Ankle Lateral Ligament Injury Assessment: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- Mariam Hashem '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} </div> == Introducti...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
High iccurance and reocurance rate and high rate if going into CIA | |||
Clear management depends on clear Ax strategy | |||
Assessment: | |||
Initially you assess the MOI. If the athlete is not able to continue to play, a decision has to be made on safety and ability to continue the game. | |||
2 weeks post injur: Ax of CAI (checklist) | |||
Comlpete CAIT questionnaire | |||
Ottawa rule- if needed Rx- if +ve seek medical referral | |||
if ottawa is absent: we need to check on the athlete's ability to compete- check again in 2 wks for CAIT questionnaire | |||
not able to compete: full Ax of injury | |||
Subjective: MOI, identify cont. factors, | |||
obejective: laxity, Ant drawer, talar tilt, syndesmosis, base line for swelling, isometric eversion/abduciton and cumberland | |||
++ laxity- medical | |||
Ottawa rules: | |||
Staight forward: if positive, refer for medical/radiological Ax | |||
1-Tenderness on plapation of : | |||
A-posterior edge/dip of lateral malleoulus | |||
B-Posterior edge/dip of medial malleoulus | |||
C-Base of 5th metatarsal | |||
D-Navicular | |||
Image? | |||
2-Inability to fully weight bear for normal 4 steps at time of injury or on examination | |||
Laxity tests: | |||
ANterior drawer | |||
talar tilt | |||
Syndesmosis Testing: | |||
Squeeze test | |||
dorsi flexion-external rotation test | |||
Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT)- cut off 11.5 > unlikely to progress . less: high likely to progress | |||
Chronic ankle instability checklist: | |||
identifies afailed outcome of rehabilitation following an ATFL injury and increased risk of developing CAI. | |||
ROM markers: | |||
WB ankle DF < 34 degrees | |||
Strength markers: | |||
isometric hip abduction strength <34% of body weight | |||
Balance-stability markers: | |||
Single-leg balance test <10 seconds and on toes < 5 seconds | |||
Revision as of 21:47, 6 November 2019
Original Editor - Mariam Hashem
Top Contributors - Mariam Hashem, Kim Jackson, Tarina van der Stockt, Jess Bell and Olajumoke Ogunleye
Introduction[edit | edit source]
High iccurance and reocurance rate and high rate if going into CIA
Clear management depends on clear Ax strategy
Assessment:
Initially you assess the MOI. If the athlete is not able to continue to play, a decision has to be made on safety and ability to continue the game.
2 weeks post injur: Ax of CAI (checklist)
Comlpete CAIT questionnaire
Ottawa rule- if needed Rx- if +ve seek medical referral
if ottawa is absent: we need to check on the athlete's ability to compete- check again in 2 wks for CAIT questionnaire
not able to compete: full Ax of injury
Subjective: MOI, identify cont. factors,
obejective: laxity, Ant drawer, talar tilt, syndesmosis, base line for swelling, isometric eversion/abduciton and cumberland
++ laxity- medical
Ottawa rules:
Staight forward: if positive, refer for medical/radiological Ax
1-Tenderness on plapation of :
A-posterior edge/dip of lateral malleoulus
B-Posterior edge/dip of medial malleoulus
C-Base of 5th metatarsal
D-Navicular
Image?
2-Inability to fully weight bear for normal 4 steps at time of injury or on examination
Laxity tests:
ANterior drawer
talar tilt
Syndesmosis Testing:
Squeeze test
dorsi flexion-external rotation test
Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT)- cut off 11.5 > unlikely to progress . less: high likely to progress
Chronic ankle instability checklist:
identifies afailed outcome of rehabilitation following an ATFL injury and increased risk of developing CAI.
ROM markers:
WB ankle DF < 34 degrees
Strength markers:
isometric hip abduction strength <34% of body weight
Balance-stability markers:
Single-leg balance test <10 seconds and on toes < 5 seconds