Frail Elderly: The Physiotherapist's Role in Preventing Hospital Admission

Welcome to "Contemporary and Emerging Issues in Physiotherapy Practice" Queen Margaret University's Current and Emerging Roles in Physiotherapy Practice project. This space was created by and for the students at Queen Margaret University in Edinburgh, UK. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!

Introduction
[edit | edit source]

This 10 hour online learning resource is tailored towards final year students and newly graduate physiotherapists, aiming to increase your knowledge and understanding of how you can use physiotherapy to prevent hospital admission in the community dwelling, frail elderly population. The module will also hopefully help you in applying this information in practice.

From clinical placements and talking with clinical experts it became apparent to us that treating patients who are frail is not a new area of physiotherapy. However, there are many new and emerging physiotherapy services aimed to help reduce the amount of time frail patients spend in hospital. We also identified in ourselves a lack of knowledge and awareness around what frailty is and the role of the physiotherapist in managing it. We therefore, agreed to direct this Wiki towards how physiotherapists can help to prevent hospital admissions in those who are frail/elderly.

Aims[edit | edit source]

• To provide a learning resource for final year physiotherapy students or junior physiotherapists with an introduction to contemporary and emerging issues in the field of reducing hospital admissions in the frail elderly population and current management strategies.

• To provide you with an introduction and overview of the physiotherapists’ role in the prevention of hospital admissions in the frail elderly population by using a holistic, patient centred approach
  

Learning outcome[edit | edit source]

Screen Shot 2016-01-11 at 10.32.33.png


Frailty[edit | edit source]

Definition[edit | edit source]

According to Fried et al (2001), frailty is defined as a “biological syndrome of decreased reserve and resistance to stressors, resulting from cumulative declines across multiple physiological systems and causing vulnerability to adverse outcomes.” However it is also to be noted that despite the large proportion of the elderly population who are diagnosed as Frail, there is no standardised definition.
Fried et al. also provides a Phenotype for identifying those who are frail. It designates that to be considered frail the person must match three of five categories.

The categories are:
1. Weight loss, a drop in bodyweight of ≥10lbs/4.5kg in the past year or a drop in bodyweight of ≥5% in the past year. Can also be described as Sarcopenia.
2. Weakness, measured using grip strength. A result within the lowest 20% according to gender and BMI indicates a weakness.
3. Reduced energy/endurance, self-reported. Can also be predictive of cardiovascular disease.
4. Slowness, the lowest 20% of the population according to gender and standing height based on a 15ft walking time.
5. Low Physical Activity, based on reported activity levels translated into a kilocalorie score. Again with a cut-off at the lowest 20% for each gender.
This can be a good way of describing the multiple physiological declines described in frail persons.

Frailty can sometimes be missed in persons with multiple pathologies as the focus is very much disease based. As professionals we must try to maintain an awareness of frailty and the impact that it will have for each individual despite their diagnosis. It is also noted that the label of frail can have negative connotations for patients and everyone will react differently. Frailty and disability do not always co-exist however they can be linked, in some cases frailty may be a consequence of disability and in others may be the causation of disability. Again this will be very unique to each individual. BGS 2014

Assessment:
The Fried Frailty Index (FFI) as described above is commonly used to diagnose frail persons, those with 3 or more categories out of 5. It can also be used to designate persons as Intermediate frail or Pre-frail. Fried et al. suggests that those who score in 1 or 2 of the categories but not 3 are “Pre-frail”.


Another commonly used assessment tool is the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). This is a multidimensional assessment tool which is implemented by the multidisciplinary team (Martin 2015). This will be looked at in more depth in the assessment section of this Wiki.


Demographics[edit | edit source]

Frailty is associated with
• Increased risk of falls
• Hospitalisation
• Loss of mobility and independence
• Increasing disability and death (Fried et al. 2001)


Risk factors (Xue 2011)
• Being female
• Being less educated
• Having chronic diseases
• Living on a lower income
• Having poorer self-reported health status

Prevalence

• Frailty prevalence increases with age. In those aged 65-75 in the United States, 7-12% will be classified as frail. This number increases to 25% in those over 85.
• The general trend is for greater incidence in females than males. (Chen et al. 2014)
• The average prevalence within Europe is 17% in those over 65 years. (Santos-Eggimann et al. 2009)

According to the Scottish Government, the number of persons over 75 years is going to rocket by 28% over a ten year period from 2012 to 2022. To compare, for those of working age there will be a 5% increase (National Records of Scotland, 2013). This suggests that there will be a much larger proportion of the population regarded as elderly and therefore an increase in the number of frail persons within Scotland. This will push the number of dependants within the population to almost 70 per 100 persons in the working population by 2037 as demonstrated by the graph below from the National Records for Scotland, 2013.

National Records for Scotland, 2013.
[edit | edit source]

Costs[edit | edit source]

Length of stay and cost implications NHS


The latest published statistics which are being used in the literature relate to the years 2012 and 2013. Within this time frame 2,211,228 people over 60 were admitted to hospital in an emergency [1].

Total NHS Expenditure 2013.png

Hospital admissions in the NHS.png

70% of day beds are occupied by people over 65; this is more than 51,000 beds at any one time. 85 year olds on average stay in hospital eight days longer than their younger counterparts[2].


A table to show the cost of average stays in hospital [1]
Type of stay Short stay
Extra bed day
Visit to A and E
Cost
£1489
£273
£114


Most emergency admissions to hospital happen through accident and emergency [1]. On average a person over 85 spends 11 days in hospital[2]. If they pass through accident and emergency the total spent is approximately £3241 per patient, per visit.
However, More than a 25% of over 85 year olds stay for 2 weeks and 10% stay longer than a month, when admitted as an emergency [3]. This means that even more money is spent.


A table to show the cost of health care input needed from falls [4]
Type of fall
Cost to NHS in millions
falls on stairs
£207
falls on level ground
£128
Falls between levels
£84
Falls associated with baths
£16


410,377 elderly persons were admitted to hospital due to a fall in 2013. Appropriate strategies could prevent this by up to 30% [5]


Length of stay and cost implications worldwide


Across the world there are varying amounts of elderly people in hospitals, how much time they spend in hospital and how much it costs.

Percentages of over 65's admitted to hospital in australia.png

In terms of falls 59,046 males and 113,632 females were admitted to hospital following a fall in Australia in 2013-2014[6].

A table to show statistics for hospital stays and costs in the United States of America [7]

Over 65's
Under 65's
Hospital admissions
34%
66%
Average length of hospital stay
5.2 days
4.5 days
Cost of average hospital stay
$10,200-$13,000
$5,000-$12,900
Cost in 2012
$30,638.57 Million
$346.86 Billion


92% of this care was paid for by insurance companies[7].

Comparing this to the UK we can see that although most people stay in hospital for fewer days than in the USA, in the UK elderly people remain in hospital for longer. This may have negative health impacts. The UK is 16th in the world when it comes to average length of stay in hospital [8].

Relevance[edit | edit source]

Based upon the statistics and projections of The Scottish Government (ref), over the next decade we will face an ageing population. As shown by literature on the topic of prevelance and cost the already limited NHS budgets will have to stretch further as with more elderly dependants will come greater expenditure on care. 

This indicates a need for change avoiding costly hospital addmissions unless absolutely neccessary. Throughout this online Wiki module we shall discuss these possible options to help you implement change.

Currently there are a number of resources on this topic from many different charities, the government and health service. However we feel that these documents do not provide a clear idea of what really needs to be done so with this in mind we hope to give you a firmer understanding of what needs to change, why and how to go about it. 

Health and Social Care Integration[edit | edit source]

The Department of Health[1] report that although there are high numbers of emergency admissions through accident and emergency, which is very costly, at least one fifth could be dealt with in the community. Some ways of doing this are through: telemedicine, risk prediction tools, case management and alternatives to hospitals.
The integration of the health and social care systems in the UK was designed to improve service delivery and the effectiveness of care. There are nine outcomes which this incorporation is meant to achieve.


1. To allow people to look after and improve their own health
2. To allow as many people as possible to live independent lives
3. To ensure users have positive experiences of their health and social care
4. To maintain or improve users quality of life
5. To reduce health inequalities
6. To ensure unpaid carers are supported with their health and wellbeing needs
7. To ensure everyone; staff and users, are safe from harm at all times
8. To ensure staff employed in health and social care services feel involved in the work they do. They should also feel supported to implement change when needed.
9. To ensure that all resources are used effectively


The planning, resources and delivery of care will be now carried out together by the local authority or health board[9]. This will mean that health and social care can run smoothly as one entity and users will experience a continuity of care.
One way this will have an effect is by reducing hospital admissions by allowing patient information to be shared more freely between hospitals and the community. This will allow for more effective multidisciplinary care in the community[3]
It has been said that better communication between health professionals, especially between those in hospitals and the social sector, may help reduce emergency admissions and help people return home sooner. However, there may be some barriers preventing this such as; differing funding levels, contrasting cultures, performance management and no sufficient way to share patient data[1].

Policies and Guidelines[edit | edit source]

This section will present the most relevant guidelines and policies in relation to frailty and highlight the most useful points.

The policies and guidelines included in this learning resource are:

HIS.jpg
THINK FRAILTY.png BGS logo.png
Healthcare Improvement Scotland[10] Think Frailty[11] Fit for Frailty[12]











For the purpose of this learning resource the chosen guidelines and policies were Scottish and UK related. If you intend to work or are currently working without the NHS you might be required to be familiar with policies in relation to your workplace.


Older People's Acute Care Improvement Programme (OPAC)[edit | edit source]

As the number of older people in the population is increasing, there is an increased need to ensure appropriate care for older people. Improving older people's acute care is a priority for the Scottish Government and in 2012 “The Older People’s Acute Care improvement programme (OPAC)”[10] was commissioned by the Scottish Government.

The programme focuses on 2 key areas

  • Frailty
  • Delirium

In relation to frailty, the programme focused on identification and immediate management of frailty. This included screening for frailty and ensuring that older people who were identified as frail received a comprehensive geriatric assessment within 24 hours of admission. [10]
The document “Think Frailty” explored the strategies implemented in practice in more depth and will be discussed in Section 3.2. 

Healthcare Improvement Scotland [13]  reported the impact of the programme and found that:

  • Frailty screening in 3 surgical wards at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh decreased the length of stay, number of falls and number of complaints
  • A reduced length of stay in NHS Grampian
  • 50% decrease in the number of falls per month in 2 wards in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

The report emphasises the importance to continue building on this work and Healthcare Improvement Scotland is committed to continue working with NHS Boards and staff to support learning and improvement of skills in relation to the management of frailty and delirium [13] .

