Elbow Examination: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="noeditbox">Welcome to [[Temple University Evidence-Based Practice Project|Temple University's Evidence-Based Practice project]]. This project was created by and for the students at Temple University in Philidelphia, and is part of the Orthopaedic curriculum. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!</div>
<div class="noeditbox">Welcome to [[Temple University Evidence-Based Practice Project|Temple University's Evidence-Based Practice project]]. This project was created by and for the students at Temple University in Philidelphia, and is part of the Orthopaedic curriculum. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!</div>  
 
Let me know if you need any assistance.Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the [[Editing pages|editing pages tutorial]] for help.  
Let me know if you need any assistance.Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the [[Editing pages|editing pages tutorial]] for help.  


Line 20: Line 19:
==== '''Subjective History'''  ====
==== '''Subjective History'''  ====


<br>• Exact location of pain<br>• Timeline-When are the patients reported symptoms at their worst?<br>• Mechanism of the injury- In the case of a traumatic event, the mechanism of injury helps guide the diagnosis.<ref name="number 1">MacDermid JC, &amp;amp;amp;amp; Michlovitz SL. Examination of the elbow: linking diagnosis, prognosis, and outcomes as a framework for maximizing therapy interventions. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(2):82-97.</ref>&nbsp;For atraumatic injuries, specific symptoms can be highly useful in determining a diagnosis.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; For example: patient reported numbness and/or tingling in the 5th digit may suggest ulnar neuropathy.<ref name="number 1" /><br>• Presence of numbness or tingling?<br>• Medications?<br>• Past Medical History<br>• Diagnostic Testing/Imaging?<br>  
<br>• Exact location of pain<br>• Timeline-When are the patients reported symptoms at their worst?<br>• Mechanism of the injury- In the case of a traumatic event, the mechanism of injury helps guide the diagnosis.<ref name="number 1">MacDermid JC, &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp; Michlovitz SL. Examination of the elbow: linking diagnosis, prognosis, and outcomes as a framework for maximizing therapy interventions. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(2):82-97.</ref>&nbsp;For atraumatic injuries, specific symptoms can be highly useful in determining a diagnosis.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; For example: patient reported numbness and/or tingling in the 5th digit may suggest ulnar neuropathy.<ref name="number 1" /><br>• Presence of numbness or tingling?<br>• Medications?<br>• Past Medical History<br>• Diagnostic Testing/Imaging?<br>  


• '''Region Specific Historical Question: These questions will help guide the examination. For example<ref>Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. User’s Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence Based Clinician. Evidence in Motion, 2008.</ref>:'''<br>1. ''Do your symptoms change (better or worse) with any movements of the neck or shoulder?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” the cervical spine and shoulder region should be screened.<br>''2. Does your elbow ever “slip out” or feel unstable?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes”, elbow instability could be indicated<br>''3. Does the pain change with gripping activities?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate possible lateral or medial epicondylagia.<br>''4. Do you ever experience numbness of tingling in the hand?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate possible pronator teres or cubital tunnel syndrome.<br>''5. Was the elbow hyper extended during the time of injury?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate fracture of ligamentous/capsular damage.<br>''6. Do you relate the symptoms to a throwing activity?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate medial instability.  
• '''Region Specific Historical Question: These questions will help guide the examination. For example<ref>Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. User’s Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence Based Clinician. Evidence in Motion, 2008.</ref>:'''<br>1. ''Do your symptoms change (better or worse) with any movements of the neck or shoulder?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” the cervical spine and shoulder region should be screened.<br>''2. Does your elbow ever “slip out” or feel unstable?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes”, elbow instability could be indicated<br>''3. Does the pain change with gripping activities?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate possible lateral or medial epicondylagia.<br>''4. Do you ever experience numbness of tingling in the hand?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate possible pronator teres or cubital tunnel syndrome.<br>''5. Was the elbow hyper extended during the time of injury?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate fracture of ligamentous/capsular damage.<br>''6. Do you relate the symptoms to a throwing activity?''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “Yes” could indicate medial instability.  
Line 33: Line 32:
|}
|}


