Cervical Instability: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
(updated categories - removed course pages)
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
== Definition/Description  ==
== Definition/Description  ==


Clinical instability of the cervical spine is defined as the inability of the spine under physiological loads to maintain its normal pattern of displacement so that there is no neurological damage or irritation, no development of deformity, and no incapacitating pain.<ref name="Olson et al" />  
Clinical instability of the cervical spine (CICS) is defined as the inability of the spine under physiological loads to maintain its normal pattern of displacement so that there is no neurological damage or irritation, no development of deformity, and no incapacitating pain.<ref name="Olson et al">K.A. Olson, D. Joder, D[http://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.2001.31.4.194 iagnosis and treatment of Cervical Spine Clinical Instability], Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy, April 2001. (LoE:4)</ref> While no tools exists for the assessment of upper cervical ligamentous instability, an approach that takes into account risk factors, patient history, and examination results to make judicious decisions about patient management has been recommended<ref>Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK, Altman RD, Beattie P, Boeglin E. N[http://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.2017.0302 eck Pain: Revision 2017: Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health From the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association.] Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-83.</ref>.


This 7 minute video is provides a good summary of CICS
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6hUT1kBoEc&feature=youtu.be|width}}<ref>Dpt Orthopeadics Cervical Instability Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6hUT1kBoEc&feature=youtu.be (last accessed 4.2.2020)</ref>
== Clinically Relevant Anatomy ==
== Clinically Relevant Anatomy ==
The cervical spine consist of 7 separate vertebrae. The first two vertebrae (referred as upper cervical spine) are highly specialised and differ from the other 5 cervical vertebrae (lower cervical) regarding anatomical structure and function.  
[[Image:Cervical instability anatomy.png|200x200px|right|frameless|
*
]]The cervical spine consist of 7 separate vertebrae. See [[Cervical Anatomy]] also.
* The first two vertebrae (referred as upper cervical spine) are highly specialised and differ from the other 5 cervical vertebrae (lower cervical) regarding anatomical structure and function
* The upper cervical spine is made of the atlas (C1) and the axis (C2) the joint [[atlanto-occipital joint]] and  the [[atlanto-axial joint]]
* Atlantoaxial joint is responsible for 60% of all cervical rotation 
* Atlanto-occipital joint is responsible for 33% of flexion and extension.&nbsp;<ref>Windsor, R. “Cervical Spine Anatomy.” Updated april 9, 2013 (http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1948797-overview#a30)</ref>
[[Image:Cervical spine anatomy.jpg|right|395x395px]]The cervical spine has sacrificed stability for mobility and is therefore vulnerable to injury. The craniocervical junction ([[atlanto-occipital joint]]), the lower [[atlanto-axial joint]] and other cervical segments are reinforced by internal as well as external ligaments. They secure the spinal stability of the cervical spine as a whole, together with surrounding postural muscles and allow cervical motion. They also provide proprioceptive information throughout the spinal nerve system to the brain.


The upper cervical spine is made of the atlas (C1) and the axis (C2). It comprises of two joint structures: one in between os occipital and atlas ([[atlanto-occipital joint]]), the other one between atlas and axis, which forms the [[atlanto-axial joint]]. The atlantoaxial joint is responsible for 50% of all cervical rotation; the atlanto-occipital joint is responsible for 50% of flexion and extension.&nbsp;<ref>Windsor, R. “Cervical Spine Anatomy.” Updated april 9, 2013 (http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1948797-overview#a30)</ref><br>
The spinal stabilising system is divided into 3 functionally integrated subsystems <ref name="Panjabi">Panjabi, M. M. “The Stabilizing System of the Spine. Part II. Neutral Zone and Instability Hypothesis.” Journal of Spinal Disorders 5, no. 4: 390–397, December 1992 (LoE:5)</ref><ref name="Olson et al" /><ref>M. Takeshi et Al., Soft-Tissue Damage and Segmental Instability in Adult Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Major Bone Injury, Spine Journal, December 2012.fckLR</ref>
* Passive subsystem – spinal column (vertebrae, facet joints, intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments and joint capsules)
* Active subsystem – spinal muscles (muscles and tendons)
* Control subsystem – neural feedback (neural control centers and force transducers located in ligaments, tendons, muscles)


[[Image:Cervical instability anatomy.png|left|250px]]  
== Aetiology  ==
Causes include:
* Trauma (one major trauma or repetitive microtrauma or delayed or missed diagnosis of cervical spine injury after trauma (car accident rugby neck injury) . The traumatic flexion-extension moment exerted on the spine can cause ligamentous disruption with subsequent atlantoaxial instability (AAI) / upper cervical instability<ref name=":0">Yeo, Chang Gi, Ikchan Jeon, and Sang Woo Kim. “Delayed or Missed Diagnosis of Cervical Instability after Traumatic Injury: Usefulness of Dynamic Flexion and Extension Radiographs.” Korean Journal of Spine 12, no. 3 (September 2015): 146–49 (LoE:3B)</ref>. 
* Inflammatory arthritides eg.[[Ankylosing Spondylitis (Axial Spondyloarthritis)]], [[Rheumatoid Arthritis|Rheumatoid arthritis,]] due to the progressive destruction of the cervical skeletal structures. The most affected region is the upper cervical spine and C4-C5. <ref>Macovei, Luana-Andreea, and Elena Rezuş. “CERVICAL SPINE LESIONS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS.” Revista Medico-Chirurgicală̆ a Societă̆ţ̜ii De Medici Ş̧i Naturaliş̧ti Din Iaş̧i 120, no. 1 (March 2016): 70–76. </ref>
* Congenital collagenous compromise (e.g. syndromes: Down’s, Ehlers-Danlos, Grisel, Morquio) The [[Craniocervical Instability in Down Syndrome|atlanto-axial instability (AAI)]] is considered as a developmental anomaly often occurring in patient with the Down’s Syndrome (DS). It affects 6.8 to 27% of the population with DS.<ref>Myśliwiec, Andrzej, Adam Posłuszny, Edward Saulicz, Iwona Doroniewicz, Paweł Linek, Tomasz Wolny, Andrzej Knapik, Jerzy Rottermund, Piotr Żmijewski, and Paweł Cieszczyk. “Atlanto-Axial Instability in People with Down’s Syndrome and Its Impact on the Ability to Perform Sports Activities - A Review.” Journal of Human Kinetics 48 (November 22, 2015): 17–24. </ref>  Usually, persons with congenital anomalies do not become symptomatic before midlife adulthood. The spine is assumed to be able to accommodate differing regions of hypermobility and fusions. With time, the degenerative changes occurring in the lower cervical spine increase rigidity and alter the balance.  This gradual loss of motion places increasing loads on the atlantoaxial articulation.
* Recent neck/head/dental surgery.


