Painful Arc: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 380px; height: 129px;"
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 380px; height: 129px;"
|+ Diagnostic Test Properties for Painful Arc Sign <ref>Calis, M., Akgun, K., Birtane, M., et al. (2000). Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis, 59, 44-47.</ref>
|+ Diagnostic Test Properties for Painful Arc Sign &lt;ref&gt;Calis, M., Akgun, K., Birtane, M., et al. (2000). Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis, 59, 44-47.&lt;/ref&gt;
|-
|-
| Sensitivity  
| Sensitivity  
Line 36: Line 36:
|}
|}


<br> When this test is combined as a cluster with the [[Hawkins_/_Kennedy_Test|Hawkins-Kennedy Impingement Sign]] and the [[Infraspinatus Muscle Test|Infraspinatus tes]]t, and all three tests report a positive, then the positive likelihood ratio is 10.56 and if all three tests are negative, the negative likelihood ratio is .17. If two of the three tests are positive, then the positive likelihood ratio is 5.03.<ref>Park, H.B., Yokota, A., Gill, H.S., EI RG, McFarland, E.G. (2005). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(7), 1446-1455.</ref>
<br>
 
'''Test Item Cluster:'''<br> When this test is combined as a cluster with the [[Hawkins / Kennedy Test|Hawkins-Kennedy Impingement Sign]] and the [[Infraspinatus Muscle Test|Infraspinatus test]], and all three tests report a positive, then the positive likelihood ratio is 10.56 and if all three tests are negative, the negative likelihood ratio is .17. If two of the three tests are positive, then the positive likelihood ratio is 5.03.&lt;ref&gt;Park, H.B., Yokota, A., Gill, H.S., EI RG, McFarland, E.G. (2005). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(7), 1446-1455.&lt;/ref&gt;


== References<br>  ==
== References<br>  ==

Revision as of 06:08, 23 January 2009

Expert Opinion[edit | edit source]

Link to Expert

If you would like to be the expert on this page, please contact us.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

This test is commonly used to identify possible subacromial impingement syndrome.

Technique
[edit | edit source]

The patient should be instructed to abduct the arm in the scapular plane and then slowly reverse the motion, bring the arm back to neutral position.  This test is considered to be positive if the patient experiences pain between 60 and 120 degrees of elevation. [1]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Diagnostic Test Properties for Painful Arc Sign <ref>Calis, M., Akgun, K., Birtane, M., et al. (2000). Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis, 59, 44-47.</ref>
Sensitivity .33
Specificity .81
Positive Likelihood Ratio 1.70
Negative Likelihood Ratio .84


Test Item Cluster:
When this test is combined as a cluster with the Hawkins-Kennedy Impingement Sign and the Infraspinatus test, and all three tests report a positive, then the positive likelihood ratio is 10.56 and if all three tests are negative, the negative likelihood ratio is .17. If two of the three tests are positive, then the positive likelihood ratio is 5.03.<ref>Park, H.B., Yokota, A., Gill, H.S., EI RG, McFarland, E.G. (2005). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(7), 1446-1455.</ref>

References
[edit | edit source]

  1. Flynn, T.W., Cleland, J.A., & Whitman, J.M. (2008). User's guide to the musculoskeletal examination: Fundamentals for the evidence-based clinician. Buckner, Kentucky: Evidence in Motion