Unilateral Neglect: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Etiology/Pathology == | == Etiology/Pathology == | ||
Unilateral neglect usually results from damage to the right parietal area, often the posterior parietal cortex <ref name="1">Hillis AE. Neurobiology of unilateral spatial neglect. The neuroscientist. 2006 Apr;12(2):153-63.fckLRDOI: 10.1177/1073858405284257</ref>. Normally, [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Introduction_to_Neuroanatomy#Neurons neurons ]in the right parietal cortex strongly attend to both the left and the right side of the space, while neurons in the left parietal cortex weakly attend to the right side of the space only <ref name="11">Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980; 30(3):327-30.fckLRPMID: 7189037</ref>. Therefore, in right parietal lesions, attention to the right side of the space is maintained by the left parietal cortex, but attention to the left side of the space ceases. In left parietal lesions, attention is typically maintained on both sides of the space by the right parietal cortex <ref name="11">Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980; 30(3):327-30.fckLRPMID: 7189037</ref>.<br> <br>However, lesions in different cortical and subcortical areas may also lead to neglect by causing dysfunction in brain networks <ref name="12">Vuilleumier P. Mapping the functional neuroanatomy of spatial neglect and human parietal lobe functions: progress and challenges. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2013; 1296:50-74.fckLRDOI: 10.1111/nyas.12161</ref>. Usually, unilateral neglect results from stroke; however, it may also result from [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Traumatic_Brain_Injury traumatic brain injuries] or a neoplastic disease. Neglect is most likely in cases of large right hemisphere stroke <ref name="4">Yang NYH, Zhou D, Chung RCK, Li-Tsang CWP, Fong KNK. Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013 May 10;7:1–11.fckLRDOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187</ref>.<br> | Unilateral neglect usually results from damage to the right parietal area, often the posterior parietal cortex <ref name="1">Hillis AE. Neurobiology of unilateral spatial neglect. The neuroscientist. 2006 Apr;12(2):153-63.fckLRDOI: 10.1177/1073858405284257</ref>. Normally, [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Introduction_to_Neuroanatomy#Neurons neurons ]in the right parietal cortex strongly attend to both the left and the right side of the space, while neurons in the left parietal cortex weakly attend to the right side of the space only <ref name="11">Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980; 30(3):327-30.fckLRPMID: 7189037</ref>. Therefore, in right parietal lesions, attention to the right side of the space is maintained by the left parietal cortex, but attention to the left side of the space ceases. In left parietal lesions, attention is typically maintained on both sides of the space by the right parietal cortex <ref name="11">Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980; 30(3):327-30.fckLRPMID: 7189037</ref>.<br> <br>However, lesions in different cortical and subcortical areas may also lead to neglect by causing dysfunction in brain networks <ref name="12">Vuilleumier P. Mapping the functional neuroanatomy of spatial neglect and human parietal lobe functions: progress and challenges. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2013; 1296:50-74.fckLRDOI: 10.1111/nyas.12161</ref>. Usually, unilateral neglect results from stroke; however, it may also result from [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Traumatic_Brain_Injury traumatic brain injuries] or a neoplastic disease. Neglect is most likely in cases of large right hemisphere stroke <ref name="4">Yang NYH, Zhou D, Chung RCK, Li-Tsang CWP, Fong KNK. Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013 May 10;7:1–11.fckLRDOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187</ref>.<br> | ||
[[Image:Neglect.jpg|left|240x240px|Differential roles of right and left hemispheres in attention]] | |||
== Clinical Presention<br> == | == Clinical Presention<br> == | ||
Revision as of 02:40, 9 May 2017
Original Editor - Emily Wood
Lead Editors - Kathy Bueckert, Alexandra Dansereau
Definition
[edit | edit source]
Unilateral neglect is an attention disorder that arises as a result of injury to the cerebral cortex Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Unilateral neglect is also commonly known as contralateral neglect, hemispatial neglect, visuospatial neglect, spatial neglect, or hemi-neglect Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In unilateral neglect, patients fail to report, respond or orient to meaningful stimuli presented on the affected side Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In most cases, the right parietal cortex is injured and the left side of the body and/or space is/are ignored Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Unilateral neglect is a heterogeneous condition; different individuals may present with different symptoms. Unilateral neglect may involve various modalities, including visual, auditory, somatosensory or kinetic Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Unilateral neglect is generally classified in one of two ways: by the modality that is affected or by the space that is affected (i.e. personal or extrapersonal space). It is important to remember that these classifications may overlap and intersect Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Epidemiology
[edit | edit source]
The incidence rate for spatial neglect following stroke in the United States is upwards of 80% in right-sided stroke patients Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Right-sided unilateral neglect resulting from left hemisphere damage was found at least to some degree in 43.5% of stroke patients Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. One’s likelihood of having unilateral neglect following a left hemisphere stroke is substantially increased if there was damage to the posterior association cortex Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. A meta-analysis found that contralateral unilateral neglect is more likely following a right hemisphere deficit compared to a left hemisphere deficit Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Between 12-100% of right hemisphere stroke patients had unilateral neglect across 30 studies, whereas between 0-76% of patients with left hemisphere stroke had unilateral neglect across 17 studies Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. When comparing the effects of unilateral neglect between right and left hemisphere damage, they have been found to have similar levels of severity in acute brain injury patients Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Age is correlated with increased risk for neglect following stroke. A study by Gottesman et al., found that 69.6% of people above 65 years of age had unilateral neglect following stroke while only 49.4% of people below the age of 65 had neglect. One’s chances of having unilateral neglect increases 1.83% per additional 10 years of age after 65 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. There are no gender differences in the prevalence or severity of spatial neglect following stroke Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Etiology/Pathology[edit | edit source]
