Paediatric Limb Deficiency: Difference between revisions

(added lonks to references)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;<br>  
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;<br>  
</div>  
</div>  
== Children are not little adults ==
== Children are not little adults. ==


Though there are some areas of general overlap, the management of limb loss in children is quite different to adults. Key differentiations include:  
Though there are some areas of general overlap, the management of limb loss in children is quite different to adults. Key differentiations in the rehabilitation protocols include<ref name=":0">Smith D, Michael J, Bowker J. Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles. 3rd Edition. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004.</ref>:  


#A high proportion of congential limb deficiency versus acquired amputation
#A high proportion of congenital limb deficiency versus acquired amputation
#Classification of congenital limb deficiencies
#Classification of congenital limb deficiencies
#An immature skeleton  
#An immature skeleton  
Line 16: Line 16:
#Paediatric distinctions when undergoing amputation
#Paediatric distinctions when undergoing amputation


== Congenital versus acquired loss ==
== Congenital versus acquired loss: ==


Even with nomenclature, children and adults differ when it comes to describing limb loss. In paediatrics, the term ‘amputee’ or ‘amputation’ is replaced with limb difference or limb deficiency, as the majority of children with limb loss are born this way (ie. congenital). The proportion of congenital versus acquired limb deficiency ranges in different studys but congenital deficiencys are alyways the leading cause<ref>Al-Worikat AF, Dameh W. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/03093640701517083?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed Children with limb deficiencies: demographic characteristics.] Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Mar;32(1):23-8. doi: 10.1080/03093640701517083. PMID: 17852778.</ref>. An article from 2021, that descibes the prevalence for lower limb loss in children in the US even mentiones congenital loss as the cause in 84% of the cases<ref>McLarney, Mitra1; Pezzin, Liliana E2; McGinley, Emily L3; Prosser, Laura4; Dillingham, Timothy R1, [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309364620968645?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed The prevalence of lower limb loss in children and associated costs of prosthetic devices: A national study of commercial insurance claims], Prosthetics and Orthotics International: April 2021 - Volume 45 - Issue 2 - p 115-122 doi: 10.1177/0309364620968645</ref>.  
Even with nomenclature, children and adults differ when it comes to describing limb loss. In paediatrics, the term ‘amputee’ or ‘amputation’ is replaced with limb difference or limb deficiency, as the majority of children with limb loss are born this way (i.e. congenital), and the limb is reduced from its normal size or is missing a portion of it<ref>Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA, Meyer RE, Correa A, Alverson CJ, Lupo PJ, Riehle‐Colarusso T, Cho SJ, Aggarwal D, Kirby RS. National population‐based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014. ''Birth Defects Research.'' 2019; 111(18): 1420-1435.</ref>. The proportion of congenital versus acquired limb deficiency were varied in different studies but congenital deficiencies are always the leading cause<ref>Al-Worikat AF, Dameh W. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/03093640701517083?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed Children with limb deficiencies: demographic characteristics.] Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Mar;32(1):23-8. doi: 10.1080/03093640701517083. PMID: 17852778.</ref>. An article from 2021, that describes the prevalence for lower limb loss in children in the US mentions congenital loss as the cause in 84% of the cases<ref>McLarney M, Pezzin L, McGinley E, Prosser L, Dillingham. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309364620968645?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed The prevalence of lower limb loss in children and associated costs of prosthetic devices: A national study of commercial insurance claims], Prosthetics and Orthotics International: April 2021 - Volume 45 - Issue 2 - p 115-122 doi: 10.1177/0309364620968645</ref>.  


For the proportion of children that suffer an acquired loss, the two primary causes are<ref>Loder, Randall T. MD1 [https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/2004/05000/Demographics_of_Traumatic_Amputations_in_Children_.6.aspx Demographics of Traumatic Amputations in Children, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery]: May 2004 - Volume 86 - Issue 5 - p 923-928 </ref>:  
For the proportion of children that suffer an acquired loss, the two primary causes are<ref>Loder R. [https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/2004/05000/Demographics_of_Traumatic_Amputations_in_Children_.6.aspx Demographics of Traumatic Amputations in Children, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery]: May 2004 - Volume 86 - Issue 5 - p 923-928 </ref>:  


#Traumatic (eg. lawn mower (29%), farm machinery (24%), motor vehichle accidents (16%), etc).  
#Traumatic (eg. lawn mower (29%), farm machinery (24%), motor vehicle accidents (16%), etc.).
#In other reasons for acquired limb loss, malignancy and infection rank highly
#In other reasons for acquired limb loss, malignancy and infection are major causes of a defect.


== Classification of cogenital limb deficiencies ==
== Classification of congenital limb deficiencies==


Congenital limb deficiency simply means the partial or total absence of a limb at birth. Classification/description of these deficiencies has been more challenging than simply stating transfemoral or transtibial amputation levels for example in the lower limb. A variety of limb classification systems have been used over the years, including Frantz and O’Rahilly 1961<ref>Frantz CH, O'Rahilly R. [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.975.8614&rep=rep1&type=pdf Congenital skeletal limb deficiencies.]1961. J Bone Joint Surg 43: 1202–1224.</ref>; McCredie 1974<ref>McCredie J. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1974.tb50781.x Embryonic neuropathy a hypothesis of neural crest injury as the pathogenesis of congenital malformations.] Medical Journal of Australia. 1974 Feb;1(6):159-63.</ref>; and Swanson 1976<ref>Swanson AB. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0363502376800214 A classification for congenital limb malformations.]1976. J Hand Surg 1: 8–22.</ref>. The current and accepted form of classification that has been adopted internationally since 1998 and is the ISPO classification system<ref>Day HJ. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/03093649109164635 The ISO/ISPO classification of congenital limb deficiency.] Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991 Aug;15(2):67-9. doi: 10.3109/03093649109164635. PMID: 1923724.</ref>. This form of classification utilizes anatomical and radiological evidence for describing the limb deficiency. It states whether the deficiency occurs in a transverse or longitudinal orientation and which anatomical structures are partially or totally absent. Eventhough the ISPO classification is still internationally used futher research in classification options is cundcted. The classification system published in 2011 in the American Journal of medical genetics is including etiological and pathogenic factor alongside the anatomic classification and has been especially developed for the classification of  congenital limb deficiencies<ref>Gold NB, Westgate M-N, Holmes LB. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.33999 Anatomic and etiological classification of congenital limb deficiencies.]2011. Am J Med Genet Part A 155:1225–1235</ref>
Congenital limb deficiency means the partial or total absence of a limb at birth. Classification/description of these deficiencies has been more challenging than simply stating transfemoral or transtibial amputation levels in the lower limb. A variety of limb classification systems have been used over the years, including Frantz and O’Rahilly (1961)<ref>Frantz CH, O'Rahilly R. [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.975.8614&rep=rep1&type=pdf Congenital skeletal limb deficiencies.]1961. J Bone Joint Surg 43: 1202–1224.</ref>; McCredie (1974)<ref>McCredie J. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1974.tb50781.x Embryonic neuropathy a hypothesis of neural crest injury as the pathogenesis of congenital malformations.] Medical Journal of Australia. 1974 Feb;1(6):159-63.</ref>; and Swanson (1976)<ref>Swanson AB. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0363502376800214 A classification for congenital limb malformations.]1976. J Hand Surg 1: 8–22.</ref>. The current and accepted form of classification that has been adopted internationally since 1998 and is the ISPO classification system<ref>Day HJ. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/03093649109164635 The ISO/ISPO classification of congenital limb deficiency.] Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991 Aug;15(2):67-9. doi: 10.3109/03093649109164635. PMID: 1923724.</ref>. This form of classification utilizes anatomical and radiological evidence for describing the limb deficiencies.  


