Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Rehabilitation Class

Community Rehab COPD

Executive summary
Background information
Disease process

Evidence for pulmonary rehabilitation

 Eligibility for the proposed pulmonary rehabilitation program shall be in line the NICE COPD guideline (2010). This states that “pulmonary rehabilitation should be offered to all patients who feel functionally disabled by COPD” (NICE 2010).Eligibility for the proposed pulmonary rehabilitation program shall be in line the NICE COPD guideline (2010). This states that “pulmonary rehabilitation should be offered to all patients who feel functionally disabled by COPD” (NICE 2010).Eligibility for the proposed pulmonary rehabilitation program shall be in line the NICE COPD guideline (2010). This states that “pulmonary rehabilitation should be offered to all patients who feel functionally disabled by COPD” (NICE 2010).

“The opportunity for structured, on going exercise with peer and professional support, in a suitable venue, is perceived as important to people with COPD in facilitating a physically active lifestyle following pulmonary rehabilitation” (Hogg et al. 2012)

According to “A summary of recommendations of the pulmonary rehabilitation in the
community- sharing best practice meeting” (2005) and the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), at least one supervised session is required per week for effective pulmonary rehabilitation. It has also been suggested that there is no difference in the benefit of two supervised exercise sessions when compared to one on exercise tolerance (O’Neill et al. 2007), however, two supervised sessions per week may have a better impact on health-related quality of life (Liddell and Webber 2010). Making it a regular weekly program would give the program a structure and would ensure that the participants have regular support which has been found to be important in exercise regimes, especially in this population (O'Shea et al. 2007).

Therefore, to make this program as cost effective as possible, we suggest that it will contain at least one weekly exercise class as a number of individual supervisions would be capital and labour intensive.

As is desirable, exercise sessions would be delivered by healthcare professionals, specifically a physiotherapist and physiotherapy technical instructor, both with experience in cardio-respiratory rehabilitation (Backley et al. 2005). The location of these sessions would be in the community as according to the COPD guidelines published by NICE, pulmonary rehabilitation classes should be held in locations which are easily accessed by participants to ensure their effectiveness (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). In addition, it has also been found that travel difficulties is a barrier to completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (Keating et al. 2011). The NICE guideline also says that these are to be held at times which suit the participants (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). These group sessions would be interspersed with exercise sessions which participants would do in their own time at home or in a local leisure facility. It is suggested that a minimum of four home sessions are completed per week (Backley et al. 2005).

As recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), a minimum of twenty exercise sessions would be included in this pulmonary rehabilitation program at a frequency of at least three per week, with one or two of these being supervised. Although any intensity of exercise has been shown to be beneficial, high intensity exercises would be encouraged for greater physiological effects (Nici et al. 2006). In addition to the traditional lower limb training included in pulmonary rehabilitation, such as treadmill walking or cycling, upper limb exercises, such as arm ergometer or hand weights, will be included as a number of beneficial effects have been noted. Ideally, aerobic exercise would be at an intensity of between four and six on Borg dyspnoea scale of more than 60% of max workload for at least 30 minutes. For resistance exercise, exercise intensity would be between two and four sets of six to twelve repetitions at an intensity of 50-80% of 1RM (Nici et al. 2006).

In addition to the structured exercise class, an essential educational component will be included in the pulmonary rehabilitation program (Backley et al. 2005). This would include teaching participants the importance of exercise. This is of specific importance with people in this population as many individuals with COPD elect not to take up a referral to pulmonary rehabilitation as they think they would not experience any health benefits from attendance. Ensuring good attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation requires consideration of how information regarding the proven benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation can be conveyed to participants (Keating et al. 2011). It is also important to supply the participants with information on how to transfer exercise into environments outside the class, such as their home, as this will be required for between supervised sessions and once they have completed the program (Nici et al. 2006).  Information on relaxation, anxiety management, medication and self management (Backley et al. 2005), including an action plan for exacerbations (Nici et al. 2006), would also be included as this seen as being essential in an effective pulmonary rehabilitation program.

“The opportunity for structured, on going exercise with peer and professional support, in a suitable venue, is perceived as important to people with COPD in facilitating a physically active lifestyle following pulmonary rehabilitation” (Hogg et al. 2012)

According to “A summary of recommendations of the pulmonary rehabilitation in the
community- sharing best practice meeting” (2005) and the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), at least one supervised session is required per week for effective pulmonary rehabilitation. It has also been suggested that there is no difference in the benefit of two supervised exercise sessions when compared to one on exercise tolerance (O’Neill et al. 2007), however, two supervised sessions per week may have a better impact on health-related quality of life (Liddell and Webber 2010). Making it a regular weekly program would give the program a structure and would ensure that the participants have regular support which has been found to be important in exercise regimes, especially in this population (O'Shea et al. 2007).

