Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
</div>  
</div>  
== Objective  ==
== Objective  ==
Infant Neurological International battery ( INFANIB) is the outcome tool used for the assessment of neuromotor development in infants aged 0-18 months.It was established by Ellison et al. in 1985.<ref name=":0">Ellison PH, Horn JL, Browning CA. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2412245 Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy.] Physical therapy. 1985 Sep 1;65(9):1326-31.</ref>  The original INFANIB was a 20-item battery with five factors; Spasticity, Vestibular Function, Head and Trunk, French Angles and Legs. It consist of assessment of  posture, extremity and axial tone, primitive reflexes, and postural reaction.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">Liao W, Wen EY, Li C, Chang Q, Lv KL, Yang W, He ZM, Zhao CM. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565932/ Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes for at-risk infants: reliability and predictive validity using a Chinese version of the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months.] BMC pediatrics. 2012 Dec;12(1):72.</ref> It is the simple, time saving and easy to learn.
Infant Neurological International battery ( INFANIB) is the developmental screening tool used for the assessment of neuromotor development in infants aged 0-18 months.It was established by Ellison et al. in 1985.<ref name=":0">Ellison PH, Horn JL, Browning CA. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2412245 Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy.] Physical therapy. 1985 Sep 1;65(9):1326-31.</ref>  The original INFANIB was a 20-item battery with five factors; Spasticity, Vestibular Function, Head and Trunk, French Angles and Legs. Many of the test items on the INFANIB were derived from other neuromotor test including the Milani-Comparetti and Gidoni scale.It consist of assessment of  posture, extremity and axial tone, primitive reflexes, and postural reaction.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">Liao W, Wen EY, Li C, Chang Q, Lv KL, Yang W, He ZM, Zhao CM. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565932/ Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes for at-risk infants: reliability and predictive validity using a Chinese version of the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months.] BMC pediatrics. 2012 Dec;12(1):72.</ref> It is the simple, time saving and easy to learn.


It help in  
It is used to distinguish infants with normal neuromotor function from those with the abnormal findings and to predict need for follow up treatment and further helps in  
# As first year of infant's life is critical period for brain development due to brain plasticity thus helps in early identification and intervention of neuromotor abnormalities.<ref name=":1" />
# As first year of infant's life is critical period for brain development due to brain plasticity thus helps in early identification and intervention of neuromotor abnormalities.<ref name=":1" />
# Normal INFANIB can be used as to reassure parents of risk infants.<ref>Sung IY, Kang W. [https://www.e-arm.org/journal/view.php?number=2972 Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) as a Predictor of Neuromotor Outcome in Risk Infants.] Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1997 Apr 1;21(2):406-13.</ref>
# Normal INFANIB can be used as to reassure parents of risk infants.<ref>Sung IY, Kang W. [https://www.e-arm.org/journal/view.php?number=2972 Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) as a Predictor of Neuromotor Outcome in Risk Infants.] Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1997 Apr 1;21(2):406-13.</ref>
Line 13: Line 13:


== Intended Population  ==
== Intended Population  ==
Neonate and Infant aged 1-18 months.  
It is used to evaluate neonates and infants aged 1-18 months who are high risk infants with premature deliveries, low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, birth asphysia, intraventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress, congenital heart diseases and slow development.<ref name=":0" />
== Method of Use  ==
It is a '''observational scale''' to assess all neuromotor status done by medical professionals. <ref>Ellison PH. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Scoring-sheet-for-the-Infant-Neurological-Battery-Ellison/a43113da9883cbe5fe1ee03599c53d1f6165ebef Scoring Sheet for the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) Suggestion from the Field. Physical therapy.] 1986 Apr 1;66(4):548-50.</ref>
 
It doesnot require any special training to administer.
 
'''Equipment required:''' Pen, Scoring Sheet, Goniometer.


High risk infants with premature deliveries, low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, birth asphysia, intraventricular hemorrage, respiratory distress, congenital heart diseases,<ref name=":0" />
Before assessing the infant, it is very essential to calculate corrected gestational age  whether the infant is preterm or post-term and tally the corrected age with start score while scoring each items.


== Method of Use  ==
The score of each item is mentioned in the score sheet itself based upon age and calculating total score will determine the neuromotor state of infants.
it is a observational scale to assess all neuromotor status done by medical professionals. <ref>Ellison PH. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Scoring-sheet-for-the-Infant-Neurological-Battery-Ellison/a43113da9883cbe5fe1ee03599c53d1f6165ebef Scoring Sheet for the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) Suggestion from the Field. Physical therapy.] 1986 Apr 1;66(4):548-50.</ref>


