Cervical Instability: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 80: Line 80:
== Outcome Measures  ==
== Outcome Measures  ==


There are no patient reported outcome measures to specifically address cervical instability. However clinicians can address the patient’s reported impairments by administering the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI).
     There are no patient reported outcome measures to specifically address cervical instability. However clinicians can address the patient’s reported impairments by administering the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI).  


add links to outcome measures here (see [[Outcome Measures|Outcome Measures Database]])
add links to outcome measures here (see [[Outcome Measures|Outcome Measures Database]])

Revision as of 22:48, 19 March 2011

Welcome to Temple University's Evidence-Based Practice project. This project was created by and for the students at Temple University in Philidelphia, and is part of the Orthopaedic curriculum. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!

Let me know if you need any assistance.Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the editing pages tutorial for help.

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - If you would like to be a lead editor on this page, please contact us.

Clinically Relevant Anatomy[edit | edit source]

     The cervical spine is structurally distinguished by differences between the upper cervical spine (C1 and C2) and the lower cervical spine (C3-C7) segments. Anatomical and functional distinctions allow for differences in segmental mobility and movement direction. The upper cervical spine allows for a greater degree of rotation with some frontal and sagittal movement. In contrast, the lower cervical spine moves in flexion-extension and inclination-rotation.1

Upper Cervical Spine (C1-C2)

     Cervical instability is commonly associated with the upper cervical spine. Ghanem1 proposes that the anatomical nature of the upper cervical spine creates an inherent instability. The alar and transverse ligaments provide the primary source of stability for the upper cervical spine.  The transverse ligament is located across the arch of the atlas and positions the dens against the anterior arch of the atlas. Functionally, the transverse ligament limits flexion and provides support from anterior translation of C1.2 If the transverse ligament is disrupted by injury or is congenitally lax, neural or vascular compromise could occur. This is due to the proximity of the spinal cord and vertebral arteries.1 The alar ligaments connect the cranium to C1 from the sides of the dens to the lateral borders of the foramen magnum. The alar ligaments function to prevent excessive rotation at the atlanto-occipital joint.3 The alar ligament is most commonly injured in motor vehicle accidents. However disruption of the alar ligament is less likely to lead to neurological or vascular injury. 

Lower Cervical Spine (C3-C7) 

     In contrast to the upper cervical spine, the frontal plane orientation of facet joints of the lower cervical spine serves as the primary source of stability. In addition, spinal ligaments including ligamentum nuchae, anterior longitudinal ligament, posterior longitudinal ligament, and ligamentum flavum contribute to stability in the lower cervical spine.

    [edit | edit source]

Mechanism of Injury / Pathological Process[edit | edit source]

Traumatic

  • Whiplash
  • Motor vehicle accident
  • Head/neck surgery 

Systemic

  • Recent upper respiratory infection

Congenital

  • Down syndrome
  • Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
  • Ankylosing spondylosis
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • Os odontoideum
  • Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS)

Clinical Presentation[edit | edit source]

     Mintken et al4 described the cardinal symptoms of clinical instability: drop attacks, facial or lip paresthesias, bilateral or quadrilateral limb paresthesias, or nystagmus.  These signs and symptoms are usually provoked with active or passive movement of the head or neck. Furthermore, in their case study, they address other secondary impairments such as dizziness and bilateral blurred vision.
     In a Delphi survey study, Cook et al5 reported that physical therapists attribute the following symptoms with cervical instability:

  • “intolerance to prolonged static postures”
  • “fatigue and inability to hold head up”
  • "better with external support, including hands or collar"
  • "frequent need for self-manipulation"
  • "feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control"
  • "frequent episodes of acute attacks"
  • "sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements"

     Since there is little evidence supportive of clinical tests for cervical spine instability, recognition of these symptoms along with clinical judgment could warrant referral. During examination, it is important to collect a thorough history from the patient to understand the patient’s chief complaint, signs and symptoms - neural or vascular compromise, duration and pain level.

