Paediatric Limb Deficiency: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="noeditbox">Welcome to [[WCPT Network for Amputee Rehabilitation Project]]. This page is being developed by participants of a project to populate the Amputees section of Physiopedia.&nbsp;
<div class="editorbox">
*Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!! &nbsp;
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Shail Maharaj|Shail Maharaj]] as part of the [[World Physiotherapy Network for Amputee Rehabilitation Project]]  
*If you would like to get involved in this project and earn accreditation for your contributions, [mailto:[email protected] please get in touch]!
</div> <div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Lim Teong Eu|Lim Teong Eu]] [[User:Iz'zah Syahira Bt Salmey|Iz'zah Syahira Bt Salmey]] [[User:Tilakh Bahadur|Tilakh Bahadur]]  


'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;<br>  
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;<br>  
</div>  
</div>  
<br>
== Children are not little adults. ==


== Introduction  ==
Though there are some areas of general overlap, the management of limb loss in children is quite different to adults. Key differentiations in the rehabilitation protocols include<ref name=":0">Smith D, Michael J, Bowker J. Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles. 3rd Edition. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004.</ref>:


Limb deficiencies can be defined as a part or entire upper or lower limb failed to form its normal size or is missing. It can be classified into two:
#A high proportion of congenital limb deficiency versus acquired amputation
#Classification of congenital limb deficiencies
#An immature skeleton
#Adjustment
#Habilitation versus rehabilitation
#Growth and development considerations
#Paediatric distinctions when undergoing amputation


#Congenital and
== Congenital versus acquired loss: ==
#Acquired.


Congenital limb deficiencies can involve upper or lower limb, at birth due to several factors although the exact cause is unknown.Approximately 58% congenital limb deficiencies involving upper limb. Longitudinal deficiency <ref name="abdel">Abdel-Mota’al M., 201-. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency. Available at:&amp;lt; http://gait.aidi.udel.edu/educate/pffd.htm&amp;gt; [Accessed 3 February 2015]</ref>&nbsp;of hand and transverse below elbow limb deficiency are the most common presentation with 20% of children present with limb deficiencies affecting more than one limb. On the other hand,'''proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD)&nbsp;<ref name="lee">Lee M.C., 2014. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency. Medscape. [website] Available at:&amp;lt; http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1248323-overview#a0101&amp;gt; [Accessed 3 February 2015]</ref>''' is a term for complex lower extremity congenital limb deficiency. It may be unilateral or bilateral, which includes the absence of proximal femur involving the acetabulum, femoral head, patella, tibia and fibula. Both Aitken <ref name="aitken">Aitken, G.T.: Congenital short femur with fibular hemimelia. JBJS: 56 -A: 1306, 1974</ref>&nbsp;and Gillespie have developed a classification <ref name="skalski">Skalski M., et al., 201-. Classification of Proximal Focal Femoral Deficiency. Radiopeadia.org [website] Available at:&amp;lt; http://radiopaedia.org/articles/classification-of-proximal-focal-femoral-deficiency&amp;gt; [Accessed 3 February 2015]</ref>&nbsp;for PFFD based on severity and complexity of medical intervention respectively. Another 40% of childhood amputation is acquired amputations involving trauma and disease-related.  
Even with nomenclature, children and adults differ when it comes to describing limb loss. In paediatrics, the term ‘amputee’ or ‘amputation’ is replaced with limb difference or limb deficiency, as the majority of children with limb loss are born this way (i.e. congenital), and the limb is reduced from its normal size or is missing a portion of it<ref>Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA, Meyer RE, Correa A, Alverson CJ, Lupo PJ, Riehle‐Colarusso T, Cho SJ, Aggarwal D, Kirby RS. National population‐based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014. ''Birth Defects Research.'' 2019; 111(18): 1420-1435.</ref>. The proportion of congenital versus acquired limb deficiency were varied in different studies but congenital deficiencies are always the leading cause<ref>Al-Worikat AF, Dameh W. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/03093640701517083?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed Children with limb deficiencies: demographic characteristics.] Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Mar;32(1):23-8. doi: 10.1080/03093640701517083. PMID: 17852778.</ref>. An article from 2021, that describes the prevalence for lower limb loss in children in the US mentions congenital loss as the cause in 84% of the cases<ref>McLarney M, Pezzin L, McGinley E, Prosser L, Dillingham. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309364620968645?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed The prevalence of lower limb loss in children and associated costs of prosthetic devices: A national study of commercial insurance claims], Prosthetics and Orthotics International: April 2021 - Volume 45 - Issue 2 - p 115-122 doi: 10.1177/0309364620968645</ref>.  


== Classification  ==
For the proportion of children that suffer an acquired loss, the two primary causes are<ref>Loder R. [https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/2004/05000/Demographics_of_Traumatic_Amputations_in_Children_.6.aspx Demographics of Traumatic Amputations in Children, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery]: May 2004 - Volume 86 - Issue 5 - p 923-928 </ref>:


Various classification has been developed to congenital limb deficiencies. However,'''Swanson''' <ref name="swanson">Swanson A.B., 1976. A Classification for Congenital Limb Malformations. PubMed. [website] Available at:&amp;lt; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1021591&amp;gt; [Accessed 4 February 2015]</ref>&nbsp;and colleagues have modified the classification based on embryonic failure:-
#Traumatic (eg. lawn mower (29%), farm machinery (24%), motor vehicle accidents (16%), etc.).
#In other reasons for acquired limb loss, malignancy and infection are major causes of a defect.


