Thoracic Spine Fracture

Welcome to Texas State University's Evidence-based Practice project space. This is a wiki created by and for the students in the Doctor of Physical Therapy program at Texas State University - San Marcos. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!

Original Editors

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Search Strategy[edit | edit source]

Databases Searched:  CINHAL plus Full Text, Cochrane, PubMed

Key Words:  thoracic, fracture, thoracolumbar, diagnosis, management, treatment, compression, burst, vertebral

Search Timeline: April 6, 2011 to May 1, 2011

Definition/Description[edit | edit source]

According to the Denis classification system for spinal injury, there are four types of vertebral fracture[1]:


  • Compression
  • Burst 
  • Flexion-distraction 
  • Fracture-dislocation - Subsets include Flexion-Rotation, Flexion-Distraction and Shear

Minor fractures include those of the spinous processes, transverse processes, pars interarticularis, and facet joints.[1]

(There are multiple classification systems for spinal fractures.  For more information, please see...)



NeckandBack.com Text, Video and Graphic Content to Donald Corenman, MD - Spine Surgeon Colorado (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SIry1QXNsA&feature=player_embedded)

Permission granted on 4/29/2011.


Crashed mountain bike off ramp: CT scan 

Epidemiology /Etiology[edit | edit source]

Compression – failure of the anterior column of the spine due to compression forces, mainly in flexion. The most common causes in younger patients are falls and motor vehicle accidents. The most common causes in older patients are minor incidents during normal activities of daily living secondary to osteoporosis or metabolic bone diseases.[2] (Also site Denis from Heather) Rarely have neurological complications (Denis from Heather)[1]


Burst – fracture of the anterior and middle columns of the spine due to axial loading[3] such as from a fall landing on the buttocks or lower extremities. The concentration of axial forces is to the thoracolumbar junction.(also site Denis) These account for 10-20% of injuries to thoracolumbar region [4][1]


Flexion-distraction – failures of the posterior and middle columns of the spine under tension usually from a trauma involving sudden upper body forward flexion while the lower body remains stationary. Often associated with abdominal trauma due to compression of abdominal cavity during injury. The anterior column may be mildly affected, but the annulus fibrosis and anterior longitudinal ligament are intact, preventing dislocation or subluxation. A gap between the spinous processes is often present upon palpation.[1]


Fracture-dislocation – failure of all three spinal columns under compression, flexion, rotation, or shear forces. The most unstable of all thoracolumbar spine injuries, they are highly associated with neurological deficits. Subsets include[1]:


  • Flexion-rotation: the spine is dislocated or subluxed in the lateral and AP planes, fracturing the superior articular process on one side of the level below the dislocation

  • Flexion-distraction: the anterior spinal column is fractured due to a severe flexion force (similar to seat belt injury), and the annulus fibrosis is torn, allowing subluxation or dislocation.

  • Shear: all three spinal columns are fractured, usually in the AP plane, due to an object falling across the back.


Clay-Shoveler's Fracture - rare, fatigue fracture of the upper thoracic spinous process. Seen in power lifters or in patients that are involved hard labor causing shear forces on the vertebra, hyperflexed spine, or direct trauma.[5]

Characteristics/Clinical Presentation[edit | edit source]

Over 65% of vertebral fractures are asymptomatic [6]. They are sometimes detected via radiograph when a patient is being screened for another injury.

Presentation of symptomatic fractures includes: [6][2][7][8][9][10]

  • Chronic back pain in thoracic and/or lumbar region
  • Slower gait
  • Decreased range of motion
  • Impaired pulmonary function
  • Increased kyphosis especially in osteoporitic patients with compression fractures
  • Neurological deficits due to narrowing of spinal canal - can present as long as 1.5 years post injury


Prolonging of these symptoms leads to decreased physical function and performance of ADLs, and increased risk of disability. Vertebral deformities are also associated with significantly increased risk of future fractures, including hip fractures[6].


Patients with non-compression fractures are usually involved in a multi-trauma, and will have various injuries and sources of pain. Clinicians must use their best judgment and employ clinical screening criteria that are not fully validated to determine if the thoracic spine is involved.

