Gaenslen Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
== Purpose<br>  ==
== Purpose<br>  ==


Gaenslen's Test is used to detect musculoskeletal abnormalities and primary-chronic inflammation of the [[Lumbar|lumbar]] vertebrae and [[Sacroiliac joint|Sacroiliac joint]]. <ref>F. J. Gaenslen (1927). "Sacro-iliac arthrodesis: indications, author’s technic and end-results". Journal of the American Medical Association 86: 2031–2035.</ref> Specifically, this test can indicate the presence or absence of a sacroiliac joint lesion, pubic symphysis instability, hip pathology, or an L4 nerve root lesion. It also stresses the femoral nerve. <ref name="Dutton">Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2008.</ref>
Gaenslen's Test is used to detect musculoskeletal abnormalities and primary-chronic inflammation of the [[Lumbar|lumbar]] vertebrae and [[Sacroiliac joint|Sacroiliac joint]]. <ref>F. J. Gaenslen (1927). "Sacro-iliac arthrodesis: indications, author’s technic and end-results". Journal of the American Medical Association 86: 2031–2035.</ref> Specifically, this test can indicate the presence or absence of a sacroiliac joint lesion, pubic symphysis instability, [[Hip_Anatomy|hip]] pathology, or an L4 nerve root lesion. It also stresses the femoral nerve. <ref name="Dutton">Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2008.</ref>


== Technique<br>  ==
== Technique<br>  ==

Revision as of 13:05, 5 June 2009

Original Editor - Jason Therrien and Katie Finley

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

Gaenslen's Test is used to detect musculoskeletal abnormalities and primary-chronic inflammation of the lumbar vertebrae and Sacroiliac joint. [1] Specifically, this test can indicate the presence or absence of a sacroiliac joint lesion, pubic symphysis instability, hip pathology, or an L4 nerve root lesion. It also stresses the femoral nerve. [2]

Technique
[edit | edit source]

Patient is supine on the edge of a table. The leg being tested is hyperextended at the hip so that it hangs over the table while the other leg is flexed at the hip and knee. The patient should hold the non-tested leg with both arms while the therapist stabilizes the pelvis and applies passive pressure to the tested leg to hold it in the hyperextended position. The therapist then applies more pressure so that the hip is put into further extension and adduction.

If pain is reproduced, the test is considered positive for SI joint lesion, hip pathology, pubic synthesis instability, or an L4 nerve root lesion. The femoral nerve may also be stressed by this test.Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag

Evidence
[edit | edit source]

Diagnostic Accuracy:

The sensitivity and specifcity for the Gaenslen's test are 0.71 and 0.26, respectively. The negative likelihood ratio for this test is 1.12 while the positive likelihood ratios is 1.00. The reliability in terms of inter-examiner Kappa is 0.54-0.76. [3]

Resources[edit | edit source]

The value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in early active sacroiliitis.

Factors related to the inability of individuals with low back pain to improve with a spinal manipulation.

Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability.

Computed tomography in diagnosis of septic sacroiliitis: report of three cases.

Pyogenic infections of the sacro-iliac joint.

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1D_UZwhO1I_JUy8Akxnpmu3LH9fg8-CqSTSkFVYx9vjOC4h5i|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. F. J. Gaenslen (1927). "Sacro-iliac arthrodesis: indications, author’s technic and end-results". Journal of the American Medical Association 86: 2031–2035.
  2. Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2008.
  3. Flynn T, Cleland J, Whitman J. Users’ Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence-Based Clinician. Buckner, KY: Evidence in Motion, 2008.