== Growth and Development ==
It states whether the deficiency occurs in a transverse or longitudinal orientation and which anatomical structures are partially or totally absent. Even though the ISPO classification is still internationally used, further research in classification options are being conducted. The classification system published in 2011 in the American Journal of medical genetics, includes etiological and pathogenic factors alongside the anatomic classification and has been especially developed for the classification of congenital limb deficiencies<ref>Gold NB, Westgate M-N, Holmes LB. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.33999 Anatomic and etiological classification of congenital limb deficiencies.]2011. Am J Med Genet Part A 155:1225–1235</ref>.


The management of paediatric limb deficiency requires a longitudinal outlook. This is to take into account the many development stages children go through from 0-18yrs, growth spurts and the need for education and anticipatory guidance for the family.  
== Management of Prosthetic provisions in Paediatric population ==
The management of paediatric limb deficiency requires a longitudinal outlook<ref name=":0" />. This is to take into account the many development stages children go through from 0-18yrs, growth spurts and the need for education and anticipatory guidance for the family.  


Unlike adult prosthetic prescription, a child may undergo a vast array of prosthetic changes as they grow eg. stumpies to extension prostheses with feet, to single axis knee units, to polycentric knee units, etc.  
Unlike adult prosthetic prescription, a child may undergo a vast array of prosthetic changes as they grow eg. stumps to extend the prostheses with feet, to single axis knee units, to polycentric knee units, etc.  


On top of the management of prosthetic alterations to match growth and cognitive development, there are the skeletal immaturity factors that need to be monitored throughout childhood (ie. Growth spurts, terminal overgrowth, limb length discrepancies, etc).  
On top of the management of prosthetic alterations to match growth and cognitive development, there are the skeletal immaturity factors that need to be monitored throughout childhood (i.e. Growth spurts, terminal overgrowth, limb length discrepancies, etc.).  


Possible reasons for review through a paediatric limb deficiency service:  
Possible reasons for review through a paediatric limb deficiency service<ref name=":0" />:  


#Prosthetic provision  
#Prosthetic provision  
#*Interim prosthetic program for assessment of prosthetic proficiency  
#*Interim prosthetic program for assessment of prosthetic proficiency
#*Definitive prosthetic prescription<br>
#*Definitive prosthetic prescription
#*Prosthetic review (eg. addition or change in prosthetic components)  
#*Prosthetic review (eg. addition or change in prosthetic components)
#Prosthetic training  
#Prosthetic training  
#*Initial prosthetic (interim program)  
#*Initial prosthetic (interim program)
#*Specific task (eg. upper limb deficiency)  
#*Specific task (eg. upper limb deficiency)
#*Specific componentry eg. myoelectric training  
#*Specific componentry eg. myoelectric training
#*Developmental training (eg. walking, running, etc)  
#*Developmental training (eg. walking, running, etc.)
#*Recreational prostheses (eg. musicianship)  
#*Recreational prostheses (eg. musicianship)
#Developmental reviews  
#Developmental reviews  
#*Key stages of development (eg. 0-1yr, pre schooling, growth spurts, etc)  
#*Key stages of development (eg. 0-1yr, pre schooling, growth spurts, etc.)
#Assistive and Adaptive Devices (particularly for children with upper limb deficiencies)  
#Assistive and Adaptive Devices (particularly for children with upper limb deficiencies)
#Psychosocial support  
#Psychosocial support  
#*Antenatal counseling  
#*Antenatal counseling
#*Pre amputation counseling  
#*Pre amputation counseling
#*Issues of bullying, body image, etc.  
#*Issues of bullying, body image, etc.
#*Peer support  
#*Peer support
#Referral for genetic counseling  
#Referral for genetic counseling
#Pain management  
#Pain management
#Orthopaedic referral / collaboration  
#Orthopaedic referral / collaboration  
#*Pre amputation planning  
#*Pre amputation planning
#*Timing of epiphysiodesis  
#*Timing of epiphysiodesis
#*Assessment and management of terminal overgrowth  
#*Assessment and management of terminal overgrowth
#*Conversion amputation  
#*Conversion amputation
#*Asymmetric deformity progression  
#*Asymmetric deformity progression
#*Considerations for limb lengthening  
#*Considerations for limb lengthening
#Stump care (eg. skin breakdown/wound management)  
#Stump care (eg. skin breakdown/wound management)
#Pain management  
#Pain management
#Anticipatory guidance (eg. medical, prosthetic, psychosocial, recreational, etc).
#Anticipatory guidance (eg. medical, prosthetic, psychosocial, recreational, etc.).