The craniocervical junction ([[atlanto-occipital joint]]), the lower [[atlanto-axial joint]] and other cervical segments are reinforced by internal as well as external ligaments. They secure the spinal stability of the cervical spine as a whole, together with surrounding postural muscles and allow cervical motion. They also provide proprioceptive information throughout the spinal nerve system to the brain.
== Clinical Presentation/Examination  ==


The cervical spine has sacrificed stability for mobility and is therefore vulnerable to injury. The orientation of the cervical spine facet joints means the cervical spine is designed for a great deal of mobility, but it lacks stability.  The nonlinear displacement curve of the spine, the total range of motion of a spinal segment may be divided into the neutral zone and the elastic zone<ref name="Olson et al" />: 
Symptoms listed in descending rank
# Neutral zone: motion occurring in this zone is produced against a minimal passive resistance. 
# Intolerance to prolonged static postures
# Elastic zone: motion occurring in occurring near the end-range of spinal motion is produced against increased passive resistance.
# Fatigue and inability to hold head up
 
# Better with external support, including hands or collar
[[Image:Cervical spine anatomy.jpg|right]] 
# Frequent need for self-manipulation
 
# Feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control
<br>There are many authors that identified common components of spinal stability. Panjabi<ref name="Panjabi">Panjabi, M. M. “The Stabilizing System of the Spine. Part II. Neutral Zone and Instability Hypothesis.” Journal of Spinal Disorders 5, no. 4: 390–397, December 1992 (Level of evidence 5)</ref> conceptualised the components into 3 functionally integrated subsystems of the spinal stabilising system<sup><ref name="Olson et al">K.A. Olson, D. Joder, D[http://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.2001.31.4.194 iagnosis and treatment of Cervical Spine Clinical Instability], Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy, April 2001. Level of Evidence 4</ref><ref>M. Takeshi et Al., Soft-Tissue Damage and Segmental Instability in Adult Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Major Bone Injury, Spine Journal, December 2012.fckLRLevel of Evidence 2B</ref></sup>:<br>
# Frequent episodes of acute attacks
 
# Sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements
The passive subsystem:
# Head feels heavy
* Consists of vertebral bodies, facet joints and capsules, spinal ligaments (lig. longitudinale anterius and posterius, ligamentum interspinosum, lig. Interspinosus and lig. Flavum).<sup><ref>R. Banerjee et Al., Catastrophic Cervical Spine Injuries in the Collision Sport Athlete, Part 1 Epidemiology, Functional Anatomy, and Diagnosis, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004. Level of Evidence 2A</ref></sup>
# Neck gets stuck, or locks, with movement
* Passive tension from spinal muscles and tendons.
# Better in unloaded position such as lying down
* Provides significant stabilization of the elastic zone and limits the size of the neutral zone.
# Catching, clicking, clunking, and popping sensation
* Acts as a transducer and provides the neural control subsystem with information about vertebral position and motion
# Past history of neck dysfunction or trauma
The active subsystem:
# Trivial movements provoke symptoms
* Consists of spinal muscles and tendons, such as: multifidus cervicis, Longus capitis and the Longus Colli.<ref>W.Platzer, Atlas van de Anatomie, Bewegingsapparaat, Sesam, 1999. Level of Evidence 5</ref>
# Muscles feel tight or stiff
* Generates forces required to stabilize the spine in response to changing loads.
# Unwillingness, apprehension, or fear of movement
* Controls the motion occurring within the neutral zone and contributes to maintain the size the size of the neutral zone.
# Temporary improvement with clinical manipulation
* Acts also as a transducer by providing the neural control subsystem with information about the forces generated by each muscle.
The 12 physical examination findings included:
The neural control subsystem:
# Poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movemen
* Consists of peripheral nerves and the central nervous system. 
# Abnormal joint play
* Receives information from the transducers of the passive and active subsystems about vertebral position, vertebral motion, and forces generated by spinal muscles. The subsystem determines the requirements for spinal stability and acts on the spinal muscles to produce the required forces.
# Motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming
Clinical instability of the spine occurs when the neutral zone increases relative to the total ROM, the stabilizing subsystems are unable to compensate for this increase, which causes a poor and uncontrolled quality of motion in the neutral zone. <sup><ref>Olson, K. A., and D. Joder. “Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Spine Clinical Instability.” The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 31, no. 4 (April 2001): 194–206. (Level of evidence: 3B)</ref></sup><sup><ref>Choudhary AK, Ishak R, Zacharia TT, Dias MS. Imaging of spinal injury in abusive head trauma: a retrospective study. Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Sep. 44 (9):1130-40.</ref><ref>R. Banerjee et Al., Catastrophic Cervical Spine Injuries in the Collision Sport Athlete, Part 1 Epidemiology, Functional Anatomy, and Diagnosis, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004. Level of Evidence 2A</ref></sup> Degeneration and mechanical injury of the spinal stabilisation components are the primary causes of increases in neutral zone size. 
# Aberrant movement
 
