Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective == | == Objective == | ||
Infant Neurological International battery ( INFANIB) is the outcome tool used for the assessment of neuromotor development in infants aged 0-18 months. | Infant Neurological International battery ( INFANIB) is the outcome tool used for the assessment of neuromotor development in infants aged 0-18 months.It was established by Ellison et al. in 1985.<ref name=":0">Ellison PH, Horn JL, Browning CA. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2412245 Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy.] Physical therapy. 1985 Sep 1;65(9):1326-31.</ref> The original INFANIB was a 20-item battery with five factors; Spasticity, Vestibular Function, Head and Trunk, French Angles and Legs. It consist of assessment of posture, extremity and axial tone, primitive reflexes, and postural reaction.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">Liao W, Wen EY, Li C, Chang Q, Lv KL, Yang W, He ZM, Zhao CM. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565932/ Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes for at-risk infants: reliability and predictive validity using a Chinese version of the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months.] BMC pediatrics. 2012 Dec;12(1):72.</ref> It is the simple, time saving and easy to learn. | ||
It help in | |||
# As first year of infant's life is critical period for brain development due to brain plasticity thus helps in early identification and intervention of neuromotor abnormalities.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
# Normal INFANIB can be used as to reassure parents of risk infants.<ref>Sung IY, Kang W. [https://www.e-arm.org/journal/view.php?number=2972 Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) as a Predictor of Neuromotor Outcome in Risk Infants.] Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1997 Apr 1;21(2):406-13.</ref> | |||
# It can be used to compare the neuromotor assessment of infant both in infants (example: birth) and later variables ( cerebral palsy, cognitive function, school performances)<ref name=":1" /> | |||
== Intended Population == | |||
Neonate and Infant aged 1-18 months. | |||
High risk infants with premature deliveries, low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, birth asphysia, intraventricular hemorrage, respiratory distress, congenital heart diseases,<ref name=":0" /> | |||
== Method of Use == | |||
it is a observational scale to assess all neuromotor status done by medical professionals. <ref>Ellison PH. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Scoring-sheet-for-the-Infant-Neurological-Battery-Ellison/a43113da9883cbe5fe1ee03599c53d1f6165ebef Scoring Sheet for the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) Suggestion from the Field. Physical therapy.] 1986 Apr 1;66(4):548-50.</ref> | |||
= | Here is the scoring sheet for INFANIB.[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a431/13da9883cbe5fe1ee03599c53d1f6165ebef.pdf?_ga=2.240750593.321173841.1550414240-688181058.1550414240] | ||
== | == Psychometric Properties == | ||
=== Reliability === | === Reliability === | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)- 0.90 | intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)- 0.90 | ||
<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span> | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 17 February 2019
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Top Contributors - Manisha Shrestha and Kim Jackson
Objective[edit | edit source]
Infant Neurological International battery ( INFANIB) is the outcome tool used for the assessment of neuromotor development in infants aged 0-18 months.It was established by Ellison et al. in 1985.[1] The original INFANIB was a 20-item battery with five factors; Spasticity, Vestibular Function, Head and Trunk, French Angles and Legs. It consist of assessment of posture, extremity and axial tone, primitive reflexes, and postural reaction.[1][2] It is the simple, time saving and easy to learn.
It help in
- As first year of infant's life is critical period for brain development due to brain plasticity thus helps in early identification and intervention of neuromotor abnormalities.[2]
- Normal INFANIB can be used as to reassure parents of risk infants.[3]
- It can be used to compare the neuromotor assessment of infant both in infants (example: birth) and later variables ( cerebral palsy, cognitive function, school performances)[2]
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Neonate and Infant aged 1-18 months.
High risk infants with premature deliveries, low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, birth asphysia, intraventricular hemorrage, respiratory distress, congenital heart diseases,[1]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
it is a observational scale to assess all neuromotor status done by medical professionals. [4]
Here is the scoring sheet for INFANIB.[1]
Psychometric Properties[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
sensitivity - 90%
specificity- 83%
positive predictive value- 79%
negative predictive value- 93%
intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)- 0.90
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ellison PH, Horn JL, Browning CA. Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy. Physical therapy. 1985 Sep 1;65(9):1326-31.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Liao W, Wen EY, Li C, Chang Q, Lv KL, Yang W, He ZM, Zhao CM. Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes for at-risk infants: reliability and predictive validity using a Chinese version of the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months. BMC pediatrics. 2012 Dec;12(1):72.
- ↑ Sung IY, Kang W. Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) as a Predictor of Neuromotor Outcome in Risk Infants. Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1997 Apr 1;21(2):406-13.
- ↑ Ellison PH. Scoring Sheet for the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) Suggestion from the Field. Physical therapy. 1986 Apr 1;66(4):548-50.