Differential Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

Plain radiographs are historically the "gold standard" for detecting thoracolumbar fractures, although due to the organs and soft tissue in the thoracic region, fractures can be missed on radiographs. A CT scan is recommended to visualize thoracic fractures and an MRI to assess soft tissue damage. [11][7][8]

Multiple Myeloma and other cancers can present as back pain, but will have additional signs such as unexplained weight loss and fever.[12]

Scheuermann Disease presents as exaggerated kyphosis, anterior body extension and schmorl’s nodes; can be distguished by vetebral body heights parameters on radiograph. [13]

Examination[edit | edit source]

Screening for Fracture

Algorithms for screening patients for thoracic fractures and the need for imaging have been developed but not fully validated.

O'Connor and Walsham (2009)

Presence one or more of the following criteria in a patient with blunt multi-trauma is an indication for thoracolumbar spine imaging(Sn=0.99)[2]:

High-Risk Mechanism of Injury
Motor vehicle accident at speed >70 kph, fall from height >3 m, ejection from motor vehicle or motorcycle, plus any injury outside of these criteria that could cause a thoracolumbar fracture
Painful Distracting Injury
Painful torso or long-bone injury sufficient to distract the patient from noticing the pain of the thoracolumbar injury
New Neurological Signs or Back Pain/Tenderness
Clinical findings suspicious of new vertebral fracture, including back pain, back tenderness, a palpable step in vertebral palpation, midline bruising, neurological signs consistent with spinal cord injury
Cognitive Impairment
Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) < 15, abnormal mentation, clinical intoxication
Known Cervical Spine Fracture
Evidence of a new traumatic cervical spine fracture

These results were derived from low-level evidence. The authors recommend future controlled trials to standardize these definitions and validate the algorithm.[2]


Holmes et al: Screening criteria for radiograph of blunt trauma patients with thoracolumbar spine injuries (Sn=1.00, Sp=0.039)[9] :
 

  • Complaints of thoracolumbar spine pain

  • Thoracolumbar spine tenderness

  • Decreased level of consciousness

  • Intoxication with alcohol or drugs

  • Neurologic deficit

  • Painful distracting injury


Singh et al: 

Three predictive variables for thoracic spine fracture based on a case control study (Sp=0.93)[8]:

  • Fall > 2m
  • Thoracic pain
  • Intoxication


Physical Therapy Exam

  • Thorough history including MOI and previous spine fractures
  • Neurological screen
  • Assessment of patient's pain level and location
  • Palpation of the thoracic spine
  • Screen for thoracic fracture
  • Identification of impairments in ROM, Strength, Flexibility

Medical Management (current best evidence)[edit | edit source]

Operative

Indications for surgery include progressive neurological deterioration, >50% spinal canal compromise, >50% anterior vertebral body height loss, >25° to 35° angle of kyphotic deformity, and posterior ligament complex (PLC) compromise. Surgical approaches can be anterior, posterior or a combination.[4]

Nonoperative

Compression fractures and stable burst fractures can typically be treated non-operatively.[14] Conservative, non-operative treatment can include:

  • Closed reduction
  • Bracing: Typically a Jewett or Cruciform Anterior Spinal Hyperextension (CASH) brace[15]  
    File:Jewett & CASH Braces.JPG
    Jewett (left) & CASH (right) Braces - courtesy of Orthotic & Prosthetic Technologies, Inc., San Marcos, TX
  • Casting 
    File:CASH & Jewett Braces on Patients.JPG
    CASH (left) & Jewett (right) Braces - courtesy of Orthotic & Prosthetic Technologies, Inc., San Marcos, TX
  • Bed Rest/Activity Limitation ranging from 4 to 12 weeks though positive results have been see with as little as 2 days of bed rest when combined with closed reduction and casting[16]
  • Pain medication
  • Physical Therapy

Preventative treatment for fractures related to osteoporosis include bisophosphonates, calcium, vitamin D and exercise.[5]

Wood et al found no significant long-term difference in pain, disability and return to work for non-neurologically involved patients who received surgery compared to those who received bracing or casting.  This indicates that the higher risk and cost of surgery may not be justified and that bracing/casting would be the preferred treatment in this patient population.  Casting was recommended over bracing, especially in the early stages of fracture healing due to increased patient compliance.[17] Braces remain a common part of both operative and non-operative thoracic fracture treatment protocols.[15]

Discussion
Alpantaki et al proposed a treatment algorithm for patients presenting with thoracolumbar burst fractures that is based on the patient’s neurological status. Incomplete neurological impairment indicated the need for surgery whereas a patient without neurological deficits could be conservatively managed. Within the surgery category, it’s recommended that patients without PLC compromise receive an anterior surgical approach, those with thoracic kyphosis >35° receive a posterior surgical approach, and those with complete PLC compromise might benefit from a combined anterior and posterior approach.
There is a lack of evidence for the use of conservative treatments in neurologically involved patients. However, Weninger et al reported positive outcomes for a select group of patients with unilateral radicular symptoms that refused surgery in favor a conservative treatment (closed reduction followed by casting). Patients with more serious neurological involvement such as cauda equina syndrome did not respond as well to the same conservative treatment.

