Jump to content

Rotator Cuff Tears

Original Editor - Lina TaingJenna Fried

Top Contributors - Descheemaeker Kari, Jenna Fried, Scott Buxton, Anne-Laure Vanherwegen, Admin, Lise Buelens, Lina Taing, Lucinda hampton, Kim Jackson, Dejonckheere Margo, Rachael Lowe, Ellen Vandyck, 127.0.0.1, Brecht Haex, Kai A. Sigel, Simisola Ajeyalemi, Selena Horner, Uchechukwu Chukwuemeka, Scott A Burns, Naomi O'Reilly, Fasuba Ayobami, Lauren Lopez, Alexandra Stead, Johnathan Fahrner, Wanda van Niekerk and Jess Bell

Definition and Classification

Defining massive rotator cuff tears remains challenging within the shoulder surgery literature, with no universally accepted criteria. Traditional classification systems have utilised either tear size measurements or the number of tendons involved to categorise severity.[1]

The Cofield classification system (1982) defines tear size based on anteroposterior or mediolateral dimensions: small tears measure less than 1 cm, medium tears 1 to 3 cm, large tears 3 to 5 cm, and massive tears exceed 5 cm.[2] However, this size-based approach has limitations as it does not account for functional implications or tendon quality.

The Collin anatomical classification provides an alternative framework by dividing the rotator cuff into five components: supraspinatus, superior subscapularis, inferior subscapularis, infraspinatus, and teres minor. This system categorises massive tears into five types based on specific tendon combinations involved. Type A involves supraspinatus and superior subscapularis tears, Type B affects supraspinatus and entire subscapularis, Type C includes supraspinatus, superior subscapularis and infraspinatus, Type D encompasses supraspinatus and infraspinatus, while Type E represents the most extensive pattern involving supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor.[1] This classification demonstrates clinical utility as it correlates with functional deficits and guides treatment decisions.

The modified Hamada classification system offers a radiographic framework for understanding progression towards rotator cuff arthropathy. This five-grade system evaluates acromiohumeral interval narrowing and glenohumeral joint changes, providing prognostic value for determining appropriate treatment strategies in massive tears.[3]

Clinically Relevant Anatomy

The shoulder complex consists of five articulations working synergistically to provide extensive range of motion whilst maintaining dynamic stability. The glenohumeral joint, acromioclavicular joint, and sternoclavicular joint are true synovial joints, complemented by the subacromial space and scapulothoracic articulation.[4]

[5]

The rotator cuff comprises four muscles providing both mobility and stability. The subscapularis enables internal rotation, whilst infraspinatus and teres minor control external rotation. The supraspinatus initiates and assists shoulder abduction. During shoulder elevation, these muscles work cooperatively through concavity compression, maintaining the humeral head centred within the glenoid fossa whilst allowing controlled motion.[3]

The rotator cuff muscles contribute significantly to shoulder elevation throughout the 60 to 130 degree arc. All muscles except supraspinatus produce a depressor force on the humeral head, counteracting the superior pull of the deltoid during glenohumeral abduction. This coordinated muscle action is essential for normal shoulder biomechanics, and disruption through massive tears leads to characteristic functional deficits including pseudo-paralysis in severe cases.[1]

Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Rotator cuff tears represent the leading cause of shoulder pain and disability, with prevalence increasing substantially with advancing age. Population studies demonstrate that full-thickness tears affect approximately 20-22% of the general population, with prevalence increasing from less than 5% in individuals under 40 years to over 35% in those aged 80 and above, though many remain asymptomatic.[6]

Recent research has identified multiple risk factors associated with symptomatic rotator cuff tears. A 2023 case-control study demonstrated that age, body mass index, hypertension, coronary heart disease, history of shoulder trauma, hyperlipidaemia, type III acromion morphology, and critical shoulder angle all independently increase tear risk.[7]

Evidence suggests risk factors may differ between younger and older patient populations. In younger individuals, traumatic injury and occupational demands play more prominent roles, whereas degenerative processes dominate in older populations. Modifiable risk factors including smoking, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, and metabolic syndrome have been associated with increased tear prevalence and progression.[8]