Diagnostic Procedures[edit | edit source]

Clinical Testing

     In the literature, cervical spine instability consistently is described as being difficult to diagnose. Clinically, ligamentous tests to assess the stability of the upper cervical spine are limited by reliability, validity, and no consensus for sequencing of such tests. It is recommended to first assess with the Sharp-Pursor test, and then, only if it is negative, to proceed with other ligamentous tests in order of provocation (alar ligamentous stress then anterior shear test). Research remains inconclusive in what order it should be performed. Some authors feel as though if the Sharp-Pursor test is performed first, it can elicit a false negative response. Thus, if the patient does not experience a provocative test first, there would be a chance the patient’s symptoms would not be relieved by the Sharp-Pursor test. More research is required in this area to clarify the order and diagnostic accuracy for upper cervical spine instability testing.4

Diagnostic Imaging

    Radiography is the primary diagnostic tool for cervical instability. Whenever possible, radiographs should be taken in sitting or standing to account for the effect of gravity and to capture an accurate picture of the normal curvature of the patient’s spine under physiological loading.1 Radiographs should be taken in 3 views: anteroposterior, open-mouth anteroposterior, and lateral.6 

    Standard anteroposterior radiographs provide visualization of the lower cervical spine, while open-mouth radiographs provide visualization of the upper cervical spine. Lateral radiographs allow for the measurement of the atlantodens interval (ADI), the space between the posterior surface of the anterior ring of the atlas and the anterior surface of the dens. An ADI greater than 3mm in adults or 5mm in children is indicative of atlantoaxial instability. In adults, an ADI of greater than 5mm typically indicates a rupture of the transverse ligament. However, in patient populations with chronic ligamentous laxity such as Rheumatoid Arthritis, Down Syndrome, or congenital abnormalties, the ADI measurement may not be as useful for diagnosing laxity of the transverse ligament. Such patients may present as asymptomatic. It is important to consider the increased risk associated with ligamentous laxity in these populations and to exercise caution in treatment.7,8

     Imaging procedures such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI, computed tomography (CT) scanning, and dynamic fluoroscopy may be used when radiograph images are unclear or incomplete and/or for complex cases that require a detailed analysis of pathoanatomical structures or involve significant neurological deficits.1,9

Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

     There are no patient reported outcome measures to specifically address cervical instability. However clinicians can address the patient’s reported impairments by administering the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI).

add links to outcome measures here (see Outcome Measures Database)

Management / Interventions
[edit | edit source]

     Upon examination findings of positive ligamentous testing and clinically observable signs such as cardinal symptoms, a referral for imaging should be implemented. Depending on the mechanism of injury or the pathological origin of cervical spine instability, the mode for medical management varies. Ghanem reports that treatments include surgical correction, immobilization or traction depending on the diagnosis of the patient’s case.1 Patients may benefit from conservative physical therapy interventions, especially those patients without severe ligamentous injury or neurovascular complications. Conservative therapy should focus on motor control retraining exercises for the cervical spine including the deep neck flexors. Manual therapy such as non-thrust manipulation and soft tissue mobilization could be considered to improve mobility of adjacent regions and for symptomatic relief. Aggressive manual techniques that would place strain through the compromised ligaments or cause neurovascular signs/symptoms are contraindicated.

Differential Diagnosis
[edit | edit source]

  • Fracture
  • Cervical myelopathy
  • Vertebral basilar insufficiency
  • Cervical spondylosis
  • Torticollis
  • Mechanical neck pain
  • Headache
  • TMJ dysfunction

Key Evidence[edit | edit source]

add text here relating to key evidence with regards to any of the above headings

Resources
[edit | edit source]

add appropriate resources here

Case Studies[edit | edit source]

add links to case studies here (case studies should be added on new pages using the case study template)

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.


The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. Read more.