== An Immature skeletal system  ==
== Skeletal Growth and Amputations: ==


As is obvious, in paediatrics we are dealing with an immature skeletal system and hence issues related to growth are of primary importance. From a simple prosthetic perspective, children require more frequent prosthetic changes. In adult populations, replacement of prostheses may occur once every three years, whereas for children it is more often every year and more frequently in the early years and during adolescent growth spurts.  
As is obvious, in paediatrics we are dealing with an immature skeletal system and hence issues related to growth are of primary importance. From a simple prosthetic perspective, children require more frequent prosthetic changes. In adult populations, replacement of prostheses may occur once every three years, whereas for children it is more often every year and more frequently in the early years and during adolescent growth spurts.  
Line 76: Line 77:
With the rapid changes in growth there are also biomechanical and orthopaedic challenges throughout development that need to be anticipated and managed.  
With the rapid changes in growth there are also biomechanical and orthopaedic challenges throughout development that need to be anticipated and managed.  


With congential limb deficiency, issues regarding limb reconstruction and/or limb lengthening are discussions that are required for a variety of limb deficiencies eg. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency; Congenital short femur, Longitudinal deficiency of the fibula.  
With congenital limb deficiency, issues regarding limb reconstruction and/or limb lengthening are discussions that are required for a variety of limb deficiencies eg. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency; Congenital short femur, Longitudinal deficiency of the fibula.  


Many children may choose the path of limb reconstruction rather than an amputation (commonly known as a conversion amputation). However, should the limb reconstruction path not deliver the desired goals of the child, family and treating team, then a switch to the conversion amputation may occur later in childhood.  
Many children may choose the path of limb reconstruction rather than an amputation (commonly known as a conversion amputation). However, should the limb reconstruction path not deliver the desired goals of the child, family and treating team, then a switch to the conversion amputation may occur later in childhood.  
Line 82: Line 83:
Appropriateness and timing of conversion amputations is another area of collaboration between orthopaedic and rehabilitation teams.  
Appropriateness and timing of conversion amputations is another area of collaboration between orthopaedic and rehabilitation teams.  


When considering amputations, preservation of joints remains a common objection. However due to the immaturity of the skeletal system, issues such as terminal overgrowth and the maintenance of growth centres arise. In paediatrics, it is preferable for amputations to occur through joints (disarticulations) rather than through the diaphysis. This principle may lead to less cosmetic outcomes (ie. the bulbous shape of the distal stump), however the preservation of growth centres and avoidance of terminal overgrowth issues mean a better biomechanical outcome in the future and less surgical intervention throughout childhood.  
When considering amputations, preservation of joints remains a common objection. However due to the immaturity of the skeletal system, issues such as terminal overgrowth and the maintenance of growth centres arise. In paediatrics, it is preferable for amputations to occur through joints (disarticulations) rather than through the diaphysis. This principle may lead to less cosmetic outcomes (ie. the bulbous shape of the distal stump), however the preservation of growth centres and avoidance of terminal overgrowth issues mean a better biomechanical outcome in the future and less surgical intervention throughout childhood.<ref name=":2">Jain S. Rehabilitation in Limb Deficiency. 2. The Pediatric Amputee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(3 Suppl):S9-S13.</ref>


In the event of amputations that do occur through the diaphysis (eg. trauma), then terminal overgrowth become issues that need to be carefully monitored through until skeletal maturity.  
In the event of amputations that do occur through the diaphysis (eg. trauma), then terminal overgrowth becomes an issue that needs to be carefully monitored until skeletal maturity<ref name=":1">Herring JA, Birch JG, eds. The Child With a Limb Deficiency. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1998:235-288.</ref>.  


The theory behind terminal overgrowth appears to be that the cut bone is trying to create callous (as in after a fracture). This overgrowth tapers and causes distal stump pain. Clinically, it can be identified by the tapering shape of the distal stump; a bursa can often be felt under the most distal point and if severe, the area can feel warm and appear red. An x-ray is often requested to confirm terminal overgrowth.  
The theory behind terminal overgrowth appears to be that the cut bone is trying to create callous (as in after a fracture). This overgrowth tapers and causes distal stump pain. Clinically, it can be identified by the tapering shape of the distal stump; a bursa can often be felt under the most distal point and if severe, the area can feel warm and appear red. An x-ray is often requested to confirm terminal overgrowth.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":3">Soldado F, Kozin SH. Bony Overgrowth in Children after Amputation. Journal of Ped Rehabil Med: An Interdisciplinary Approach 2. 2009; 235-239.</ref>


== Adjustment  ==
== Adjustment  ==
Line 92: Line 93:
=== Congenital Limb Deficiency  ===
=== Congenital Limb Deficiency  ===


*In the paediatric population, because the majority of children are born with limb deficiency, there is little adjustment to body image for the child. However with those that acquire an amputation (be it through a conversion amputation or traumatic amputation), the issue of adjustment does have to be addressed.  
*In the paediatric population, because the majority of children are born with limb deficiency, there is little adjustment to body image for the child. However with those that acquire an amputation (be it through a conversion amputation or traumatic amputation), the issue of adjustment does have to be addressed.<ref name=":4">Bryant Ph, Pandian G. Acquire limb deficiencies. 1. Acquired limb deficiencies in children and young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil''.''  2001; 82 (Suppl 1): S3-8.</ref>
*Though children may not go through a period of adjustment, parents and extended family members definitely do and hence support for these family members is paramount in the early phases. <br>  
*Though children may not go through a period of adjustment, parents and extended family members definitely do and hence support for these family members is paramount in the early phases. <ref name=":5">Calder P, Shaw S, Roberts A, Tennant S, Sedki I, Hanspal R, Eastwood D. A comparison of functional outcome between amputation and extension prosthesis in the treatment of congenital absence of the fibula with severe limb deformity. Journal of children's orthopaedics. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):318-25.</ref>
*Ideally, if the limb deficiency is identified in pre-natal scanning, an early referral helps the clinic team meet with the family prior to birth to help address the concerns and questions parents and extended family may have.  
*Ideally, if the limb deficiency is identified in pre-natal scanning, an early referral helps the clinic team meet with the family prior to birth to help address the concerns and questions parents and extended family may have.<ref name=":6">Engstrom B, Van de Ven C.Therapy for Amputees, 3rd Edition, Churchill Livingston, 1999. ISBN: 978-0-443-05975-9</ref>
*A follow up review is also advisable as soon as practicable after birth to allow the family further opportunity to discuss concerns and queries.
*A follow up review is also advisable as soon as practicable after birth to allow the family further opportunity to discuss concerns and queries.<ref name=":5" />


