Cervical Instability

Original Editor - Mary-Kate McCoy and Heather Lampe as part of the Temple University EBP Project

Top Contributors - Vanbeylen Antoine, Mary-Kate McCoy, Rachael Lowe, Admin, Pieter Piron, Sara Evenepoel, David Herteleer, Kim Jackson, Lucinda hampton, Heather Lampe, Laura Ritchie, Nick Van Doorsselaer, Daniele Barilla, WikiSysop, Simisola Ajeyalemi, Tony Lowe, Scott A Burns, 127.0.0.1, Jess Bell, Olajumoke Ogunleye, Beth Potter and Evan Thomas

Definition/Description

Cervical instability describes a wide range of conditions from neck pain and deformation without any clear proof over little malformations too complete failure of intervertebral connection¹⁵. White et al (1975)¹⁶ described cervical stability as: Cervical spine instability is defined as the loss of ability of cervical spine under physiological loads to maintain relationships between vertebrae in such a way, that spinal cord or nerve roots are not damaged or irritated and deformity or pain does not develop.

Clinically Relevant Anatomy

The cervical spine consist of 7 separate vertebrae. The first two vertebrae (referred as upper cervical spine) are highly specialized and differ from the other 5 cervical vertebrae (lower cervical) regarding anatomical structure and function.
The upper cervical spine is made of the atlas (C1) and the axis (C2). It comprises of two joint structures: one in between os occipital and atlas (atlanto-occipital joint), the other one between atlas and axis, which forms the atlanto-axial joint. The atlantoaxial joint is responsible for 50% of all cervical rotation; the atlanto-occipital joint is responsible for 50% of flexion and extension. ⁸
The craniocervical junction (atlanto-occipital joint), the lower atlanto-axial joint and other cervical segments are reinforced by internal as well as external ligaments. They secure the spinal stability of the cervical spine as a whole, together with surrounding postural muscles and allow cervical motion. They also provide proprioceptive information throughout the spinal nerve system to the brain.
Articulations include disk-vertebral body articulations, uncovertebral joints, and facet joints. The disk is thicker anteriorly as wel as its nearby ligamentous structures, contributing to normal cervical lordosis. The facet joints are oriented at a 45º angle to the axial plane, allowing a sliding motion; the joint capsule is weakest posteriorly. Supporting ligamentum flavum, posterior, and interspinous ligaments strengthen the posterior column but are thinner and therefore more fragile. ^9,10
The remaining 5 vertebrae form the lower cervical spine, C3-C7, are similar to each other but differ from the upper cervical spine as mentioned before. ¹¹

Epidemiology /Etiology

add text here

Characteristics/Clinical Presentation

Until this day there is no golden standard or acceptable measurement to diagnose cervical instability. Cervical instability is diagnosed as a combination of clinical findings and X-ray both dynamic and static. It is generally accepted that cervical instability is caused by trauma (one major trauma or repetitive microtrauma), rheumatoid arthritis or a tumor. Cervical instability leads to degenerative changes which effects the motion segment but may not be confused with severe incapacity or other signs of spinal cord compression.
A list of clinical findings composed by Magee et al¹⁷:
- Neckpain
- Complaints of locking/catching in the neck
- Weakness of the neck
- Altered ROM
- Neck pain and/or headaches provoked by sustained weightbearing postures and a relieve of those complaints in non-weighbearing positions
- Hypermobility and soft end-feeling in passive therapie
- Poor cervical muscle strength (multifidus, longus capitis, longus colli)
The findings in X-ray from Cervical Spine by Clark CL¹⁸ that combined with clinical findings can lead to a diagnosis of cervical instability.

Differential Diagnosis

add text here

Diagnostic Procedures

add text here related to medical diagnostic procedures

Outcome Measures

add links to outcome measures here (also see Outcome Measures Database)

Examination

MRI images could be useful to screen the integrity of the vertebral ligaments. Taking images during an anterior shear test or a distraction test shows a greater intervertebral distance and an increase in direct length of the ligaments.⁷

Medical Management

In the past few decades nonoperative maneuvers like traction, cast immobilization and long periods of bed rest had been replaced by the use of instrumentation to stabilize the spine after a trauma. This method can reduce the risk of negative sequelae of long term bed rest.¹² The cervical stability can be received by using posterior fixation such as lateral mass plating, processus spinosus or facet wiring and cervical pedicle screws. The choice of which fixation is best, can be made by the surgeon after seeing a CT-scan or MRI. In a retrospective study of Fehlings, the cervical spine stabilization was successful in 93% off the cases. ^12,13 Obviously this fixation procedure also holds some risks. It is possible that the spinal cord, vertebral artery, spinal nerve and facet joints get injured. Levine et al. reported radicular symptoms in 6 of their 72 patients. ¹⁴