Think Frailty[edit | edit source]

As mentioned above the Scottish Government provided funding for Healthcare Improvement Scotland's policy to improve health care for older people due to the rising numbers of unplanned admissions in older people. There is strong evidence for the benefits of CGA for frail patients. The programme is aiming to ensure that 95% of frail patients have a CGA and are admitted or referred to a specialist unit within 24 hours of admission[11]

This case study report focuses on the work to identify frailty and ensure rapid CGA in four NHS boards in Scotland: NHS Ayrshire & Arran, NHS Grampian, NHS Lanarkshire and NHS Lothian.

Common themes underpinning the success in the NHS boards mention in the report included[11]:

Easy to use screening tool

The use of these should be at first point contact with older people; at the front door or at home

  • Important to enable rapid identification and referral to CGA
  • Valid screening tools reduces variability and increases the number of appropriate referrals to frailty services


Early intervention & Senior decision makers

  • Senior decision makers were valued in particularly in NHS Ayrshire & Arran and NHS Grampian. As senior clinicians were more likely to use a wider range of care management options other than admission
  • Early intervention focusing on discharge planning


Multidisciplinary team working

  • Having a strong, integrated team was valued by all sites
  • Good communication between the members of the MDT was important
  • Common aim for all sites: Expanding the team. In particular physiotherapy and OT services so that a 7 day a week around the clock service is available

The sites involved in this project were able to show significant improvements in outcomes for frail elderly presenting at the hospital.
These outcomes included a reduction in the number of admissions and re-admissions to hospital[11].

To read more about each NHS board strategies to improve frailty identification and management access Think Frailty: Improving the identification and management of frailty

Fit for Frailty[edit | edit source]

Part 1: Recognition and management of frailty in individuals in community and outpatient settings[12]

This part of the Fit for Frailty guidelines by the British Geriatric Society (BGS) intend to support health and social care professionals working with frail older people in the community.


In order to recognise and identify frailty BGS recommends[12]:

  • During all encounters with health and social care professionals older people should be assessed for frailty
  • There are 5 main syndromes of frailty; Falls, change in mobility, delirium, change in continence and susceptibility to side effects of medication. Encountering one of these should raise suspicion of frailty
  • Gait speed, timed up and go test and the PRISMA questionnaire are recommended outcome measures to assess for frailty

For managing frailty in an individual BGS recommends[12]:

  • A Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), which involves a holistic, multidimensional and multidisciplinary assessment of an individual
  • The result of the CGA should be an individualised care and support plan (CSP).
  • The CSP includes a named health or social care professional coordinating the person’s care. A plan for maintaining and optimising the person’s care as well as urgent, escalation and end of life care plans


Gap in literature[edit | edit source]

Clinical guidelines provide evidence based recommendations in relation to the management of a specific condition or a syndrome. They are aiming to assists health and social care professionals in their decision making and help reduce undesirable variations in practice (Broughton and Rathbone 2001).
The guidelines on frailty discussed above are aimed to all health and social care professionals and it has been found that these rarely go in depth in their explanation of specific healthcare professional's role. As physiotherapists it can be difficult to identify what recommendations are most applicable to our practice in relation to the management of frailty.
The guidelines do not state the main role of physiotherapy in the management of frailty. However, exact guidance is challenging to provide as the assessment and treatment of frailty will vary depending on the individual, the setting and the situation.

The following sections of this wiki learning resource aims to critically synthesise evidence on the physiotherapy management of frailty in relation to preventing hospital admissions.
This aims to help “fill the gap” in the national clinical guidelines and make you as a final year physiotherapy student or recent graduate more aware of the physiotherapy role and practice in relation to frailty.


Resources[edit | edit source]


Additional reading heading.png


  • Fit for Frailty Part 2 - Developing, commissioning and managing services for people
    living with frailty in community settings. 
    This is a resource for all GPs, geriatricians, Health Service managers,
    Social Service managers and Commissioners of Services[14].

  • Silver book - Quality Care For Older People with Urgent and Emergency Care Needs.
    Click on "Complete Silverbook" in the toolbar to access this document on managing
    frailty in acute settings[15].


Physiotherapy assesment
[edit | edit source]

Delivery of care[edit | edit source]

Physiotherapists work within multiple teams that help with preventing hospital admissions. Day hospital and community are two very common areas that work with the frail elderly.

For patients who are unable to travel, physiotherapy treatments are offered at home. At times home can be the most appropriate environment to have treatments. When aiming for living independently or increasing mobility it can be beneficial for physiotherapists to work within the environment patients live in, to get a better understanding and to adapt any treatments[16]. Physiotherapy at home offers treatment for a lot of different conditions such as: respiratory, muscular and skeletal problems, nervous system and if any issues with mobility and balance[17].

The video below is one example of an itiative in England, which was set up to reduce hospital admissions and length of hospital stay in the frail elderly.

Recently, physiotherapists have started working within A&E as part of the multi-disciplinary teams, by helping to reduce delays and inefficiencies, and also preventing unnecessary hospital admissions. In the UK 18.3 million people attended A&E units in 2012-2013, 24% of those who attended were aged 60 or above, almost 21% was due to ligament, joint, muscle, and soft tissue injuries and 21% were then admitted to hospital[18]. Physiotherapists main task in A&E is assessing and managing people with MSK injuries, loss of function and falls in elderly. Occupational therapists and physiotherapists works together with discharge planning, assessing elderly patient’s management of activity of daily living, avoiding unnecessary hospital admission and enable patients to return safely to home.

In 2015 there was a conference held in Liverpool discussing the effectiveness of musculoskeletal emergency physiotherapy practitioner. As A&E is a new working environment for physiotherapists continuous research is needed, and due to this there is a lack of evidence within this area[19].

In 2015 there was a six-week trail where a physiotherapists and a paramedic joined forces for non life- threatening emergency calls, aiming to prevent unnecessary A&E attendances and reducing hospital admissions. Conditions that were commonly seen was falls, chronic pain, loss of mobility, exacerbations of long- term conditions and frailty. 61 incidents were responded to during this trail, 49 were due to falls in own home. 57 % of the patients seen remained at home. Through this trail £2,850 was saved every time a person was not transferred to hospital. This shows an emerging role in which physiotherapists are helping to prevent unnecessary hospital admissions[20].

A&E NHS.png
CSP: Physiotherapy works: Accident and Emergency


                                                    

The comprehensive geriatric assessment[edit | edit source]

All the guidelines outlined above state a need for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to be completed to diagnose patients who may be frail. From this assessment a holistic interdisciplinary treatment program can be devised to suit the problems and needs of the individual. The assessment is usually carried out by a geriatrician or another trained professional[21].
This assessment usually takes place when a patient is identified as possibly being frail; during acute illness, prior to surgery or when returning to a community environment. It is a multi-dimensional program, which looks at the patients; health (physical and mental), mobility and social status. This approach was introduced in 2001 by the Department of Health. There are five domains in which assessment takes place.


Below is a table adapted from [21] which identifies and outlines what should be included in each domain.

CGA.jpg


The methods used to achieve this are specific to the region of the UK in which you work. However, the measurement tools should be standardised and reliable. For example, the 6-minute walk test is commonly used to test gait and balance. Some measures identify problems while others examine their severity.
The assessment will allow health professionals to identify the associated effects of frailty to the patient, now and in the future. Once specific problems have been identified onward referral can be made to appropriate healthcare professionals. This can then allow for a more in depth assessment to be made around these problems. For example a patient may be referred to physiotherapy to help increase mobility[21].


Follow up is part of the CGA and identifies effectiveness of treatment. These sessions usually occur when people are readmitted to hospital. A study examined whether a comprehensive assessment after an emergency admission is more effective when carried out by a team trained in a using a CGA. The paper showed that this approach reduced; costs, length of hospital stay, deterioration, mortality. Yet this approach is not yet taken in the community[22].


In hospitalised patients it has been shown to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and enhances management in both the long and short term[23] [24]. In the community completing a CGA can prevent reductions in mobility and problems which arise from poor mobility by implementing treatment programmes tailored to all the patients’ needs [25]. It can also reduce hospital stay, increase the likelihood of keeping patients out of hospital[26] [27] and reduce mortality[28].

Resources[edit | edit source]

Quiz heading.png

How many of the key points can you recall?

1. Who carries out a comprehensive geriatric assessment?
2. Where can it take place?
3. What are its key components?
4. What effects can completing a CGA have?


Reflection heading.png

Use the reading in this section and your prior knowledge to reflect upon any problems that you
think may arise when carrying out this type of assessment.

This activity should take 10 minutes to complete.




Functional assessment of frail individuals[edit | edit source]


Not all of the papers reviewed below look at people diagnosed as being frail. As there is a lack of literature related to this population some literature has been extrapolated and applied to this population of patients.


What is it?


It is advised that frailty assessments should be carried out by an MDT. Physiotherapists have the knowledge and skill level to carry out the functional aspect[29][30].


Functional assessments are a way of determining health needs now and in the future. Assessments of patients with frailty should occur after every illness or injury to establish the effect the episode had on the patient’s functional ability [31]. More specifically, functional assessments should be done on every patient over 75[32]. The functional assessment element of the comprehensive geriatric assessment compromises of; gait, balance, abilities to carry out activities of daily living (both fundamental and basic)and activity/exercise status[21]. All these areas should be assessed by the attending physiotherapist.


However, assessing frail elderly patients can be difficult as it takes a long time due to…


• A through top to toe assessment needs to be done including all of the elements of the ICF model [33] [34][35]
• Are there any cognitive issues present? These include dementia and long-term or short-term memory problems. Cognitive function in the elderly has been shown to have a strong association with reduced functional performance[36]. It can also impact on how you carry out your assessment and communicate with the patient [37][38].
• Auditory problems, affecting the patients’ ability to hear you[31]
• Visual problems, meaning the patient cannot see you or what you are trying to get them to do clearly[31].
• Easily fatigued, causing patients to have reduced performance in activities which occur at the end of the assessment[39]. This may skew the results of any outcome measures used.
• Reduced / slow mobility (i.e. Sit-stand takes longer)[39].


Subjective assessment
The subjective assessment will be very similar to that of any other patient. Yet, some specific questions related to age and frailty must be asked.
1. Has anything changed recently in terms of the patients’; vision, hearing, mobility status, cognitive ability, medication usgae or activity levels[40].
2. Questions should be asked regarding falls history and mobility status [41][40]. When did they last fall and why? how often do they fall? The context around circumstances of the fall should also be asked.
3. It is useful to know how often the patient is eating and what foods they consume[42].
4. Do they have help or support with activities of daily living from anyone? Do they give help or support to anyone? [41].

Test yourself heading.png

Think about why the above questions are important to ask with this type of patient.

This task should take 20 minutes.

Answers are below


1. It’s important to know any changes which could affect the rest of your assessment and treatment plans. How could these changes have impacted on the patients’ life? Can we help to change any issues/problems?