=== Congenital Limb Deficiency undergoing conversion amputation  ===
=== Congenital Limb Deficiency undergoing conversion amputation  ===


*Where a planned amputation occurs (ie. Conversion amputation), then pre-amputation counseling is carried out so that the child and family can adjust to the upcoming. This is often carried out with the use of therapy dolls and play therapy to illustrate the level of amputation and the use of a prosthesis in future life.  
*Where a planned amputation occurs (i.e. Conversion amputation), then pre-amputation counseling is carried out so that the child and family can adjust to the upcoming changes. This is often carried out with the use of therapy dolls and play therapy to illustrate the level of amputation and the use of a prosthesis in future life.<ref name=":4" />
*The period and inclusions of pre-amputation counseling varies for each child and family. Meeting another child and family who have gone through the same or similar process can be beneficial. It assists the child to see what life after enduring the impending surgery.  
*The period and inclusions of pre-amputation counseling varies for each child and family. Meeting another child and family who have gone through the same or similar process can be beneficial. It assists the child to see what life after enduring the impending surgery.<ref name=":3" />
*Pre-amputation counseling also includes clear guidance about the various phases the child and family will go through (ie. Pre-amputation planning, surgical admission, post-operative healing, stump bandaging, pre-prosthetic casting, prosthetic fitting, prosthetic rehabilitation and where appropriate participation in recreational and leisure pursuits).  
*Pre-amputation counseling also includes clear guidance about the various phases the child and family will go through (i.e. Pre-amputation planning, surgical admission, post-operative healing, stump bandaging, pre-prosthetic casting, prosthetic fitting, prosthetic rehabilitation and where appropriate participation in recreational and leisure pursuits).<ref name=":1" />
*Post operative, medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc) and psychosocial support are utilized to continue to address the issues around adjustment.
*Post operative, medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support are utilized to continue to address the issues around adjustment.<ref name=":6" />


=== Traumatic Amputation  ===
=== Traumatic Amputation  ===
Line 109: Line 110:
*The key factors that assist in adjustment often include timely support and again guidance as to the various phases that follow surgery.  
*The key factors that assist in adjustment often include timely support and again guidance as to the various phases that follow surgery.  
*In the post-operative phase, a team approach is adopted to address pain from the surgery, phantom sensation and phantom pain. In children phantom pain is not usually a long standing issue, however in the traumatic cases (and long standing tumours), anecdotally, there is a higher likelihood of phantom pain.  
*In the post-operative phase, a team approach is adopted to address pain from the surgery, phantom sensation and phantom pain. In children phantom pain is not usually a long standing issue, however in the traumatic cases (and long standing tumours), anecdotally, there is a higher likelihood of phantom pain.  
*In traumatic cases, a greater emphasis post operatively on medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc) and psychosocial support is needed to aid in adjustment due to the absence of minimal input that can be given in the pre-amputation phase.<br>
*In traumatic cases, a greater emphasis post operatively on medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support is needed to aid in adjustment due to the absence of minimal input that can be given in the pre-amputation phase. <ref name=":0" /><br>


With children and families, many childhood milestones, will cause a recurrence of grief and adjustment. Anticipatory guidance is important as a child enters child-care, the first year of schooling, sporting and recreational pursuits, etc.  
With children and families, many childhood milestones, will cause a recurrence of grief and adjustment. Anticipatory guidance is important as a child enters child-care, the first year of schooling, sporting and recreational pursuits, etc.<ref name=":1" />


The focus on family adjustment is key as the child often reflects their adjustment to their limb deficiency from those that are significant in their lives (parents, grandparents, older siblings).  
The focus on family adjustment is key as the child often reflects their adjustment to their limb deficiency from those that are significant in their lives (parents, grandparents, older siblings).<ref name=":1" />


== ‘Habilitation’ versus Rehabilitation  ==
== ‘Habilitation’ versus Rehabilitation  ==


Prosthetic rehabilitation in children is often more aptly described as ‘habilitation’ as many of the skills taught are newly acquired rather than needing to be reacquired as in adult rehabilitation.  
Prosthetic rehabilitation in children is often more aptly described as ‘habilitation’ as many of the skills taught are newly acquired rather than needing to be reacquired as in adult rehabilitation.<ref name=":7">Khan MA, Javed AA, Rao DJ, Corner JA, Rosenfield P. Pediatric Traumatic Limb Amputation: The Principles of Management and Optimal Residual Limb Lengths. World J Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;5(1):7-14. PMID: 27308235; PMCID: PMC4904133.</ref>


Decision making around prosthetic prescription and rehabilitation are often guided by a combination of factors. Initial prescription may revolve around physical development (eg. ‘fit to sit’ for upper limb deficiencies; ‘pull to stand’ for lower limb deficiencies), but the component and rehabilitation approach often are influenced by cognitive development.  
Decision making around prosthetic prescription and rehabilitation are often guided by a combination of factors. Initial prescription may revolve around physical development (eg. ‘fit to sit’ for upper limb deficiencies; ‘pull to stand’ for lower limb deficiencies), but the component and rehabilitation approach often are influenced by cognitive development.<ref name=":8">Le JT, Scott-Wyard PR. Pediatric limb differences and amputations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Feb;26(1):95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.09.006. PMID: 25479783</ref>


For children receiving their first limb, the prosthesis is seen as a tool that can assist in play (eg. for being able to stand and cruise, reach toys that are higher, etc). It is often recommended to the family that the limb remain in the toy box when not in use, so that the child develops positive associations with the limb.  
For children receiving their first limb, the prosthesis is seen as a tool that can assist in play (eg. for being able to stand and cruise, reach toys that are higher, etc). It is often recommended to the family that the limb remain in the toy box when not in use, so that the child develops positive associations with the limb.<ref name=":1" />


For children who have a lower limb deficiency, after progressing through the developmental sequences prior to upright mobility, the issue with prosthetic rehabilitation is often that children ‘get up an go’ and hence this period of input requires adequate understanding of developmental progressions without immediately seeking a mature gait pattern. As children mature, refinement of gait can be made, but therapy is again tailored to their level of development.  
For children who have a lower limb deficiency, after progressing through the developmental sequences prior to upright mobility, the issue with prosthetic rehabilitation is often that children ‘get up an go’ and hence this period of input requires adequate understanding of developmental progressions without immediately seeking a mature gait pattern. As children mature, refinement of gait can be made, but therapy is again tailored to their level of development.  