Understanding the natural history of rotator cuff tears is essential for treatment planning. Research indicates that approximately 50% of tears demonstrate progression over time, with medium and large tears progressing more rapidly than small tears. Factors associated with tear progression include high physical work demands and supraspinatus muscle atrophy.[9]

Clinical Presentation

The clinical presentation of massive rotator cuff tears varies considerably depending on tear location, chronicity, and individual compensation patterns. Common presenting features include:

  • Shoulder pain that typically worsens with overhead activities and at night, particularly when lying on the affected side.[10]
  • Progressive weakness affecting daily activities such as reaching overhead, lifting objects, or performing personal care tasks.
  • A positive painful arc sign during active shoulder elevation between 60 and 120 degrees is characteristic. The degree of functional impairment correlates with tear pattern, with anterosuperior tears affecting internal rotation strength and posterosuperior tears compromising external rotation capacity.[1]

On clinical examination, a rotator cuff tear may present with:

  • Muscle atrophy may be visible in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus fossae, particularly in chronic massive tears.
  • Superior migration of the humeral head may be palpable with the humeral head abutting the acromion.
  • Passive range of motion is typically preserved, though limited active motion may be present, reflecting motor weakness rather than joint stiffness.[10]
  • Pseudoparalysis, defined as active forward elevation less than 90 degrees with preserved passive motion, may occur in severe cases. This finding typically indicates extensive cuff disruption with inadequate compensatory muscle function.[1]

Diagnostic Assessment

Clinical Examination

A systematic physical examination protocol is essential for accurate diagnosis and tear localisation. The examination should include inspection for muscle atrophy, palpation of bony landmarks and tendons, active and passive range of motion assessment, strength testing, and special provocative tests.[4]

[11]

Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have clarified the diagnostic accuracy of common special tests.[12] For supraspinatus tears, the Jobe test (empty can test) and full can test demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity when properly performed. The external rotation lag sign shows particular utility for detecting large to massive posterosuperior tears.[13]

For subscapularis evaluation, the belly press test, lift-off test, and bear hug test provide complementary information. These tests generally demonstrate high specificity but variable sensitivity, with positive findings strongly suggesting subscapularis involvement. The Hornblower's sign effectively identifies teres minor tears, which typically occur only in massive posterosuperior tears.[4]

A 2024 systematic review confirmed that combinations of clinical tests improve diagnostic accuracy over individual tests alone. Experienced clinicians can achieve diagnostic accuracy comparable to imaging for full-thickness tears when using structured examination protocols.[12]

Imaging Studies

Plain radiography remains the initial imaging modality, providing valuable information about acromiohumeral distance, acromial morphology, greater tuberosity changes, and glenohumeral joint integrity. Narrowing of the acromiohumeral interval below 7 mm suggests chronic massive tears with superior humeral migration.[10]

Magnetic resonance imaging has become the reference standard for rotator cuff tear diagnosis and surgical planning. MRI accurately demonstrates tear size, location, tendon retraction, muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles. The Goutallier classification system, derived from MRI signal characteristics, grades fatty muscle degeneration from 0 to 4 and provides prognostic information regarding surgical repairability and outcomes.[3]

Ultrasound imaging offers a cost-effective alternative with comparable diagnostic accuracy for full-thickness tears when performed by experienced operators. Ultrasound provides dynamic assessment capabilities and point-of-care evaluation but depends heavily on operator skill and experience.[14]

Differential Diagnosis

Several shoulder conditions may present with similar symptoms and require differentiation from massive rotator cuff tears. Rotator cuff tendinopathy without full-thickness tearing produces comparable pain patterns but typically demonstrates preserved strength on examination. Subacromial bursitis may mimic rotator cuff pathology but usually responds promptly to targeted interventions.[4]

Cervical spine pathology including cervical radiculopathy and spondylosis can refer pain to the shoulder region and produce weakness that may be confused with rotator cuff tears. Neurological examination and consideration of symptom distribution patterns help distinguish these conditions. Adhesive capsulitis presents with marked restriction of passive range of motion, contrasting with the preserved passive mobility typical of rotator cuff tears.[10]

