic glenohumeral instability’, North American Journal of Sports Fhysical Therapy, 2006, p 16-31 (Level of Evidence 1A)
  11. ASSET consensus rehabilitation guidelines: Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization with or without Bankart Repair, (Level of Evidence 3A)