Facial Grading System

Original Editor - Wendy Walker

Lead Editors  

Introduction

The Facial Grading System [FGS] is also known as the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System as it was devised and established at the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto. The clinicians who developed the FGS intended to create a measure which provided a quantitative score for reporting purposes, which would be sensitive enough to detect clinically important change over time or with treatment[1].

Objective

The Facial Grading System is a tool used for clinical evaluation of Facial Nerve function. It scores range of movement of the facial muscles, and records the score as a % where full range movement = 100%. It is easy for the clinician to compare range of movement on the affected side of the face to the contralateral side.

Intended Population

The FGS is intended for use on people with Facial Palsy irrespective of the cause of the facial palsy or weakness.

Method of Use

The FGS comprises 3 areas of evaluation[1]:

  1. Evaluation of resting symmetry
  2. Degree of voluntary excursion of facial muscles
  3. Degree of synkinesis associated with specific voluntary movement

The regions of the face are evaluated separately, with the use of 5 standard expressions:

  • eyebrow raise
  • eye closure
  • open mouth smile
  • lip pucker
  • snarl/show teeth

All the above items are evaluated on point scales, and a cumulative composite score is calculated.

Reliability

Studies have round the FGS to have good intrarater and inter-rater reliability[2][3][4].

One study[3] concluded "The intrarater reliability coefficients for the raters ranged from .838 to .929... The FGS is as reliable when applied by novice users as by expert users."

Comparison to other Facial Nerve Grading Instruments

One comprehensive 2015 study[5] examined a large number of grading instruments of facial nerve function, in particular "Each system was evaluated against the following criteria: convenience of clinical use, regional scoring, static and dynamic measures, features secondary to facial palsy (e.g., synkinesis), reproducibility with low interobserver and intraobserver variability, and sensitivity to changes over time and/or following interventions." The authors concluded that they "recommend widespread adoption of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale as the current standard in reporting outcomes of facial nerve disorders."

  1. 1.0 1.1 Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Mar:114(3):380-6
  2. Neely JG, Cherian NG, Dickerson CB, Nedzelski JM. Sunnybrook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading. Laryngoscope. 2010 May;120(5):1038-45
  3. 3.0 3.1 Hu WL, Ross B, Nedzelski J. Reliability of the Sunnybrook Facaial Grading System by novice users. J Otolaryngol. 2001 Aug;30(4):208-11
  4. Kanerva M, Poussa T, Pitkaranta A. Sunnybrook and House-Brackman Facial Grading Systems: intrater repeatability and interrater agreement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Dec; 135(6): 865-71
  5. Fattah AY, Gurusinghe AD, Gavilan J, Hadlock TA, et al. Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):569-79.