2. We need to know about any previous falls. This will help determine their mobility status and how well they are coping. We can then tailor treatment where it is needed[43] [44].

3. Nutrition is important for these patients and it should be part of the physiotherapist assessment to check what and how often the patient is eating[42]. The physiotherapist can then reinforce good eating habits and if needed refer the patient to a dietician. It is also important to have an idea about how much the patient eats as this could contribute to increased fatigue. A reduced tolerance to activity is present in frail patients [39] and so how much you include in your first assignment is crucial.

4. You can get an idea of what ADL’s they are able to do, how they are coping with these demands and how busy they are throughout the day[45] [41].


Objective assessment
The objective assessment should begin by observing posture, skin condition and body shape [33]. This can give you clues as to their general health and the extent of their frailty.

The dependency level of the patient should be established as high dependency can reduce quality of life[46]. This can be achieved by using outcome measures such as, the timed up and go which has been shown to have good reliability and validity as a tool for measuring the mobility status of patients who are frail[47].

As gait speed is an important measure of frailty, it is important for physiotherapists to measure it. A speed of less than 0.8 m/sec indicates frailty [31]. Keeping track of the patient’s gait speed will enable the physiotherapist to objectively measure patient progress. 

Endurance can be tested by completing multiple sit to stands or by carrying out a six minute walk test. Monitoring the patients’ heart rate during this will give an indication of their bodies ability to respond to increased effort[46]. The six minute walk test has been shown to be valid and reliable within this population[35]. Measuring endurance gives the physiotherapist an indication of how far the patient is likely to be able to walk, which can aid treatment planning and goal setting.

Analysing the persons gait is also important. However, the difference in gait in people who are frail has not been widely researched. As well as frail individuals having reduced gait speed, they also have reduced stride length and cadence. Reductions in stride length are linked with the severity of frailty and come about due to sarcopenia and so lower limb weakness. It is advised that in order to truly assess gait the person should be asked to walk at their maximum speed[48]. Good indicators of falls risk are the berg balance scale and the Tinneti, as these look at functional balance [35][49]. Reduced balance is linked with increasing falls ([44].

Gait assessment.png


Balance should be assessed comprehensively as this will allow for individualised treatment. 75% of over 70’s have reduced balance, which can increase falls[50]. Physiotherapists prefer using their own observations to measure balance rather than outcome measures. Some use standardised outcome measures, but clinical decisions were based on observations. The Berg balance scale, single leg stance test and TUG were seen by physiotherapists as useful tools to measure functional ability[50]. Balance outcome measures were assessed in a systematic review for their psychometric properties. There are many which the physiotherapist can use; very few measure all aspects of balance. Testing a patients’ reactive balance was one area which was rarely examined. It is therefore important to know what aspects of balance and postural awareness are being tested by the OM so that treatment will be tailored to problems[51].


The patients’ ROM and strength should be assessed at every joint. Tibiotarsal range is important to measure as it can impact on posture and may therefore contribute to falls[46]. Grip strength can be tested by using a grip ball dynamometer and has been shown to be accurate and comfortable to use with people with frailty. It is important to measure grip strength as weakness can limit the patients’ ability to carry out activities of daily living [52]. This type of dynamometer shows high validity and reliability [53].

Determining ROM is important with these patients as a link between reduced lower limb mobility and fall prevalence has been found. In this population dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, hip extension, internal rotation and abduction were found to be tight [54]. It is therefore important to establish if your patient has reduced ROM as tailored interventions may help reduce falls.


Activities of daily living (ADL’s) can help establish the range of motion and strength of frail patients. Two main types of ADL’s should be assessed, instrumental and basic [55][21].

  • Basic ADL’s are self-care tasks, whereas,
  • instrumental ADL’s are activities which are needed for a person to live independently in the community [56].

IADL’s are important to measure as an inability to do these is a better indicator of dysfunction than ability to self-care [56]. The percentage of elderly people reported as being independent increased to 65.4% (from 46.5%) when looking at basic ADL’s when compared to IADLs. There are standardised outcome measures in which to assess IADLs, yet the specific activities needed to enable independence vary depending on the environment and social aspects of the patients’ life. It is therefore important to have a grasp of what the patients’ needs to be able to do to remain independent and them review these activities [56]. Functional dependence should be assessed as there are correlations between dependence and increased length of stay in hospital [55].

The Barthel index is a way to assess self-care. It was originally designed to use with stroke patients. Yet, research has shown that it is a reliable tool to use with geriatric patients [57]. However, the Barthel index may be less reliable with individuals who have cognitive impairments[58].

Activity levels
The therapist should have an idea as to what level of independence the patient has and how much physical activity they carry out on a daily basis. This can be achieved by functional tasks and by asking the patient and their families[34].


Additional reading heading.png
Ward, 1998 looked at different standardised IADL which can be used in practice.


Quiz heading.png

Take a look at the case study, What instrumental activties of daily living do you

think need to be measured as part of Mr Smith's assessment?

This activity should take 10 minutes



Outcome measures
Outcome measures may be useful to track the patient’s progress but also to assess the patient’s abilities [59][60]. There are many different outcome measures to choose in this population. Some were specifically designed for frailty while others were developed for other conditions but have been shown to have good psychometric properties with this population. The next section will review some commonly used outcome measures. However, this is not an exhortative list and will not necessarily be the best to use with each patient. It is up to the clinician to select the most appropriate measure for their practice.


Outcome Measures (OM)
Description of OM
Psychometric properties
Frail elderly functional assessment (1995)
-Examines functional ability in the frail
-Nineteen point questionnaire

-Valid
-Reliable
-Sensitive to change [61][62]
Ten Meter walk test
10 Metre Walk Test
-Excellent test-retest reliability and high concurrent validity when compared to the shorter 4 meter walking test[63].
-High concurrent validity in the frail population with a 10 meter and 20 meter walk test [64].

The Edmonton frail scale
12 questions related to cognition, general health status, mobility, social status, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence and functional performance. It has a total score of 17 which depicts severe frailty. It is a very brief way of assessing for frailty and can be used to see whether a CGA should take place[65].
-Good inter-rater reliability
-Takes less than 5 mins to complete
-Good construct validity
-Acceptable internal consistency[65]


PRISMA 7
A questionnaire devised of seven yes/no questions that can be used when the patient is unable to carry out a stand up and go or a 10 meter walk test [66]. It was developed with a service in Canadian healthcare, to integrate frailty assessment and management and allow for increase patient-centred care[67].
Using this approach can reduce hospitalisation and is an encouraged approach across systems[67]. Its use is recommended by the BGS and can indicate frailty. [12]
The Barthel index
It measures the patients’ ability to look after themselves by asking 10 questions and answers that are graded on the amount of assistance needed to carry out the activity.
The interrater reliability of this outcome is fair to good depending on which activity is being assessed [57].
Tinetti
The Tinetti is a 17 item OM used to assess gait and balance[68].

-70% sensitivity score

-52% sensitivity (good predictor of falls risk[69]).

-Excellent test-retest and intrarater reliability[70][71][72].

-In community-dwelling older adults the concurrent validity was adequate when compared to the timed-up and go[73].

Elderly Mobility Scale
Assesses mobility in the frail by answering 20 questions[74].
Good concurrent validity, discriminant validity and inter-rater reliability[75].



Both the Edmonton frail scale and the PRISMA 7 can be used by physiotherapists to determine whether a patient who displays symptoms of frailty is frail or not. If a positive result is found they could refer a patient back to their GP for further assessment [12].


Key points to take
• Assessment of known frail patients is important and should be carried out by physiotherapists at the first contact with every patient.
• Outcome measures should be regularly administered to review the physiotherapists’ effectiveness at improving frailty.
• There are specific elements which need to be measured with persons who are frail: dependency level and ADL ability, Gait; speed and quality, endurance, balance, strength and falls risk.
• Doing these may help prevent hospital admissions.

Reflection heading.png

You have reached the end of the Functional assessment section.

Reflect on how your learning thorughout this section will change any future assessments

you carry out with patients who are frail.

This task should take 10 minutes


Medical[edit | edit source]

As people age the number of medications taken by the elderly increases to help tackle the effects of aging, such as; heart problems, cholesterol, depression and discomfort.[76]

Some of the causes of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can occur with multiple medications or improper drug or dosage selection. Fall, distress, depression, anxiety, confusion and insomnia are a few of the symptoms of ADRs in elderly population[77].

Risk factors for ADR is such as [77]:
- Age (≥85)
- Multiple prescribers
- Long duration of use
- Multiple chronic disease
- History of drug reactions
- Regular alcohol intake

Common medication and their side effects 

Medication Conditions used to treat Common side effects Examples
Beta Blockers[78] Angina, Heart failure, Atrial fibrillation and Heart attach Angina, Heart failure, Atrial fibrillation and Heart attach Dizziness, tiredness, Blurred vision, slow heartbeat, diarrhoea and nausea Atenolol, bisoprolol, acebutolol, metoprolol
Antidepressants[79] Depression Dizziness, insomnia, headaches, loss of appetite, anxious, feeling agitated and blurry vision Tricyclic antidepressants, Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors,
Serotonin- noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors
Benzodiazepines[80] Relief of severe anxiety Drowsiness, difficulty concentrating, headaches and vertigo Diazepam, lorazepam, Chlordiazepoxide
Non-Steroidal Anti- Inflammatory drugs[81] Relieve pain, reduce inflammation and a high temperature Short term use of NSAIDs is unlikely to have any side effects. However long term use causes indigestion and stomach ulcers Ibuprofen, Aspirin, diclofenac, naproxen


Side effects of medication such as drowsiness, blurred vision and insomnia can interfere with the treatment session and also delay any recovery, it is therefore important for physiotherapists to know if the patient is on any medication to modify treatments.

Social and Environmental[edit | edit source]

Assessment

Assessment of the social and environmental aspects of a patient’s life is a fundamental part of the CGA, as laid out on section 4.2

Recap of the social and environmental sections of the CGA:

CGA x2.png

Taking this type of information is also a key component of the common assessment framework for adults, which was published by the Department of Health [82].
It is an occupational therapists (OT’s) role to find out this type of information. Their assessments and the subsequent home modifications and adaptions can help increase the functional abilities of people who are frail [83]. However, a patients’ ability to carry out activities in the home is dependent on its layout and the persons’ social situation. As physiotherapy interventions try to help improve peoples’ ability to perform ADL’s, it is important for physiotherapists to know how the environment and social situation can impact on their treatment.

The international classification of health, functioning and disability (ICF) can be used by physiotherapists to help establish the needs of a patient[84].


