Traumatic Brain Injury Outcome Measures Overview: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Deleted the Conclusion heading because no content: Naomi please add again if the page is still being completed)
Line 192: Line 192:
[https://scireproject.com/outcome-measures/outcome-measure-tool/quebec-user-evaluation-of-satisfaction-with-assistive-technology-quest-2-0/ Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)]
[https://scireproject.com/outcome-measures/outcome-measure-tool/quebec-user-evaluation-of-satisfaction-with-assistive-technology-quest-2-0/ Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)]
|}<div align="justify"><div align="justify">
|}<div align="justify"><div align="justify">
== Conclusion  ==
Add text here...


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==

Revision as of 23:15, 11 September 2019

Introduction[edit | edit source]

An Outcome Measure is a test used to objectively determine baseline function of an individual at the beginning of treatment. Once treatment has commenced, the same instrument can be used to determine progress and treatment efficacy. With the move towards Evidence Based Practice (EBP), objective measures of outcome are important to provide credible and reliable justification for treatment. The instrument should also be convenient to apply for the therapist and comfortable for the individual.

Measuring the effectiveness of interventions is accepted as being central to good practice. An integral part of evaluating clinical practice is to objectively assess the intervention and measure it against a set of outcomes to determine its efficacy. For results to be meaningful, it is imperative that any measures used to assess outcomes in any health care context cover domains (for example pain, physical function, perceived independence) that are relatively specific and appropriate to both the particular context and population that you are working with and have acceptable measurement properties, including: reliability, validity, responsiveness, acceptability and feasibility specific to that population.

TBI EDGE Task Force Recommended Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

The TBI EDGE Task Force reviewed 88 outcome measures covering the range of ICF Domains, including body structure and function (15), activities (21), participation (29) and some covering more than 1 ICF domain (29), evaluating each for psychometrics and clinical utility for individuals with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Through literature review, analysis, and a modified Delphi Procedure, recommendations were formulated for outcome measures that are highly recommended for use in individuals with Traumatic Injury during each phase of treatment, with a summary for each of these outcome measures updated or added to the Shirley Ryan Ability Lab Rehabilitation Measures Database.

  • 5 measures were recommended or highly recommended for acute setting
  • 17 measures were recommended or highly recommended for inpatient rehabilitation
  • 18 measures were recommended or highly recommended for outpatient rehabilitation
  • 6 measures were recommended for patients mildly dependent to independent in ambulation:
  • 2 measures were recommended for patients moderately to severely dependent in ambulation
  • 19 measures were recommended for use in physiotherapy education
  • 52 measures were recommended for use in traumatic brain injury research

Phase and Setting of Treatment[edit | edit source]

Overall 14 measures were recommended or highly recommended for at least 2 levels of acuity providing the ability to compare progress over a longer period of time and covering a number of domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. The acute spinal cord injury category had a total of 6 “Highly Recommended” Outcome Measures and 7 “Recommended” Outcome Measures in comparison with the chronic spinal cord injury category, which had a total of 6 “Highly Recommended” Outcome Measures and 19 “Recommended” Outcome Measures. Limited research in acute spinal cord injury (0 - 3 months) meant fewer measures could be recommended during this phase of injury. In particular in relation to quality of life and upper limb function were areas in which no recommendations could be made, despite the importance of both areas and have been identified as a need for further research and development. [1]

Phase Timeframe Highly Recommended Recommended
Acute 0-3 Months Agitated Behavior Scale

Coma Recovery Scale-Revised

Moss Attention Rating Scale

Rancho Levels of Cognitive Functioning

Inpatient Coma Recovery Scale-Revised

Moss Attention Rating Scale

6 minute walk

10 meter walk

Berg Balance Scale

Community Balance and Mobility Scale Disability Rating Scale

Functional Assessment Measure Modified Ashworth Scale

Patient Health Questionnaire

Quality of Life after Brain Injury

Rancho Levels of Cognitive Function

Outpatient High Level Mobility Assessment Action Research Arm Test

Apathy Evaluation Scale

Balance Error Scoring Scale

Community Integration Questionnaire

Dizziness Handicap Inventory

Global Fatigue Index

Sydney Psychosocial Re-integration Scale

6 minute walk

10 meter walk

Berg Balance Scale

Community Balance and Mobility Scale Disability Rating Scale

Functional Assessment Measure Modified Ashworth Scale

Patient Health Questionnaire

Quality of Life after Brain Injury

Rancho Levels of Cognitive Function

Ambulatory Level[edit | edit source]

Phase Recommended
Mildly Dependent to Independent in Ambulation 6 minute walk

10 meter walk

Balance Error Scoring System

Community Mobility and Balance Scale

Functional Assessment Measure

High Level Mobility Assessment Test

Moderately to Severely Dependent in Ambulation Functional Assessment Measure

FIM

Note: Recommendations based on ambulatory level were made without consideration of treatment settings, therefore therapists must use clinical judgment to determine appropriateness of recommendations for individual cases.


International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Component[edit | edit source]

ICF Area Clinical Area Outcome Measure
Body Structure and Function Neurological and Autonomic Surface Electromyography
Strength Hand-Held Myometer
Spasticity Ashworth and Modified Ashworth

Penn Spasm Frequency Scale

Pendulum Test

Sensory - Pain Brief Pain Inventory
Skin Health Braden Scale
Mental Health CAGE Questionnaire

Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21

Patient Health Questionnaire - 9

Activities Lower Limb and Walking 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)

Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

Standing and Walking Toolkit

Wheeled Mobility Wheelchair Skills Test (WST)
Upper Limb Capabilities of Upper Extremity Instrument (CUE)

Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)

Jebsen Hand Function Test

Sollerman Hand Function Test

Box and Block Test

Self Care Frenchay Activities Index (FAI)

Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)

Participation Community Reintegration Craig Handicap Assessment & Reporting Technique (CHART)

Reintegration to Normal Living Index

Quality of Life Short Form-36 (SF-36)

World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)

Environment Assistive Technology Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment (ATD-PA)

Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)

Resources[edit | edit source]

The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury (COMBI)

Shirley Ryan Ability Lab Rehabilitation Measures Database

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named :1