Physical Therapy Management (current best evidence)[edit | edit source]

The management of vertebral fractures remains controversial [4],[18],[19] and research is limited on identifying the most appropriate physical therapy intervention. Until recently, conservative management of vertebral fractures consisted of pain meds, bed rest and bracing to reduce spinal movements and stabilize the fracture [20],[18],[21],[17].
Rehabilitation programs must be designed specifically for the individual and be based on the physical abilities of that individual. Because of this, an impairment based exam and intervention is most likely warranted.


With conservative treatment, the majority of vertebral fractures heal and patients experience a significant decrease in pain in 8-12 weeks. Significant declines in pain (5.9cm on VAS) are experienced 12-24 hours post-surgery.[20] Therefore, physical therapy interventions depend largely on whether the patient chose surgery or conservative treatment. Either way, interventions should always be prescribed and progressed based on the patient’s tolerance.


Physical Therapy Goals should address patient limitations and improve pain, stability, balance, strength and range of motion. Bennell et al. found that a multimodal treatment approach over a 10-week period was successful in reducing pain and improving physical function in patients who suffered from osteoporotic vertebral fractures.[22] However, because it was a multimodal approach it was unclear which individual treatment was more or less effective.

Although evidence or specific therapeutic exercise regimens for the treatment of vertebral fractures is limited, preferred practice patterns 4B: Impaired Posture; 4G: Impaired Joint Mobility, Muscle Performance, and Range of Motion Associated with Fracture; and 4I: Impaired Joint Mobility, Muscle Performance, and Range of Motion Associated with Bony or Soft Tissue Surgery are offered by The Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 2nd edition[23] to assist physical therapists in managing patients who fit these patterns.


General Exercise Recommendations [22],[23]: (all within a pain free range and progressed as tolerated)
Supine:

  • Bilateral Shoulder Flexion
  • Marching
  • Alternating Knee Extension
  • Bicep Curl

Seated:

  • Shoulder Shrugs
  • Chin Tucks
  • Scapular Retraction
  • Rows with T-Band
  • Deep breathing exercises to promote full chest expansion

Standing:

  • Wall Push-Ups
  • Corner Stretch
  • Step-ups
  • Single Leg Stance

Prone:

  • Trunk Extension
  • Alternating Arm Extension
  • Alternating Leg Extension

Other:

  • General Aerobic Conditioning
  • Education in Proper Body Mechanics
  • Ergonomic/Posture Education


A major concern is refracture within a year of the initial injury.  Researchers agree that strengthening back-extensor muscles can help decrease the rate of refracture or prolong occurance of refracture  [21],[22] Studies show significant improvement in reported pain levels and increased function with patients who had back-extensor exercises as part of their exercise regimen [21],[24],[25],[22].  Therefore, patient should begin strengthening back-extensor muscles as soon as they are physically able.


When developing a plan of care, the therapist should consider the individual characteristics of a vertebral fracture and the possible secondary limitations.

Complications to Consider [4],[19],[21]:

  • Cardiorespiratory compromise
  • Additional Fractures
  • Refractures
  • Osteoporosis
  • Prolonged Pain
  • Limited Range of Motion
  • Limited Strength
  • Neurological Compromise
  • Postural Dysfunction
  • General Deconditioning
  • Gait/Ambulation Abnormalities
  • Loss of Balance

Key Research[edit | edit source]

add links and reviews of high quality evidence here (case studies should be added on new pages using the case study template)

Resources
[edit | edit source]


Clinical Bottom Line[edit | edit source]

There is a lack of high quality evidence for the management of thoracic spine fractures. Physical therapists should be familiar with screening for thoracic fractures and take an impairment-based approach when treating post-operative or non-operative patients.

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)
[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1B3BG_B5Yy7ec5xycl3JjGdmfpS6K3yKdYSY8Zeqg0yTsC_o9P: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

see adding references tutorial.