ICF


The ICF is a model which allows professionals to see the impact a health condition has on a persons’ life, by taking a holistic viewpoint. Participation restrictions and activity limitations are the two areas of the ICF which relates to the influence of the patients social and environmental circumstances. Activity limitations are the execution of a task by the patient. Whereas, participation restrictions relates to how involved with a life situation the patient is due to the societal setup [84].


The World Health Organization (WHO) has devised a checklist which allows clinicians to identify what activity and participation restrictions the patient has [85].

Activity limitations
Elderly people who have a high participation level in leisure activities also have better health outcomes. Reduced mobility and activity limitations directly reduce participation in leisure activities. Activity limitations have a bigger impact on social involvement than the severity of the patients’ medical condition. Specific activity limitations which may cause participation restriction are:
• Anxiety [86]([87]
• Needing help with personal care [88][87]
• Mobility aid use and walking speed [87][88][89]
• Memory [89] [88]


Musculoskeletal impairments cause the majority of activity limitations in elderly community-dwelling adults [90]. Physiotherapists are therefore in a prim position to help reduce activity limitations. However, these activity limitations affect a greater number of people who live in institutions than those who live at home [88].

Elderly people who experience activity limitations sometimes also have participation restrictions [91] [88][92].

Participation restrictions

Knowing what participation restrictions a patient has is really important as they are linked to the patients’ quality of life. Participation frequency should also be noted [91]. It is common for people with frailty who live in the community to report having participation restrictions[93][31]. This is due to reduced community mobility and a reduced ability to carry out work both at home and in the community [31]. Increased participation restrictions are also linked with increasing age[94]. The symptoms of frailty most closely linked to participation restrictions are grip strength, mobility and the number of co-morbidities a patient has[31]. Participation is also linked to environmental factors such as, access to public transport. It has been shown that mobility levels can remain constant even though the patients’ condition may decline [95].

Interventions available
Physiotherapists need to tackle the barriers which cause activity limitations[87]. One way to do this is by using motivational techniques such as CBT and motivational interviewing, which have been shown to reduce activity limitations [96]. However, the above meta-analysis included studies using samples of varying ages and impairments and so these results may not be found in the frail population.

Participation restrictions in the elderly population do not change with time, unless targeted interventions are implemented[94]. Adopting a behavioral coping strategy, which swops a high intensity social activity for a lower intensity social activity i.e. football for bird watching, can ensure reduced participation restrictions and increased involvement in daily activities for older adults in the Community. Therefore physiotherapists should educate patients to adopt behavioral coping strategies to maximise social participation and reduce stress where needed [97].

As seen in section 5 physiotherapy interventions can improve mobility and musculoskeletal impairments in the frail population and so they are able to independently carry out more ADL’s. In doing this patients will face less activity limitations and participation restrictions allowing them to have increased social participation [89].

A study by Mast and Azar[98] found a correlation between ADL limitations and readmission to hospital in the geriatric population. This shows that physiotherapy targeted at reducing activity limitations could reduce hospital stay as well as improving social network and participation.

Social circumstances
Taking a social history allows the physiotherapist to understand the patients current level of functioning and their desired functional goals [99][100]. This should include; activities they do in and outside their home and what formal or informal care/support they receive[33][99]. 80% of nonagenarians have carers to help with some of their ADL’s[88]. Having a small amount of regular help with ADL’s may prevent an acute episode turning into an emergency where the patient is no longer safe to stay at home[33]. This shows the importance of knowing the patients’ social circumstances.

Physiotherapists can help to increase patients’ social networks by informing the patient about activities or groups which occur in their local area[101]. The therapist can also help the patient plan the best way to get to these. For example, a physiotherapist may provide a four wheeled walker and a map so that a patient can get to and from the shops without carrying heavy bags. The map may show benches along the route where the patient can rest, if needed. This may further reduce participation restrictions and aid an increased mood[91]. It is important that treatment plans are devised around ways to help patients become more socially active[33]. For example, exercises which increase cardiopulmonary function will also increase walking distance and time and so may allow the patient to spend the day in their garden.

Home environment

Test yourself heading.png
Create a mind map around the different hazards that can be found in someones house. This should include the bathroom, the kitchen and the stairs. Once completed compare to the one below. This should take 20 minutes

Enviromental considerations in the house.png 

The mind map above shows the different things which should be checked in the patients house on assessment, before a treatment plan is devised or goals are set. Sometimes these assessments are performed jointly with an OT[33].

It is important to know if any intervention is being put in place to help rectify these. Finding out if an OT is involved, what their findings were and what their plan is, is important as then interdisciplinary goals can be devised which are safe and suited to the patient[102]

Being aware of the environment in which the patient lives will allow the physiotherapist to tailor treatments effectively and safely to their surroundings.

Test yourself heading.png

End of section Quiz. This activity should take 20 minutes

  1. What are activity limitationa nd participation restrictions?
  2. What are the four most common activity limitations in the frail/eldelry?
  3. What is the link between participation restrictions and the frailty phenotypes?
  4. What can physiotherapists do to overcome activity limitations and participation restrictions?
  5. Why should physiotherapists take a socail history from their patients?

Physiotherapy treatment[edit | edit source]

As previously mentioned, there are several clinical guidelines available for healthcare professionals to assist them in preventing hospital admissions providing quality care for patients. However, whilst they recommend physiotherapy intervention, these guidelines lack rigorous information and evidence surrounding treatment. This section will summarise and synthesis available evidence on physiotherapy treatment options for preventing hospital admissions in the frail elderly.

As two thirds of NHS clients are aged 65 or over (Philp 2007), there is a plethora of different occasions in which an older person may be admitted to hospital, however it can be loosely split in to two categories: injury and illness (Albert et al. 2013). For the purpose of condensing this learning resource and delivering the information you are more likely to need, we will consider the more common admission causes that the physiotherapist can play a part in preventing. However, some of the information provided here could be transferable to other cases. 


Injury[edit | edit source]

We will look at injury first.


Injuries leading to hospitalisation are more common in people over 65 and they can be more critical and more often preventable. The increasing age of the population heightens the significance of this problem (Rothschild et al. 2000).

Falls represent the most frequent and serious type of accident in people aged 65 and over in the UK (Age UK 2010). Gowing and Jain (2007) found that a fall is the most common mechanism of injury and accounts for approximately 64% of elderly trauma patients presenting to accident and emergency units and falls cases are the most common presentation to the Scottish Ambulance Service in the older adult population (Scottish Government 2012).

Graph.PNG

A fall is an incident which results in a person coming to rest unintentionally on the floor or ground or other lower level (WHO 2007) and can result in fracture, dislocation, traumatic brain injury and even death (Tinetti et al. 1995). Anyone can have a fall, however, the natural ageing process means that older people are at higher risk. Over 400 risk factors leading to falls have been highlighted including muscle weakness, impaired balance, delayed reaction time, poor vision, polypharmacy and co-morbidities such as dementia, cardiovascular disease and hypotension (Skelton and Dinan 1999). Additionally, several extrinsic factors that could lead to falls have been suggested, including poor lighting, cluttered environment and ill-fitting footwear. The risk of falls and related complications increase gradually with age and can be an indication of increasing frailty (Fried et al. 2001). Falls represent the main cause of disability and are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among people over 75 in the UK. Not all falls will result in injury, however in some cases a fall could be fatal and it is thought that the repercussions of even a minor fall could have catastrophic effects on physical and mental health (Age UK 2010).

Despite these statistics, falls are not an inevitable consequence of old age. A multifaceted interaction of several risk factors relating to the ageing process, lifestyle choices, environmental factors and the presence of long term conditions determines an individual’s risk of falling (Age UK 2010). As risk increases with age and it is important for the physiotherapist identify those at risk early, recognise and modify risk factors and provide timely intervention to prevent falls and subsequent injury (CSP 2014).

A summary of some potential treatment options follows. This list is not exhaustive.

Strength training[edit | edit source]

A significant component of age-related weakness and frailty is sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is the gradual loss of muscle tissue, resulting in diminished strength (Janssen et al. 2002) and it is thought that 2% of skeletal muscle mass is lost each year past the age of 50 (Hughes et al. 2002). Sarcopenia increases the risk of frailty and falls and in turn, hospitalization in the older adult population (Sousa et al. 2015). Strength training has been suggested as a potential treatment for sarcopenia and its prevention. This could lead to improved function, increased quality of life and reduced likelihood for falls (Burton and Sumukadas 2010). Resistance training programmes have consistently shown to improve muscle strength and mass in older adults (Liu and Latham 2009; Seynnes et al 2004), however, it is questionable whether this transfers to reducing the risk of falling.

Latham et al. (2003) have conducted the only trial which has studied the effect of seated resistance training on risk of falls in an older adult population. This study solely involved home-based, progressive, seated quadriceps strength exercises using 60-80% of the individuals 1RM with ankle weights. It was found to have no effect on falls rate or risk of falling and an increased chance of musculoskeletal injury. As a result, seated resistance training or high intensity resistance are not recommended.

Furthermore, Liu-Ambrose et al. (2004) examined the effect of a course of 50-minute resistance training sessions, twice weekly for 25 weeks on number of falls and risk of falls in a female population aged 75-85. Exercises included targeted upper limb, trunk and lower limb muscles and like Latham et al. (2003) resistance training alone was found to have no significant effect on number of falls or risk of falls. However, when combined with agility training, participants did develop a decreased risk of falling.

It has been proposed that strength training alone is not enough to fully manage falls risk, however, it should be part of a multi-component falls prevention exercise programme (Sherrington et al. 2011). We will discuss this in further detail later on in the wiki.

Balance re-education[edit | edit source]

Balance disorders are very common in older adults and are a key cause of falls in this population. They are associated with reduced level of function, as well as an increased risk of disease and death. Most balance disorders comprise of several contributing factors including long-term conditions and medication side effects.

Recent research conducted by El-Khoury et al. (2015) examined the effectiveness of two-year progressive balance retraining in reducing injurious falls among community-dwelling women aged 75-85. The study took place over 20 centres and recruited 706 participants who were randomised in to the intervention group, who received weekly dynamic balance exercise supplemented by prescribed home exercise, or the control group, who did not take part in the exercise. Over the two-year intervention period, there were 397 injurious falls in the control group compared with 305 in the intervention group, the injurious fall rate was 19% lower in the intervention group than in the control group highlighting the benefit of a balance training programme.