#&nbsp;Failure of formation of parts
== Classification of congenital limb deficiencies:  ==
#&nbsp;Failure of differentiation of parts
#Duplication
#Overgrowth
#Undergrowth
#Congenital constriction band syndrome
#Generalized skeletal deformities <br><br>


== Causes <br> ==
Congenital limb deficiency means the partial or total absence of a limb at birth. Classification/description of these deficiencies has been more challenging than simply stating transfemoral or transtibial amputation levels in the lower limb. A variety of limb classification systems have been used over the years, including Frantz and O’Rahilly (1961)<ref>Frantz CH, O'Rahilly R. [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.975.8614&rep=rep1&type=pdf Congenital skeletal limb deficiencies.]1961. J Bone Joint Surg 43: 1202–1224.</ref>; McCredie (1974)<ref>McCredie J. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1974.tb50781.x Embryonic neuropathy a hypothesis of neural crest injury as the pathogenesis of congenital malformations.] Medical Journal of Australia. 1974 Feb;1(6):159-63.</ref>; and Swanson (1976)<ref>Swanson AB. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0363502376800214 A classification for congenital limb malformations.]1976. J Hand Surg 1: 8–22.</ref>. The current and accepted form of classification that has been adopted internationally since 1998 and is the ISPO classification system<ref>Day HJ. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/03093649109164635 The ISO/ISPO classification of congenital limb deficiency.] Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991 Aug;15(2):67-9. doi: 10.3109/03093649109164635. PMID: 1923724.</ref>. This form of classification utilizes anatomical and radiological evidence for describing the limb deficiencies.


*Familial inheritance
It states whether the deficiency occurs in a transverse or longitudinal orientation and which anatomical structures are partially or totally absent. Even though the ISPO classification is still internationally used, further research in classification options are being conducted. The classification system published in 2011 in the American Journal of medical genetics, includes etiological and pathogenic factors alongside the anatomic classification and has been especially developed for the classification of  congenital limb deficiencies<ref>Gold NB, Westgate M-N, Holmes LB. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.33999 Anatomic and etiological classification of congenital limb deficiencies.]2011. Am J Med Genet Part A 155:1225–1235</ref>.
*Chromosomal abnormality
*Poor nutrition
*Vascular disruption to the limbs
*Drug/alcohol abuse &amp; during pregnancy
*Exposure to certain medications/chemicals
*Asymmetric neurological disorders (E.g. Poliomyelitis, encephalopathy, etc)
*Trauma
*Growth plate disturbances (E.g. Infection, tumor)
*Soft tissue overgrowth<br>


== Types  ==
== Management of Prosthetic provisions in Paediatric population ==
The management of paediatric limb deficiency requires a longitudinal outlook<ref name=":0" />. This is to take into account the many development stages children go through from 0-18yrs, growth spurts and the need for education and anticipatory guidance for the family.


According to the ISO/ISPO classification <ref name="day">Day H.J., 1991. The ISO/ISPO Classification of Congenital Limb Deficiency. PubMed. [website] Available at:&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1923724&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; [Accessed 4 February 2015]</ref>, the anatomic and radiologic bases are used to describe the congenital limb deficiency. It consists of:-
Unlike adult prosthetic prescription, a child may undergo a vast array of prosthetic changes as they grow eg. stumps to extend the prostheses with feet, to single axis knee units, to polycentric knee units, etc.  


#'''Longitudinal deficiencies&nbsp;:&nbsp;<ref name="day" />'''
On top of the management of prosthetic alterations to match growth and cognitive development, there are the skeletal immaturity factors that need to be monitored throughout childhood (i.e. Growth spurts, terminal overgrowth, limb length discrepancies, etc.).


*&nbsp;Absence or reduction of an element or elements happens within the long axis of the limb.
Possible reasons for review through a paediatric limb deficiency service<ref name=":0" />:  
*About two thirds of the cases are associated with other congenital anomalies such as Adams-Oliver <ref name="webmd">NIH/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 2014. Adams Oliver Syndrome. WebMD. [website] Available at:&amp;amp;lt; http://www.webmd.com/children/adams-oliver-syndrome&amp;amp;gt; [Accessed 5 February 2015]</ref>, Holt Oram <ref name="basson">Basson C.T., 2014. Holt-Oram Syndrome. Medscape. [website] Available at:&amp;amp;lt; http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/159911-overview&amp;amp;gt; [Accessed 5 February 2015]</ref>&nbsp;, Poland <ref name="wilhelmi">Wilhelmi B.J., 2014. Poland Syndrome. Medscape. [website] Available at:&amp;amp;lt; http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1273664-overview&amp;amp;gt; [Accessed 5 February 2015]</ref>, Fanconi<ref name="fathallah">Fathallah-Shaykh S., 2014. Fanconi Syndrome. Medscape. [website] Available at:&amp;amp;lt; http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/981774-overview&amp;amp;gt; [Accessed 5 February 2015]</ref> and VACTERL<ref name="castori">Castori M., 2012. VACTERL Association.National Organization for Rare Disorders. [website] Available at:&amp;amp;lt; https://www.rarediseases.org/rare-disease-information/rare-diseases/byID/486/viewFullReport&amp;amp;gt; [Accessed 5 February 2015]</ref> syndrome.


&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;2.&nbsp;'''Transverse deficiencies&nbsp;:&nbsp;<ref name="simeon">Simeon A. Boyadjiev Boyd, 2014, Common Congenital Limb Defects [online] Available at :&amp;amp;amp;lt;http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/pediatrics/congenital_craniofacial_and_musculoskeletal_abnormalities/common_congenital_limb_defects.html&amp;amp;amp;gt; [Accessed 9 February 2015]</ref>'''
#Prosthetic provision
#*Interim prosthetic program for assessment of prosthetic proficiency
#*Definitive prosthetic prescription
#*Prosthetic review (eg. addition or change in prosthetic components)
#Prosthetic training
#*Initial prosthetic (interim program)
#*Specific task (eg. upper limb deficiency)
#*Specific componentry eg. myoelectric training
#*Developmental training (eg. walking, running, etc.)
#*Recreational prostheses (eg. musicianship)
#Developmental reviews
#*Key stages of development (eg. 0-1yr, pre schooling, growth spurts, etc.)
#Assistive and Adaptive Devices (particularly for children with upper limb deficiencies)
#Psychosocial support
#*Antenatal counseling
#*Pre amputation counseling
#*Issues of bullying, body image, etc.
#*Peer support
#Referral for genetic counseling
#Pain management
#Orthopaedic referral / collaboration
#*Pre amputation planning
#*Timing of epiphysiodesis
#*Assessment and management of terminal overgrowth
#*Conversion amputation
#*Asymmetric deformity progression
#*Considerations for limb lengthening
#Stump care (eg. skin breakdown/wound management)
#Pain management
#Anticipatory guidance (eg. medical, prosthetic, psychosocial, recreational, etc.).