Unilateral neglect usually results from damage to the right parietal area, often the posterior parietal cortex Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Normally, neurons in the right parietal cortex strongly attend to both the left and the right side of the space, while neurons in the left parietal cortex weakly attend to the right side of the space only Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Therefore, in right parietal lesions, attention to the right side of the space is maintained by the left parietal cortex, but attention to the left side of the space ceases. In left parietal lesions, attention is typically maintained on both sides of the space by the right parietal cortex Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
However, lesions in different cortical and subcortical areas may also lead to neglect by causing dysfunction in brain networks Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Usually, unilateral neglect results from stroke; however, it may also result from traumatic brain injuries or a neoplastic disease. Neglect is most likely in cases of large right hemisphere stroke Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Clinical Presention
[edit | edit source]
Unilateral neglect is a heterogeneous syndrome; the clinical presentation varies largely between individuals. Typically, the syndrome occurs following a lesion of the right parietal cortex of the brain, and the left side of the body or space is neglected. Right-sided neglect may also occur, but usually to a much lesser extent than left-sided neglect Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In unilateral neglect, individuals behave as if the space opposite to the lesion does not exist anymore Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Individuals may fail to report, respond, or orient to stimuli presented on the contralesional side Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Visual, somatosensory, kinesthetic, and auditory modalities may be disregarded, despite intact primary visual/somatosensory/auditory/vestibular areas Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Active exploration of the environment is also biased toward the ipsilesional side Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
The disorder may have a different distribution in different individuals: the neglect may differentially affect the personal space and the extrapersonal space Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In neglect of the personal space, individuals fail to be aware of one side of their own body Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. They may fail to dress, shave, or groom the affected side Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In severe cases, individuals may deny ownership of the limbs on affected side, a phenomenon called somatoparaphrenia Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In neglect of the extrapersonal space, the individuals fail to acknowledge and respond to stimuli located in their extrapersonal space Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Typical behaviours include eating food only on one side of a plate and bumping into objects on the affected side as they navigate in a space. Furthermore, individuals may either ignore visual stimuli on the affected hemifield, or they may ignore one half of all objects (object-centered neglect), regardless of the location of the objects Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Individuals with neglect also may shift their gaze toward the ipsilesional side when at rest Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. They may also shift their posture toward the ipsilesional side Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Neglect may also affect internal maps of spatial representations Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Representational neglect may be anterograde or retrograde. In anterograde representational neglect, individuals perceive stimuli in the contralesional hemispace, but are unable to recall them. One example is failure to recall auditory information presented on the affected side after distraction Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In retrograde representational neglect, individuals are unable to recall the contralesional half of a previously known scene. However, they are able to recall those details when imagining themselves facing the opposite direction Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
In motor, or intentional unilateral neglect, the initiation of motor behaviour may be affectedCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In motor neglect, the individual may be aware of the stimuli, but fail to move the contralesional side of the body to respond to them despite normal strength Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. In addition, patients may not realize that they are missing half of the space, a symptom called anosognosia Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Diagnosis[edit | edit source]
Unilateral neglect can often be seen in a patient’s behaviour even before a conclusive diagnosis, as there will frequently be a distinct lack of awareness displayed by the patient towards their affected side. They may exhibit behaviours such as only shaving half of their face, only eating half of the food on their plate, repeatedly walking into walls, etc. These behaviours should be the cue that initiates an assessment for unilateral neglect Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. However, it is possible that these symptoms could be attributed to other deficits following a stroke and it is important to rule out possible differential diagnoses, such as vestibular impairment, extinction, hemiplegia, hemionopsia, or somatoparaphrenia Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. It is important to remember that in a case of unilateral neglect these or other deficits may also be present and that testing for neglect should be done in such a way that these other deficits do not give a false positive or negative Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. To this end there are several tests that specifically evaluate spatial or visual presentations of unilateral neglect.