Exergaming is a relatively new treatment concept and is thought to increase motivation and enjoyment for users. The Nintendo Wii has a built in pressure sensor that allows for feedback to be delivered to the user on their performance. There is evidence that a Wii based balance exercise programme could improve balance ability in the frail elderly population (Laufer et al. 2014), so as a result, Fu et al. 2015 conducted research into whether this would transfer to reducing fall risk and incidence. Sixty participants aged 65 or over received balance training three times per week for six weeks. They were randomly allocated into the intervention group who undertook balance activity on the Wii, or the control group who received conventional exercise. The results showed that while both groups reduce their risk and incidence of falls, the intervention group showed a more significant improvement. The Wii balance training has shown to reduce falls by 69% compared with conventional training. Additionally, the intervention group had a 35% improvement in the fall risk score, considerably greater than that of the conventional balance training at 11%. As a result, the use of the Nintendo Wii for balance re-education is highly recommended and perhaps this suggests the need for further research on various other computer games available.

Exercise aimed at improving balance control has been proven to be a key component in falls prevention. It will be explored further in the multi-component falls prevention programme section of this wiki.

Tai Chi[edit | edit source]

Tai chi is a newly emerging exercise incorporating breathing, relaxation and slow and gentle movements with strengthening and balance exercises. Whilst originally an ancient 13th century Chinese martial art, it has recently become more prevalent around the world as a health-promoting exercise (NHS Choices 2015a). Whilst there is room for more rigorous research on the health benefits of tai chi, it is thought that it could help adults aged 65 and over in improving balance (Song et al. 2015), reducing stress (Li et al. 2001) and controlling osteoarthritis pain (Kang et al. 2011). Additionally, in a high quality systematic review, tai chi was not only found to significantly reduce rate of falls, but also lessen risk of falls (Gillespie et al. 2012). As tai chi is considered a low impact exercise, it is suitable for most to participate in and should be considered as a treatment option although some may require assistance in locating a suitable local group for them to join. In the additional resources section you will find a link to the West Lothian Council local groups website where they have a database of various groups active in their area. Whilst this is specific to West Lothian, there is likely a similar service for the community in which you serve.


Reflection heading.png


Below is a useful video clip highlighting the benefits of tai chi. Watch this and then take 5 minutes to reflect upon the key learning points.




Backward Chaining[edit | edit source]

Declining muscle function in older adults reduces their ability to rise from the floor following a fall and up to a half of all non-injured fallers are unable to get up (Skelton et al. 2005). When someone is unable to get up off the floor unassisted, the associated risks are far greater due to the complications that can occur from lying on the floor for an extended period of time – for example, dehydration, hypothermia, pneumonia, pressure sores, unavoidable incontinence and even death (Tinetti et al. 1993). This inability to get up has a poor prognosis in terms of hospitalisation and mortality (Tinetti et al. 1993), thus, a long lie is one of the most serious consequences of a fall. The responsibility of the physiotherapist is to ensure the patient has a plan should they fall and are unable to rise and educate them about available strategies to combat this (Reece and Simpson 1996).

Backward chaining is a method utilised to re-educate patients in rising from the floor unassisted. It consists of a sequence of movements combined together to help teach someone to be able to get down to the floor safely. Once learnt, the sequence is reversed and is applied to teach a safe and effective way to get up from the floor.

The movement is broken into several stages depending on the patient’s ability. The patient will complete one stage, then return to a stand. Then they will add on the next stage and return to a stand. This is repeated until the patient is able to stand from a lying on the floor.

The effect of backward chaining on an individual’s ability to rise unassisted from the ground has been proven to be beneficial. In the only study to compare backward chaining with a control of conventional therapy, Zak et al. (2008) found that backward-chaining method significantly enhances ability in rising after an incidental fall (20-40%). The control group showed no improvement. The study took part over 12 weeks and included 120 participants aged 80-99. Additionally, Timed Up and Go and Tinetti measurements were also compared before and after the intervention and control and a notable improvement was only observed from the intervention group. This highlights the benefits for improving functional capabilities in addition to rising abilities.

NHS Sutton and Merton Community Services (http://www.smcs.nhs.uk/files/patient-information/getting-on-off-floor.pdf ) have created this useful document to give to patients. It clearly explains backward chaining and has an example of a backward chain that you could teach to your clients.

In the additional resource section, you will find a patient leaflet with advice for people after a fall on how to stand or how to get assistance. Have a look at this, there may be a similar leaflet available in your service which you could provide.

Test yourself heading.png


If you are unfamiliar with backward chaining, take 20 minutes to practice a routine yourself. As you are completing a chain, think about giving clear and concise instructions; the concept of backward chaining can sometimes be confusing.

This should make it easier to teach to a patient. Make sure you have plenty of space around you. The only equipment required is a chair.



Fear of falling[edit | edit source]

The prevalence of fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults ranges between 12% and 65% (Legters 2002). Whilst it frequently occurs after falls (Tinetti et al. 1994), it is also established in those without a fall history (Vellas et al. 1997). It can lead to a loss of independence, activity restriction and ultimately a poorer quality of life (Donohue et al. 2013). Not all will avoid ADL’s due to fear avoidance but for those who do, it can have debilitating and devastating effects (Delbaere et al. 2004).

Lethem et al. (1983) introduced the psychiatric concept of a fear avoidance model and is it is commonly utilised in the prevention of acute musculoskeletal pain becoming chronic (Leeuw et al. 2007). However, the hypothesis behind the model can be adapted to explain fear of falling and avoidance of activity. Extreme avoidance can lead to a decline in physical function, and ultimately an increased risk of falls, further fuelling fear and avoidance of activities. This is illustrated in the below fear avoidance model, adapted from Lethem et al. (1983).

Fear avoidance model (Falls).PNG

The physiotherapist is in an ideal position to steer the individual towards the route of confrontation and recovery as opposed to activity avoidance and disability (CSP 2014). There is high quality evidence from two systematic reviews highlighting the benefits of treatment to improve confidence and reduce fear of falling (Zijlstra et al. 2007; Rand et al. 2011). Recommended interventions include: exercise, including tai chi, and multi-component falls prevention programmes.


Multi-component falls prevention programmes[edit | edit source]

Finally, we will consider the effect of a multi-component falls prevention programme. As most falls are multifactorial in origin, they usually require several interventions (Hausdorff et al. 2001). Such interventions typically involve a combination of medication review and optimization and education, environmental modification and exercise. This type of programme would be delivered by a multidisciplinary team in which the physiotherapist would be a key member. A Cochrane systematic review suggests that the physiotherapy treatment should combine all elements mentioned above; that is strengthening, balance, backward chaining, tai chi and confidence building with education, tailored to each individual. Clinic-based group exercise or individual exercise in the home setting is suitable. However, further research is needed into the effectiveness of medication management in preventing falls (Gillespie et al. 2012).

Additionally, in a systematic review conducted by Sherrington et al. (2011), it was reported that for the greatest effect, exercise programmes should include a high level challenge to balance, alongside strength and walking training. However, brisk walking training should not be prescribed to those at a high risk of falls. Furthermore, it was found that exercise should not only target those at high risk but the also the general community and it should be performed for at least two hours per week on an ongoing basis.


Key points[edit | edit source]

Test yourself heading.png


Take 30 minutes to write down the key points you have learned from the Injury related physiotherapy treatment section (5.1)
Compare your answers to the table on the right.







Resources[edit | edit source]

Additional reading heading.png


http://nhsscotlandevent.com/sites/default/files/2015%20-%20NHSScotland%20Event%20-%20Posters%20-%20PDF%20-%20HP01%20-%20Liz%20Simpson.pdf
• AGILE Guidelines for the Physiotherapy management of older people at risk of falling
http://www.westlothian.gov.uk/localgroups
http://www.bridgewater.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Bridgewater-backward-chaining.pdf 





Illness
[edit | edit source]

illness


Self-management[edit | edit source]


Emergency hospital admissions is a major concern for the NHS. There are a number of factors associated with increased rates of admission including area of residency, ethnicity, socio-economic deprivation and environmental factors. Older people are also identified at high risk of being admitted to the hospital[30].

In Scotland, 40% of the population have at least one long term condition (LTC). People with LTCs and co-morbidities are known to have poorer clinical outcomes, poorer quality of life and longer hospital stays[103].
The Scottish Government[104] reports that people with LTCs are twice as likely to be admitted to the hospital. The aging population and the increase prevalence of long term conditions requires healthcare professionals to move their focus towards preventative strategies and empowering self-management[105].

Disease related self management abilities such as taking medication and exercise are often promoted by health care professionals.
However, there may also be a need for interventions aimed at self-management of overall health and well-being to contribute to healthy aging[106]. Older peoples’ abilities to self-manage the aging process depends on physical, psychological and social aspects of their life[107]. Physiotherapists working with frail older people could play a role in promoting healthy aging as evidence shows that interventions to promote health aging can be used to the delay the onset of frailty and reduce its adverse outcomes among older people[107].

As older people often have co-morbidities leading to a mixture of physical and psychosocial issues, self-management interventions should focus on providing them with general behavioral and cognitive skills for dealing with range of problems rather than focusing on on health-related problems only[106].


It is without the scope of this learning resource to go into detail about how to promote self-management strategies as you are likely to see a range of diverse patients presenting with multiple conditions and challenging psychosocial issues. However, as physiotherapists we believe our main role can be to promote physical activity to contribute to the healthy aging process. Therefore, this will be discussed in more detail in Section 6.2 – Physical activity.

Please see additional reading to access useful resources in relation to promoting self-management.

Resources[edit | edit source]


Additional reading heading.png

The King’s Fund have published evidence based information on self-management
in response to a growing interest amongst policy-makers, healthcare professionals
and patients[108].


Resources for patients

  • NHS 24 is an online and telephone-based service.
    Call for free (111) and they can answer questions about your health and offer advice. Visit their website to access self-help guides and find local services in Scotland[111].
  • Age UK’s information and advice guides in relation to health and wellbeing & home and care[117].

Motivation in Elderly Persons[edit | edit source]

For the purposes of narrowing down this section I have chosen to look at the motivation of the elderly population in relation to exercise as this is a commonly used and effective physiotherapy intervention for many ailments.

Improved activity levels in the elderly population has been shown to improve mobility and fitness whilst also reducing the risk of falls and a decreased cardiorespiratory fitness level indicated more chance of becoming dependant (Weeks et al. 2008). Weeks et al. which is a qualitative study looked at groups of both community-dwelling and cared for elderly persons and asked a series of questions regarding their participation in Physical Activity.

The results of the study highlight many of the reasons why an elderly person may become less physically active:
• Less able due to health
o Pain
o Mobility
o Assistance required
• Providing care to family members

However the study also showed a great deal of impact from historical interaction with physical activity:
• Growing up with active parents generally meant that the person would be more physically active themselves
• Those with active partners would be more active and in turn those with inactive partners would suffer
• Many reported reduced time for physical activity in their mid-life while caring for family
o Children
o Parents
• Work commitments

Some persons increased activity with age:
• To improve/maintain mobility
• Preventing falls
• Friends suffering poor health due

The study also highlights the need for more trained professionals to work in care settings as this population require extra assistance with physical activity but don’t get enough of it. On average the community dwelling elderly persons in this study were found to complete vigorous exercise on 4 days per week where as in the care setting they did not complete vigorous exercise at all and spent more time undertaking sedentary activities.