The primary role of paediatric prosthetic rehabilitation is not so much rehabilitation but anticipatory guidance to assist the child and family problem solve upcoming developmental milestones eg. growth spurts, commencement of schooling, engagement in sports and recreation, etc.  
The primary role of paediatric prosthetic rehabilitation is not so much rehabilitation but anticipatory guidance to assist the child and family problem solve upcoming developmental milestones eg. growth spurts, commencement of schooling, engagement in sports and recreation, etc.<ref name=":2" />


== Paediatric distinction when undergoing amputation  ==
== Paediatric distinction when undergoing amputation  ==
Line 138: Line 139:
**Physiotherapist (preamputation counseling, physical preparation, equipment planning, guidance through the various phases to follow)
**Physiotherapist (preamputation counseling, physical preparation, equipment planning, guidance through the various phases to follow)


Pain management involves the pre-surgical commencement of medications that may limit post-operative phantom limb pain eg. Gabapentin.  
Pain management involves the pre-surgical commencement of medications that may limit post-operative phantom limb pain eg. Gabapentin.<ref name=":7" />


=== Surgical Principles  ===
=== Surgical Principles  ===


As indicated in the ‘Immature Skeletal System’ section, the principles that guide amputation levels are different to the adult population:  
As indicated in the ‘Skeletal Growth and Amputations’ section, the principles that guide amputation levels are different to the adult population:<ref name=":8" />


*Preserving growth centres is a key principle that both limits the discrepancy between limbs and allows for greatest mechanical advantage as the child grows.  
*Preserving growth centres is a key principle that both limits the discrepancy between limbs and allows for greatest mechanical advantage as the child grows.  
Line 152: Line 153:
*Paediatric populations rarely have the list of comorbidities of adults and hence post-operative issues around wound healing are more related to the child’s activity rather than inactivity.  
*Paediatric populations rarely have the list of comorbidities of adults and hence post-operative issues around wound healing are more related to the child’s activity rather than inactivity.  
*Children heal relatively quickly and can be out of hospital within a matter of days to a week.  
*Children heal relatively quickly and can be out of hospital within a matter of days to a week.  
*Faster healing also progresses them through their post operative phase sooner and it may be as soon as 10 days post-operatively when sutures are removed and shaping of the stump may commence.<br>
*Faster healing also progresses them through their post operative phase sooner and it may be as soon as 10 days post-operatively when sutures are removed and shaping of the stump may commence.
*Unlike adult populations, where shrinker socks appear to be more readily used, these socks rarely are appropriate or available in paediatric sizes. Often due to the uniqueness of the stump because of its anatomy (ie. Congential limb deficiencies), stump bandaging is utilized in the pre-casting phase.
*Unlike adult populations, where shrinker socks appear to be more readily used, these socks rarely are appropriate or available in paediatric sizes. Often due to the uniqueness of the stump because of its anatomy (i.e. Congenital limb deficiencies), stump bandaging is utilized in the pre-casting phase. <ref>Miller M, Takata G, Stucky E, Neuspiel D. Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management and Committee on Hospital Care; Principles of Pediatric Patient Safety: Reducing Harm Due to Medical Care. Pediatrics, 2011; 127 (6): 1199–1210. 10.1542/peds.2011-0967</ref>


=== Prosthetic Provision  ===
=== Prosthetic Provision  ===


*Prosthetic fitting can occur as early as 3 weeks following surgery if no complications are encountered and the stump has little oedema. <br>
*Prosthetic fitting can occur as early as 3 weeks following surgery if no complications are encountered and the stump has little oedema.  
*Paediatric prosthetic design requires a high degree of adjustability, need to be lightweight and durable. <br>
*Paediatric prosthetic design requires a high degree of adjustability, need to be lightweight and durable.  
*Prosthetic design also reflects developmental stages eg. Child with disarticulation may go form having stumpy (socket with peg base) in early years and progression to attachment of foot and then progression to a knee joint. The size and weight of components often dictate when a component may be added rather than simply gauging when a child is cognitively ready to use a new component eg. progression from extension prosthesis to inclusion of a knee joint.<br>
*Prosthetic design also reflects developmental stages eg. Child with disarticulation may go form having stumpy (socket with peg base) in early years and progression to attachment of foot and then progression to a knee joint. The size and weight of components often dictate when a component may be added rather than simply gauging when a child is cognitively ready to use a new component eg. progression from extension prosthesis to inclusion of a knee joint.
*Due to rapid growth, the prosthesis may include design features unlike adult populations eg. added sockets or thicknesses of sockets, more modular components to accommodate height growth; growth oriented suspension systems, etc.
*Due to rapid growth, the prosthesis may include design features unlike adult populations eg. added sockets or thicknesses of sockets, more modular components to accommodate height growth; growth oriented suspension systems, etc.<ref>O'Keeffe B, Rout S. Prosthetic Rehabilitation in the Lower Limb. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;52(1):134-143. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687919. </ref>


=== Complications  ===
=== Complications  ===


*As indicated in the ‘Immature Skeletal System’ section, the key difference in paediatrics with regard to post-operative complications is the development of terminal overgrowth. This is far more frequent in children than in adult populations.  
*As indicated in the ‘Immature Skeletal System’ section, the key difference in paediatrics with regard to post-operative complications is the development of terminal overgrowth. This is far more frequent in children than in adult populations.  
*Its recurrence can be as frequent as every two years until reaching skeletal maturity.
*Its recurrence can be as frequent as every two years until reaching skeletal maturity.<ref name=":0" />


=== Follow Up  ===
=== Follow Up  ===


*Paediatric limb deficiency requires far greater follow up than in adult populations due to ongoing growth and development.  
*Paediatric limb deficiency requires far greater follow up than in adult populations due to ongoing growth and development.  
*For this reason, it is important to see children who are using prostheses at least once a year. Many children with upper limb deficiencies that don’t use prostheses, may access the clinic ever 2-3 years. Children who are undergoing growth spurts may require reviews 3-6monthly.
*For this reason, it is important to see children who are using prostheses at least once a year. Many children with upper limb deficiencies that don’t use prostheses, may access the clinic ever 2-3 years. Children who are undergoing growth spurts may require reviews 3-6monthly.<ref name=":0" />


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==


Day, H.J.B. [http://www.oandplibrary.org//alp/chap33-01.asp The ISO/ISPO Classification of Congenital Limb Deficiency] in Atlas of Limb Prosthetics. http://www.oandplibrary.org
Day, H.J.B. [http://www.oandplibrary.org//alp/chap33-01.asp The ISO/ISPO Classification of Congenital Limb Deficiency] in Atlas of Limb Prosthetics.


