Bunnell-Littler Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
== Technique<br>  ==
== Technique<br>  ==


The MCP is held in an extended position and the therapist passively flexes the PIP making note of the available range.&nbsp; The test is then repeated with the MCP flexed. If no change in motion is detected between the two tests, then capsular restriction at the PIP joint is implicated.&nbsp; If the motion increases when the MCP is flexed, then lumbricale muscle tightness is implicated.
The MCP is held in an extended position and the therapist passively flexes the PIP making note of the available range.&nbsp; The test is then repeated with the MCP flexed. If no change in motion is detected between the two tests, then capsular restriction at the PIP joint is implicated.&nbsp; If the motion increases when the MCP is flexed, then lumbricale muscle tightness is implicated.  


Scroll over the pictures below for captions.<br><br>  
Scroll over the pictures below for captions.<br><br>  


[[Image:B l test start.jpg|+ test finding for PIP restriction]] &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:B_l_end_intrinsic.jpg|increased PIP flexion with MCP flexion implies intrinsic restriction]]  
[[Image:B l test start.jpg|+ test finding for PIP restriction]] &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:B l end intrinsic.jpg|increased PIP flexion with MCP flexion implies intrinsic restriction]]  


<br>


 
[[Image:B l end capsular.jpg|no increase in PIP flexion with MCP flexion implies capsular restriction]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Image:B l normal.jpg|full PIP flexion with MCP extension is a normal (-) test finding]]  
[[Image:B_l_end_capsular.jpg|no increase in PIP flexion with MCP flexion implies capsular restriction]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Image:B_l_normal.jpg|full PIP flexion with MCP extension is a normal (-) test finding]]


== Evidence  ==
== Evidence  ==
Line 24: Line 24:
== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==


Orthopaedic Physical Therapy by Donatelli and Wooden. 4th edition<br>
Orthopaedic Physical Therapy by Donatelli and Wooden. 4th edition


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>
</div>
== References  ==
== References  ==



Revision as of 21:16, 6 December 2009

Original Editor - [[User:Jon DeVaul|Jon DeVaul

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

This test evaluates the source of PIP flexion motion limitation by differentiating between intrinsic muscle or capsular tightness in the affected digit.  A typical patient presentation may include pain located in the distal intermetacarpal space and with prolonged gripping or making a fist.  Symptoms are most often seen in the ring and long finger.

Technique
[edit | edit source]

The MCP is held in an extended position and the therapist passively flexes the PIP making note of the available range.  The test is then repeated with the MCP flexed. If no change in motion is detected between the two tests, then capsular restriction at the PIP joint is implicated.  If the motion increases when the MCP is flexed, then lumbricale muscle tightness is implicated.

Scroll over the pictures below for captions.

+ test finding for PIP restriction             increased PIP flexion with MCP flexion implies intrinsic restriction


no increase in PIP flexion with MCP flexion implies capsular restriction             full PIP flexion with MCP extension is a normal (-) test finding

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Provide the evidence for this technique here

Resources[edit | edit source]

Orthopaedic Physical Therapy by Donatelli and Wooden. 4th edition

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.