Guo & Phillips 2010 also suggests that decreased Physical activity leads to negative health factors such as reduced function and mobility. This study looks at the self-imposed activity limitations (SIALs) of the elderly population; it expresses the natural limitations that come with age such as poor health, dependency and inactive lifestyle but also notes that SIAL is present within the generally healthy elderly populations also. It is also shown here that many older persons tend to favour sedentary activities such as reading and watching TV to exercise in their leisure time.

Guo & Phillips goes on to show the implications for health care staff in the management of persons with SIALs. There is a model that outlines the process of SIAL (see below), which has not currently been tested however helps to highlight the importance of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors in SIALs. There is also an emphasis on the impact of a Trigger event, a significant health event in which mind-set may be altered triggering changes in behaviours and habits. The role of the healthcare staff is to make options of assistance available to the elderly persons and also to be aware of any SIALs as they occur to help reduce their impact and their effect on the persons’ overall health.

SIAL Model: Guo & Phillips 2010

Muse 2005 takes a look at goal setting within the elderly population. Without goals adherence to exercise is limited. The literature covers the general principles of goal setting:
• Person centred goals
• Based upon persons objectives
• Small goals to large goals e.g. short term and long term
• SMART

However there is further discussion suggesting that with this population it is extremely important to show attentive listening and not patronise these persons. When communicating it is important to avoid slang terms and to be clear but again avoiding patronisation.

Thomas & Storey, 2000 also looks at motivating factors in getting elderly persons to perform self-treatments within long term care. One stand out feature of this article is that we must not rush to label persons as unmotivated; instead we should appreciate why they feel how they feel and help them to make a change. Again the importance of patient led goals is highlighted, stating that this will make the patients feel more in control and motivated. On top of this there is a large focus on making the patients feel respected and listened to as well as working to build up a trusting bond. This article also mentions the rewards may help motivate patients, such as getting home sooner if they work on their exercises. However other sources refute the benefit of using reward in the long term as it does not promote a long term change in behaviour (Pink 2011).

Maslow’s Hierarchy provides professionals with an insight into how successful their efforts of motivation may be with individuals. Maslow’s Hierarchy is made up of five levels of need and can be represented as a pyramid with the most basic needs at the bottom working up to the more complex needs. A visual representation of Maslow's Theory can be found below.

Maslow's Hierarchy: Simons, Irwin & Drinnien 2016

Physiological needs are you basic requirements for survival e.g. food, water, warmth.
Once the Physiological needs have been met the individual will be able to work towards fulfilling their Safety needs.
This continues through each level, only being able to move on to the next once the previous level has been satisfied adequately. For professionals this means if we can gauge where our patient is according to Maslow’s Hierarchy then we have a better idea of what their requirements from us as professionals may be. (Simons et al)
For example; a patient who is currently not motivated to eat and drink would not be likely to respond well to a physiotherapist trying to get them up and on their feet following an operation. It is then our job as health professionals to try and assist the patient in fulfilling their needs in order to move onto the next level of Maslow’s Hierarchy and progressing their treatment.

A short informative video outlining the Maslow's Hierarchy can be found below: 
 

In summary, in order to motivate the elderly population you must take time to listen and respect each individual. Create holistic patient led goals and be appreciative of how each patient is feeling and why their motivation may be diminished.

Physical activity[edit | edit source]

Functional capacity declines with age and this is further accelerated by low levels of physical activity.

The recommendations for physical activity for older adults (65+)[118]:

  • Older adults should aim to be active daily
  • At least 150 minutes a week of moderate intensity activity
  • Muscle strength training twice a week in addition to the 150 minutes of activity
  • Balance training and co-ordination should be incorporated into activities to manage risk of falls
  • Minimise sedentary time 


Physical activity significantly decreases with age. The graph below shows the percentage of men and women meeting the physical activity recommendations in Scotland[119].

PA levels Scotland.png


Benefits of physical activity in frail older adults

Strength, endurance, balance and bone density is lost about 10% per decade, while muscle power reduces with around 30% per decade[120]. The loss of muscle mass and strength is called sarcopenia, which is highly prevalent among older adults and has been identified as a risk factor for frailty[121].
Being physically active slows down these physiological changes associated with aging. Physical activity can also reduce the risk of falls, promote cognitive health and self-management of chronic diseases. As well as slowing down the deterioration in ability to perform ADLs and maintain quality of life in older adults[122][123].

A meta-analysis[122] found that exercise is beneficial to improve balance, gait speed and abilities to carry out ADLs in the frail older adults.


Physiotherapists role in promoting physical activity in frail older adults

Due to their training and experience, physiotherapists are in a good position to promote health and well being of individuals and the community through education on physical activity and exercise prescription[124].
Recently there has been a shift in the general public health agenda towards the prevention of chronic conditions and enabling the aging population to stay active and manage conditions in the community. This have required a change in the role of physiotherapists towards addressing these issues through promotion of physical activity and other lifestyle changes[125].


Factors influencing participation in physical activity in older adults[126]

Older peoples’ participation in physical activity can be effected by biological, demographic, physiological and social factors
These factors are important to be aware of when attempting to motivate older people to increase their activity levels.

  • Men are more active then women
  • A decline in physical activity with age is higher among: minority ethnic groups, those from lower socio-economic backgrounds, those with lower education and those living alone
  • Older people might be less able due to pain, reduced mobility and the need of assistance to mobilise[123]
  • Physical activity can be influenced by trusted others such as health care professionals, care givers, family and friends
  • Lack of transport often affects older peoples abilities to part take in activity

Psychological factors that can positively affect participation

  • Beliefs and confidence in abilities to active
  • General values, beliefs and attitudes


Psychological factors that can negatively affect participation

  • Fear of falling and over exertion
  • Safety concerns

Exercises for frail older adults

These are the recommended activities and intensity for frail older adults to increase physical activity in order to improve general health and well being as well as reduce the risk of falls and manage chronic lifestyle conditions:

  • Sessions as short as 10 minutes can provide health benefits[120]
  • Frail older adults should aim to accumulate numerous of 10 minute sessions to achieve the recommended activity guides[127]


Suggested activities:

  • Take the stairs[118]
  • Walking[118]
  • Do housework or gardening[118]
  • Tai Chi[127]
  • Dance[127]
  • Swimming[118]
  • Home-based or group exercise classes[120]
  • Breaking up time spent sitting with short regular periods of standing or walking[127]
  • Encourage to move for longer. E.g. Going from moving 5 minutes to 10 minutes may increase the intensity[127]


When encouraging physcial activity physiotherapists should also aim to[128]:

  • Identify fears and barriers to being physically active and provide solutions to overcome these
  • Provide ongoing support and encouragement



Did you know?

There is a National Physical Activity Pathway for Secondary Care established to support all healthcare professionals to raise the issue of physical activity, offer simple advice and suggested appropriate activities [129].


The National Physical Activity Pathway[130]   Providing brief advice[130]

If you prefer reading about The National Physical Activity Pathway please access the document Physical Activty Pathway in Secondary Care[131].

Resources[edit | edit source]
Additional reading heading.png


Resources for patients

  • Active Scotland can assist with finding places to go to be active
    near you sports centres, community halls, parks, gyms, climbing walls, woodlands, swimming beaches, national cycle routes,
    and lots more[132].