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Kandabarow A. Clinical excerpts... Injuries of the thoracolumbar spine... reprinted from Alexander Kandabarow, Injuries of the Thoracolumbar Spine, Topics in Emergency Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 65-80, (C)1997 Aspen Publishers, Inc.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 O'Connor E, Walsham J. Indications for thoracolumbar imaging in blunt trauma patients: A review of current literature. Emerg Med Australas. April 2009;21(2):94-101.
  3. Tisot R, Avanzi O. Laminar fractures as a severity marker in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). December 2009;17(3):261-264.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Alpantaki K, Bano A, Pasku D, Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ, Sapkas G, Korres D, Katonis P. Thoracolumbar burst fractures: A systematic review of management. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(6): 422-429.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Demir S, Akin C, Aras M, Koseoglu F. Spinal cord injury associated with thoracic osteoporotic fracture. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation [serial online]. March 2007;86(3):242-246. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed April 12, 2011. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Demir 2007" defined multiple times with different content
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Lentle B, Brown J, Hodsman A, et al. Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Can Assoc Radiol J. February 2007;58(1):27.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Marre B, Ballesteros V, Martinez C, Zamorano JJ, Ilabaca F, Munjin M, Yurac R, Urzua A, Lecaros M, Fleiderman J. Thoracic spine fractures: Injury profile and outcomes of a surgically treated cohort. Eur Spine J. Published online January 2011.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Singh R, Taylor DM, D’Souza D, Gorelik A, Page P, Phal P. Mechanism of injury and clinical variables in thoracic spine fracture: A case control study. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2011; 18(1): 5-12.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Holmes JF et al. Prospective evaluation of criteria for obtaining thoracolumbar radiographs in trauma patients. J Emerg Med. 2003; 24:1-7.
  10. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Pieler-Bruha E. Misleading history of pain location in 51 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J. December 2006;15(12):1797-1800.
  11. Diaz J, Cullinane D, Vaslef S, et al. Practice management guidelines for the screening of thoracolumbar spine fracture. J Trauma. Sept 2007;63(3):709-718.
  12. PubMed Health: Multiple myeloma Web site. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001609/. Accessed April 29, 2001.
  13. Masharawi Y, Rothschild B, Peled N, Hershkovitz I. A simple radiological method for recognizing osteoporotic thoracic vertebral compression fractures and distinguishing them from Scheuermann disease. Spine. Aug 2009;34(18):1995-1999.
  14. Shaffrey CI, Shaffrey ME, Whitehill R, Nockels RP. Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1997; 8(4): 519-540.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Giele BM, Wiertsema SH, Beelen A, va der Schaaf M, Lucas C, Been HD, Bramer JA. No evidence for the effectiveness of bracing in patients with thoracolumbar fractures: A systematic review. Acta Orthopaedica. 2009; 80(2): 226-232.
  16. Weninger P, Schultz A, Hertz H. Conservative management of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine compression and burst fractures: Functional and radiographic outcomes in 136 cases treated by closed reduction and casting. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 129: 207-219.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Wood 2003
  18. 18.0 18.1 Van Leeuwen PJ, Bos RP, Derksen JC, de Vries J. Assessment of spinal movement reduction by thoraco-lumbar-sacral orthoses: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2000; 37(4): 395-403
  19. 19.0 19.1 Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD. Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. A five to seven-year prospective randomized study: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 1033-1041
  20. 20.0 20.1 Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen M, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K, Lauritsen JM. Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: SPINE. 2010; 35(5): 478-482
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 Cahoj PA, Cook JL, Robinson BS. Efficacy of percutaneous vertebral augmentation and use of physical therapy intervention following vertebral compression fractures in older adults: A systematic review. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. 2007; 30(1): 31-40
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 Bennell KL, Matthews B, Greig A, Briggs A, Kelly A, Sherburn M, Larsen J, Wark J. Effects of an exercise and manual therapy program on physical impairments, function and quality of life in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: A randomised, single-blind controlled pilot trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010; 11(36) 1-11.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. 2nd ed. Revised. Alexandria, Va: American Physical Therapy Association; 2003
  24. Huntoon EA, Schmidt CK, Sinaki M. Significantly fewer refractures after vertebroplasty in patients who engage in back-extensor-strengthening exercises. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008; 83(1): 54-57
  25. Sinaki M, Itoi E, Wahner HW, Wollan P, Gelzcer R, Mullan BP, Collins DA, Hodgson SF. Stronger Back Muscles Reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: A prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women. Bone. 2002; 30(6): 836-841