Mill’s Test: Difference between revisions
Kim Jackson (talk | contribs) (Updated categories) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==== Clinical presentation ==== | ==== Clinical presentation ==== | ||
Presenting equally in men and women, 1% to 3% of the population will experience lateral epicondylitis in their lifetime, usually between ages 35 and 50.<ref name="Nirschl RP">Nirschl RP, Ashman ES. Elbow tendinopathy: tennis elbow. | Presenting equally in men and women, 1% to 3% of the population will experience lateral epicondylitis in their lifetime, usually between ages 35 and 50.<ref name="Nirschl RP">Nirschl RP, Ashman ES. [https://www.sportsmed.theclinics.com/article/S0278-5919(03)00051-6/abstract Elbow tendinopathy: tennis elbow.] Clinics in sports medicine. 2003 Oct 1;22(4):813-36.</ref><ref name="Allander E. et al">Allander E. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/03009747409097141 Prevalence, incidence, and remission rates of some common rheumatic diseases or syndromes]. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. 1974 Jan 1;3(3):145-53.</ref> Patients report pain at the lateral elbow that radiates down the forearm. In addition, patients often complain of a weakened grip and difficulties lifting objects. On physical examination, patients typically have point tenderness medial and distal to the lateral epicondyle.<ref name="Whaley AL, Baker CL">Whaley AL, Baker CL. [https://europepmc.org/article/med/15474229 Lateral epicondylitis]. Clinics in sports medicine. 2004 Oct 1;23(4):677-91.</ref><ref name="Pomerance J. et al">Pomerance J. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105827460290282X Radiographic analysis of lateral epicondylitis]. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2002 Mar 1;11(2):156-7.</ref> | ||
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 577px; height: 157px" | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 577px; height: 157px" | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Patient age | | Patient age | ||
| Mechanism of injury | | Mechanism of injury | ||
| Symptoms | | Symptoms aggravated by | ||
| Observation | | Observation | ||
| Tenderness with palpation | | Tenderness with palpation | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| 35-55 | | 35-55 | ||
| Gradual overuse | | Gradual overuse | ||
| Activities involving wrist | | Activities involving wrist extension/grasping | ||
| Possible swelling (over lateral elbow) | | Possible swelling (over the lateral elbow) | ||
| Lateral elbow (over extensor carpi radialis brevis) | | Lateral elbow (over extensor carpi radialis brevis) | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==== Pathology ==== | ==== Pathology ==== | ||
The histological aspects of the injury to the ECRB origin appears to be multifaceted, involving hypovascular zones, eccentric & concentric tendon stresses, and a microscopic degenerative response.<u><ref name="FARO F et al"> | The histological aspects of the injury to the ECRB origin appears to be multifaceted, involving hypovascular zones, eccentric & concentric tendon stresses, and a microscopic degenerative response.<u><ref name="FARO F et al">Faro F, Wolf JM. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502307006491 Lateral epicondylitis: review and current concepts.] The Journal of hand surgery. 2007 Oct 1;32(8):1271-9.</ref></u> | ||
[[Image:Mills test 1.png|frame|right|Mills test 1.png]] | [[Image:Mills test 1.png|frame|right|Mills test 1.png]] | ||
<br>In most cases the lesion involves the specialized junctional tissue (intercel adhesion molecules) at the origin of the common extensor muscle at the lateral humeral epicondyle, specifically the tendinous origin of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB), and in 35% of the cases the origin of the ECRL will also be overstrained.<ref name="Pecina M. and Bojanic">Pecina M. Bojanic. Overuse injuries of the musculoskeletal system. CRC press Boca Rotan, USA, 1993</ref> The lesion is characterized by microscopic tears, which may be superficial or deep and situated at the tendinous origin of ECRB into the periosteum of the lateral humeral epicondyle. Microavulsion fractures may be seen as well as lymphocyte infiltration, calcification, scar tissue, and fibrinoid degeneration may be evident in some cases; repair is by immature fibroblasts.<ref name="Wadsworth T et al">Wadsworth | <br>In most cases, the lesion involves the specialized junctional tissue (intercel adhesion molecules) at the origin of the common extensor muscle at the lateral humeral epicondyle, specifically the tendinous origin of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB), and in 35% of the cases, the origin of the ECRL will also be overstrained.<ref name="Pecina M. and Bojanic">Pecina M. Bojanic. Overuse injuries of the musculoskeletal system. CRC press Boca Rotan, USA, 1993</ref> The lesion is characterized by microscopic tears, which may be superficial or deep and situated at the tendinous origin of ECRB into the periosteum of the lateral humeral epicondyle. Microavulsion fractures may be seen as well as lymphocyte infiltration, calcification, scar tissue, and fibrinoid degeneration may be evident in some cases; repair is by immature fibroblasts.<ref name="Wadsworth T et al">Wadsworth TG. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc1245660/ Tennis elbow: conservative, surgical, and manipulative treatment]. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.). 1987 Mar 7;294(6572):621.</ref><ref name="Geoffroy P., et al.">Geoffroy P, Yaffe MJ, Rohan I. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2379994/ Diagnosing and treating lateral epicondylitis]. Canadian Family Physician. 1994 Jan;40:73.</ref> | ||