Acromioclavicular joint disorders, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, shoulder instability, and labral pathology including SLAP lesions and Bankart lesions all warrant consideration. Parsonage-Turner syndrome (neuralgic amyotrophy) can produce sudden severe shoulder pain and weakness mimicking acute rotator cuff tears but follows a distinct clinical course. Calcific tendinopathy represents another important differential diagnosis, particularly when patients present with acute severe pain.[14]

Outcome Measures

Valid and reliable outcome measures are essential for evaluating treatment effectiveness and facilitating clinical research. Several shoulder-specific instruments have been validated for rotator cuff pathology, each offering distinct advantages.[15]

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score combines pain assessment using a visual analogue scale with functional evaluation, providing a comprehensive 100-point scale. The ASES demonstrates good responsiveness to clinical change and is widely used in rotator cuff research. The Constant-Murley Score includes both subjective (pain, activities of daily living, sleep) and objective components (range of motion, strength), yielding a maximum score of 100 points.[16]

The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) focuses specifically on pain and disability using 13 items across two domains. The SPADI demonstrates excellent reliability and validity for rotator cuff pathology and can be completed quickly in clinical settings. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire provides a region-specific rather than joint-specific assessment, evaluating upper extremity function more broadly.[4]

The Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL) questionnaire specifically addresses quality of life impacts across five domains: symptoms and physical complaints, work-related concerns, sports and recreation, lifestyle issues, and social and emotional issues. This disease-specific measure captures the broader life impacts of rotator cuff pathology and has demonstrated responsiveness in recent long-term outcome studies.[9]

Conservative Management

Indications and Evidence

Conservative management represents an appropriate initial treatment approach for many patients with massive rotator cuff tears. Recent evidence from the MOON Shoulder Group demonstrated that 74% of patients with atraumatic full-thickness tears avoided surgery following 6 to 12 weeks of structured physiotherapy, with most surgical decisions occurring within the first 12 weeks.[17]

Conservative treatment is particularly indicated for older patients (over 70 years) with chronic tears, individuals with significant medical comorbidities or low functional demands, and those with irreparable tears characterised by extensive muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration, and superior humeral migration. A 2023 network meta-analysis found no significant differences in functional outcomes between conservative treatment, surgical repair, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for selected patient populations, supporting conservative approaches in appropriate cases.[9]

Ten-year follow-up data from nonoperatively treated patients demonstrate that successful conservative management can provide sustained improvement in quality of life measures, with many patients maintaining functional independence. However, clinicians must inform patients that conservative treatment does not repair the tear and that initially reparable tears may become irreparable over time due to tear progression and muscle degeneration.[10]

Physiotherapy Interventions

The primary objectives of physiotherapy for massive rotator cuff tears include pain reduction, restoration of functional movement patterns, strengthening of intact rotator cuff and scapular stabiliser muscles, and improving overall shoulder function for daily activities.[18]

A recent systematic review examining exercise therapy found that motor control exercise programmes demonstrated superior outcomes compared to non-specific exercise programmes for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain. However, the review noted that effects may be attributable to programme characteristics such as progression and individualisation rather than exercise type alone.[19]

Current evidence supports a phased approach to exercise rehabilitation. Initial phases focus on pain management, addressing muscle tension in the cervicoscapular region (including pectoralis minor, upper trapezius, and levator scapulae), and gentle range of motion exercises. Scapular positioning and mobilisation receive early attention, as scapulothoracic dysfunction commonly accompanies rotator cuff tears.[10]

Progressive strengthening of the intact rotator cuff muscles and scapular stabilisers forms the foundation of mid-phase rehabilitation. External rotation strengthening typically emphasises the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles through side-lying or standing resistance exercises. Scapular stabilisation exercises target the serratus anterior and middle/lower trapezius, which provide essential proximal stability for shoulder function.[4]

Research indicates that exercise dosage follows a principle of diminishing returns, with minimal additional benefit from excessive exercise volume. A single well-chosen exercise performed consistently may be as effective as complex multi-exercise programmes for many patients. Rehabilitation timelines typically extend at least 3 months, with some patients requiring 6 months or longer to achieve optimal outcomes.[19]

