Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Top Contributors - Priyanka Chugh  

Objective

Foot and ankle surgery accounts for approximately one fifth of orthopaedic practice and has a high level of patient dissatisfaction. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire’s (MOXFQ’s) are 16-item Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures developed and validated for use in clinical trials involving foot surgery. These self-administered PROs assesses how foot problems impair health-related quality of life can be completed before and after surgery.

The original MOXFQ (foot) PRO was developed as an outcome measure of hallux valgus (bunions) corrective surgery and has recently been slightly amended and validated for use among patients with a variety of foot or ankle problems. The MOXFQ (foot) and the MOXFQ (foot and ankle) PROs are available for license through iOutcomes.

The MOXFQ PROs were developed by researchers in the University of Oxford using interviews with patients and partially drawing on a pain related foot disability measure, the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI), as a template for item generation and content. The MFPDI is also available through iOutcomes.

Intended Population

Originally proven for use in hallux valgus corrective surgery[1][2], and more recently proven for use with patients receiving surgery for a variety of foot or ankle problems[3][4].

Method of Use

16 item questionnaire consisting of three domains/scales: 'Walking/standing' (seven items), 'Pain' (five items) and 'Social interaction' (four items) each having good measurement properties.

Reference

Jill Dawson, Jane Coffey, Helen Doll, Grahame Lavis, Paul Cooke, Mark Herron and Crispin Jenkinson. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: Validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. 2006. Quality of Life Research, Volume 15, Number 7:1211-1222.

Evidence

Reliability

The MOXFQ PROs exhibit good internal consistency. The MOXFQ (foot and Ankle) has also demonstrated good test-retest reliability within different foot and ankle surgical subgroups at baseline assessment.


Validity

 The MOXFQ PROs have been rigorously tested to demonstrate good content and construct validity.

Acceptability

Pre-testing and high completion rates suggest the PROs are easy to complete and acceptable within the test population.

The PROs (Patient Reported Outcome)

The MOXFQ PROs are self-administered, paper based measures consisting of 16-items. The PROs measure three domains:

Walking/standing (7 items)
Pain (5 items)
Social interaction (4 items)
Response options consist of a 5 point Likert scale ranging from no limitation to maximum limitation.

Developers’ of the PROs recommend using the MOXFQ (foot) questionnaire for clinical trials that are specifically investigating outcomes of interventions for hallux valgus correction and use of the MOXFQ (foot and ankle) in all other instances. For example, trials of surgery or audits of outcomes involving all other foot or ankle condition (this may include people with hallux valgus).

Scoring System:

Scores for each domain are calculated by summing the responses to each item within a given domain. Raw scores can be converted to a 0-100 metric where 100=most severe. As mentioned above, the domains can also be summed to give a Summary Index score.

Development:

The MOFOX PROs were developed in a multistage process consistent with industry best practice:

MOXFQ (foot)

Phase 1: Incorporating the patient’s perspective in order to understand the domain under investigation (Content validity)

Review of relevant literature revealed a potentially suitable PRO (the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index - also available from iOutcomes) which could be adapted and tested for use within in the hallux valgus surgical context.

Interviews exploring problems associated with hallux valgus were conducted with 10 out-patients attending hospital surgical clinics. Patients were asked to comment on questionnaire items and revisions were made to encompass pain severity within the measure. The amended questionnaire was piloted on seven patients for acceptability.

Phase 2: Establishing validity, reliability and responsiveness

The MOXFQ (foot) questionnaire and an established generic reference measure (the SF-36) were completed by 100 patients four weeks before undergoing surgery and again at 12 months post-surgery. A clinical examination by a foot surgeon or consultant surgical podiatrist was also carried out on both occasions.

Factor analysis confirmed three domains within the PRO (Walking/standing, Pain, Social Interaction). Two of the three domains (Walking/standing and Pain) conform to Rasch principles and represent unidimensional scales.

The MOXFQ (foot) domains ‘Walking/standing’ and ‘Pain’ showed high correlation (convergent validity) with similar domains found on the SF-36 and clinical foot assessment scores. Divergent validity was evident through low correlations with domains believed to be unrelated on the MOXFQ (foot) and the SF-36.

The three scales identified during factor analysis have shown good internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients: Walking/standing (0.92), Pain (0.86) and Social Interaction (0.73)

The MOXFQ foot specific PRO detected significant changes in mean scores from before and after surgery showing sensitivity to change. Higher effect sizes were detected on the MOXFQ (foot) compared to the SF-36 indicating this condition specific PRO is more precise at measuring change.

The MOXFQ (foot and ankle)

The MOXFQ (foot and ankle) PRO was reevaluated in a study of 671 consequtive patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. Here, all measurement properties were confirmed as good and good test-retest reliability, with ICCs all ≥0.89.

Responsiveness

Dawson, J., Boller, I., Doll, H., Lavis, G., Sharp, R., Cooke, P., Jenkinson, C. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery. 2011, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,February 2012, vol. 94-B no. 2:205-209

Miscellaneous

Links

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!

References

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Jill Dawson, Jane Coffey, Helen Doll, Grahame Lavis, Paul Cooke, Mark Herron and Crispin Jenkinson. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: Validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. 2006. Quality of Life Research, Volume 15, Number 7:1211-1222.
  2. Dawson J, Doll H, Coffey J, Jenkinson C; Oxford and Birmingham Foot and Ankle Clinical Research Group. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Aug;15(8):918-31. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
  3. J. Dawson, I. Boller, H. Doll, G. Lavis, R. Sharp, P. Cooke, C. Jenkinson. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: Assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. The FootfckLRVolume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 92-102, June 2011
  4. Dawson, J., Boller, I., Doll, H., Lavis, G., Sharp, R., Cooke, P., Jenkinson, C. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery. 2011, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,February 2012, vol. 94-B no. 2:205-209

https://innovation.ox.ac.uk/outcome-measures/manchester-oxford-foot-questionnaire-moxfq/