# Hypomobility of upper thoracic spine
== Epidemiology /Etiology  ==
# Increased muscle guarding, tone, or spasms with test movements
 
# Palpable instability during test movements
It is generally accepted that cervical instability is caused by trauma (one major trauma or repetitive microtrauma). Cervical instability can also be a cause of delayed or missed diagnosis of cervical spine injury occurred after trauma (car accident, high impact on the neck) . The traumatic flexion-extension moment exerted on the spine can cause ligamentous disruption with subsequent atlantoaxial instability (AAI) also known as upper cervical instability<ref name=":0" />.  Although this occurs in very rare case its incidence is between 4.9 to 20%.<ref name=":0">Yeo, Chang Gi, Ikchan Jeon, and Sang Woo Kim. “Delayed or Missed Diagnosis of Cervical Instability after Traumatic Injury: Usefulness of Dynamic Flexion and Extension Radiographs.” Korean Journal of Spine 12, no. 3 (September 2015): 146–49 (Level of evidence 3B)</ref>
# Jerkiness or juddering of motion during cervical movement
 
# Decreased cervical muscle strength
Cervical instability is often diagnosed in patients with [[Rheumatoid Arthritis|rheumatoid arthritis]], due to the progressive destruction of the cervical skeletal structures. The most affected region is the upper cervical spine and C4-C5. <ref>Macovei, Luana-Andreea, and Elena Rezuş. “CERVICAL SPINE LESIONS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS.” Revista Medico-Chirurgicală̆ a Societă̆ţ̜ii De Medici Ş̧i Naturaliş̧ti Din Iaş̧i 120, no. 1 (March 2016): 70–76. (Level of evidence 2B)</ref>
# Catching, clicking, clunking, popping sensation heard during movement assessment
 
# Fear, apprehension, or decreased willingness to move during examination
Congenital deviation (eg, down syndrome) also can cause upper cervical spine instability.  The atlanto-axial instability (AAI) is considered as a developmental anomaly often occurring in patient with the down’s syndrome (DS). It affects 6.8 to 27% of the population with DS.<ref>Myśliwiec, Andrzej, Adam Posłuszny, Edward Saulicz, Iwona Doroniewicz, Paweł Linek, Tomasz Wolny, Andrzej Knapik, Jerzy Rottermund, Piotr Żmijewski, and Paweł Cieszczyk. “Atlanto-Axial Instability in People with Down’s Syndrome and Its Impact on the Ability to Perform Sports Activities - A Review.” Journal of Human Kinetics 48 (November 22, 2015): 17–24. (Level of evidence 2A)</ref>  Usually, persons with congenital anomalies do not become symptomatic before midlife adulthood. The spine is assumed to be able to accommodate differing regions of hypermobility and fusions. With time, the degenerative changes occurring in the lower cervical spine increase rigidity and alter the balance.  This gradual loss of motion places increasing loads on the atlantoaxial articulation
# Pain provocation with joint-play testing
 
Symptoms can be different but the most frequent clinical findings are<ref name="Olson et al" />:
The following risk factors are associated with the potential for bony or ligamentous compromise of the upper cervical spine<ref name="Cook et al">Cook C, Brismee JM, Fleming R, et al (2005). Identifiers suggestive of clinical cervical spine instability: a Delphi study of physical therapists. Physical Therapy 85(9):895-906.</ref>:
 
*History of trauma (e.g. whiplash, rugby neck injury)
*Throat infection
*Congenital collagenous compromise (e.g. syndromes: Down’s, Ehlers-Danlos, Grisel, Morquio)
*Inflammatory arthritides (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis)
*Recent neck/head/dental surgery.
 
Causes of cervical deformity/instability: 
* Congenital and developmental cervical deformities
* Neoplastic cervical deformities
* Neurologic abnormalities
* Metabolic and degenerative cervical deformities
* Inflammatory- induced cervical deformities
* Infection- induced cervical deformities
* Iatrogenically induced cervical deformities
* Traumatically induced deformities
 
== Characteristics/Clinical Presentation  ==
 
Aberrant motions occurring in the mid-ranges of active cervical movement are cardinal signs of cervical clinical instability<ref name="Olson et al" />
 
Symptoms can be different but the most frequent clinical findings are<ref name="Olson et al" />:  
* Tenderness in the cervical region
* Tenderness in the cervical region
* Referred pain in the shoulder or paraspinal region
* Referred pain in the shoulder or paraspinal region
Line 81: Line 75:
* Hypermobility and soft end-feeling in passive motion testing
* Hypermobility and soft end-feeling in passive motion testing
* Poor cervical muscle strength (multifidus, longus capitis, longus colli)
* Poor cervical muscle strength (multifidus, longus capitis, longus colli)
Because a definitive diagnostic tool has not been developed, cervical clinical instability will continue to be diagnosed through clinical findings, including history, subjective complaints, visual analysis of active motion quality, and manual examination methods<ref name="Olson et al" />.
The following tests can be used to measure cervical instability<ref>Hutting N, Scholten-Peeters GG, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests: a systematic review.Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1686-95. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130186. Epub 2013 Jul 25.</ref> but little is known about the diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests:
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Sharp_Purser_Test Sharp-Purser test]
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Transverse_Ligament_Stress_Test Transverse Ligament Stress Test]
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Cervical_Flexion-Rotation_Test Cervical flexion-rotation test]
*Neck Flexor Muscle Endurance Test and [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Cranio%E2%80%90cervical_Flexion_Test Craniocervical flexion test]
One high quality systematic review by Hutting et al<ref>Hutting N, Scholten-Peeters GG, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1686-1695. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.2522/</nowiki> ptj.20130186</ref> revealed poor diagnostic accuracy for all upper cervical ligament instability tests evaluated. In general, these tests have sufficient specificity and can rule in upper cervical ligamentous instability, but degrees of sensitivity varied.