Recent clinical protocols recommend 4 to 6 physical therapy visits over 6 to 12 weeks, with visits spaced every other week to allow sufficient time for neural adaptation between sessions. Home exercise programmes should initially be prescribed 5 to 7 times per week when the clinical focus is activation and neural recruitment, transitioning to 3 times per week as the exercise focus shifts to strength and conditioning.[20]

Adjunctive Treatments

The 2025 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines on rotator cuff management provide evidence-based recommendations for various non-operative interventions. Subacromial corticosteroid injections may provide short-term pain relief but should be limited to no more than three to four injections to avoid potential tendon weakening effects.[17]

Evidence for platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in full-thickness tears remains inconclusive, with current guidelines noting insufficient evidence to recommend for or against this intervention. Hyaluronic acid injections and prolotherapy similarly lack robust supporting evidence for rotator cuff tears.[17]

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs provide symptomatic relief and can be incorporated into multimodal treatment programmes. Manual therapy techniques including joint mobilisation and soft tissue techniques may address secondary restrictions and facilitate exercise participation, though evidence supports limiting manual therapy to a maximum of 10 minutes as an adjunct to active exercise.[20]

Patient education regarding activity modification, sleep positioning, and self-management strategies enhances treatment outcomes. Across the literature, there is moderate evidence that passive intervention with modalities is not justified in treating rotator cuff tears, with active exercise forming the cornerstone of effective conservative management.[18]

Surgical Management

Indications and Decision-Making

Surgical intervention for massive rotator cuff tears requires careful consideration of multiple factors including patient age, functional demands, tear characteristics, muscle quality, and patient expectations. The 2025 AAOS guidelines note that high-level evidence supporting surgical treatment for full-thickness tears over conservative management remains limited, though surgery may be appropriate for selected patients.[17]

Early surgical repair should be considered for significant acute traumatic tears (greater than 1 to 1.5 cm) in younger patients, particularly when imaging demonstrates limited muscle degeneration and fatty infiltration. These patients face higher risks of irreversible muscle changes including tear progression, atrophy, and fatty degeneration if repair is delayed. Recent evidence suggests timing of repair for acute tears may be more critical than previously recognised.[21]

Surgical candidacy depends heavily on tear repairability, determined by tendon quality, degree of retraction, muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration. Tears with Goutallier grade 3 or 4 fatty infiltration generally demonstrate poor healing potential and may be better managed with alternative approaches including debridement, partial repair, or arthroplasty.[15]

Surgical Techniques

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has become the predominant surgical approach for most massive tears. This minimally invasive technique offers advantages including reduced soft tissue trauma, improved visualisation, faster rehabilitation, and decreased postoperative pain compared to open repair.[3]

For tears amenable to repair, both single-row and double-row fixation techniques are utilised. Recent systematic reviews found no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes between these approaches, though double-row repairs may demonstrate lower retear rates in some studies. The choice between techniques often depends on tear configuration and surgeon preference.[17]

Recent innovations in surgical technique include all-arthroscopic rotator cuff muscle advancement procedures. This approach, based on the Debeyre-Patte procedure, involves dissection of the medial insertions of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles whilst maintaining fascial continuity with the rhomboid muscle. Early reports demonstrate retear rates less than 6% with significant improvement in clinical outcomes, offering a viable option for large to massive tears previously considered difficult to repair.[21]

When complete repair is not feasible due to tear size or tissue quality, partial repair restoring the anterior or posterior cable may improve pain and function despite incomplete cuff reconstruction. This approach follows the suspension bridge concept, emphasising restoration of force couples rather than complete defect closure.[3]

For irreparable massive tears without arthropathy, superior capsular reconstruction and tendon transfers represent alternative options in selected younger patients. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has emerged as the treatment of choice for irreparable tears with rotator cuff arthropathy or in older patients with pseudoparalysis, with recent studies demonstrating superior outcomes compared to other salvage procedures.[15]

Postoperative Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Protocols

Postoperative rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair progresses through four distinct phases: protection and immobilisation, passive range of motion, active motion, and strengthening and functional training. The specific timeline and progression criteria vary based on tear size, tissue quality, repair security, and surgeon preference.[22]