== References  ==
== References  ==
 
<references />  
&nbsp;<references />  


[[Category:Amputees]]  
[[Category:Amputees]]  
Line 184: Line 184:
[[Category:Paediatrics]]
[[Category:Paediatrics]]
[[Category:Paediatrics - Conditions]]
[[Category:Paediatrics - Conditions]]
[[Category:Congenital Conditions]]

Latest revision as of 15:23, 9 January 2023

Children are not little adults.[edit | edit source]

Though there are some areas of general overlap, the management of limb loss in children is quite different to adults. Key differentiations in the rehabilitation protocols include[1]:

  1. A high proportion of congenital limb deficiency versus acquired amputation
  2. Classification of congenital limb deficiencies
  3. An immature skeleton
  4. Adjustment
  5. Habilitation versus rehabilitation
  6. Growth and development considerations
  7. Paediatric distinctions when undergoing amputation

Congenital versus acquired loss:[edit | edit source]

Even with nomenclature, children and adults differ when it comes to describing limb loss. In paediatrics, the term ‘amputee’ or ‘amputation’ is replaced with limb difference or limb deficiency, as the majority of children with limb loss are born this way (i.e. congenital), and the limb is reduced from its normal size or is missing a portion of it[2]. The proportion of congenital versus acquired limb deficiency were varied in different studies but congenital deficiencies are always the leading cause[3]. An article from 2021, that describes the prevalence for lower limb loss in children in the US mentions congenital loss as the cause in 84% of the cases[4].

For the proportion of children that suffer an acquired loss, the two primary causes are[5]:

  1. Traumatic (eg. lawn mower (29%), farm machinery (24%), motor vehicle accidents (16%), etc.).
  2. In other reasons for acquired limb loss, malignancy and infection are major causes of a defect.

Classification of congenital limb deficiencies:[edit | edit source]

Congenital limb deficiency means the partial or total absence of a limb at birth. Classification/description of these deficiencies has been more challenging than simply stating transfemoral or transtibial amputation levels in the lower limb. A variety of limb classification systems have been used over the years, including Frantz and O’Rahilly (1961)[6]; McCredie (1974)[7]; and Swanson (1976)[8]. The current and accepted form of classification that has been adopted internationally since 1998 and is the ISPO classification system[9]. This form of classification utilizes anatomical and radiological evidence for describing the limb deficiencies.

It states whether the deficiency occurs in a transverse or longitudinal orientation and which anatomical structures are partially or totally absent. Even though the ISPO classification is still internationally used, further research in classification options are being conducted. The classification system published in 2011 in the American Journal of medical genetics, includes etiological and pathogenic factors alongside the anatomic classification and has been especially developed for the classification of congenital limb deficiencies[10].

Management of Prosthetic provisions in Paediatric population[edit | edit source]

The management of paediatric limb deficiency requires a longitudinal outlook[1]. This is to take into account the many development stages children go through from 0-18yrs, growth spurts and the need for education and anticipatory guidance for the family.

Unlike adult prosthetic prescription, a child may undergo a vast array of prosthetic changes as they grow eg. stumps to extend the prostheses with feet, to single axis knee units, to polycentric knee units, etc.

On top of the management of prosthetic alterations to match growth and cognitive development, there are the skeletal immaturity factors that need to be monitored throughout childhood (i.e. Growth spurts, terminal overgrowth, limb length discrepancies, etc.).

Possible reasons for review through a paediatric limb deficiency service[1]:

  1. Prosthetic provision
    • Interim prosthetic program for assessment of prosthetic proficiency
    • Definitive prosthetic prescription
    • Prosthetic review (eg. addition or change in prosthetic components)
  2. Prosthetic training
    • Initial prosthetic (interim program)
    • Specific task (eg. upper limb deficiency)
    • Specific componentry eg. myoelectric training
    • Developmental training (eg. walking, running, etc.)
    • Recreational prostheses (eg. musicianship)
  3. Developmental reviews
    • Key stages of development (eg. 0-1yr, pre schooling, growth spurts, etc.)
  4. Assistive and Adaptive Devices (particularly for children with upper limb deficiencies)
  5. Psychosocial support
    • Antenatal counseling
    • Pre amputation counseling
    • Issues of bullying, body image, etc.
    • Peer support
  6. Referral for genetic counseling
  7. Pain management
  8. Orthopaedic referral / collaboration
    • Pre amputation planning
    • Timing of epiphysiodesis
    • Assessment and management of terminal overgrowth
    • Conversion amputation
    • Asymmetric deformity progression
    • Considerations for limb lengthening
  9. Stump care (eg. skin breakdown/wound management)
  10. Pain management
  11. Anticipatory guidance (eg. medical, prosthetic, psychosocial, recreational, etc.).

Skeletal Growth and Amputations:[edit | edit source]

As is obvious, in paediatrics we are dealing with an immature skeletal system and hence issues related to growth are of primary importance. From a simple prosthetic perspective, children require more frequent prosthetic changes. In adult populations, replacement of prostheses may occur once every three years, whereas for children it is more often every year and more frequently in the early years and during adolescent growth spurts.

With the rapid changes in growth there are also biomechanical and orthopaedic challenges throughout development that need to be anticipated and managed.

With congenital limb deficiency, issues regarding limb reconstruction and/or limb lengthening are discussions that are required for a variety of limb deficiencies eg. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency; Congenital short femur, Longitudinal deficiency of the fibula.

Many children may choose the path of limb reconstruction rather than an amputation (commonly known as a conversion amputation). However, should the limb reconstruction path not deliver the desired goals of the child, family and treating team, then a switch to the conversion amputation may occur later in childhood.

Appropriateness and timing of conversion amputations is another area of collaboration between orthopaedic and rehabilitation teams.