Magee et al reported poor cervical muscle endurance is one of the clinical findings we find with cervical instability. A good way to test these muscles (the deep cervical flexor muscles, the longus capitis and longus colli) is the [[Cranio‐cervical Flexion Test|craniocervical flexion test]] (CCFT) which is a test of neuromotor control. The main goal of the test is to apply an isometric force on a pressure sensor placed behind the neck without using the superficial cervical flexors. The construct validity of the craniocervical flexion test has ben verified in a laboratory setting<ref name="Jull">Jull GA; Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test; J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):525-33.</ref>
== Differential Diagnosis  ==
== Differential Diagnosis  ==


It’s important to remember that problems in de neck region can be masked by problems in other regions of the body. A frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) for example can be seen in conjunction with a cervical radiculopathy. Other shoulder pathologies such as brachial plexitis can also cause pain and weakness of muscles in the shoulder-neck-region. <sup>[</sup><sup>LOE 5]</sup>.
Certain Patients that might present with acute neurologic symptoms that raise alarm for cervical compression or neck pain but without a specific origin should undergo a thorough physical examination and radiographic evaluation to determine the source.<br>More often than not are the findings nonspecific and can be representative of any number of related conditions. Neck pain, weakness and other characteristics also present in cervical spine instability can also be seen in the following cervical diseases including the following:&nbsp;<ref name="Cook et al">Cook C, Brismee JM, Fleming R, et al (2005). [https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/85/9/895/2805194/Identifiers-Suggestive-of-Clinical-Cervical-Spine Identifiers suggestive of clinical cervical spine instability: a Delphi study of physical therapists.] Physical Therapy 85(9):895-906. (LoE:5)</ref><ref>Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE,Quillen Ws : Cervical spine in Pathology an intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation p17-63 ,2009, St-Louis, Saunders Elsevier</ref>
 
Certain Patients that might present acute neurologic symptoms that raise alarm for cervical compression or neck pain but without a specific origin should undergo a thorough physical examination and radiographic evaluation to determine the source.<br>More often than not are the findings nonspecific and can be representative of any number of related conditions. Neck pain, weakness and other characteristics also present in cervical spine instability can also be seen in the following cervical diseases including the following:&nbsp;<ref name="Cook et al" /><ref>Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE,Quillen Ws : Cervical spine in Pathology an intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation p17-63 ,2009, St-Louis, Saunders Elsevier</ref>
* Cervical strain  
* Cervical strain  
* Cervical trauma or fracture  
* Cervical trauma or fracture  
Line 104: Line 105:


== Diagnostic Procedures  ==
== Diagnostic Procedures  ==
Evaluation for spinal instability differs in the acute traumatic setting versus the chronic degenerative setting.
Acute setting: Canadian C-spine rule used to determine what patients need cervical spine imaging
Chronic setting: History and physical exam help guide the initial imaging modality, which will often be plain x-rays. However, more advanced detail imaging such as dynamic imaging, MRI, CT and studies with contrast, is often necessary to detect instability.<ref name=":1">Vincent Huang, MD, Andrew Lederman, MD Nov 2016 [https://now.aapmr.org/spinal-instability-definition-theory-and-assessment-of-spinal-column-function-and-dysfunction/ SPINAL INSTABILITY: DEFINITION, THEORY AND ASSESSMENT OF SPINAL COLUMN FUNCTION AND DYSFUNCTION] Available from:
☀https://now.aapmr.org/spinal-instability-definition-theory-and-assessment-of-spinal-column-function-and-dysfunction/ (last accessed 4.2.2020)
</ref>


Cervical instability is a diagnosis based primarily on a patient’s history and reported symptoms.  
Cervical instability is a diagnosis based primarily on a patient’s history and reported symptoms.  
Line 109: Line 117:
'''Imaging'''
'''Imaging'''


Objective criteria have been established in the analysis of end-range flexion and extension radiographs to diagnose cervical spine instability<ref>McCracken B, Klineberg E, Pickard B, Wisner DH. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698361/ Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients.] European Spine Journal. 2013 Jul 1;22(7):1467-73.</ref>. However, radiographs do not provide information about the quantity or quality of motion in the neutral zone (ie, mid-range), which limits their value in the diagnosis of cervical spine clinical instability<ref name="Olson et al" />.  
Radiologic Diagnosis of Instability:   
 
* Cervical radiographs
There is often little correlation between the degree of instability or hypermobility shown on radiographic studies and clinical symptoms. Even after severe whiplash injuries, plain radiographs are usually normal despite clinical findings indicating the presence of soft tissue damage. <ref>Van Mameren H, Drukker J, Sanches H, Beursgens J. Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane (I) range of motion of actually performed movements, an x-ray cinematographic study. Eur J Morphol. 1990;28(1): 47–68 (Level of evidence: 2B)</ref> 
** Segmental kyphosis greater than 11 degrees
 