Conclusion
[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 DOH. Emergency admissions to hospital: merging the demand. http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/10288-001-Emergency-admissions.pdf (accessed 20 dec 2015).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Royal College of Physicians. Hospitals on the edge: the time for action. London: RCP, 2012.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Cornwall J, Levenson R, Sonola L, Poteliakhoff E. Continuity of care for older hospital patients: a call for action. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/continuity-of-care-for-older-hospital-patients-mar-2012.pdf (accessed 16 Oct 2015).
  4. AGE UK. Later in life United Kingdom. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/Factsheets (accessed 19 dec 2015).
  5. Age UK. Later in life United Kingdom. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/Factsheets (accessed 16 Oct 2015).
  6. AHIW. Australia’s hospitals 2013-14: at a glance http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129551482 (accessed 20 Dec 2015).
  7. 7.0 7.1 Weiss, A. J., And Elixhauser, A., 2014. Overview of Hospital Stays in the United States, 2012. Online from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb180-Hospitalizations-United-States-2012.jsp (accessed 4 Jan 2016).
  8. OECD. Health at a Glance, 2013. http://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/download/8113161e.pdf?expires=1444911042&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=AAD68253A0B959E184ACCEE3FFE37481 (accessed 16 Oct 2015).
  9. The Scottish Government. National health and wellbeing outcomes. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Policy/Adult-Health-SocialCare-Integration/Outcomes (accessed 16 Oct 2015).
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Older People in Acute Care improvement programme. http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/person-centred_care/opac_improvement_programme.aspx (accessed 10 Nov 2015)
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Improving the identification and management of frailty. fckLRhttp://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/person-centred_care/opac_improvement_programme/frailty_report.aspx (accessed 19 Nov 2015)
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 British Geriatrics Society. Fit For Frailty: Part 1: Recognition and management of frailty in individuals in community and outpatient settings. http://www.bgs.org.uk/index.php/fit-for-frailty (accessed 12 Oct 2015)
  13. 13.0 13.1 Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Improving older people’s acute care: Impact report.http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/person-centred_care/opac_improvement_programme/opac_impact_report.aspx (accessed 10 Oct 2015)
  14. British Geriatrics Society. Fit for Frailty Part 2.fckLRhttp://www.bgs.org.uk/index.php/fitforfrailty-2m (accessed 12 Oct 2015)
  15. British Geriatrics Society. Silver Book. http://www.bgs.org.uk/index.php/bgscampaigns-715/silverbook (accessed 13 Jan 2016)
  16. Brekshire Healthcare NHS: Physiotherapy at homefckLRhttp://www.berkshirehealthcare.nhs.uk/ServiceCatInfo.asp?id=60 (accessed 11 Jan 2016)
  17. NHS. PhysiotherapyfckLRhttp://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Physiotherapy/Pages/Introduction.aspx (accessed 9 Jan 2016).
  18. Chartered Society Of Physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Works: accident and emergency. http://www.csp.org.uk/professional-union/practice/your-business/evidence-base/physiotherapy-works/accident-emergency (accessed 9 Jan 2016)
  19. Physiotherapy UK. Effectiveness of musculoskeletal emergency physiotherapy practitionershttp://www.physiotherapyuk.org.uk/presentation/effectiveness-musculoskeletal-emergency-physiotherapy-practitioners (accessed 4 Jan 2016).
  20. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Physio and paramedic pool resources in Lakes initiativefckLRhttp://www.csp.org.uk/news/2015/10/12/physio-paramedic-pool-resources-lakes-initiative (accessed 11 Jan 2016).
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 Martin F. Comprehensive Assessment of the Frail Older Patient. http://www.bgs.org.uk/index.php/topresources/publicationfind/goodpractice/195-gpgcgassessment (accessed 16 Sept 2015).
  22. Ellis G, Langhorne P. Comprehensive geriatric AX for older hospital patients. Bri Med Bull 2004; 71: 45-49.
  23. Ellis G, Langhorne P. Comprehensive geriatric AX for older hospital patients. Bri Med Bull 2004; 71: 45-49.
  24. Sergi G, De Rui M, Sarti S, Manzato E. Polypharmacy in the elderly: can comprehensive geriatric assessment reduce inappropriate medication use? Drugs & aging 2011; 28(7):509.
  25. Tikkanen P, Lönnroos E, Sipilä S, Nykänen I, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S. Effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment-based individually targeted interventions on mobility of pre-frail and frail community-dwelling older people. Geriatrics & Gerontology International 2015; 15(1): 80-88.
  26. Nikolaus T, Specht-Leible N, Bach M, Oster P and Schlierf G . A randomized trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and home intervention in the care of hospitalized patients . Age Ageing 1999;28(6): 543-550.
  27. Barer D. Inpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment improves the likelihood of living at home at 12 months. ACP Journal Club; 2011; 155(6): 1.
  28. Frese T , Deutsch T, Keyser M, Sandholzer H. In-home preventive comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) reduces mortality—A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2012;55(3): 639–644.
  29. Wyrko Z. Frailty at the front door. Clinical Medicine 2015; 15(4): 377–81.
  30. 30.0 30.1 The King's Fund. Avoiding hospital admissions: What does the research evidence say?. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/avoiding-hospital-admissions (accessed 11 Jan 2016)
  31. 31.0 31.1 31.2 31.3 31.4 31.5 31.6 Fairhall N, Sherrington C, Kurrle S E, Lord S R and Cameron I D. ICF participation restriction is common in frail, community-dwelling older people: an observational cross-sectional study. Physiotherapy [serial online]. 2011 [cited 2016 Jan 11]; 97(1):26-32. Available from: Wiley online library.
  32. Mohile SG, Velarde C, Hurria A, Magnuson A, Lowenstein L, Pandya C, O'Donovan A, Gorawara-Bhat R, Dale W. Geriatric assessment-guided care processes for older adults: A Delphi consensus of geriatric oncology experts. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2015; 13(9):1120-1130.
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 Wagstaff P and Coakley D. Physiotherapy and the elderly patient. Kent: Croom Helm ltd, 1988.
  34. 34.0 34.1 Smyth L. Practical physiotherapy with older people. Chapman and Hall, 1990.
  35. 35.0 35.1 35.2 Farrell MK. Using functional assessment and screening tools with frail older adults. Topics in geriatric rehabilitation 2004;20(1):14-20.
  36. Morala D. Factors Associated with the Functional Status of Community-dwelling. Elderly Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy 2006; 29(3).
  37. Albert SM, Tabert MH, Dienstag A, Pelton G, Devanand D. The impact of mild cognitive impairment on functional abilities in the elderly. Current Psychiatry Reports 2002; 4(1):64-68.
  38. Deary IJ, Corley J, Gow AJ, Harris SE. Age-associated cognitive decline. Br Med Bull 2009; 92(1): 135-152.
  39. 39.0 39.1 39.2 Theou O, Jones GR, Overend TJ, Kloseck M, and Vandervoort AA. An exploration of the association between frailty and muscle fatigue. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2008; 33: 651–665. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/51415786_An_exploration_of_the_association_between_frailty_and_muscle_fatigue (accessed 4 Jan 2016).
  40. 40.0 40.1 Baker L. 2015. Physiotherapy guidelines for management of people at risk of falling version 6. http://www.torbaycaretrust.nhs.uk/publications/TSDHC/Physio%20Guidelines%20for%20the%20Management%20of%20People%20at%20Risk%20of%20Falling.pdf (accessed 20 Dec 2015).
  41. 41.0 41.1 41.2 Stokes M. Physical management in neurological rehabilitation. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier mosby,2004.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Needle JJ, Petchey RP, Benson J, Scriven A, Lawrenson J, Hilari K. The allied health professions and health promotion: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Final report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme;2011.
  43. Stubbs B, Brefka S, Denkinger MD. What Works to Prevent Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults? Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials. Physical therapy 2015; 95(8):1095-110.
  44. 44.0 44.1 Sherrington C, Tiedemann A. Physiotherapy in the prevention of falls in older people. Journal of Physiotherapy 2015; 61(2): 54–60.
  45. Edwards S. Neurological physiotherapy: a problem-solving approach. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone,2002
  46. 46.0 46.1 46.2 HAS. Physiotherapy-Preserving motor function in frail elderly people living at home. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/physiotherapy_guidelines.pdf (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
  47. Podsiadlo D and Richardson S. The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1991;39(2):142–148.
  48. Schwenk M, Howe C, Saleh A, Mohler J, Grewal G, Armstrong D and Najafi B. Frailty and Technology: A Systematic Review of Gait Analysis in Those with Frailty. Gerontology 2014; 60(1): 79–89.
  49. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH, Wu HD, Wang YW, Huang FC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52(8):1343-8.
  50. 50.0 50.1 Sibley KM, Straus SE, Inness EL, Salbach NM, Jaglal SB. Clinical balance assessment: perceptions of commonly-used standardized measures and current practices among physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada. Implement Sci 2013; 8: 33.
  51. Sibley KM, Beauchamp MK, Van Ooteghem K, Straus SE, Jaglal SB. Using the systems framework for postural control to analyze the components of balance evaluated in standardized balance measures: a scoping review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96(1):122-132.
  52. Chkeir A, Jaber R , Hewson DJ , Duchêne J. Estimation of grip force using the Grip-ball dynamometer. Medical Engineering & Physics 2013; 35(11):1698-1702.
  53. Chkeir A, Jaber R , Hewson DJ , Duchêne J. Reliability and validity of the GripBall dynamometer for grip-strength measurement. Annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in medicine and biological sciences 2012; Aug; France, Reserach gate, 2015.
  54. Chiacchiero M, Dresely B, Silva U, DeLosReyes R, Vorik B. The relationship between range of movement, flexibility, and balance in the elderly. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 2010; 26(2): 148-155.
  55. 55.0 55.1 Millán-Calenti JC, Tubío J, Pita-Fernández S, González-Abraldes I, Lorenzo T, Fernández-Arruty T, Maseda A. Prevalence of functional disability in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and associated factors, as predictors of morbidity and mortality. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2010; 50(3): 306–310.
  56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 Ward G, Jagger C and Harper W. A review of instrumental ADL assessments for use with elderly people. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 1998; 8: 65-71.
  57. 57.0 57.1 Richards, S. H., Peters, T. J., et al. Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel ADL index: how does a researcher compare to a nurse? Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14(1): 72-78.
  58. Sainsbury A, Seebass G, Bansal A and Young JB. Reliability of the Barthel Index when used with older people. Age and Ageing 2005; 34: 228–232.
  59. Jette DU et al.Use of Standardized Outcome Measures in Physical Therapist Practice: Perceptions and Applications. Physical therapy 2009; 89(2):125-35.
  60. Kyte DG, Calvert M. An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2015; 101(2):119-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620440 (accessed 5 Jan 2016).
  61. Gloth FM, Walston J, Meyer J & Pearson J. Frail elderly functional assessment. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1995; 74(1): 45-53.
  62. Gloth FM, Walston J, Meyer J & Pearson J. The frail elderly functional assessment questionnaire: Its responsiveness and validity in alternative settings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999; 80(12):1572–1576.
  63. Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish D. Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Shorter Walk Test Compared With the 10-Meter Walk Test for Measurements of Gait Speed in Healthy, Older Adults. Journal of geriatric physical therapy 2001; 36(1).
  64. Leerar P J, Miller EW. Concurrent Validity of Distance-Walks and Timed-Walks in the Well-Elderly. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy 2002; 25(2): 3-7.
  65. 65.0 65.1 Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A and Rockwood K . Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Age and aging 2006; 35(5):526-29.
  66. NHS. Prisma 7 questionnaire. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/frlty-spec-tools-prisma.pdf (accessed 15 Nov 2015).
  67. 67.0 67.1 Hebert R, Durand PJ, Dubuc N, Tourigny A. Frail elderly patients: new model for integrated service delivery. Can Fam Physician 2003; 49: 992-997.
  68. Tinetti ME.Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986; 34(2): 119-126.
  69. Raiche M, Rejean H, Francois P, Corriveau H. Screening older adults at risk of falling with the Tinetti balance scale. The Lancet 2000; 356(9234):1001-1002.
  70. Thomas JI and Lane JV. A pilot study to explore the predictive validity of 4 measures of falls risk in frail elderly patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005; 86(8): 1636-1640.