Therefore, to make this program as cost effective as possible, we suggest that it will contain at least one weekly exercise class as a number of individual supervisions would be capital and labour intensive.

As is desirable, exercise sessions would be delivered by healthcare professionals, specifically a physiotherapist and physiotherapy technical instructor, both with experience in cardio-respiratory rehabilitation (Backley et al. 2005). The location of these sessions would be in the community as according to the COPD guidelines published by NICE, pulmonary rehabilitation classes should be held in locations which are easily accessed by participants to ensure their effectiveness (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). In addition, it has also been found that travel difficulties is a barrier to completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (Keating et al. 2011). The NICE guideline also says that these are to be held at times which suit the participants (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). These group sessions would be interspersed with exercise sessions which participants would do in their own time at home or in a local leisure facility. It is suggested that a minimum of four home sessions are completed per week (Backley et al. 2005).

As recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), a minimum of twenty exercise sessions would be included in this pulmonary rehabilitation program at a frequency of at least three per week, with one or two of these being supervised. Although any intensity of exercise has been shown to be beneficial, high intensity exercises would be encouraged for greater physiological effects (Nici et al. 2006). In addition to the traditional lower limb training included in pulmonary rehabilitation, such as treadmill walking or cycling, upper limb exercises, such as arm ergometer or hand weights, will be included as a number of beneficial effects have been noted. Ideally, aerobic exercise would be at an intensity of between four and six on Borg dyspnoea scale of more than 60% of max workload for at least 30 minutes. For resistance exercise, exercise intensity would be between two and four sets of six to twelve repetitions at an intensity of 50-80% of 1RM (Nici et al. 2006).

In addition to the structured exercise class, an essential educational component will be included in the pulmonary rehabilitation program (Backley et al. 2005). This would include teaching participants the importance of exercise. This is of specific importance with people in this population as many individuals with COPD elect not to take up a referral to pulmonary rehabilitation as they think they would not experience any health benefits from attendance. Ensuring good attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation requires consideration of how information regarding the proven benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation can be conveyed to participants (Keating et al. 2011). It is also important to supply the participants with information on how to transfer exercise into environments outside the class, such as their home, as this will be required for between supervised sessions and once they have completed the program (Nici et al. 2006).  Information on relaxation, anxiety management, medication and self management (Backley et al. 2005), including an action plan for exacerbations (Nici et al. 2006), would also be included as this seen as being essential in an effective pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Eligibility for the proposed pulmonary rehabilitation program shall be in line the NICE COPD guideline (2010). This states that “pulmonary rehabilitation should be offered to all patients who feel functionally disabled by COPD” (NICE 2010).“The opportunity for structured, on going exercise with peer and professional support, in a suitable venue, is perceived as important to people with COPD in facilitating a physically active lifestyle following pulmonary rehabilitation” (Hogg et al. 2012)

According to “A summary of recommendations of the pulmonary rehabilitation in the
community- sharing best practice meeting” (2005) and the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), at least one supervised session is required per week for effective pulmonary rehabilitation. It has also been suggested that there is no difference in the benefit of two supervised exercise sessions when compared to one on exercise tolerance (O’Neill et al. 2007), however, two supervised sessions per week may have a better impact on health-related quality of life (Liddell and Webber 2010). Making it a regular weekly program would give the program a structure and would ensure that the participants have regular support which has been found to be important in exercise regimes, especially in this population (O'Shea et al. 2007).

Therefore, to make this program as cost effective as possible, we suggest that it will contain at least one weekly exercise class as a number of individual supervisions would be capital and labour intensive.

As is desirable, exercise sessions would be delivered by healthcare professionals, specifically a physiotherapist and physiotherapy technical instructor, both with experience in cardio-respiratory rehabilitation (Backley et al. 2005). The location of these sessions would be in the community as according to the COPD guidelines published by NICE, pulmonary rehabilitation classes should be held in locations which are easily accessed by participants to ensure their effectiveness (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). In addition, it has also been found that travel difficulties is a barrier to completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (Keating et al. 2011). The NICE guideline also says that these are to be held at times which suit the participants (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). These group sessions would be interspersed with exercise sessions which participants would do in their own time at home or in a local leisure facility. It is suggested that a minimum of four home sessions are completed per week (Backley et al. 2005).

As recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), a minimum of twenty exercise sessions would be included in this pulmonary rehabilitation program at a frequency of at least three per week, with one or two of these being supervised. Although any intensity of exercise has been shown to be beneficial, high intensity exercises would be encouraged for greater physiological effects (Nici et al. 2006). In addition to the traditional lower limb training included in pulmonary rehabilitation, such as treadmill walking or cycling, upper limb exercises, such as arm ergometer or hand weights, will be included as a number of beneficial effects have been noted. Ideally, aerobic exercise would be at an intensity of between four and six on Borg dyspnoea scale of more than 60% of max workload for at least 30 minutes. For resistance exercise, exercise intensity would be between two and four sets of six to twelve repetitions at an intensity of 50-80% of 1RM (Nici et al. 2006).

In addition to the structured exercise class, an essential educational component will be included in the pulmonary rehabilitation program (Backley et al. 2005). This would include teaching participants the importance of exercise. This is of specific importance with people in this population as many individuals with COPD elect not to take up a referral to pulmonary rehabilitation as they think they would not experience any health benefits from attendance. Ensuring good attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation requires consideration of how information regarding the proven benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation can be conveyed to participants (Keating et al. 2011). It is also important to supply the participants with information on how to transfer exercise into environments outside the class, such as their home, as this will be required for between supervised sessions and once they have completed the program (Nici et al. 2006).  Information on relaxation, anxiety management, medication and self management (Backley et al. 2005), including an action plan for exacerbations (Nici et al. 2006), would also be included as this seen as being essential in an effective pulmonary rehabilitation program.

“The opportunity for structured, on going exercise with peer and professional support, in a suitable venue, is perceived as important to people with COPD in facilitating a physically active lifestyle following pulmonary rehabilitation” (Hogg et al. 2012)

According to “A summary of recommendations of the pulmonary rehabilitation in the
community- sharing best practice meeting” (2005) and the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), at least one supervised session is required per week for effective pulmonary rehabilitation. It has also been suggested that there is no difference in the benefit of two supervised exercise sessions when compared to one on exercise tolerance (O’Neill et al. 2007), however, two supervised sessions per week may have a better impact on health-related quality of life (Liddell and Webber 2010). Making it a regular weekly program would give the program a structure and would ensure that the participants have regular support which has been found to be important in exercise regimes, especially in this population (O'Shea et al. 2007).

Therefore, to make this program as cost effective as possible, we suggest that it will contain at least one weekly exercise class as a number of individual supervisions would be capital and labour intensive.

As is desirable, exercise sessions would be delivered by healthcare professionals, specifically a physiotherapist and physiotherapy technical instructor, both with experience in cardio-respiratory rehabilitation (Backley et al. 2005). The location of these sessions would be in the community as according to the COPD guidelines published by NICE, pulmonary rehabilitation classes should be held in locations which are easily accessed by participants to ensure their effectiveness (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). In addition, it has also been found that travel difficulties is a barrier to completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (Keating et al. 2011). The NICE guideline also says that these are to be held at times which suit the participants (NHS, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010). These group sessions would be interspersed with exercise sessions which participants would do in their own time at home or in a local leisure facility. It is suggested that a minimum of four home sessions are completed per week (Backley et al. 2005).

As recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2006), a minimum of twenty exercise sessions would be included in this pulmonary rehabilitation program at a frequency of at least three per week, with one or two of these being supervised. Although any intensity of exercise has been shown to be beneficial, high intensity exercises would be encouraged for greater physiological effects (Nici et al. 2006). In addition to the traditional lower limb training included in pulmonary rehabilitation, such as treadmill walking or cycling, upper limb exercises, such as arm ergometer or hand weights, will be included as a number of beneficial effects have been noted. Ideally, aerobic exercise would be at an intensity of between four and six on Borg dyspnoea scale of more than 60% of max workload for at least 30 minutes. For resistance exercise, exercise intensity would be between two and four sets of six to twelve repetitions at an intensity of 50-80% of 1RM (Nici et al. 2006).

In addition to the structured exercise class, an essential educational component will be included in the pulmonary rehabilitation program (Backley et al. 2005). This would include teaching participants the importance of exercise. This is of specific importance with people in this population as many individuals with COPD elect not to take up a referral to pulmonary rehabilitation as they think they would not experience any health benefits from attendance. Ensuring good attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation requires consideration of how information regarding the proven benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation can be conveyed to participants (Keating et al. 2011). It is also important to supply the participants with information on how to transfer exercise into environments outside the class, such as their home, as this will be required for between supervised sessions and once they have completed the program (Nici et al. 2006).  Information on relaxation, anxiety management, medication and self management (Backley et al. 2005), including an action plan for exacerbations (Nici et al. 2006), would also be included as this seen as being essential in an effective pulmonary rehabilitation program.