<br>
<br>  


==== '''Self-Report Outcome Measures'''  ====
==== '''Self-Report Outcome Measures'''  ====
Line 39: Line 38:
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=DASH_Outcome_Measure DASH (Quick Dash)]  
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=DASH_Outcome_Measure DASH (Quick Dash)]  
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Patient_Specific_Functional_Scale Patient-Specific Functional Scale]  
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Patient_Specific_Functional_Scale Patient-Specific Functional Scale]  
*PREE and ASES: Patient-rated elbow evaluation (PREE)<ref name="number 1" />&nbsp;and American Shoulder and Elbow Society evaluation(ASES)<ref>King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, et al. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Commitee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8:351–4.</ref>&nbsp;are two similar scales that allow the patient to self-report their pain and disability related to their elbow pathology. The conceptual difference between the two scales is minimal and the correlation between the two scales usually exceeds 0.90.<ref name="number 1" />
*PREE and ASES: Patient-rated elbow evaluation (PREE)<ref name="number 1" />&nbsp;and American Shoulder and Elbow Society evaluation(ASES)<ref>King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, et al. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Commitee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8:351–4.</ref>&nbsp;are two similar scales that allow the patient to self-report their pain and disability related to their elbow pathology. The conceptual difference between the two scales is minimal and the correlation between the two scales usually exceeds 0.90.<ref name="number 1" />  
*P4: P4 is a 4-item pain intensity measure. The P4 asks patients to rate pain in the morning, afternoon, evening, and with activity over the past 2 days. The P4 can be particularly useful as the elbow is greatly impacted by movement and time of day.<ref name="number 1" /><br>
*P4: P4 is a 4-item pain intensity measure. The P4 asks patients to rate pain in the morning, afternoon, evening, and with activity over the past 2 days. The P4 can be particularly useful as the elbow is greatly impacted by movement and time of day.<ref name="number 1" /><br>


Line 74: Line 73:
[[Image:Image-File.jpeg|center|Illustration adapted from [Frick, 2006]]]  
[[Image:Image-File.jpeg|center|Illustration adapted from [Frick, 2006]]]  


''Fig. 1 ''. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs of a normal elbow demonstrate the normal articulations of the elbow.<ref>Frick MA. Imaging of the elbow: A review of imaging findings in acute and chronic traumatic disorders of the elbow. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(2):98-112.</ref>
''Fig. 1 ''. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs of a normal elbow demonstrate the normal articulations of the elbow.<ref>Frick MA. Imaging of the elbow: A review of imaging findings in acute and chronic traumatic disorders of the elbow. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(2):98-112.</ref>  


== Objective  ==
== Objective  ==
Line 83: Line 82:
*Thoracic and cervical spine including kyphosis and forward head  
*Thoracic and cervical spine including kyphosis and forward head  
*Scapular Considerations  
*Scapular Considerations  
*Carrying angle: The carrying angle has a mean value of 10 degrees for men and 13 degrees for women.<ref>Colman WW &amp; Strauch RJ. Physical examination of the elbow. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(1):15-20.</ref>
*Carrying angle: The carrying angle has a mean value of 10 degrees for men and 13 degrees for women.<ref>Colman WW &amp;amp; Strauch RJ. Physical examination of the elbow. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(1):15-20.</ref>  
*Swelling/ecchymosis/deformities/muscle wasting  
*Swelling/ecchymosis/deformities/muscle wasting  
*Triangle Sign
*Triangle Sign
Line 91: Line 90:
=== Palpation  ===
=== Palpation  ===


*Medial/lateral epicondyle
*Medial/lateral epicondyle  
*Olecranon and olecranon fossa
*Olecranon and olecranon fossa  
*Radial head
*Radial head  
*Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) of the elbow
*Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) of the elbow  
*Soft tissue in upper arm and forearm/wrist for pain provocation, heat, swelling<br>
*Soft tissue in upper arm and forearm/wrist for pain provocation, heat, swelling<br>


=== Neurologic Assessment <br>  ===
=== Neurologic Assessment <br>  ===


*Reflexes: C5-C7
*Reflexes: C5-C7  
*Myotomes: C5-T1
*Myotomes: C5-T1  
*Dermatomes: C5-T1
*Dermatomes: C5-T1


Line 1,117: Line 1,116:
<references />  
<references />  


<br><br><br><br>
<br><br><br><br>  


{| cellspacing="5" cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid rgb(163, 177, 191); margin: 15px 0pt 0pt; width: 100%; vertical-align: top; background-color: rgb(227, 228, 250); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
{| cellspacing="5" cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid rgb(163, 177, 191); margin: 15px 0pt 0pt; width: 100%; vertical-align: top; background-color: rgb(227, 228, 250); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"

Revision as of 23:50, 20 March 2011

Welcome to Temple University's Evidence-Based Practice project. This project was created by and for the students at Temple University in Philidelphia, and is part of the Orthopaedic curriculum. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!

Let me know if you need any assistance.Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the editing pages tutorial for help.

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - If you would like to be a lead editor on this page, please contact us.

Subjective[edit | edit source]

Clinical Presentation
[edit | edit source]

Pain and symptoms localized in or around elbow. May present with neurological symptoms local or distant to elbow.

Subjective History[edit | edit source]


• Exact location of pain
• Timeline-When are the patients reported symptoms at their worst?
• Mechanism of the injury- In the case of a traumatic event, the mechanism of injury helps guide the diagnosis.[1] For atraumatic injuries, specific symptoms can be highly useful in determining a diagnosis.
     For example: patient reported numbness and/or tingling in the 5th digit may suggest ulnar neuropathy.[1]
• Presence of numbness or tingling?
• Medications?
• Past Medical History
• Diagnostic Testing/Imaging?