** Anterolisthesis greater than 3.5 mm of one vertebral body on another
MRI images could be useful to screen the integrity of the vertebral ligaments. Taking images during an anterior shear test or a distraction test shows a greater intervertebral distance and an increase in direct length of the ligaments<ref>Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, Rowe LJ. The anterior shear and distraction tests for craniocervical instability. An evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging. Man Ther. 2012 Oct;17(5):416-21. Level of evidence: 1B</ref>.
* Lateral neutral, flexion and extension xrays
 
** Forward displacement of one vertebrae on another: spondylolisthesis
However, functional computerized tomography (fCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans and digital motion x-ray (DMX) are able to adequately depict cervical instability pathology . Studies using fCT for diagnosing soft tissue ligament or post-whiplash injuries have demonstrated the ability of this technique to show excess atlanto-occipital or atlanto-axial movement during axial rotation . This is especially pertinent when patients have signs and symptoms of cervical instability, yet have normal MRIs in a neutral position.
** Backward displacement of one vertebrae on another: retrolisthesis
 
** Narrowing of the intervertebral foramen and loss of disc thickness
Functional imaging technology, as opposed to static standard films, is necessary for adequate radiologic depiction of instability in the cervical spine because they provide dynamic imaging (flexion and extension images of the spine) of the neck during movement and are helpful for evaluating the presence and degree of cervical instability.<ref>Radcliff K, Kepler C, Reitman C, Harrop J, Vaccaro A. CT and MRI-based diagnosis of craniocervical dislocations the role of the occipitoatlantal ligament. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2012 (Level of evidence: 2B)</ref><ref>Antinnes J, Dvorak J, Hayek J, Panjabi MM, Grob D. The value of functional computed tomography in the evaluation of soft-tissue injury in the upper cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 1994;3: 98–101 (Level of evidence: 2B)</ref> (LOE 2B)
** An abrupt apparent change in pedicle length
 
* Anteroposterior xrays with lateral bending
'''Examination''' 
** Bending to one side or another
 
** Decreased bending to one side with loss of both vertebral rotation and tilt with actual opening of the disc on the side to which the patient is bending
Cook et al<ref name="Cook et al" /> tired to obtain consensus of symptoms and physical examination findings associated with clinical cervical spine instability. The study resulted in a list of 16 symptoms and 12 physical examination findings that is associated with CCSI.
** An abnormal degree of disc closure on the side to which the patient is bending
 
** Malalignment of spinous processes and pedicles
The related symptoms listed in descending rank of relationship are:
** Lateral translation of one vertebra on another due to an abnormal degree of rotation
# Intolerance to prolonged static postures
<sup></sup>
# Fatigue and inability to hold head up
# Better with external support, including hands or collar
# Frequent need for self-manipulation
# Feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control
# Frequent episodes of acute attacks
# Sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements
# Head feels heavy
# Neck gets stuck, or locks, with movement
# Better in unloaded position such as lying down
# Catching, clicking, clunking, and popping sensation
# Past history of neck dysfunction or trauma
# Trivial movements provoke symptoms
# Muscles feel tight or stiff
# Unwillingness, apprehension, or fear of movement
# Temporary improvement with clinical manipulation<sup></sup>
The 12 physical examination findings included:
# Poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movement
Abnormal joint play
Motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming
Aberrant movement
Hypomobility of upper thoracic spine
Increased muscle guarding, tone, or spasms with test movements
Palpable instability during test movements
Jerkiness or juddering of motion during cervical movement
Decreased cervical muscle strength
Catching, clicking, clunking, popping sensation heard during movement assessment
Fear, apprehension, or decreased willingness to move during examination
Pain provocation with joint-play testing
Motion disparity between AROM and PROM
Poor posture; postural deviations
Decreased AROM in weight bearing
Need to support head during examination movements
Positive radiographic evidence
Palpable segmental changes, such as step-off at C5-C6
Positive ligament shear test
Painful arc, including through range of pain
Forward head posture
Positive test for transverse ligament of atlas
Hypomobility of upper cervical spine
Positive Alar Ligament Stress Test
Positive Sharp-Purser Test
Pain at end range of movement
Positive VBI tests
 
Magee et al reported poor cervical muscle endurance is one of the clinical findings we find with cervical instability. A good way to test these muscles (the deep cervical flexor muscles, the longus capitis and longus colli) is the [[Cranio‐cervical Flexion Test|craniocervical flexion test]] (CCFT). The CCFT could be described as a test of neuromotor control.
 
The features that are tested are the activation and isometric endurance of the deep cervical flexors as well as their interaction with the superficial cervical flexors (the sternocleidomastoid and the anterior scalene) during the performance of five progressive stages of increasing craniocervical flexion range of motion. It is a low-load test performed in the supine position with the patient guided to each stage by feedback from a pressure sensor placed behind the neck. While the test in the clinical setting provides only an indirect measure of performance, the construct validity of the CCFT has been verified in a laboratory setting by direct measurement of deep and superficial flexor muscle activity. If the 5 stages can’t be completed by the patient, the deep cervical flexor muscles need to be trained. <ref>Gwendolen AJ et al; Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008 Sep;31(7):525-33. (Level of evidence 2C)</ref>
== Outcome Measures  ==
== Outcome Measures  ==


To measure chronic neck pain we can use the neck disability index, the neck bournemouth questionnaire or the neck pain and disability scale. These three questionnaires are specific and valid instruments to evaluate the neckpain and dysfunction. <ref name="Gay">Ralph E. Gay; Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain; Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. Volume 30, Issue 4, May 2007, Pages 259–262 (Level of evidence 1B)</ref><ref name="Linton">Steven J Linton, A cognitive-behavioral group intervention as prevention for persistent neck and back pain in a non-patient population: a randomized controlled trial; Volume 90, Issues 1–2, 1 February 2001, Pages 83–90 (Level of evidence 1B)</ref><br>The pain catastrophizing scale can be used to evaluate how the patient experiences the pain. It measures the rumination, magnification and helplessness of the patient. <ref name="Linton" />
These three questionnaires are specific and valid instruments to evaluate the neckpain and dysfunction. <ref name="Gay">Ralph E. Gay; Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain; Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. Volume 30, Issue 4, May 2007, Pages 259–262 </ref><ref name="Linton">Steven J Linton, A cognitive-behavioral group intervention as prevention for persistent neck and back pain in a non-patient population: a randomized controlled trial; Volume 90, Issues 1–2, 1 February 2001, Pages 83–90</ref>
* [[Neck Disability Index|Neck disability index]]
* Neck bournemouth questionnaire
* Neck pain and disability scale.  


