Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S): Difference between revisions

(New page: {{subst:Outcome Measures}})
 
mNo edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Kirsten Ryan|Kirsten Ryan]]


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;  
</div>  
</div>  
== Objective<br>  ==
== Objective<br>  ==
The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a global index that may be used to rate the severity of a specific condition (a single-state scale).&nbsp; It is a simple, direct, easy to use scale that is intuitively understandable to clinicians.<ref name="Yalcin">Yalcin I, Bump R. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:98-101.</ref>


== Intended Population<br>  ==
== Intended Population<br>  ==
The PGI-S was validated on women with stress urinary incontinence.&nbsp; It has not been established to be applicable to men and women with other lower urinary tract symptoms or conditions.<ref name="Yalcin" />


== Method of Use  ==
== Method of Use  ==
The PGI-S is a single question asking the patient to rate how their urinary tract condition is now on a scale of 1.&nbsp; Normal to 4.&nbsp; Severe.<ref name="Yalcin" />


== Reference<br>  ==
== Reference<br>  ==
Line 17: Line 23:


=== Validity  ===
=== Validity  ===
The PGI-S has excellent construct validity.&nbsp;&nbsp;The assessment variables included incontinence episode frequency, the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, and fixed volume (400 mL) stress pad test results. The category differences for all variables was highly significant (P&lt; .0001).<ref name="Yalcin" />


=== Responsiveness  ===
=== Responsiveness  ===


=== Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span><br>  ===
=== Miscellaneous<br>  ===


== Links  ==
Global ratings can precise when used to assess the same person over time but they have a degress of imprecision across the spectrum of different people who might use it.<ref name="Yalcin" />


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>
</div>
== References  ==
== References  ==


References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].
<references />


<references />
[[Category:Outcome_Measures]]

Latest revision as of 00:46, 5 August 2019

Original Editor - Kirsten Ryan

Top Contributors - Kirsten Ryan, Admin, WikiSysop and Kim Jackson  

Objective
[edit | edit source]

The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a global index that may be used to rate the severity of a specific condition (a single-state scale).  It is a simple, direct, easy to use scale that is intuitively understandable to clinicians.[1]

Intended Population
[edit | edit source]

The PGI-S was validated on women with stress urinary incontinence.  It has not been established to be applicable to men and women with other lower urinary tract symptoms or conditions.[1]

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

The PGI-S is a single question asking the patient to rate how their urinary tract condition is now on a scale of 1.  Normal to 4.  Severe.[1]

Reference
[edit | edit source]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability[edit | edit source]

Validity[edit | edit source]

The PGI-S has excellent construct validity.  The assessment variables included incontinence episode frequency, the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, and fixed volume (400 mL) stress pad test results. The category differences for all variables was highly significant (P< .0001).[1]

Responsiveness[edit | edit source]

Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]

Global ratings can precise when used to assess the same person over time but they have a degress of imprecision across the spectrum of different people who might use it.[1]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Yalcin I, Bump R. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:98-101.