Region Specific Historical Question: These questions will help guide the examination. For example[2]:
1. Do your symptoms change (better or worse) with any movements of the neck or shoulder?
     “Yes” the cervical spine and shoulder region should be screened.
2. Does your elbow ever “slip out” or feel unstable?
     “Yes”, elbow instability could be indicated
3. Does the pain change with gripping activities?
     “Yes” could indicate possible lateral or medial epicondylagia.
4. Do you ever experience numbness of tingling in the hand?
     “Yes” could indicate possible pronator teres or cubital tunnel syndrome.
5. Was the elbow hyper extended during the time of injury?
     “Yes” could indicate fracture of ligamentous/capsular damage.
6. Do you relate the symptoms to a throwing activity?
     “Yes” could indicate medial instability.

• Environmental and Personal Factors
During the initial examination, environmental and personal factors should be addressed. These issues could affect healing and return of function after an elbow injury. Table 1 outlines these issues.[1]

Table 1. Patient Factors that can affect healing and return of function after elbow injury
Diabetes • Immunosuppression • Infection • Multiple site injuries • Tobacco use • Excessive alcohol intake • Complications following injury or surgery(joint stiffness, heterotopic ossification, infection, joint instability)


Self-Report Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

  • DASH (Quick Dash)
  • Patient-Specific Functional Scale
  • PREE and ASES: Patient-rated elbow evaluation (PREE)[1] and American Shoulder and Elbow Society evaluation(ASES)[3] are two similar scales that allow the patient to self-report their pain and disability related to their elbow pathology. The conceptual difference between the two scales is minimal and the correlation between the two scales usually exceeds 0.90.[1]
  • P4: P4 is a 4-item pain intensity measure. The P4 asks patients to rate pain in the morning, afternoon, evening, and with activity over the past 2 days. The P4 can be particularly useful as the elbow is greatly impacted by movement and time of day.[1]
  • SF-36: SF-36 is a generic health form. It is appropriate to address broad areas of health. For individuals with elbow dysfunction, the SF-36 is not a good tool to evaluate change in the clinic for patients with elbow disorders because it is not responsive and specific to the symptoms that the patient is reporting with. This measure can also be very time consuming and difficult to use.[1]

Special Questions
[edit | edit source]

• Red and Yellow Flags

Red Flags
•Infection/Inflammation
•Malignancy
•Fracture/Dislocation (Positive Elbow Extension Test)
• Inflammatory Arthritides
•Abnormal Vitals
•Abnormal Vascular/Neurological Exam
•Heterotopic Ossification (Post-Surgical Consideration)
•Inappropriate progress from treatment made after surgery


Yellow Flags
-Psychosocial factors
-Passive coping
-Fear Avoidance Beliefs


Investigations
[edit | edit source]

• Radiological Considerations
     The information from the history should be correlated with imaging findings of the elbow when available.1

                                                                   Fig. 1

Fig. 1 . Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs of a normal elbow demonstrate the normal articulations of the elbow.[4]

Objective[edit | edit source]

Observation[edit | edit source]

  • General posture of the upper quarter: Proximal factors should be considered which could predispose the patient to elbow symptoms.
  • Thoracic and cervical spine including kyphosis and forward head
  • Scapular Considerations
  • Carrying angle: The carrying angle has a mean value of 10 degrees for men and 13 degrees for women.[5]
  • Swelling/ecchymosis/deformities/muscle wasting
  • Triangle Sign

Functional Tests
[edit | edit source]

Palpation[edit | edit source]

  • Medial/lateral epicondyle
  • Olecranon and olecranon fossa
  • Radial head
  • Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) of the elbow
  • Soft tissue in upper arm and forearm/wrist for pain provocation, heat, swelling

Neurologic Assessment
[edit | edit source]

  • Reflexes: C5-C7
  • Myotomes: C5-T1
  • Dermatomes: C5-T1

Movement Testing[edit | edit source]

  • AROM, PROM, and Overpressure
  • Passive Intervertebral Motion
  • Muscle Strength

Special Tests (broken up by possible diagnosis)
[edit | edit source]

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome:


Lateral Epicondylalgia:


Ligamentous Tests:


Neurodynamic Tests

  • Median nerve bias: Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1
  • Radial nerve bias:  Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 2b
  • Ulnar nerve bias:  Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 3



References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 MacDermid JC, &amp;amp;amp;amp; Michlovitz SL. Examination of the elbow: linking diagnosis, prognosis, and outcomes as a framework for maximizing therapy interventions. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(2):82-97.
  2. Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. User’s Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence Based Clinician. Evidence in Motion, 2008.
  3. King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, et al. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Commitee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8:351–4.
  4. Frick MA. Imaging of the elbow: A review of imaging findings in acute and chronic traumatic disorders of the elbow. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(2):98-112.
  5. Colman WW &amp; Strauch RJ. Physical examination of the elbow. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(1):15-20.





The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. Read more.