*Symptoms
== Medical Management  ==
The current definitions of spine instability are not uniformly accepted nor applied. Therefore, there is no consensus about the timing of conservative versus surgical treatment of CICS. The understandings of spinal biomechanics need improvement to determine and differentiate the relationship and severity between radiographic instability and its clinical manifestation. This gap in knowledge makes it difficult for all disciplines involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients suffering from disorders of spine stability.<ref name=":1" />


There is a large agreement on following symptoms to make a clinical judgment on CCSI: “intolerance to prolonged static postures,” “fatigue and inability to hold head up,” “better with external support, including hands or collar,” “frequent need for self-manipulation,” “feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control,” “frequent episodes of acute attacks,” and “sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements.” <sup>[10] Level of evidence: 4</sup>  
In the past few decades nonoperative manoeuvres like traction, cast immobilizations and long periods of bed rest had been replaced by the use of instrumentation to stabilise the spine after a trauma (reducing the risk of negative sequelae of long term bed rest)<ref>Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M? Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP. Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma: indications and techniques. Injury 2005 Jul;36 Suppl 2:B36-43.  Review</ref>.


*Physical examination
The cervical stability can be achieved by using posterior fixation such as lateral mass plating, processus spinosus or facet wiring and cervical pedicle screws. The choice of which fixation is best, can be made by the surgeon after seeing a CT-scan or MRI. 


The physical examination findings related to cervical instability that reached the highest consensus among specialists included “poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movement,” “abnormal joint play,” “motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming,” and “aberrant movement.” <sup>[10]</sup>  
In a retrospective study of Fehlings, the cervical spine stabilisation was successful in 93% off the cases<ref name="Kandziora">Fehlings MG, Cooper PR, Errico TJ. Posterior plates in the management of cervical instability: long-term results in 44 patients. Journal of neurosurgery. 1994 Sep 1;81(3):341-9.</ref>. &nbsp; 


*Radiography
The fixation procedure also holds some risks. It is possible that the spinal cord, vertebral artery, spinal nerve and facet joints get injured.
 
All initial evaluations of cervical spine injuries should begin with plain radiographs. A variety of other imaging modalities may also be used, such as conventional tomography, CT, and MRI. An appropriate choice has to be made quickly to make a diagnosis of cervical trauma. When cervical trauma exists, it may be at multiple levels, justifying the fact that if treatment is to be instituted, imaging should include the upper and lower cervical hinges. The quality of the standard radiographs varies greatly; their negative quality and predictive value decreases when the severity of the injury increases. <sup>[1,2,3,4,5,6,7] </sup>
 
== Examination  ==
 
Little is known about the diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests.
 
One study proposed different identifiers for cervical spine instability. They divided them into different categories: movements, descriptive components, and postures. Patients also experienced neurological problems and headaches. [15] [LOE 5]
 
Movements: <ref name="Cook et al" />[LOE 5]<br>The neck locks when doing certain movements<br>A sharp pain can be provoked by certain movements<br>Banal movements provoke symptoms out of proportion<br>Patients are not willing to move their neck into areas beyond their confort zone
 
Descriptive components: <ref name="Cook et al" /><ref name="Olson et al" />[LOE 5,4]<br>History of a trauma or neckdysfunction(cervicogenic headaches, chronic whiplash dysfunction, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and segmental degeneration)<br>Supporting the neck with a brace or hands causes relief of symptoms<br>The neck feels instable<br>Catching or clicking sensation when moving the neck<br>The musculature of the neck feels stiff<br>The pain is worse at the end of the day
 
Postures: <ref name="Olson et al" />[LOE 4]<br>Neckpain or headaches provoked by static weightbearing postures<br>Relieved by non-weightbearing postures
 
Cook et al.(2005) listed the related physical examination findings in descending rank of relationship. These findings are:
 
#Poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movement
#Abnormal joint play
#Motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming
#Aberrant movement
#Hypomobility of upper thoracic spine
#Increased muscle guarding, tone, or spasms with test movements
#Palpable instability during test movements
#Jerkiness or juddering of motion during cervical movement
#Decreased cervical muscle strength
#Catching, clicking, clunking, popping sensation heard during movement assessment
#Fear, apprehension, or decreased willingness to move during examination
#Pain provocation with joint-play testing<br>
The following tests can be used to measure cervical instability<ref>Hutting N, Scholten-Peeters GG, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests: a systematic review.Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1686-95. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130186. Epub 2013 Jul 25.</ref><span style="line-height: 1.5em; font-size: 13.28px;">:</span>
 
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Cranio%E2%80%90cervical_Flexion_Test Craniocervical flexion test]
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Sharp_Purser_Test Sharp-Purser test]
*Upper cervical flexion test
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Cervical_Flexion-Rotation_Test Cervical flexion-rotation test]
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Transverse_Ligament_Stress_Test Transverse Ligament Stress Test]
*Neck Flexor Muscle Endurance Test
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Spurling's_Test Spurling's Test]
 