*Limb has developed normally until certain level where skeletal elements are absent, though there may be digital buds.
== Skeletal Growth and Amputations: ==
*Most common cause is amniotic bands while the remaining cases are mostly due to underlying genetic syndromes.<br>


<br>
As is obvious, in paediatrics we are dealing with an immature skeletal system and hence issues related to growth are of primary importance. From a simple prosthetic perspective, children require more frequent prosthetic changes. In adult populations, replacement of prostheses may occur once every three years, whereas for children it is more often every year and more frequently in the early years and during adolescent growth spurts.


Approximately 70%-85% of acquired amputation is due to trauma and the remaining is the result of disease.  
With the rapid changes in growth there are also biomechanical and orthopaedic challenges throughout development that need to be anticipated and managed.  


#'''Traumatic amputation'''
With congenital limb deficiency, issues regarding limb reconstruction and/or limb lengthening are discussions that are required for a variety of limb deficiencies eg. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency; Congenital short femur, Longitudinal deficiency of the fibula.


*Incidence vary according to age and geographic location.
Many children may choose the path of limb reconstruction rather than an amputation (commonly known as a conversion amputation). However, should the limb reconstruction path not deliver the desired goals of the child, family and treating team, then a switch to the conversion amputation may occur later in childhood.  
*Farm machinery and household power tools are the leading factors to traumatic amputation.
*Amputation due to motor vehicle accidents, gunshot wounds and railroad accidents are common in older child.<br><br>2.'''&nbsp;Disease-related amputation'''
*In children, it is rare for primary bone tumors to occur.  
*However, the most common primary bone tumors are osteosarcoma <ref name="yibin1">Yi-Bin C., 2013. Osteosarcoma. PubMed Health. [website] Available at: &amp;lt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002616/&amp;gt; [Accessed 5 February 2015]</ref>&nbsp;and Ewing’s sarcoma.<ref name="yibin2">Yi-Bin C., 2014. Ewing Sarcoma. Medline Plus. [website] Available at: &amp;lt;http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001302.htm&amp;gt;  [Accessed 6 February 2015]</ref> <br>


== Sign and Symptom  ==
Appropriateness and timing of conversion amputations is another area of collaboration between orthopaedic and rehabilitation teams.


=== General (whereby both congenital and acquired facing similar difficulties) ===
When considering amputations, preservation of joints remains a common objection. However due to the immaturity of the skeletal system, issues such as terminal overgrowth and the maintenance of growth centres arise. In paediatrics, it is preferable for amputations to occur through joints (disarticulations) rather than through the diaphysis. This principle may lead to less cosmetic outcomes (ie. the bulbous shape of the distal stump), however the preservation of growth centres and avoidance of terminal overgrowth issues mean a better biomechanical outcome in the future and less surgical intervention throughout childhood.<ref name=":2">Jain S. Rehabilitation in Limb Deficiency. 2. The Pediatric Amputee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(3 Suppl):S9-S13.</ref>


#&nbsp;Loss of skeletal component
In the event of amputations that do occur through the diaphysis (eg. trauma), then terminal overgrowth becomes an issue that needs to be carefully monitored until skeletal maturity<ref name=":1">Herring JA, Birch JG, eds. The Child With a Limb Deficiency. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1998:235-288.</ref>.
#Delay normal motor development
#Assistance with daily activities such as self-care
#Potential emotional and social issues because of physical appearance


=== Congenital  ===
The theory behind terminal overgrowth appears to be that the cut bone is trying to create callous (as in after a fracture). This overgrowth tapers and causes distal stump pain. Clinically, it can be identified by the tapering shape of the distal stump; a bursa can often be felt under the most distal point and if severe, the area can feel warm and appear red. An x-ray is often requested to confirm terminal overgrowth.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":3">Soldado F, Kozin SH. Bony Overgrowth in Children after Amputation. Journal of Ped Rehabil Med: An Interdisciplinary Approach 2. 2009; 235-239.</ref>


#Limb length discrepancy
== Adjustment  ==
#Other associated musculoskeletal abnormalities


=== Acquired  ===
=== Congenital Limb Deficiency  ===


#'''Phantom sensation&nbsp;:''' A tingling sensation that felt by the patient as if the part amputated is still present.  
*In the paediatric population, because the majority of children are born with limb deficiency, there is little adjustment to body image for the child. However with those that acquire an amputation (be it through a conversion amputation or traumatic amputation), the issue of adjustment does have to be addressed.<ref name=":4">Bryant Ph, Pandian G. Acquire limb deficiencies. 1. Acquired limb deficiencies in children and young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil''.''  2001; 82 (Suppl 1): S3-8.</ref>
#'''Phantom pain: '''Pain that exist after an amputation which appears in burning, aching, shooting or any other characterization.
*Though children may not go through a period of adjustment, parents and extended family members definitely do and hence support for these family members is paramount in the early phases. <ref name=":5">Calder P, Shaw S, Roberts A, Tennant S, Sedki I, Hanspal R, Eastwood D. A comparison of functional outcome between amputation and extension prosthesis in the treatment of congenital absence of the fibula with severe limb deformity. Journal of children's orthopaedics. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):318-25.</ref>
*Ideally, if the limb deficiency is identified in pre-natal scanning, an early referral helps the clinic team meet with the family prior to birth to help address the concerns and questions parents and extended family may have.<ref name=":6">Engstrom B, Van de Ven C.Therapy for Amputees, 3rd Edition, Churchill Livingston, 1999. ISBN: 978-0-443-05975-9</ref>
*A follow up review is also advisable as soon as practicable after birth to allow the family further opportunity to discuss concerns and queries.<ref name=":5" />