Here is the scoring sheet for INFANIB.[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a431/13da9883cbe5fe1ee03599c53d1f6165ebef.pdf?_ga=2.240750593.321173841.1550414240-688181058.1550414240]     
Here is the scoring sheet for INFANIB.[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a431/13da9883cbe5fe1ee03599c53d1f6165ebef.pdf?_ga=2.240750593.321173841.1550414240-688181058.1550414240]     
  `div class="row"`
  `div class="row"`
`div class="col-md-6"` {{#ev: youtube| sB5CRV7SS-Q}} `div class="test-right"``Taylor Albert. INFANIB. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB5CRV7SS-Q [last assessed 17/2/2019]`ref``/div``/div`
`div class="col-md-6"` {{#ev: youtube| sB5CRV7SS-Q}} `div class="test-right"``Taylor Albert. INFANIB. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB5CRV7SS-Q [last assessed 17/2/2019]`ref``/div``/div`
`div class="col-md-6"` {{#ev: youtube| oDmn3DKWQxA}} `div class="test-right"``Taylor Albert. INFANIB- Part 2. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDmn3DKWQxA [last assessed 17/2/2019]`ref``/div``/div`
`div class="col-md-6"` {{#ev: youtube| oDmn3DKWQxA}} `div class="test-right"``Taylor Albert. INFANIB- Part 2. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDmn3DKWQxA [last assessed 17/2/2019]`ref``/div``/div`




== Psychometric Properties  ==
== Psychometric Properties  ==
Several studies had been done in several countries  for the cross-cultural translation and identification of psychometric properties of INFANIB.


=== Reliability  ===
The study done in Iran by Soleimani and Dadkhah shows its sensitivity was 90%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value (PPV) 79% and negative predictive value (NPV) 93% with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.90. Thus proposed INFANIB as a appropriate and reliable measurement for gross motor developmental delay.<ref>Soleimani F, Dadkhah A. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00704.x Validity and reliability of Infant Neurological International Battery for detection of gross motor developmental delay in Iran. Child: care, health and development.] 2007 May;33(3):262-5.</ref>
sensitivity - 90%
 
specificity- 83%
 
positive predictive value- 79%
 
negative predictive value- 93%
 
intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)- 0.90


<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span>   
Where as the other study done in China shown the interclass correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient values for the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months were >0.8, indicating excellent reliability with regard to inter- and intraobserver differences. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were high for both high-risk premature infants and full-term infants at the age of 10 months. For premature infants at the age of 7 months or below, INFANIB had low validity for detecting abnormalities.<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span>   
== Links ==
== References  ==
== References  ==



Revision as of 19:05, 17 February 2019

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Top Contributors - Manisha Shrestha and Kim Jackson  

Objective[edit | edit source]

Infant Neurological International battery ( INFANIB) is the developmental screening tool used for the assessment of neuromotor development in infants aged 0-18 months.It was established by Ellison et al. in 1985.[1] The original INFANIB was a 20-item battery with five factors; Spasticity, Vestibular Function, Head and Trunk, French Angles and Legs. Many of the test items on the INFANIB were derived from other neuromotor test including the Milani-Comparetti and Gidoni scale.It consist of assessment of posture, extremity and axial tone, primitive reflexes, and postural reaction.[1][2] It is the simple, time saving and easy to learn.

It is used to distinguish infants with normal neuromotor function from those with the abnormal findings and to predict need for follow up treatment and further helps in

  1. As first year of infant's life is critical period for brain development due to brain plasticity thus helps in early identification and intervention of neuromotor abnormalities.[2]
  2. Normal INFANIB can be used as to reassure parents of risk infants.[3]
  3. It can be used to compare the neuromotor assessment of infant both in infants (example: birth) and later variables ( cerebral palsy, cognitive function, school performances)[2]

Intended Population[edit | edit source]

It is used to evaluate neonates and infants aged 1-18 months who are high risk infants with premature deliveries, low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, birth asphysia, intraventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress, congenital heart diseases and slow development.[1]

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

It is a observational scale to assess all neuromotor status done by medical professionals. [4]

It doesnot require any special training to administer.

Equipment required: Pen, Scoring Sheet, Goniometer.

Before assessing the infant, it is very essential to calculate corrected gestational age whether the infant is preterm or post-term and tally the corrected age with start score while scoring each items.

The score of each item is mentioned in the score sheet itself based upon age and calculating total score will determine the neuromotor state of infants.

Here is the scoring sheet for INFANIB.[1]

`div class="row"`

`div class="col-md-6"`

`div class="test-right"``Taylor Albert. INFANIB. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB5CRV7SS-Q [last assessed 17/2/2019]`ref``/div``/div` `div class="col-md-6"`

`div class="test-right"``Taylor Albert. INFANIB- Part 2. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDmn3DKWQxA [last assessed 17/2/2019]`ref``/div``/div`


Psychometric Properties[edit | edit source]

Several studies had been done in several countries for the cross-cultural translation and identification of psychometric properties of INFANIB.

The study done in Iran by Soleimani and Dadkhah shows its sensitivity was 90%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value (PPV) 79% and negative predictive value (NPV) 93% with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.90. Thus proposed INFANIB as a appropriate and reliable measurement for gross motor developmental delay.[5]

Where as the other study done in China shown the interclass correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient values for the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months were >0.8, indicating excellent reliability with regard to inter- and intraobserver differences. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were high for both high-risk premature infants and full-term infants at the age of 10 months. For premature infants at the age of 7 months or below, INFANIB had low validity for detecting abnormalities.

References[edit | edit source]