Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective == | == Objective == | ||
The International Continence Society (ICS), the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons came to agreement in 1996, for a graded objective measure to be used in the assessment of female pelvic organ prolapse<ref>Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056425/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP–Q)–a new era in pelvic prolapse staging]. Journal of medicine and life. 2011 Feb 15;4(1):75.</ref><ref name=":0">Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney‐Geany S, Drake MJ. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/nau.23740 How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP‐Q) system?]. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2018 Aug;37(S6):S39-43.</ref>. This system provides characterisation of a patient's prolapse and allows a uniform recording method to be used by clinicians that enables contrast and disclosure of findings<ref name=":0" />. | The International Continence Society (ICS), the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons came to agreement in 1996, for a graded objective measure to be used in the assessment of female pelvic organ prolapse<ref>Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056425/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP–Q)–a new era in pelvic prolapse staging]. Journal of medicine and life. 2011 Feb 15;4(1):75.</ref><ref name=":0">Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney‐Geany S, Drake MJ. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/nau.23740 How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP‐Q) system?]. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2018 Aug;37(S6):S39-43.</ref>. This system provides characterisation of a patient's prolapse and allows a uniform recording method to be used by clinicians that enables contrast and disclosure of findings<ref name=":0" />. This system was named the 'Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System' and is generally used in clinical setting <ref>Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD. [https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(03)01119-0/fulltext Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2003 Dec 1;189(6):1632-5.</ref>. | ||
== Intended Population == | == Intended Population == | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 15 September 2020
Original Editor - User Name
Top Contributors - Jacintha McGahan, Mila Andreew and Kim Jackson
Objective[edit | edit source]
The International Continence Society (ICS), the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons came to agreement in 1996, for a graded objective measure to be used in the assessment of female pelvic organ prolapse[1][2]. This system provides characterisation of a patient's prolapse and allows a uniform recording method to be used by clinicians that enables contrast and disclosure of findings[2]. This system was named the 'Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System' and is generally used in clinical setting [3].
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Validity
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Links[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP–Q)–a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. Journal of medicine and life. 2011 Feb 15;4(1):75.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney‐Geany S, Drake MJ. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP‐Q) system?. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2018 Aug;37(S6):S39-43.
- ↑ Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD. Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2003 Dec 1;189(6):1632-5.