== Diagnosis &amp; Tests ==
=== Congenital Limb Deficiency undergoing conversion amputation ===


*Prenatal ultrasound
*Where a planned amputation occurs (i.e. Conversion amputation), then pre-amputation counseling is carried out so that the child and family can adjust to the upcoming changes. This is often carried out with the use of therapy dolls and play therapy to illustrate the level of amputation and the use of a prosthesis in future life.<ref name=":4" />
*Genetic tests
*The period and inclusions of pre-amputation counseling varies for each child and family. Meeting another child and family who have gone through the same or similar process can be beneficial. It assists the child to see what life after enduring the impending surgery.<ref name=":3" />
*Physical examinations
*Pre-amputation counseling also includes clear guidance about the various phases the child and family will go through (i.e. Pre-amputation planning, surgical admission, post-operative healing, stump bandaging, pre-prosthetic casting, prosthetic fitting, prosthetic rehabilitation and where appropriate participation in recreational and leisure pursuits).<ref name=":1" />
*X ray
*Post operative, medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support are utilized to continue to address the issues around adjustment.<ref name=":6" />
*MRI


<br>
=== Traumatic Amputation  ===


Typically, x-rays are done to determine which bones are involved. When defects appear to be familial or if a genetic syndrome is suspected, evaluation should also include a thorough assessment for other physical, chromosomal, and genetic abnormalities. When available,assessment by a clinical geneticist is useful.<br>  
*In the event of traumatic amputations there is often no time to for counseling pre-operatively.
*The key factors that assist in adjustment often include timely support and again guidance as to the various phases that follow surgery.  
*In the post-operative phase, a team approach is adopted to address pain from the surgery, phantom sensation and phantom pain. In children phantom pain is not usually a long standing issue, however in the traumatic cases (and long standing tumours), anecdotally, there is a higher likelihood of phantom pain.
*In traumatic cases, a greater emphasis post operatively on medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support is needed to aid in adjustment due to the absence of minimal input that can be given in the pre-amputation phase. <ref name=":0" /><br>


== Medical Management  ==
With children and families, many childhood milestones, will cause a recurrence of grief and adjustment. Anticipatory guidance is important as a child enters child-care, the first year of schooling, sporting and recreational pursuits, etc.<ref name=":1" />


The medical management is divided into&nbsp;:-
The focus on family adjustment is key as the child often reflects their adjustment to their limb deficiency from those that are significant in their lives (parents, grandparents, older siblings).<ref name=":1" />


=== Congenital ===
== ‘Habilitation’ versus Rehabilitation ==


==== UL  ====
Prosthetic rehabilitation in children is often more aptly described as ‘habilitation’ as many of the skills taught are newly acquired rather than needing to be reacquired as in adult rehabilitation.<ref name=":7">Khan MA, Javed AA, Rao DJ, Corner JA, Rosenfield P. Pediatric Traumatic Limb Amputation: The Principles of Management and Optimal Residual Limb Lengths. World J Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;5(1):7-14. PMID: 27308235; PMCID: PMC4904133.</ref>


#Amputation
Decision making around prosthetic prescription and rehabilitation are often guided by a combination of factors. Initial prescription may revolve around physical development (eg. ‘fit to sit’ for upper limb deficiencies; ‘pull to stand’ for lower limb deficiencies), but the component and rehabilitation approach often are influenced by cognitive development.<ref name=":8">Le JT, Scott-Wyard PR. Pediatric limb differences and amputations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Feb;26(1):95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.09.006. PMID: 25479783</ref>


*Shoulder disarticulation
For children receiving their first limb, the prosthesis is seen as a tool that can assist in play (eg. for being able to stand and cruise, reach toys that are higher, etc). It is often recommended to the family that the limb remain in the toy box when not in use, so that the child develops positive associations with the limb.<ref name=":1" />  
*Forearm amputation
*Hand amputation<br>


==== LL  ====
For children who have a lower limb deficiency, after progressing through the developmental sequences prior to upright mobility, the issue with prosthetic rehabilitation is often that children ‘get up an go’ and hence this period of input requires adequate understanding of developmental progressions without immediately seeking a mature gait pattern. As children mature, refinement of gait can be made, but therapy is again tailored to their level of development.


#Tenotomy
The primary role of paediatric prosthetic rehabilitation is not so much rehabilitation but anticipatory guidance to assist the child and family problem solve upcoming developmental milestones eg. growth spurts, commencement of schooling, engagement in sports and recreation, etc.<ref name=":2" />
#Amputation


*Hip disarticulation
== Paediatric distinction when undergoing amputation ==
*Transfemoral amputation  
*Transtibial amputation
*Ankle and foot disarticulation
*Syme’s amputation or Boyd amputation
*Partial foot amputation and tenotomy
*Chopart (Mid-tarsal joint)
*Lisfranc (Tarsometatarsal joint)


&nbsp; '''&nbsp; &nbsp;3.'''&nbsp;&nbsp;Prosthetic<br>
=== Preoperative Phase  ===


<br>
*As indicated in the ‘Adjustment’ section, where possible (planned amputations) children and families require a developmentally appropriate approach to preoperative counseling. It involves not only the child, but also parents siblings, grandparents and other significant members of the family unit.
*All members of the team are often involved in this phase
**Medical (appropriate information and guidance, pain management, etc)
**Social Worker (preamputation counseling)
**Occupational Therapist (preamuputation counseling, play therapy, home modification and/or equipment planning).
**Physiotherapist (preamputation counseling, physical preparation, equipment planning, guidance through the various phases to follow)