The craniocervical flexiontest is a test to measure the isometric endurance of the deep cervical flexors. The main goal of the test is to aply an isometric force on a pressure sensor placed behind the neck without using the superficial cervical flexors. The construct validity of the craniocervical flexiontest has ben verified in a laboratory setting. <ref name="Jull">Jull GA; Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test; J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):525-33. (Level of evidence 5)</ref>[LOE 5]
 
Deep cervical flexor electromyographic activity was recorded with custom electrodes inserted via the nose and fixed by suction to the posterior mucosa of the oropharynx. Surface electrodes were placed over the superficial neck muscles (sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene). Root mean square electromyographic amplitude and craniocervical flexion range of motion was measured during five incremental levels of craniocervical flexion in supine. After this we can conclude there is a strong linear relation between the electromyographic amplitude of the deep cervical flexor muscles and the incremental stages of the craniocervical flexion test for control and individuals with neck pain. These data confirm that reduced performance of the cranio cervical flexion test is associated with dysfunction of the deep cervical flexor muscles and support the validity of this test for patients with neck pain. <ref name="Falla">Falla DL, Jull GA, Hodges PW. Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 1;29(19):2108-14 (Level of evidence: 3B)</ref>(LOE 3B)
 
The sharp-Purser test listed in Gregory Uitvlugt et al is a useful clinical examination to diagnose atlantoaxial instability. We assessed the validity of the Sharp-Purser test in 123 outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis. Our findings indicate a predictive value of 85% and a specificity of 96%. The sensitivity was 88% when subluxation was &gt; 4 mm. <ref name="Gregory Uitvlugt">Gregory Uitvlugt; Clinical assessment of atlantoaxial instability using the sharp-purser test; Arthritis &amp; Rheumatism; nov 2005 (Level of evidence: 2B)</ref> (LOE 2B)
 
== Medical Management  ==
 
In the past few decades nonoperative maneuvers like traction, cast immobilization and long periods of bed rest had been replaced by the use of instrumentation to stabilize the spine after a trauma. This method can reduce the risk of negative sequelae of long term bed rest<ref>Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M? Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP. Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma: indications and techniques. Injury 2005 Jul;36 Suppl 2:B36-43. (Level of Evidence IA) Review</ref>.&nbsp;The cervical stability can be received by using posterior fixation such as lateral mass plating, processus spinosus or facet wiring and cervical pedicle screws. The choice of which fixation is best, can be made by the surgeon after seeing a CT-scan or MRI. In a retrospective study of Fehlings, the cervical spine stabilization was successful in 93% off the cases<ref name="Kandziora">Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M? Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP. Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma: indications and techniques. Injury 2005 Jul;36 Suppl 2:B36-43. Level of Evidence IA</ref>. &nbsp;Obviously this fixation procedure also holds some risks. It is possible that the spinal cord, vertebral artery, spinal nerve and facet joints get injured. Levine et al. reported radicular symptoms in 6 of their 72 patients<ref>Ebraheim N. Posterior lateral mass screw fixation: anatomic and radiographic considerations. The University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal 12: 66-72, 1999. (Level of evidence Ia) Review</ref>.


== Physical Therapy Management  ==
== Physical Therapy Management  ==


The goal of the physical treatment is to enhance the function of the spinal stabilizing subsystems and to decrease the stresses on the involved spinal segments.
Conservative treatment is indicated when cervical clinical instability does not severely involve or threaten neurological structures. The goal of nonsurgical treatment should be to enhance the function of the spinal stabilising subsystems and to decrease the stresses on the involved spinal segments.  
 
• Posture education and spinal manipulation: <br>- Decreases stresses on the passive subsystem. <br>- Proper posture: reduces the loads placed on the spinal segments at end-ranges and returns the spine to a biomechanically efficient position. <br>- Spinal manipulation can be performed on hypomobile segments above and below the level of instability, what eventually will result in a distribution of the spinal movement across several segments. Also the mechanical stresses on the level of clinical instability are believed to be decreased. <sup>[10] Level of Evidence 4</sup><br>- Video over joint mobilization: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn1Ed2SxTx0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn1Ed2SxTx0]<br>• Strengthening exercises: <br>- Enhances the function of the active subsystem. <br>- The cervical multifidus may provide stability via segmental attachments to cervical vertebrae.<br>- The m. longus colli and capitus provide anterior stability.<br>- Strengthening the stabilizing muscles may enable those muscles to improve the quality and control of movement occurring within the neutral zone.<sup>[10] Level of Evidence 4, [13] Level of Evidence 2B</sup><br>• Exercise video: Neck strength and stability [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ldpfUxEv9M www.youtube.com/watch]<br>In a more specific situation such as post-operative revalidation for example in the case of a cervical fusion, the treatment can differ as described hereunder.
 
• The patient is not required to wear a brace. After 6 weeks it is not encouraged to do any lifting more than 4kg as also overhead work. The rehabilitation begins at week 6, mostly a basic stability exercises program. No cervical strengthening or ranges of motion exercises are encouraged in the first 6 months.<br>The exercises or mainly focused on the neutral postural alignment, were the patients are recommended to us there trunk, hips and chest to produce proper cervical alignment. For other types of operations the treatment-plan will be defined in function of the critical nature of the trauma.<sup>[19]Level of Evidence 5</sup><br><br>
 
The use of posture education and spinal manipulation may be used to decrease stress on the passive subsystem. Spinal manipulation can be performed on hypomoblie spinal segments above and below the instability level. It is believed that with those manipulations the spinal movement is more evenly distributed across the segments and that mechanical stress on clinical instability is decreased.<br>By using proper posture the loads placed on spinal segments is reduced at end-ranges. The spine can return to his biomechanically efficient position. <ref name="Panjabi" /><ref name="Olson et al" />
 