Physical Therapy Management

Manipulation1: There is moderate evidence for manipulation when this technique is combined with mobilisation of the cervical spine. When manipulation is done, there is just low evidence for pain relief and improvement in function. Thoracic manipulation could be an additional therapy to realise pain reduction. In our opinion, cervical manipulation is not recommended when patients show a structural or functional instability.
Mobilisation: There is low evidence for improvement when only mobilisations are performed during the therapy.^1,2 There is no difference compared with acupuncture for acute pain reduction.¹
Exercise: Stretching and strengthening of the cervical region and the areas around it shows a moderate quality of evidence in pain reduction and improvement in function on short term to intermediate follow-up.2 Dusunceli et al showed that neck stabilization exercise programme gives a beter outcome in pain and disability compared with isometric and stretching exercises. ⁵ This exercise programme consisted from exercises in front of the mirror and upper extremity exercises in with the cervical spine in a neutral position. ⁵ Other authors describe no significant difference in these primary outcomes but show a decrease in medication intake in an exercise group with specific stabilization exercises compared with a general programme^.6
Electrotherapy: Very low to low evidence is available that TENS, EMS, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy and repetitive magnetic stimulation show a greater therapy effect compared with a placebo treatment.⁴
Patient education: When doing physical exercises with patients, the therapist has to convince the patient about its positive effects to avoid patient’s satisfaction.²
Traction: A review based on 7 RCT’s shows no significant difference in pain reducation and daily functioning when a traction therapy is compared with a placebo traction.⁴

Key Research

add links and reviews of high quality evidence here (case studies should be added on new pages using the case study template)

Resources

add appropriate resources here

Clinical Bottom Line

add text here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)

see tutorial on Adding PubMed Feed

References

1) Gross A. Miller J, D’Sylva J, Burnie S.J, Goldsmith C.H, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving J.L. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain. The Cochrane Library, 12/05/2010. evidence level: 1A (review)
2) Kay T.M, Gross A, Goldsmith C.H, Rutherford S, Voth S, Hovingg J.L, Bronfort G, Santaguida P.L. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. The Cochrane Library, 15/08/2010. Evidence level: 1A (review)
3) Kroeling P, Gross A, Goldsmith C.H, Burnie S.J, Haines T, Graham N, Brant A. Electrotherapy for neck pain. The Cochrane Library, 17/03/2010. Evidence level: 1A (review)
4) Graham N, Gross A, Goldsmith C.H, Moffett J.K, Haines T, Burnie S.J, Peloso P.M.J. Mechanical traction for neck pain with or without radiculopathy. The Cochrane Library, 17/02/2010. Evidence level: 1A (review)
5) Dusunceli Y, Ozturk C, Atamaz F, Hepguler S, Durmaz B. Efficacy of neck stabilization exercises for neck pain: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 626-631. Evidence level: 1B
6) Griffiths C, Dziedzic K, Waterfield J, Sim J. Effectiveness of specific neck stabilization exercises or a general neck exercise program for chronic neck disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2009 Feb;36(2):390-7. Evidence level: 1B
7) Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, Rowe LJ. The anterior shear and distraction tests for craniocervical instability. An evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging. Man Ther. 2012 Oct;17(5):416-21. Level of evidence: 1B
8) Windsor, R. “Cervical Spine Anatomy.” Updated april 9, 2013. (http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1948797-overview#a30)
9) White AA III, Panjabi MM. Kinematics of the spine. In: White AA III, Panjabi MM, eds. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1990:92-102.
10) Bogduk N. The clinical anatomy of the cervical dorsal rami. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Jul-Aug 1982;7(4):319-30.
11) Johnson R. Anatomy of the cervical spine and its related structures. In: Torg JS, ed. Athletic Injuries to the Head, Neck, and Face. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1991:371-83.
12) Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M? Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP. Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma: indications and techniques. Injury 2005 Jul;36 Suppl 2:B36-43. (Level of Evidence IA) Review
13) Fehlings MG, Cooper PR, Errico TJ. Posterior plates in the management of cervical instability: long-term results in 44 patients. J Neurosurg. 1994 Sep;81(3):341-9. (Level of evidence IIA)
14) Ebraheim N. Posterior lateral mass screw fixation: anatomic and radiographic considerations. The University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal 12: 66-72, 1999. (Level of evidence Ia) Review
15) Hunningher A, Calder I, (2007), Cervical Spine Surgery ,Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain (3): 81-84.
16) White AA et al (1975), Biomechanical analysis of cervical stability in the cervical spine Clin Orthop Relat Res; (109):85-96.
17) Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE, Quillen WS (2009) Cervical spine in Pathology an intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation p17-63 door Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE, Quillen WS, St-Louis, Saunders Elsevier
18) Clark CL et al, Functional anatomy of joints ligaments and disks in Cervical Spine 4th ed.p 46-54 door Clark CL, Philadelphia, Lipincott Wlliams & Wilkins