=== Acquired  ===
Pain management involves the pre-surgical commencement of medications that may limit post-operative phantom limb pain eg. Gabapentin.<ref name=":7" />


==== UL and LL ====
=== Surgical Principles ===


#Amputation
As indicated in the ‘Skeletal Growth and Amputations’ section, the principles that guide amputation levels are different to the adult population:<ref name=":8" />  
#Prosthetic<br>


== Physiotherapy Management  ==
*Preserving growth centres is a key principle that both limits the discrepancy between limbs and allows for greatest mechanical advantage as the child grows.
*Preservation of joints is a key principle, much like in adults, however in paediatrics it is taken one step further, in that operations such as a rotationplasty have been developed where ankle joints can substitute as knee joints.
*Where the joint cannot be saved, amputations are preferable through joints rather than through the diaphysis. The primary reasons for this surgical principle is that it preserves growth centres and prevents risks of terminal bony overgrowth. In adult populations amputations through the diaphysis are preferred due to their cosmetic appearance and prosthetic socket design.


It is important for the child to attend physiotherapy treatment to facilitate as normal development sequence as possible. Besides, development of impairments and activity limitations should be prevented or minimized. However, there are several factors that might influence the intensity of physiotherapy needed which are child’s age, type of limb deficiency, level of amputation and other medical factors. <br>Functional abilities of the child can be highlighted through the examination of neuromotor development, aerobic capacity and endurance, gait and balance, community and work integration, and self care. Overall goals of a physiotherapist are:-<br>
=== Post Operatively  ===


*Prevent joint contracture
*Paediatric populations rarely have the list of comorbidities of adults and hence post-operative issues around wound healing are more related to the child’s activity rather than inactivity.
*Minimize muscle strength imbalances
*Children heal relatively quickly and can be out of hospital within a matter of days to a week.
*Prevent skin breakdown
*Faster healing also progresses them through their post operative phase sooner and it may be as soon as 10 days post-operatively when sutures are removed and shaping of the stump may commence.
*Develop independence with mobility and self-care skills<br>
*Unlike adult populations, where shrinker socks appear to be more readily used, these socks rarely are appropriate or available in paediatric sizes. Often due to the uniqueness of the stump because of its anatomy (i.e. Congenital limb deficiencies), stump bandaging is utilized in the pre-casting phase. <ref>Miller M, Takata G, Stucky E, Neuspiel D. Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management and Committee on Hospital Care; Principles of Pediatric Patient Safety: Reducing Harm Due to Medical Care. Pediatrics, 2011; 127 (6): 1199–1210. 10.1542/peds.2011-0967</ref>


In addition, meeting among the children, parents, teachers and physiotherapists before the beginning of the school may be helpful to allay any concerns and to develop a way to answer the questions of the child’s peers.
=== Prosthetic Provision  ===


=== Outcome Measure  ===
*Prosthetic fitting can occur as early as 3 weeks following surgery if no complications are encountered and the stump has little oedema.
*Paediatric prosthetic design requires a high degree of adjustability, need to be lightweight and durable.
*Prosthetic design also reflects developmental stages eg. Child with disarticulation may go form having stumpy (socket with peg base) in early years and progression to attachment of foot and then progression to a knee joint. The size and weight of components often dictate when a component may be added rather than simply gauging when a child is cognitively ready to use a new component eg. progression from extension prosthesis to inclusion of a knee joint.
*Due to rapid growth, the prosthesis may include design features unlike adult populations eg. added sockets or thicknesses of sockets, more modular components to accommodate height growth; growth oriented suspension systems, etc.<ref>O'Keeffe B, Rout S. Prosthetic Rehabilitation in the Lower Limb. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;52(1):134-143. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687919. </ref>


The Child Amputee Prosthetics Project- Functional Status Inventory (CAPP-FSI) was developed to assess 40 activities on two scales to determine whether the child performs the activity with or without prosthesis. A recently developed functional outcome measure, Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA), comprises six categories:-
=== Complications  ===


#pain
*As indicated in the ‘Immature Skeletal System’ section, the key difference in paediatrics with regard to post-operative complications is the development of terminal overgrowth. This is far more frequent in children than in adult populations.
#&nbsp;function as measured by timed up and down stairs (TUGS) and the timed up and go (TUG)&nbsp;[[Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)]]
*Its recurrence can be as frequent as every two years until reaching skeletal maturity.<ref name=":0" />
#use of supports or assistive devices
#satisfaction with quality of walking
#participation in work, school, and sports
#endurance as measured by a 6 minute walk test&nbsp;[[Six Minute Walk Test / 6 Minute Walk Test|_6_Minute_Walk_Test]]<br>


== Resources ==
=== Follow Up  ===


Day, H.J.B. [http://www.oandplibrary.org//alp/chap33-01.asp The ISO/ISPO Classification of Congenital Limb Deficiency] in Atlas of Limb Prosthetics. [http://www.oandplibrary.org http://www.oandplibrary.org]
*Paediatric limb deficiency requires far greater follow up than in adult populations due to ongoing growth and development.
*For this reason, it is important to see children who are using prostheses at least once a year. Many children with upper limb deficiencies that don’t use prostheses, may access the clinic ever 2-3 years. Children who are undergoing growth spurts may require reviews 3-6monthly.<ref name=":0" />
 
== Resources  ==
 
Day, H.J.B. [http://www.oandplibrary.org//alp/chap33-01.asp The ISO/ISPO Classification of Congenital Limb Deficiency] in Atlas of Limb Prosthetics.