= Technique = | = Technique = | ||
1. Patient is seated.<br>2. The clinician palpates the patient’s lateral epicondyle with one hand | 1. Patient is seated.<br>2. The clinician palpates the patient’s lateral epicondyle with one hand while pronating the patient’s forearm, fully flexing the wrist, the elbow extended. <br>3. A reproduction of pain in the area of the insertion at the lateral epicondyle indicates a positive test.<ref name="Geoffroy P., et al." /> | ||
{{#ev:youtube|gBReeVQqmpc}}<ref>[https://youtu.be/gBReeVQqmpc/ Tennis elbow test - Mills test] [Accessed 9 November 2020]</ref> | {{#ev:youtube|gBReeVQqmpc}}<ref>[https://youtu.be/gBReeVQqmpc/ Tennis elbow test - Mills test] [Accessed 9 November 2020]</ref> | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
[[Cozen’s Test|<u>Cozen’s test</u>]] = Resisted wrist extension with radial deviation and full pronation | [[Cozen’s Test|<u>Cozen’s test</u>]] = Resisted wrist extension with radial deviation and full pronation | ||
<u>Chair lift test</u> = Lifting the back of a chair with a three finger pinch (thumb, index long fingers) and the elbow fully extended | <u>Chair lift test</u> = Lifting the back of a chair with a three-finger pinch (thumb, index long fingers) and the elbow fully extended | ||
= Key Research = | = Key Research = | ||
A study (By Tuomo Pienimäki et al. 2002) found that pain thresholds at the lateral epicondyles are strongly associated with pain on palpation and a positive Mills test, providing evidence.<ref name="Tuomo Pienimäki et al"> | A study (By Tuomo Pienimäki et al. 2002) found that pain thresholds at the lateral epicondyles are strongly associated with pain on palpation and a positive Mills test, providing evidence.<ref name="Tuomo Pienimäki et al">Pienimäki T, Tarvainen T, Siira P, Malmivaara A, Vanharanta H. [https://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/fulltext/2002/05000/associations_between_pain,_grip_strength,_and.5.aspx Associations between pain, grip strength, and manual tests in the treatment evaluation of chronic tennis elbow]. The Clinical journal of pain. 2002 May 1;18(3):164-70.</ref> | ||
Wadsworth found that a forceful Mills movement under general | Wadsworth found that a forceful Mills movement under general anaesthesia produces an audible snap and provides good results, although no scientific reason is given. Hereby giving evidence for the effectiveness of the movement itself. | ||
The Mills test is a very straightforward test who is described in most of the physical therapy manuals. Knowing that expert opinion is only level 5 evidence, consensus about diagnostic effectiveness by a range of experts | The Mills test is a very straightforward test who is described in most of the physical therapy manuals. Knowing that expert opinion is only level 5 evidence, consensus about diagnostic effectiveness by a range of experts can be used to make weak recommendations where there is a lack of higher quality evidence. | ||
More research is required. | More research is required. | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
= Resources = | = Resources = | ||
The Mills test is named after the clinical findings by G Percival Mills, F.R.C.S who published his findings in The British Medical Journal (Jan 7th 1928)<ref name="G. Percival Mills">G. Percival Mills Treatment of tennis elbow. The British medical journal 12. Jan 7. 1928</ref> and updated this on July 31. 1937.<ref name="GP Mills"> | The Mills test is named after the clinical findings by G Percival Mills, F.R.C.S who published his findings in The British Medical Journal (Jan 7th 1928)<ref name="G. Percival Mills">G. Percival Mills Treatment of tennis elbow. The British medical journal 12. Jan 7. 1928</ref> and updated this on July 31. 1937.<ref name="GP Mills">Mills GP. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2087033/ Treatment of tennis elbow.] British medical journal. 1937 Jul 31;2(3995):212.</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 22:18, 18 February 2021
Original Editor - Tyler Shultz, Matthias Verlinden
Top Contributors - Matthias Verlinden, Evan Thomas, Admin, Aminat Abolade, Rachael Lowe, Kim Jackson, Jennifer Chew, Tony Lowe, Magdalena Hytros, Mohit Chand, Tyler Shultz, Gayatri Jadav Upadhyay, Wanda van Niekerk, Francky Petit, Bert Pluym, Kai A. Sigel, WikiSysop and Claire Knott
Purpose[edit | edit source]
Diagnosing Lateral Epicondylitis in the elbow, also known as “Tennis Elbow”.