Three primary postoperative protocols are described in the literature: strict immobilisation, early passive motion, and early assisted active motion. Recent meta-analyses suggest that early passive motion protocols beginning on the first postoperative day provide similar outcomes to delayed motion approaches whilst potentially reducing stiffness risk, though this must be balanced against repair security concerns in massive tears.[22]

The protection phase typically lasts 4 to 6 weeks for standard repairs, with extended immobilisation for massive tears or when tissue quality is poor. During this period, patients wear an abduction sling and perform pendulum exercises and passive range of motion with therapist assistance. Scapular retraction and protraction exercises without glenohumeral motion may begin during this phase.[23]

Many different factors influence postoperative rotator cuff repair rehabilitation outcomes, including rotator cuff tear size, type of repair, tissue quality, number of tendons involved, and individual patient factors like age and comorbidities including increased BMI and diabetes. Clinicians should consider taking a more conservative approach for more complex tears and involvement of more than one tendon.[23]

Exercise Progression

Active assisted and active range of motion exercises typically begin at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively once adequate tendon healing has occurred. Patients progress from supine active assisted elevation using a cane or pulley system to standing active motion in pain-free ranges. External rotation and internal rotation range of motion exercises advance gradually based on repair site protection principles.[8]

Strengthening exercises generally commence at 10 to 12 weeks postoperatively, beginning with isometric contractions and progressing to isotonic exercises using resistance bands and light weights. The strengthening programme emphasises rotator cuff muscles, scapular stabilisers, and deltoid strengthening in coordination patterns that protect the repair. Recent evidence suggests focusing on scapulothoracic joint rehabilitation may improve outcomes following arthroscopic repair.[8]

Functional and sport-specific training represents the final rehabilitation phase, typically occurring 4 to 6 months after surgery. Patients progress to higher-level activities based on achievement of range of motion and strength milestones, with return to full activities guided by tissue healing, functional performance, and individual goals.[24]

Rehabilitation Outcomes

Understanding that communication between surgeon and therapist is essential for optimal outcomes, rehabilitation programmes should be individualised based on specific tear and repair characteristics. Larger tears and repairs under greater tension require more conservative progression, whilst smaller tears may advance more quickly through rehabilitation phases.[23]

Recent systematic reviews examining long-term outcomes demonstrate that repair of massive rotator cuff tears leads to maintained improvements in outcome measures over extended follow-up periods. Failure of repair is common, with retear rates exceeding 50% at 12-month follow-up for large and massive tears. However, results following retear are often superior to preoperative outcomes when patients undergo comprehensive rehabilitation, suggesting rehabilitation may be more responsible for outcome improvements than repair integrity alone.[24]

Studies have shown that patients with failed repairs demonstrate similar satisfaction and clinical outcomes to those with intact repairs when both groups undergo comprehensive rehabilitation. This finding emphasises the critical importance of structured postoperative rehabilitation programmes regardless of structural repair integrity.[18]

Clinical Bottom Line

Massive rotator cuff tears represent complex shoulder pathology requiring individualised treatment approaches based on patient age, functional demands, tear characteristics, and treatment goals. Recent evidence demonstrates that conservative management with structured physiotherapy can successfully manage many patients, particularly older individuals with chronic tears or those with limited functional demands. Studies show that approximately three-quarters of patients with atraumatic tears can avoid surgery following dedicated physiotherapy programmes.[17]

For patients who proceed to surgery, arthroscopic repair techniques have evolved considerably, though repair integrity remains challenging to achieve in massive tears. Innovative techniques including muscle advancement procedures and biological augmentation strategies continue to expand treatment options. Regardless of treatment approach, comprehensive rehabilitation addressing pain management, range of motion restoration, and progressive strengthening of intact muscles forms the cornerstone of successful outcomes.[3]