When considering amputations, preservation of joints remains a common objection. However due to the immaturity of the skeletal system, issues such as terminal overgrowth and the maintenance of growth centres arise. In paediatrics, it is preferable for amputations to occur through joints (disarticulations) rather than through the diaphysis. This principle may lead to less cosmetic outcomes (ie. the bulbous shape of the distal stump), however the preservation of growth centres and avoidance of terminal overgrowth issues mean a better biomechanical outcome in the future and less surgical intervention throughout childhood.[11]

In the event of amputations that do occur through the diaphysis (eg. trauma), then terminal overgrowth becomes an issue that needs to be carefully monitored until skeletal maturity[12].

The theory behind terminal overgrowth appears to be that the cut bone is trying to create callous (as in after a fracture). This overgrowth tapers and causes distal stump pain. Clinically, it can be identified by the tapering shape of the distal stump; a bursa can often be felt under the most distal point and if severe, the area can feel warm and appear red. An x-ray is often requested to confirm terminal overgrowth.[12][13]

Adjustment[edit | edit source]

Congenital Limb Deficiency[edit | edit source]

  • In the paediatric population, because the majority of children are born with limb deficiency, there is little adjustment to body image for the child. However with those that acquire an amputation (be it through a conversion amputation or traumatic amputation), the issue of adjustment does have to be addressed.[14]
  • Though children may not go through a period of adjustment, parents and extended family members definitely do and hence support for these family members is paramount in the early phases. [15]
  • Ideally, if the limb deficiency is identified in pre-natal scanning, an early referral helps the clinic team meet with the family prior to birth to help address the concerns and questions parents and extended family may have.[16]
  • A follow up review is also advisable as soon as practicable after birth to allow the family further opportunity to discuss concerns and queries.[15]

Congenital Limb Deficiency undergoing conversion amputation[edit | edit source]

  • Where a planned amputation occurs (i.e. Conversion amputation), then pre-amputation counseling is carried out so that the child and family can adjust to the upcoming changes. This is often carried out with the use of therapy dolls and play therapy to illustrate the level of amputation and the use of a prosthesis in future life.[14]
  • The period and inclusions of pre-amputation counseling varies for each child and family. Meeting another child and family who have gone through the same or similar process can be beneficial. It assists the child to see what life after enduring the impending surgery.[13]
  • Pre-amputation counseling also includes clear guidance about the various phases the child and family will go through (i.e. Pre-amputation planning, surgical admission, post-operative healing, stump bandaging, pre-prosthetic casting, prosthetic fitting, prosthetic rehabilitation and where appropriate participation in recreational and leisure pursuits).[12]
  • Post operative, medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support are utilized to continue to address the issues around adjustment.[16]

Traumatic Amputation[edit | edit source]

  • In the event of traumatic amputations there is often no time to for counseling pre-operatively.
  • The key factors that assist in adjustment often include timely support and again guidance as to the various phases that follow surgery.
  • In the post-operative phase, a team approach is adopted to address pain from the surgery, phantom sensation and phantom pain. In children phantom pain is not usually a long standing issue, however in the traumatic cases (and long standing tumours), anecdotally, there is a higher likelihood of phantom pain.
  • In traumatic cases, a greater emphasis post operatively on medical (pain relief), physical (desensitization, contracture prevention, early mobilization, etc.) and psychosocial support is needed to aid in adjustment due to the absence of minimal input that can be given in the pre-amputation phase. [1]

With children and families, many childhood milestones, will cause a recurrence of grief and adjustment. Anticipatory guidance is important as a child enters child-care, the first year of schooling, sporting and recreational pursuits, etc.[12]

The focus on family adjustment is key as the child often reflects their adjustment to their limb deficiency from those that are significant in their lives (parents, grandparents, older siblings).[12]

‘Habilitation’ versus Rehabilitation[edit | edit source]

Prosthetic rehabilitation in children is often more aptly described as ‘habilitation’ as many of the skills taught are newly acquired rather than needing to be reacquired as in adult rehabilitation.[17]

Decision making around prosthetic prescription and rehabilitation are often guided by a combination of factors. Initial prescription may revolve around physical development (eg. ‘fit to sit’ for upper limb deficiencies; ‘pull to stand’ for lower limb deficiencies), but the component and rehabilitation approach often are influenced by cognitive development.[18]

For children receiving their first limb, the prosthesis is seen as a tool that can assist in play (eg. for being able to stand and cruise, reach toys that are higher, etc). It is often recommended to the family that the limb remain in the toy box when not in use, so that the child develops positive associations with the limb.[12]

For children who have a lower limb deficiency, after progressing through the developmental sequences prior to upright mobility, the issue with prosthetic rehabilitation is often that children ‘get up an go’ and hence this period of input requires adequate understanding of developmental progressions without immediately seeking a mature gait pattern. As children mature, refinement of gait can be made, but therapy is again tailored to their level of development.

The primary role of paediatric prosthetic rehabilitation is not so much rehabilitation but anticipatory guidance to assist the child and family problem solve upcoming developmental milestones eg. growth spurts, commencement of schooling, engagement in sports and recreation, etc.[11]

Paediatric distinction when undergoing amputation[edit | edit source]

Preoperative Phase[edit | edit source]

  • As indicated in the ‘Adjustment’ section, where possible (planned amputations) children and families require a developmentally appropriate approach to preoperative counseling. It involves not only the child, but also parents siblings, grandparents and other significant members of the family unit.
  • All members of the team are often involved in this phase
    • Medical (appropriate information and guidance, pain management, etc)
    • Social Worker (preamputation counseling)
    • Occupational Therapist (preamuputation counseling, play therapy, home modification and/or equipment planning).
    • Physiotherapist (preamputation counseling, physical preparation, equipment planning, guidance through the various phases to follow)

Pain management involves the pre-surgical commencement of medications that may limit post-operative phantom limb pain eg. Gabapentin.[17]

Surgical Principles[edit | edit source]

As indicated in the ‘Skeletal Growth and Amputations’ section, the principles that guide amputation levels are different to the adult population:[18]

  • Preserving growth centres is a key principle that both limits the discrepancy between limbs and allows for greatest mechanical advantage as the child grows.
  • Preservation of joints is a key principle, much like in adults, however in paediatrics it is taken one step further, in that operations such as a rotationplasty have been developed where ankle joints can substitute as knee joints.
  • Where the joint cannot be saved, amputations are preferable through joints rather than through the diaphysis. The primary reasons for this surgical principle is that it preserves growth centres and prevents risks of terminal bony overgrowth. In adult populations amputations through the diaphysis are preferred due to their cosmetic appearance and prosthetic socket design.