== References  ==
== References  ==
<references />


&nbsp;<references />
[[Category:Amputees]]
 
[[Category:World Physiotherapy Amputee Project]]
[[Category:Amputees]] [[Category:WCPT_Amputee_Project]]
[[Category:Paediatrics]]
[[Category:Paediatrics - Conditions]]
[[Category:Congenital Conditions]]

Latest revision as of 15:23, 9 January 2023

Children are not little adults.[edit | edit source]

Though there are some areas of general overlap, the management of limb loss in children is quite different to adults. Key differentiations in the rehabilitation protocols include[1]:

  1. A high proportion of congenital limb deficiency versus acquired amputation
  2. Classification of congenital limb deficiencies
  3. An immature skeleton
  4. Adjustment
  5. Habilitation versus rehabilitation
  6. Growth and development considerations
  7. Paediatric distinctions when undergoing amputation

Congenital versus acquired loss:[edit | edit source]

Even with nomenclature, children and adults differ when it comes to describing limb loss. In paediatrics, the term ‘amputee’ or ‘amputation’ is replaced with limb difference or limb deficiency, as the majority of children with limb loss are born this way (i.e. congenital), and the limb is reduced from its normal size or is missing a portion of it[2]. The proportion of congenital versus acquired limb deficiency were varied in different studies but congenital deficiencies are always the leading cause[3]. An article from 2021, that describes the prevalence for lower limb loss in children in the US mentions congenital loss as the cause in 84% of the cases[4].

For the proportion of children that suffer an acquired loss, the two primary causes are[5]:

  1. Traumatic (eg. lawn mower (29%), farm machinery (24%), motor vehicle accidents (16%), etc.).
  2. In other reasons for acquired limb loss, malignancy and infection are major causes of a defect.

Classification of congenital limb deficiencies:[edit | edit source]

Congenital limb deficiency means the partial or total absence of a limb at birth. Classification/description of these deficiencies has been more challenging than simply stating transfemoral or transtibial amputation levels in the lower limb. A variety of limb classification systems have been used over the years, including Frantz and O’Rahilly (1961)[6]; McCredie (1974)[7]; and Swanson (1976)[8]. The current and accepted form of classification that has been adopted internationally since 1998 and is the ISPO classification system[9]. This form of classification utilizes anatomical and radiological evidence for describing the limb deficiencies.

It states whether the deficiency occurs in a transverse or longitudinal orientation and which anatomical structures are partially or totally absent. Even though the ISPO classification is still internationally used, further research in classification options are being conducted. The classification system published in 2011 in the American Journal of medical genetics, includes etiological and pathogenic factors alongside the anatomic classification and has been especially developed for the classification of congenital limb deficiencies[10].

Management of Prosthetic provisions in Paediatric population[edit | edit source]

The management of paediatric limb deficiency requires a longitudinal outlook[1]. This is to take into account the many development stages children go through from 0-18yrs, growth spurts and the need for education and anticipatory guidance for the family.

Unlike adult prosthetic prescription, a child may undergo a vast array of prosthetic changes as they grow eg. stumps to extend the prostheses with feet, to single axis knee units, to polycentric knee units, etc.

On top of the management of prosthetic alterations to match growth and cognitive development, there are the skeletal immaturity factors that need to be monitored throughout childhood (i.e. Growth spurts, terminal overgrowth, limb length discrepancies, etc.).

Possible reasons for review through a paediatric limb deficiency service[1]:

  1. Prosthetic provision
    • Interim prosthetic program for assessment of prosthetic proficiency
    • Definitive prosthetic prescription
    • Prosthetic review (eg. addition or change in prosthetic components)
  2. Prosthetic training
    • Initial prosthetic (interim program)
    • Specific task (eg. upper limb deficiency)
    • Specific componentry eg. myoelectric training
    • Developmental training (eg. walking, running, etc.)
    • Recreational prostheses (eg. musicianship)
  3. Developmental reviews
    • Key stages of development (eg. 0-1yr, pre schooling, growth spurts, etc.)
  4. Assistive and Adaptive Devices (particularly for children with upper limb deficiencies)
  5. Psychosocial support
    • Antenatal counseling
    • Pre amputation counseling
    • Issues of bullying, body image, etc.
    • Peer support
  6. Referral for genetic counseling
  7. Pain management
  8. Orthopaedic referral / collaboration
    • Pre amputation planning
    • Timing of epiphysiodesis
    • Assessment and management of terminal overgrowth
    • Conversion amputation
    • Asymmetric deformity progression
    • Considerations for limb lengthening
  9. Stump care (eg. skin breakdown/wound management)
  10. Pain management
  11. Anticipatory guidance (eg. medical, prosthetic, psychosocial, recreational, etc.).

Skeletal Growth and Amputations:[edit | edit source]

As is obvious, in paediatrics we are dealing with an immature skeletal system and hence issues related to growth are of primary importance. From a simple prosthetic perspective, children require more frequent prosthetic changes. In adult populations, replacement of prostheses may occur once every three years, whereas for children it is more often every year and more frequently in the early years and during adolescent growth spurts.

With the rapid changes in growth there are also biomechanical and orthopaedic challenges throughout development that need to be anticipated and managed.

With congenital limb deficiency, issues regarding limb reconstruction and/or limb lengthening are discussions that are required for a variety of limb deficiencies eg. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency; Congenital short femur, Longitudinal deficiency of the fibula.

Many children may choose the path of limb reconstruction rather than an amputation (commonly known as a conversion amputation). However, should the limb reconstruction path not deliver the desired goals of the child, family and treating team, then a switch to the conversion amputation may occur later in childhood.

Appropriateness and timing of conversion amputations is another area of collaboration between orthopaedic and rehabilitation teams.

When considering amputations, preservation of joints remains a common objection. However due to the immaturity of the skeletal system, issues such as terminal overgrowth and the maintenance of growth centres arise. In paediatrics, it is preferable for amputations to occur through joints (disarticulations) rather than through the diaphysis. This principle may lead to less cosmetic outcomes (ie. the bulbous shape of the distal stump), however the preservation of growth centres and avoidance of terminal overgrowth issues mean a better biomechanical outcome in the future and less surgical intervention throughout childhood.[11]

In the event of amputations that do occur through the diaphysis (eg. trauma), then terminal overgrowth becomes an issue that needs to be carefully monitored until skeletal maturity[12].