Current evidence supports early surgical intervention for younger patients with acute massive tears and good tissue quality, whilst favouring conservative approaches for older patients with chronic degenerative tears. Shared decision-making incorporating patient preferences, functional goals, and realistic outcome expectations optimises treatment selection and patient satisfaction. Long-term outcome studies demonstrate that both operative and nonoperative treatments can provide sustained improvements in quality of life when coupled with appropriate rehabilitation strategies.[9]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Noh KC, Seo JB. Arthroscopic-guided Release of Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus Muscles for Repair of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tear and Suprascapular Nerve Release. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2024 Sep;13(9):102908.
  2. ↑ DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):563-567.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Kim YS, Koh KH. Current concepts in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2025 Mar;28(1):107-117.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Littlewood C, Malliaras P, Mawson S, May S, Walters SJ. Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy Diagnosis, Nonsurgical Medical Care, and Rehabilitation: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2025 Apr;55(4):235-274.
  5. ↑ Rotator Cuff Anatomy. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubpzaRjH7vA [last accessed 31/1/2026]
  6. ↑ Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, Yanagawa T, Nakajima D, Shitara H, Kobayashi T. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):116-120.
  7. ↑ Liao W, Jiang Q, Huang J, Li Z, Lin J, Chen J. Risk factors for symptomatic rotator cuff tears: A case-control study. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023 Dec 11;10:1321939.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Rezaie M, Negahban H, Mostafaee N, Tabatabaei Hashemi ST, Dehghani MR. Comparison of the physiotherapy with and without focus on the scapulothoracic joint on pain, range of motion, functional disability, quality of life, and treatment effectiveness of patients after arthroscopic shoulder rotator cuff tendon repair. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2024 Jul;37(3):319-330.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Boorman RS, More KD, Koles SL. Ten-year rotator cuff quality of life index (RC-QOL) outcomes following nonoperative treatment of patients with chronic full-thickness rotator cuff tears. JSES International. 2025 Feb;9(1):268-273.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Park JG, Ha YC. Conservative treatment of older adult patients with shoulder diseases: rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis. Ewha Medical Journal. 2025 Jan;48(1):e1.
  11. ↑ Rotator Cuff Examination. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkWZAo3XCvI [last accessed 31/1/2026]
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Zhao Q, Palani P, Kassab NS, Brounstein DE, Haydel C. Evidence-based approach to the shoulder examination for subacromial bursitis and rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1028.
  13. ↑ Jain NB, Luz J, Higgins LD, Dong Y, Warner JJP, Matzkin E, Katz JN. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Special Tests for Rotator Cuff Tear: The ROW Cohort Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;96(3):176-183.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Moya D, Rashid M, Rowinski S, Laver L, Maffulli N. Therapeutic options in rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. SICOT Journal. 2025 Jan;11:9.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Antonacci C, Longo UG, Schena E, De Salvatore S, Carnevale A, Nazarian A, Denaro V. Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority comparative surgical trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025 Jul 14;26(1):600.
  16. ↑ Tintu KK, Lakshmanan C, Binu M. Comparative study of conservative and surgical management of rotator cuff tears. International Journal of Medical and Public Health. 2025 Jan;15(1):1838-1843.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management of Rotator Cuff Injuries: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Rosemont, IL: AAOS; 2025.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 Littlewood C, May S, Walters S. Exercise rehabilitation in the non-operative management of rotator cuff tears: A review of the literature. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2023 Jun;18(3):763-777.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Wu XJ, Wen CX, Ke JZ, Liang JQ, Ding WQ, Zhong ZM. Specific modes of exercise to improve rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2025 Jan 7;6:1506406.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Sports & Orthopaedic Specialists. Conservative Rotator Cuff Tear Rehabilitation Protocol. Minneapolis, MN: Allina Health; 2024.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 Morihara T, Kida Y, Furukawa R, Hirose M, Matsumoto T, Takatori R, Kawakami Y, Kuroda R, Matsushita T. Clinical outcomes of primary repair for large and massive rotator cuff tears using an all-arthroscopic rotator cuff muscle advancement technique. JSES International. 2024 May 15;9(3):655-665.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Lee YJ, Wu CL, Hsu CC, Chiang ER, Lo SF. Early versus delayed mobilisation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024 Dec 4;25(1):974.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 Massachusetts General Hospital Sports Medicine. Rehabilitation Protocol for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Large to Massive Tear. Boston, MA: MGH; 2024.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Nuvoli N, Troiano E, Masini A, Bucci A, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Long-Term Outcomes of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024 Sep 23;13(18):5596.
Retrieved from "https://www.physio-pedia.com/w/index.php?title=Rotator_Cuff_Tears&oldid=375288"