Traditional assessment of neglect uses a pencil and paper model to determine the patient’s awareness and processing ability in a close-up space. Examples of the traditional tests include, but are not limited to, the line bisection, the single letter cancellation and the behaviour inattention tests. More recently there has been a shift towards more functional assessment, allowing the evaluator to determine which tasks of daily living the patient may struggle with. Examples of these tests include having the patient navigate an obstacle course or try to walk a straight line Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. One of the most common pencil and paper tests is the Line Bisection Test. In this test patients draw a line to indicate where they perceive midline to be on a horizontal line Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. One of the most common functional tests is the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS). This 10 item checklist is used mostly in the case of patients who have very few additional functional limitations and assesses functional activities such as grooming and eating as well as attentional and motor skills necessary to daily tasks Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
There are several other tests that can be used to assess and diagnose unilateral neglect; these tests are designed to cover the wide spectrum of presentations and spatial differences that may occur with unilateral neglect Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Management / Interventions
[edit | edit source]
There are two types of rehabilitation interventions used to improve neglect. The first one aims at improving the patient’s attention to the neglected space; the second one aims at addressing the proprioceptive and kinesthetic deficits Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. These interventions may include the following methods: visual scanning/exploration training, neck muscle vibration, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), optokinetic stimulation (OKS), cold water (caloric) vestibular stimulation (CVS), galvanic-vestibular stimulation (GVS), prism adaptation, limb activation training, mental imagery training, sustained attention training, eye patching, virtual reality training, trunk rotation training, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), mirror therapy, and feedback training. Traditionally, treatment often also includes adapting the environment so that stimuli are constantly presented on the neglected side although there does not seem to be a lot of scientific evidence to support this Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Physiotherapy typically involves treating the motor and sensory deficits caused by the stroke, but in stroke patients with neglect, it is important to ensure that the attentional deficits are addressed as well Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Visual Exploration Training
Visual exploration training was conducted by Schindler, Kerkhoff, Karnath, Keller, & Goldenberg (2002) by training both smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. Patients performed smooth pursuit eye movements by following slow pencil movements performed by a therapist. Saccadic eye movement training can be achieved by using a computer program. In the program used by Schindler et al. (2002), patients had to identify whether the square that appeared on their screen was red or green as one task and read the word that appeared on their screen as a second task Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title. A potential benefit from this type of treatment is the acquisition of compensatory strategies Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title.
Neck Muscle Vibration
Neck muscle vibration has a proprioceptive effect whereby it creates the illusion that these muscles are being lengthened (i.e. the neck is turning to one side) (Kerkhoff & Schnek, 2012, p. 1074). Vibration of contralesional posterior neck muscles when combined with visual exploration training results in lasting improvement in neglect symptoms specifically when measured by visual straight ahead, cancellation, tactile exploration, and text reading and also reduces difficulties that a patient may have with activities of daily living (ADL’s) (Schindler et al., 2002, p. 417-418).
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
TMS is a noninvasive method of stimulating the nerve cells in the brain with the use of short magnetic pulses. Repetitive TMS can be used to create significant, long-lasting decreases in unilateral neglect (Cha & Kim, 2016, p. 650-652).
Optokinetic Stimulation
OKS uses movement on a large visual display to change a patient’s perception of where their body is in space with the assumption that they will try to reorient themselves based on this visual information. A systematic review by Kerkhoff & Schenk (2012) showed that there is a lot of evidence to support that OKS is an effective treatment for neglect (p. 1074). OKS treatment combined with visual scanning training leads to significant improvements on neglect tests lasting less than a week and significant improvements on reading and writing tasks lasting more than a week (Schröder, Wist, & Hömberg).
Cold Water Vestibular Stimulation
CVS stimulates the horizontal ear canal of the vestibular system using cold water for the contralesional ear or warm water for the ipsilesional ear, thereby inducing nystagmus. Multimodal positive effects can be seen with CVS including improved visual scanning, improved subjective straight ahead, and reduced somatosensory neglect. However, the effects of CVS are short-term (sometimes limited to 10-15 minutes), and repetitive CVS is not thought to produce long-term effects due to the adaptation of the vestibular system (Kerkhoff & Schenk, 2012, p. 1074-1075).