The theory behind terminal overgrowth appears to be that the cut bone is trying to create callous (as in after a fracture). This overgrowth tapers and causes distal stump pain. Clinically, it can be identified by the tapering shape of the distal stump; a bursa can often be felt under the most distal point and if severe, the area can feel warm and appear red. An x-ray is often requested to confirm terminal overgrowth.[12][13]

Adjustment[edit | edit source]

Congenital Limb Deficiency[edit | edit source]

  • In the paediatric population, because the majority of children are born with limb deficiency, there is little adjustment to body image for the child. However with those that acquire an amputation (be it through a conversion amputation or traumatic amputation), the issue of adjustment does have to be addressed.[14]
  • Though children may not go through a period of adjustment, parents and extended family members definitely do and hence support for these family members is paramount in the early phases. [15]
  • Ideally, if the limb deficiency is identified in pre-natal scanning, an early referral helps the clinic team meet with the family prior to birth to help address the concerns and questions parents and extended family may have.[16]
  • A follow up review is also advisable as soon as practicable after birth to allow the family further opportunity to discuss concerns and queries.[15]

Congenital Limb Deficiency undergoing conversion amputation[edit | edit source]

  • Where a planned amputation occurs (i.e. Conversion amputation), then pre-amputation counseling is carried out so that the child and family can adjust to the upcoming changes. This is often carried out with the use of therapy dolls and play therapy to illustrate the level of amputation and the use of a prosthesis in future life.[14]
  • The period and inclusions of pre-amputation counseling varies for each child and family. Meeting another child and family who have gone through the same or similar process can be beneficial. It assists the child to see what life after enduring the impending surgery.[13]
  • Pre-amputation counseling also includes clear guidance about the various phases the child and family will go through (i.e. Pre-amputation planning, surgical admission, post-operative healing, stump bandaging, pre-prosthetic casting, prosthetic fitting, prosthetic rehabilitation and where appropriate participation in recreational and leisure pursuits).[12]
  • Post operative, medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support are utilized to continue to address the issues around adjustment.[16]

Traumatic Amputation[edit | edit source]

  • In the event of traumatic amputations there is often no time to for counseling pre-operatively.
  • The key factors that assist in adjustment often include timely support and again guidance as to the various phases that follow surgery.
  • In the post-operative phase, a team approach is adopted to address pain from the surgery, phantom sensation and phantom pain. In children phantom pain is not usually a long standing issue, however in the traumatic cases (and long standing tumours), anecdotally, there is a higher likelihood of phantom pain.
  • In traumatic cases, a greater emphasis post operatively on medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support is needed to aid in adjustment due to the absence of minimal input that can be given in the pre-amputation phase. [1]

With children and families, many childhood milestones, will cause a recurrence of grief and adjustment. Anticipatory guidance is important as a child enters child-care, the first year of schooling, sporting and recreational pursuits, etc.[12]

The focus on family adjustment is key as the child often reflects their adjustment to their limb deficiency from those that are significant in their lives (parents, grandparents, older siblings).[12]

‘Habilitation’ versus Rehabilitation[edit | edit source]

Prosthetic rehabilitation in children is often more aptly described as ‘habilitation’ as many of the skills taught are newly acquired rather than needing to be reacquired as in adult rehabilitation.[17]

Decision making around prosthetic prescription and rehabilitation are often guided by a combination of factors. Initial prescription may revolve around physical development (eg. ‘fit to sit’ for upper limb deficiencies; ‘pull to stand’ for lower limb deficiencies), but the component and rehabilitation approach often are influenced by cognitive development.[18]

For children receiving their first limb, the prosthesis is seen as a tool that can assist in play (eg. for being able to stand and cruise, reach toys that are higher, etc). It is often recommended to the family that the limb remain in the toy box when not in use, so that the child develops positive associations with the limb.[12]

For children who have a lower limb deficiency, after progressing through the developmental sequences prior to upright mobility, the issue with prosthetic rehabilitation is often that children ‘get up an go’ and hence this period of input requires adequate understanding of developmental progressions without immediately seeking a mature gait pattern. As children mature, refinement of gait can be made, but therapy is again tailored to their level of development.

The primary role of paediatric prosthetic rehabilitation is not so much rehabilitation but anticipatory guidance to assist the child and family problem solve upcoming developmental milestones eg. growth spurts, commencement of schooling, engagement in sports and recreation, etc.[11]

Paediatric distinction when undergoing amputation[edit | edit source]

Preoperative Phase[edit | edit source]

  • As indicated in the ‘Adjustment’ section, where possible (planned amputations) children and families require a developmentally appropriate approach to preoperative counseling. It involves not only the child, but also parents siblings, grandparents and other significant members of the family unit.
  • All members of the team are often involved in this phase
    • Medical (appropriate information and guidance, pain management, etc)
    • Social Worker (preamputation counseling)
    • Occupational Therapist (preamuputation counseling, play therapy, home modification and/or equipment planning).
    • Physiotherapist (preamputation counseling, physical preparation, equipment planning, guidance through the various phases to follow)

Pain management involves the pre-surgical commencement of medications that may limit post-operative phantom limb pain eg. Gabapentin.[17]

Surgical Principles[edit | edit source]

As indicated in the ‘Skeletal Growth and Amputations’ section, the principles that guide amputation levels are different to the adult population:[18]

  • Preserving growth centres is a key principle that both limits the discrepancy between limbs and allows for greatest mechanical advantage as the child grows.
  • Preservation of joints is a key principle, much like in adults, however in paediatrics it is taken one step further, in that operations such as a rotationplasty have been developed where ankle joints can substitute as knee joints.
  • Where the joint cannot be saved, amputations are preferable through joints rather than through the diaphysis. The primary reasons for this surgical principle is that it preserves growth centres and prevents risks of terminal bony overgrowth. In adult populations amputations through the diaphysis are preferred due to their cosmetic appearance and prosthetic socket design.