Clinical presentation[edit | edit source]
Presenting equally in men and women, 1% to 3% of the population will experience lateral epicondylitis in their lifetime, usually between ages 35 and 50.[1][2] Patients report pain at the lateral elbow that radiates down the forearm. In addition, patients often complain of a weakened grip and difficulties lifting objects. On physical examination, patients typically have point tenderness medial and distal to the lateral epicondyle.[3][4]
| Condition | Patient age | Mechanism of injury | Symptoms aggravated by | Observation | Tenderness with palpation |
|
Lateral epicondylitis |
35-55 | Gradual overuse | Activities involving wrist extension/grasping | Possible swelling (over the lateral elbow) | Lateral elbow (over extensor carpi radialis brevis) |
Pathology[edit | edit source]
The histological aspects of the injury to the ECRB origin appears to be multifaceted, involving hypovascular zones, eccentric & concentric tendon stresses, and a microscopic degenerative response.[5]
Mills test 1.png
In most cases, the lesion involves the specialized junctional tissue (intercel adhesion molecules) at the origin of the common extensor muscle at the lateral humeral epicondyle, specifically the tendinous origin of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB), and in 35% of the cases, the origin of the ECRL will also be overstrained.[6] The lesion is characterized by microscopic tears, which may be superficial or deep and situated at the tendinous origin of ECRB into the periosteum of the lateral humeral epicondyle. Microavulsion fractures may be seen as well as lymphocyte infiltration, calcification, scar tissue, and fibrinoid degeneration may be evident in some cases; repair is by immature fibroblasts.[7][8]
Technique[edit | edit source]
1. Patient is seated.
2. The clinician palpates the patient’s lateral epicondyle with one hand while pronating the patient’s forearm, fully flexing the wrist, the elbow extended.
3. A reproduction of pain in the area of the insertion at the lateral epicondyle indicates a positive test.[8]
Other Techniques to Diagnose Lateral Epicondylitis[edit | edit source]
Maudsley’s test = Resisted third digit extension
Cozen’s test = Resisted wrist extension with radial deviation and full pronation
Chair lift test = Lifting the back of a chair with a three-finger pinch (thumb, index long fingers) and the elbow fully extended
Key Research[edit | edit source]
A study (By Tuomo Pienimäki et al. 2002) found that pain thresholds at the lateral epicondyles are strongly associated with pain on palpation and a positive Mills test, providing evidence.[10]
Wadsworth found that a forceful Mills movement under general anaesthesia produces an audible snap and provides good results, although no scientific reason is given. Hereby giving evidence for the effectiveness of the movement itself.
The Mills test is a very straightforward test who is described in most of the physical therapy manuals. Knowing that expert opinion is only level 5 evidence, consensus about diagnostic effectiveness by a range of experts can be used to make weak recommendations where there is a lack of higher quality evidence.
More research is required.
Resources[edit | edit source]
The Mills test is named after the clinical findings by G Percival Mills, F.R.C.S who published his findings in The British Medical Journal (Jan 7th 1928)[11] and updated this on July 31. 1937.[12]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Nirschl RP, Ashman ES. Elbow tendinopathy: tennis elbow. Clinics in sports medicine. 2003 Oct 1;22(4):813-36.
- ↑ Allander E. Prevalence, incidence, and remission rates of some common rheumatic diseases or syndromes. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. 1974 Jan 1;3(3):145-53.
- ↑ Whaley AL, Baker CL. Lateral epicondylitis. Clinics in sports medicine. 2004 Oct 1;23(4):677-91.
- ↑ Pomerance J. Radiographic analysis of lateral epicondylitis. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2002 Mar 1;11(2):156-7.
- ↑ Faro F, Wolf JM. Lateral epicondylitis: review and current concepts. The Journal of hand surgery. 2007 Oct 1;32(8):1271-9.
- ↑ Pecina M. Bojanic. Overuse injuries of the musculoskeletal system. CRC press Boca Rotan, USA, 1993
- ↑ Wadsworth TG. Tennis elbow: conservative, surgical, and manipulative treatment. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.). 1987 Mar 7;294(6572):621.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Geoffroy P, Yaffe MJ, Rohan I. Diagnosing and treating lateral epicondylitis. Canadian Family Physician. 1994 Jan;40:73.
- ↑ Tennis elbow test - Mills test [Accessed 9 November 2020]
- ↑ Pienimäki T, Tarvainen T, Siira P, Malmivaara A, Vanharanta H. Associations between pain, grip strength, and manual tests in the treatment evaluation of chronic tennis elbow. The Clinical journal of pain. 2002 May 1;18(3):164-70.
- ↑ G. Percival Mills Treatment of tennis elbow. The British medical journal 12. Jan 7. 1928
- ↑ Mills GP. Treatment of tennis elbow. British medical journal. 1937 Jul 31;2(3995):212.