Galvanic-Vestibular Stimulation
GVS is the electrical stimulation of the vestibular system achieved by placing electrodes on a patient’s mastoid processes. Similar to CVS, GVS appears to have a positive, yet short-term effect. More research is needed to determine if repetitive stimulation would have a long-term effect (Kerkhoff & Schenk, 2012, p. 1075).
Prism Adaptation
This treatment requires patients to wear right-shift wedge prism glasses/goggles. With the use of successive perceptual motor pointing tasks, adaptation to the prisms will occur (Luauté et al., 2006, p. 967). This adaptation results in a shift of a patient’s perceived straight ahead towards the contralesional side, thereby correcting the ipsilesional shift exhibited by neglect patients. The evidence suggests that a single session will not result in lasting benefits, but multiple sessions (i.e. >10) could lead to longer lasting benefits (i.e. 5 weeks). However, the benefits of prism adaptation treatment are not greater than other forms of neglect treatment, neither is the process less time consuming (Kerkhoff & Schenk, 2012, p. 1075).
Limb Activation Training
Limb activation training involves getting the patient to perform active limb movements on the contralesional side of the body in an attempt to bring more attention to that side of the body. This has been shown to significantly reduce visual neglect (Luauté, Halligan, Rode, Rossetti, & Boisson, 2006, p. 963).
Mental Imagery Training
Visual and motor imagery exercises can be used in individuals with neglect to improve contralesional space exploration (Luauté et al., 2006, p. 964-965) as well as arm sensation and copying/drawing performance on neglect tests (Welfringer et al.). This can be achieved by having patients mentally practice positions and movements of the contralesional upper limb (Welfringer).
Sustained Attention Training
Sustained attention training increases a patient’s arousal through the presence of external alerting stimuli produced by the therapist and results in significant improvements in cancellation tests (Luauté et al., 2006, p. 965).
Eye Patching
An eye patch over the patient’s ipsilesional eye can improve symptoms of visuo-spatial neglect (Luauté et al., 2006, p. 967).
Virtual Reality Training
Virtual reality training can be performed through the use of a variety of different programs and has been shown to be more effective than conventional treatment for improving unilateral spatial neglect (Kim, Chun, Yun, Song, Young).
Trunk Rotation Training
Trunk rotation training leads to improved visual exploration on the contralesional side and improved cancellation and line bisection tests. (Luauté et al., 2006, p. 966) Schindler and Kerkhoff (_) achieved this training by having a patient sit in a chair and orienting them with their head and trunk fixated straight forward, head or trunk fixated 20 degrees to the left, and head or trunk fixated 20 degrees to the right. The results were that an orientation of the head or trunk 20 degrees to the left had a significant effect (Schindler & Kerkhoff).
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Electrical stimulation of the posterior aspect of the sternocleidomastoid muscle can be used to improve postural control in patients with neglect. Pérennou et al. (2001) set their TENS parameters to a frequency of 100Hz and a pulse width of 200us and noticed a significantly larger decrease in postural instability in stroke patients with neglect compared to stroke patients without neglect (p. 443-445). TENS treatment combined with visual scanning training leads to significant improvements on neglect tests lasting less than a week and significant improvements on reading and writing tasks lasting more than a week (Schröder, Wist, & Hömberg).
Mirror Therapy
Mirror therapy can be carried out, as was done by Thieme et al. (_), by having the patient place both of their arms on a table with a mirror placed between their arms (p. 316). They are then required to look in the mirror while moving both arms. The reflecting side of the mirror faces the non-affected arm. Mirror therapy has been shown to have a significant effect on spatial neglect (Thieme, Bayn, Wurg, Zange, Pohl, Behrens).
Feedback Training
Feedback training can be achieved through verbal, video, and visual feedback. Simply pointing out a patient’s neglect behaviour (verbal feedback) or showing them a video of their performance can lead to an increase in self-awareness and a decrease in neglect symptoms (Luauté et al). Significant improvements in neglect symptoms were also seen in a study that used rod lifting as a form of visuomotor feedback. The intervention simply consisted of having patients lift and balance rods with a central grip; the rod provides immediate feedback as to whether or not their grip is actually central (Harvey et al.).
Differential Diagnosis
[edit | edit source]
add text here relating to the differential diagnosis of this condition
Key Evidence[edit | edit source]
add text here relating to key evidence with regards to any of the above headings
Resources
[edit | edit source]
add appropriate resources here
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