Post Operatively[edit | edit source]

  • Paediatric populations rarely have the list of comorbidities of adults and hence post-operative issues around wound healing are more related to the child’s activity rather than inactivity.
  • Children heal relatively quickly and can be out of hospital within a matter of days to a week.
  • Faster healing also progresses them through their post operative phase sooner and it may be as soon as 10 days post-operatively when sutures are removed and shaping of the stump may commence.
  • Unlike adult populations, where shrinker socks appear to be more readily used, these socks rarely are appropriate or available in paediatric sizes. Often due to the uniqueness of the stump because of its anatomy (i.e. Congenital limb deficiencies), stump bandaging is utilized in the pre-casting phase. [19]

Prosthetic Provision[edit | edit source]

  • Prosthetic fitting can occur as early as 3 weeks following surgery if no complications are encountered and the stump has little oedema.
  • Paediatric prosthetic design requires a high degree of adjustability, need to be lightweight and durable.
  • Prosthetic design also reflects developmental stages eg. Child with disarticulation may go form having stumpy (socket with peg base) in early years and progression to attachment of foot and then progression to a knee joint. The size and weight of components often dictate when a component may be added rather than simply gauging when a child is cognitively ready to use a new component eg. progression from extension prosthesis to inclusion of a knee joint.
  • Due to rapid growth, the prosthesis may include design features unlike adult populations eg. added sockets or thicknesses of sockets, more modular components to accommodate height growth; growth oriented suspension systems, etc.[20]

Complications[edit | edit source]

  • As indicated in the ‘Immature Skeletal System’ section, the key difference in paediatrics with regard to post-operative complications is the development of terminal overgrowth. This is far more frequent in children than in adult populations.
  • Its recurrence can be as frequent as every two years until reaching skeletal maturity.[1]

Follow Up[edit | edit source]

  • Paediatric limb deficiency requires far greater follow up than in adult populations due to ongoing growth and development.
  • For this reason, it is important to see children who are using prostheses at least once a year. Many children with upper limb deficiencies that don’t use prostheses, may access the clinic ever 2-3 years. Children who are undergoing growth spurts may require reviews 3-6monthly.[1]

Resources[edit | edit source]

Day, H.J.B. The ISO/ISPO Classification of Congenital Limb Deficiency in Atlas of Limb Prosthetics.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Smith D, Michael J, Bowker J. Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles. 3rd Edition. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004.
  2. Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA, Meyer RE, Correa A, Alverson CJ, Lupo PJ, Riehle‐Colarusso T, Cho SJ, Aggarwal D, Kirby RS. National population‐based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014. Birth Defects Research. 2019; 111(18): 1420-1435.
  3. Al-Worikat AF, Dameh W. Children with limb deficiencies: demographic characteristics. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Mar;32(1):23-8. doi: 10.1080/03093640701517083. PMID: 17852778.
  4. McLarney M, Pezzin L, McGinley E, Prosser L, Dillingham. The prevalence of lower limb loss in children and associated costs of prosthetic devices: A national study of commercial insurance claims, Prosthetics and Orthotics International: April 2021 - Volume 45 - Issue 2 - p 115-122 doi: 10.1177/0309364620968645
  5. Loder R. Demographics of Traumatic Amputations in Children, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: May 2004 - Volume 86 - Issue 5 - p 923-928
  6. Frantz CH, O'Rahilly R. Congenital skeletal limb deficiencies.1961. J Bone Joint Surg 43: 1202–1224.
  7. McCredie J. Embryonic neuropathy a hypothesis of neural crest injury as the pathogenesis of congenital malformations. Medical Journal of Australia. 1974 Feb;1(6):159-63.
  8. Swanson AB. A classification for congenital limb malformations.1976. J Hand Surg 1: 8–22.
  9. Day HJ. The ISO/ISPO classification of congenital limb deficiency. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991 Aug;15(2):67-9. doi: 10.3109/03093649109164635. PMID: 1923724.
  10. Gold NB, Westgate M-N, Holmes LB. Anatomic and etiological classification of congenital limb deficiencies.2011. Am J Med Genet Part A 155:1225–1235
  11. 11.0 11.1 Jain S. Rehabilitation in Limb Deficiency. 2. The Pediatric Amputee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(3 Suppl):S9-S13.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 Herring JA, Birch JG, eds. The Child With a Limb Deficiency. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1998:235-288.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Soldado F, Kozin SH. Bony Overgrowth in Children after Amputation. Journal of Ped Rehabil Med: An Interdisciplinary Approach 2. 2009; 235-239.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Bryant Ph, Pandian G. Acquire limb deficiencies. 1. Acquired limb deficiencies in children and young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.  2001; 82 (Suppl 1): S3-8.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Calder P, Shaw S, Roberts A, Tennant S, Sedki I, Hanspal R, Eastwood D. A comparison of functional outcome between amputation and extension prosthesis in the treatment of congenital absence of the fibula with severe limb deformity. Journal of children's orthopaedics. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):318-25.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Engstrom B, Van de Ven C.Therapy for Amputees, 3rd Edition, Churchill Livingston, 1999. ISBN: 978-0-443-05975-9
  17. 17.0 17.1 Khan MA, Javed AA, Rao DJ, Corner JA, Rosenfield P. Pediatric Traumatic Limb Amputation: The Principles of Management and Optimal Residual Limb Lengths. World J Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;5(1):7-14. PMID: 27308235; PMCID: PMC4904133.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Le JT, Scott-Wyard PR. Pediatric limb differences and amputations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Feb;26(1):95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.09.006. PMID: 25479783
  19. Miller M, Takata G, Stucky E, Neuspiel D. Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management and Committee on Hospital Care; Principles of Pediatric Patient Safety: Reducing Harm Due to Medical Care. Pediatrics, 2011; 127 (6): 1199–1210. 10.1542/peds.2011-0967
  20. O'Keeffe B, Rout S. Prosthetic Rehabilitation in the Lower Limb. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;52(1):134-143. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687919.