Post Operatively[edit | edit source]

  • Paediatric populations rarely have the list of comorbidities of adults and hence post-operative issues around wound healing are more related to the child’s activity rather than inactivity.
  • Children heal relatively quickly and can be out of hospital within a matter of days to a week.
  • Faster healing also progresses them through their post operative phase sooner and it may be as soon as 10 days post-operatively when sutures are removed and shaping of the stump may commence.
  • Unlike adult populations, where shrinker socks appear to be more readily used, these socks rarely are appropriate or available in paediatric sizes. Often due to the uniqueness of the stump because of its anatomy (i.e. Congenital limb deficiencies), stump bandaging is utilized in the pre-casting phase. [19]

Prosthetic Provision[edit | edit source]

  • Prosthetic fitting can occur as early as 3 weeks following surgery if no complications are encountered and the stump has little oedema.
  • Paediatric prosthetic design requires a high degree of adjustability, need to be lightweight and durable.
  • Prosthetic design also reflects developmental stages eg. Child with disarticulation may go form having stumpy (socket with peg base) in early years and progression to attachment of foot and then progression to a knee joint. The size and weight of components often dictate when a component may be added rather than simply gauging when a child is cognitively ready to use a new component eg. progression from extension prosthesis to inclusion of a knee joint.
  • Due to rapid growth, the prosthesis may include design features unlike adult populations eg. added sockets or thicknesses of sockets, more modular components to accommodate height growth; growth oriented suspension systems, etc.[20]

Complications[edit | edit source]

  • As indicated in the ‘Immature Skeletal System’ section, the key difference in paediatrics with regard to post-operative complications is the development of terminal overgrowth. This is far more frequent in children than in adult populations.
  • Its recurrence can be as frequent as every two years until reaching skeletal maturity.[1]

Follow Up[edit | edit source]

  • Paediatric limb deficiency requires far greater follow up than in adult populations due to ongoing growth and development.
  • For this reason, it is important to see children who are using prostheses at least once a year. Many children with upper limb deficiencies that don’t use prostheses, may access the clinic ever 2-3 years. Children who are undergoing growth spurts may require reviews 3-6monthly.[1]

Resources[edit | edit source]

Day, H.J.B. The ISO/ISPO Classification of Congenital Limb Deficiency in Atlas of Limb Prosthetics.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Smith D, Michael J, Bowker J. Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles. 3rd Edition. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004.
  2. Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA, Meyer RE, Correa A, Alverson CJ, Lupo PJ, Riehle‐Colarusso T, Cho SJ, Aggarwal D, Kirby RS. National population‐based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014. Birth Defects Research. 2019; 111(18): 1420-1435.
  3. Al-Worikat AF, Dameh W. Children with limb deficiencies: demographic characteristics. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Mar;32(1):23-8. doi: 10.1080/03093640701517083. PMID: 17852778.
  4. McLarney M, Pezzin L, McGinley E, Prosser L, Dillingham. The prevalence of lower limb loss in children and associated costs of prosthetic devices: A national study of commercial insurance claims, Prosthetics and Orthotics International: April 2021 - Volume 45 - Issue 2 - p 115-122 doi: 10.1177/0309364620968645
  5. Loder R. Demographics of Traumatic Amputations in Children, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: May 2004 - Volume 86 - Issue 5 - p 923-928
  6. Frantz CH, O'Rahilly R. Congenital skeletal limb deficiencies.1961. J Bone Joint Surg 43: 1202–1224.
  7. McCredie J. Embryonic neuropathy a hypothesis of neural crest injury as the pathogenesis of congenital malformations. Medical Journal of Australia. 1974 Feb;1(6):159-63.
  8. Swanson AB. A classification for congenital limb malformations.1976. J Hand Surg 1: 8–22.
  9. Day HJ. The ISO/ISPO classification of congenital limb deficiency. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991 Aug;15(2):67-9. doi: 10.3109/03093649109164635. PMID: 1923724.
  10. Gold NB, Westgate M-N, Holmes LB. Anatomic and etiological classification of congenital limb deficiencies.2011. Am J Med Genet Part A 155:1225–1235
  11. 11.0 11.1 Jain S. Rehabilitation in Limb Deficiency. 2. The Pediatric Amputee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(3 Suppl):S9-S13.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 Herring JA, Birch JG, eds. The Child With a Limb Deficiency. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1998:235-288.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Soldado F, Kozin SH. Bony Overgrowth in Children after Amputation. Journal of Ped Rehabil Med: An Interdisciplinary Approach 2. 2009; 235-239.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Bryant Ph, Pandian G. Acquire limb deficiencies. 1. Acquired limb deficiencies in children and young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.  2001; 82 (Suppl 1): S3-8.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Calder P, Shaw S, Roberts A, Tennant S, Sedki I, Hanspal R, Eastwood D. A comparison of functional outcome between amputation and extension prosthesis in the treatment of congenital absence of the fibula with severe limb deformity. Journal of children's orthopaedics. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):318-25.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Engstrom B, Van de Ven C.Therapy for Amputees, 3rd Edition, Churchill Livingston, 1999. ISBN: 978-0-443-05975-9
  17. 17.0 17.1 Khan MA, Javed AA, Rao DJ, Corner JA, Rosenfield P. Pediatric Traumatic Limb Amputation: The Principles of Management and Optimal Residual Limb Lengths. World J Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;5(1):7-14. PMID: 27308235; PMCID: PMC4904133.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Le JT, Scott-Wyard PR. Pediatric limb differences and amputations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Feb;26(1):95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.09.006. PMID: 25479783
  19. Miller M, Takata G, Stucky E, Neuspiel D. Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management and Committee on Hospital Care; Principles of Pediatric Patient Safety: Reducing Harm Due to Medical Care. Pediatrics, 2011; 127 (6): 1199–1210. 10.1542/peds.2011-0967
  20. O'Keeffe B, Rout S. Prosthetic Rehabilitation in the Lower Limb. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;52(1):134-143. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687919.