Anterior Drawer Test of the Knee: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
== Evidence  ==
== Evidence  ==


Reliable data are rare regarding the accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for ACL ruptures, especially in a primary care setting. To evaluate a possible rupture of the ACL, there are 3 primarily diagnostic assessments: The anterior drawner test, the Lachman test, and the pivot shift test. Based on some study results, the pivot shift test seems to have a favorable positive predictive value, the Lachman test has good negative predictive value, but the anterior drawner test is of unproven value.  
<ref name="Katz and Fingeroth" />&nbsp;reported that the knee anterior draw test has a diagnostic accuracy of acute ACL ruptures (within 2 weeks of examination) of: 22.2% sensitivity and &gt;95% specificity.&nbsp;The study reported the diagnostic accuracy of subacute/chronic ACL ruptures (more than 2 weeks before examination) is: 40.9% sensitivity and 98.4% specificity.&nbsp;It is important to note that in this study all examinations were performed under anesthesia; thus the diagnostic accuracy in physiotherapy clinical pracitice may be less.&nbsp;The knee anterior draw test, although widely used, is a poor diagnostic indicator of ACL ruptures, especially in the acute setting (<ref name="Katz and Fingeroth" />).


The anterior drawer test knee&nbsp;
Both th Lachman test and the pivot shift test have been reported to have a greater diagnostic accuracy of ACL ruptures (<ref name="Katz and Fingeroth" />).


== PubMed Feed  ==
== PubMed Feed  ==

Revision as of 16:31, 18 August 2013

Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the editing pages tutorial for help.

Original Editor - Roel De Groef

Lead Editors -Alistair James


Video[edit | edit source]

[1]

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

To diagnose ruptures of the anterior cruciate liagment (ACL) by testing it's integrity ([2]).

Technique
[edit | edit source]

The patient lies on his back with 45° of hip flexion, 90° flexion of the knee and the tibia in neutral position. The fysiotherapist stabilizes the foot of the patient with his thigh and put both hands on the dorsal side of the proximal part of the tibia. The thumbs of the fysiotherapist are placed on the anterior part of the tibia plateau. The researcher performs an anterior-directed movement and assesses the degree of translation of the tibia. Grading is based on differences of degrees in translation of the affected side compared with the healthy side.

Evidence[edit | edit source]

[2] reported that the knee anterior draw test has a diagnostic accuracy of acute ACL ruptures (within 2 weeks of examination) of: 22.2% sensitivity and >95% specificity. The study reported the diagnostic accuracy of subacute/chronic ACL ruptures (more than 2 weeks before examination) is: 40.9% sensitivity and 98.4% specificity. It is important to note that in this study all examinations were performed under anesthesia; thus the diagnostic accuracy in physiotherapy clinical pracitice may be less. The knee anterior draw test, although widely used, is a poor diagnostic indicator of ACL ruptures, especially in the acute setting ([2]).

Both th Lachman test and the pivot shift test have been reported to have a greater diagnostic accuracy of ACL ruptures ([2]).

PubMed Feed[edit | edit source]


Failed to load RSS feed from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1vMcRd_vquRX1DClR4PORNXO_EycsLE_wagq8rS2PVAJB6dEn1|charset=UTF­8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS


References
[edit | edit source]

  1. bigesor. Anterior drawer test - knee. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQdBrr3Mmj0 [last accessed 18/8/13]
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Katz JW, Fingeroth RJ. The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 1986;14:88-91. http://ajs.sagepub.com/content/14/1/88.short (accessed 18 July 2013).


The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. Read more.