  71. Faber MJ, Bosscher RJ et al. Clinimetric properties of the performance-oriented mobility assessment. Phys Ther 2006;86(7): 944-954.
  72. Vaniersel M, Benraad CM et al.Validity and reliability of quantitative gait analysis in geriatric patients with and without dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2007; 55(4): 632-633.
  73. Lin M R, Hwang H F et al. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2004; 52(8): 1343-1348.
  74. Smith R. Validation and Reliability of the Elderly Mobility Scale. Physiotherapy1994;80(11):744-747.
  75. Nolan J, Remilton L & Green M.The reliability and validity of the Elderly Mobility Scale in the acute hospital setting. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract 2008;6(4).
  76. NHS. PHYSIOTHERAPY FOR OLDER ADULTS.fckLRhttps://www.cumbriapartnership.nhs.uk/our-services/community-health/our-community-health-services/physiotherapy/elderly-physiotheraphy (accessed 5 Jan 2016).
  77. 77.0 77.1 Vervloet D, Durham S.Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ 1998;316:1511-4. Full version: http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/316/7143/1511.full.pdf (Accessed 12 Dec 2015).
  78. NHS. Beta- BlockersfckLRhttp://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Beta-blockers/Pages/Introduction.aspx (Accessed 5 Jan 2016)
  79. NHS. Antidepressants.fckLRhttp://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Antidepressant-drugs/Pages/Introduction.aspx (Accessed 2 Jan 2016)
  80. NHS. Generalised anxiety disorder in adults - Treatment. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Anxiety/Pages/Treatment.aspx (Accessed 3 Jan 2016).
  81. NHS. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/anti-inflammatories-non-steroidal/Pages/Introduction.aspx (Accessed 3 Jan 2016)
  82. Department of health. Common Assessment Framework for Adults: a consultation on proposals to improve information sharing around multi-disciplinary assessment and care planning. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_093438 (accessed 4 Jan 2016).
  83. Horowitz B P. Supporting community living through client-centered care. Occupational therapy in mental health; 2002 : 18(1).
  84. 84.0 84.1 World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
  85. World Health Organisation. ICF Checklist version 2.1a clinicians. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfchecklist.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 04 Jan 2016).
  86. Norton J, Ancelin ML, Stewart R, Berr C, Ritchie K, Carrière I. Anxiety symptoms and disorder predict activity limitations in the elderly. Journal of Affective Disorders 2012; 141(2/3): 276-285.
  87. 87.0 87.1 87.2 87.3 Nilsson I, Nyqvist F, Gustafson Y and Nygård M. Leisure Engagement: Medical Conditions, Mobility Difficulties, and Activity Limitations—A Later Life Perspective. Journal of Aging Research; 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/610154 (accessed 04 Jan 2016).
  88. 88.0 88.1 88.2 88.3 88.4 88.5 Cambois E, Robine J-M, Romieu I. The influence of functional limitations and various demographic factors on self-reported activity restriction at older ages. Disability and Rehabilitation 2005; 27(15): 871 – 883.
  89. 89.0 89.1 89.2 Makizako H, Shimada H, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Lee S, Hotta R, et al. Cognitive Functioning and Walking Speed in Older Adults as Predictors of Limitations in Self-Reported Instrumental Activity of Daily Living: Prospective Findings from the Obu Study of Health Promotion for the Elderly. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015; 12: 3002-3013. www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/3/3002/pdf (accessed 20 Dec 2015).
  90. Qu W, Stineman, MG, Streim J E, Dawei Xie D. Understanding Linkages between Perceived Causative Impairment and Activity Limitations among Older People Living In the Community. A Population-Based Assessment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 90(6): 466–476.
  91. 91.0 91.1 91.2 Arnadottir S A, Gunnarsdottir E D, Stenlund H and Lundin-olsson L. Participation frequency and perceived participation restrictions at older age: applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Disability and rehabilitation 2011; 33(22-23): 2208-2216.
  92. Crews JE and Campbell VA. Health Conditions, Activity Limitations, and Participation Restrictions Among Older People with Visual Impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 2001; 95(8):453-467.
  93. Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Croft P. The prevalence of person-perceived participation restriction in community-dwelling older adults. Qual Life Res. 2006;15: 1471–1479.
  94. 94.0 94.1 Wilkie R, Thomas E, Mottram S, Peat G, Croft P. Onset and persistence of person-perceived participation restriction in older adults: a 3-year follow-up study in the general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes [serial online]. 2008 [cited 2016 Jan 11];6(92). Available from: www.biomedcentral.com
  95. Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Croft P. Factors associated with restricted mobility outside the home in community-dwelling adults ages fifty years and older with knee pain: An example of use of the international classification of functioning to investigate participation restriction. Arthritis Care and Research. 2007; 57 (8): 1381-1389.
  96. McGrane N, Galvin R, Cusack T, Stokes E. Addition of motivational interventions to exercise and traditional Physiotherapy: a review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 2015; 101(1): 1–12. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ (accessed 28 Dec 2015).
  97. Demers L, Robichaud L, Gélinas I, Noreau L et al. Coping strategies and social participation in older adults. Gerontology 2009; 55:233–239. http://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/181170 (accessed 17 Dec 2015).
  98. Mast BT, Azar AR, MacNeill SE, Lichtenberg PA. Depression and activities of daily living predict rehospitalization within 6 months of discharge from geriatric rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology 2004; 49(3): 219-223.
  99. 99.0 99.1 Petty, NJ. Neuromusculoskeletal examination and assessment: a handbook for therapists. Edinburgh : Churchill Livingstone, 2011.
  100. Cott, CA. Goal setting. In: Pickles B et al, editor. Physiotherapy with older people. London: WB Saunders company ltd, 1995.
  101. Jessep SA, Walsh NE, Ratcliffe J, Hurley MV. Long-term clinical benefits and costs of an integrated rehabilitation programme compared with outpatient physiotherapy for chronic knee pain. Physiotherapy 2009; 95(2): 94-102. http://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl (accessed 8 Jan 2016).
  102. Mearns N, Duguid I. Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy in the Acute Medical Unit: Guidelines for Practice. http://www.acutemedicine.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/10.2-PTOT-AMU-Guidance-Document-2015.pdf (accessed 13 Jan 2016).
  103. The King's Fund. Managing people with long-term conditions. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_document/managing-people-long-term-conditions-gp-inquiry-research-paper-mar11.pdf (accessed 17 Nov 2015)
  104. The Scottish Government. Long Term Conditions.fckLRhttp://www.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Services/Long-Term-Conditions (accessed 20 Nov 2015)
  105. The King's Fund. Transforming our health care system. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/articles/transforming-our-health-care-system-ten-priorities-commissioners (accessed 11 Jan 2016)
  106. 106.0 106.1 Cramm JM, Hartgerink JM, Steyerberg EW, Bakker TJ, Mackenbach JP, Nieboer AP. Understanding older patients’ self-management abilities: Functional loss, self-management, and well-being. Qual Life Res, 2013;22:85–92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350532 (accessed 11 Jan 2016)
  107. 107.0 107.1 Cramm JM, Twisk J, Nieboer AP. Self-management abilities and frailty are important for healthy aging among community-dwelling older people; a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics 2014;14:28.fckLR http://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2318-14-28 (accessed 11 Jan 2016)
  108. 108.0 108.1 The King’s Fund. Self-management for Long-Term Conditions: Patients’ perspectives on the way ahead. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/self-management-long-term-conditions (accessed 7 Jan 2016)
  109. The King’s Fund. Transforming our health care system. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/articles/transforming-our-health-care-system-ten-priorities-commissioners (accessed 7 Jan 2016)
  110. My condition, my terms, my life. Professional Resources: About self management. fckLRhttp://www.myconditionmylife.org/professional-resources/about-self-management/ (accessed 14 Jan 2016)
  111. NHS 24. NHS 24 Explained. http://www.nhs24.com/explained/services/ (accessed 14 Jan 2016)
  112. NHS Lothian Respiratory Managed Clinical Network. Public Resources. http://www.lothianrespiratorymcn.scot.nhs.uk/for-public/ (accessed 14 Jan 2016)
  113. The British Lung Foundation. COPD self-help tools. http://shop.blf.org.uk/collections/self-management (accessed 14 Jan 2016)
  114. Chest, Heart & Stroke Scotland. Chest factsheets & booklets. http://www.chss.org.uk/chest-information-and-support/resources-to-help/order-download-publications/ accessed 14 Jan 2016)
  115. Arthritis Research UK. Arthritis information. http://www.arthritisresearchuk.org/arthritis-information.aspx (accessed 14 Jan 2016)
  116. Alzheimers Scotland. Living with Dementia. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/documents.php?categoryID=200342 (accessed 14 Jan 2016)
  117. Age UK. Age UK information guides and factsheets. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/publications/age-uk-information-guides-and-factsheets/#Infoguides (accessed 14 Jan 2016
  118. 118.0 118.1 118.2 118.3 118.4 118.5 Department of Health. Start active, stay active: report on physical activity in the UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/start-active-stay-active-a-report-on-physical-activity-from-the-four-home-countries-chief-medical-officersfckLR (accessed 28 Oct 2015)
  119. The Scottish Government. The Scottish Health Survey 2012. Volume 1 – Main report. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2013/09/3684 (accessed 28 Oct 2015)
  120. 120.0 120.1 120.2 The British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health. Interpreting the UK physical activity guidelines for older adults in transition. http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/older-adults-resources-and-publications-item/39/429/index.html (accessed 17 Oct 2015)
  121. Jansen FM, Prins RG, Etman A, van der Ploeg HP, de Vries SI, van Lenthe FJ, Pierik, FH. Physical Activity in Non-Frail and Frail Older Adults. PLoS One 2015;10:1-15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25910249 (accessed 27 Oct 2015)
  122. 122.0 122.1 Chou CH, Hwang CL, Wu YT. Effect of Exercise on Physical Function, Daily Living Activities,and Quality of Life in the Frail Older Adults: A Meta Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:237-44.fckLRhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999311008173 (accessed 16 Oct 2015)
  123. 123.0 123.1 Weeks LE, Profit S, Campbell B, Graham H, Chircop A, Sheppard-LeMoine D. Participation in Physical Activity: Influences Reported by Seniors in the Community and in Long-Term Care Facilities. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 2008;34:36–43. http://www.healio.com/nursing/journals/jgn/2008-7-34-7/%7Bf65345f8-58ac-4381-a607-f663b5d57d53%7D/participation-in-physical-activity-influences-reported-by-seniors-in-the-community-and-in-long-term-care-facilities (accessed 7 Jan 2016)
  124. Verhagen E, Engbers L. The physical therapist’s role in physical activity promotion. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:99–101. http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/2/99.abstract (accessed 28 Oct 2015)
  125. Spijker J, MacInnes J. Population ageing: the timebomb that isn’t? BMJ 2013;347:1-5. http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f6598.full.pdf+html (accessed 11 Jan 2016)
  126. The British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health. Factors influencing physical activity in older adults. http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/resources-and-publications-item/18/404/index.html (accessed 11 Jan 2016)
  127. 127.0 127.1 127.2 127.3 127.4 The British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health. Interpreting the UK physical activity guidelines for frailer older adults. http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/resources-and-publications-item/39/430/index.html (accessed 17 Oct 2015)
  128. The British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health. Physical activity interventions for older adults.fckLRhttp://www.bhfactive.org.uk/older-adults-resources-and-publications-item/18/405/index.html (accessed 13 Jan 2016)
  129. NHS Health Scotland. Physical Activity. :http://www.healthscotland.com/physical-activity.aspx (accessed 13 Jan 2016)
  130. 130.0 130.1 130.2 The Knowledge Network. NHS Physical Activity Promotion. http://www.knowledge.scot.nhs.uk/home/portals-and-topics/health-improvement/hphs/nhs-physical-activity-promotion.aspx (accessed 13 Jan 2016)
  131. NHS Health Scotland. Publication: Physical Activity Pathway For Secondary Care. http://www.healthscotland.com/documents/21759.aspx (accessed 13 Jan 2016)
  132. Active Scotland. Lets get active. http://www.activescotland.org.uk/ (accessed 13 Jan 2016)
  133. NHS Health Scotland. Publication: Get Active Your way. http://www.healthscotland.com/documents/21759.aspx (accessed 13 Jan 2016)
  134. Age UK. Keeping fit. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/health-wellbeing/keeping-fit/ (accessed 13 Jan 2016)