<br> To enhance the function of the active subsystem the physiotherapist will use strengthening exercises for the spinal region. The multifidus and the transversus abdominis play a role in the lumbar stabilization. Some have hypnotized that an analogy could be made between the cervical and lumbar multifidus and between the m. longus coli and m. longus capitis and the transversus abdominis.<ref name="Panjabi" /><ref name="Olson et al" />
 
One of the main goals of the non-surgical treatment is to improve the quality of controlled motion. Therefore proprioception exercises must be used, this will improve the control of movement in the neutral zone. Another important goal is to decrease the stress on the cervical region, using soft tissue techniques. By achieving these goals surgery may be prevented.<ref name="Panjabi" /><ref name="Olson et al" /><br> <br>Kenneth A. Olson (2001) used the following exercises for his case study.<ref name="Olson et al" /> (LOE: 3B)
 
<u>'''Therapeutic manipulations (mostely for headache)'''</u><ref name="Olson et al" /> (LOE: 3B)''':'''<br>
 
{| width="600" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" align="center"
|-
! scope="col" | Type
! scope="col" | Description
|-
|
Grade I oscillation
 
|
Small amplitude movement performed at the beginning of range
 
|-
|
Grade II oscillation
 
|
Large amplitude movement performed within the range but not reach- ing the'limit of the range
 
|-
|
Grade III oscillation
 
|
Large amplitude movement performed up to the limit of the range
 
|-
|
Grade IV oscillation
 
|
Small amplitude movement performed at the limit of the range.
 
|-
|
High velocity thrust
 
|
When a sudden high velocity, short amplitude motion is delivered at the pathological limit of an accessory motion
 
|-
|
Isometric
 
|
Where the patient's muscles are used to mobilize the joint by performing an isometric contraction against the operator's resistance
 
|}
 
<br>
 
#Second rib manipulation using supine thrust technique<br>
#Upper thoracic manipulation (high-velocity thrust)
#Cervical facet joint upglide manipulation (grade IV)
#Suboccipital distraction with C2 stabilization
#Upper thoracic rotation manipulation (grade III)
 
<br>'''<u>Active exercise therapy <ref name="Olson et al" /></u>'''(LOE: 3B)''':'''
 
*Partial suboccipital nod with a head lift in supine to strengthen the longus capitus and longus colli muscles[12] (LOE: 3B):
 
The patient lies on his back with his head on the table/a pillow. He nods and hold this position as he lift his head off the table/pillow. This position is hold during 2-3 seconds and then the patient lowers his head back on the table/pillow. 3-4 sets of 10 repetitions were performed.
 
*Active suboccipital nodding:
 
The patient lies on his back with a pillow under his head and nods. The physiotherapist applies a little resistance to prevent the patient to perform a neck flexion. The patient is then asked to bend his neck from a neutral position to the point of first resistance and then return to a neutral position. The patient is instructed to keep her head on the pillow throughout performance of the exercise. 3-4 sets of 10 repetitions were performed.
 
*Craniovertebral sidebending isometric manipulation:
 
With the patient in supine, head resting on a low pillow, passively position the cran- iovertebral region into right sidebending to the point of resistance to the motion. Manually resist further right sidebending by applying manual pressure above the right ear as the patient holds isometrically for 10 seconds. Passively reposition the patient into further right sidebending if the passive motion has improved, and then reapply the isometric force for 10 seconds. This sequence is repeated 3-4 times in 1 session.
 
*Quadruped position arm lift with spinal stabilization.
 
3-4 sets of 10 repetitions were performed.<br>
 
<br>
 
All those exercises can be performed at home. In adittion the patient recieved controlled opening exercises for the mandible that would be repeated 5- 6 times, 5-6 times per day as home training.<br>
 
<br>
 
<u>Anita R. Gross et al </u>listed an evidence-based home neck care exercise program that exists in 3 progressive phases. These exercises should be judiciously tailored to individual circumstances and applied as indicated based on a clinical examination. These exercices can be included if the CCFT test was found positive. <ref name="Gross et al">Gross R. et al; Knowledge to action: a challenge for neck pain treatment; J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):351-63 (Level of evidence 5)</ref>(LOE 5)
 
'''<u>Phase 1</u>'''<br>
 
*Craniocervical flexion
 
Start with pressure biofeedback inflated to 20 mmHg. Make sure your chin and forehead are lined up. Nod your head, keeping the large neck muscles soft and bringing the reading up to 22 mmHg. Work up to ten 10-second holds. Then progress to 24, 26, and 28 mmHg.<br>
 
*Neck active range of motion
 
Start with your head in neutral, then:
 
#Tilt backward
#Bend forward
#Tilt side to side
#Turn side to side<br>
 
*Resisted shoulder extension&nbsp;with elbow flexed
 
“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals and scapulae, then extend your arm with elbows bent backward.
 
<br>
 
*Resisted shoulder extension with elbow straight
 
“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then extend your arm backward. <br>
 
*Resisted shoulder shrug
 
“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then slightly abduct arms and minimally shrug shoulders. <br>
 
*Resisted elbow exercise
 
“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then:
 
#Bend
#Straighten level 1
#Straighten level 2 your elbows.<br>


<br>  
'''Posture Education and Spinal Manipulation'''
* Decreases stresses on the passive subsystem<ref name="Olson et al" />  
* Proper posture: reduces the loads placed on the spinal segments at end-ranges and returns the spine to a biomechanically efficient position<ref name="Olson et al" /><ref name="Panjabi" />
* Spinal manipulation can be performed on hypomobile segments above and below the level of instability, what eventually will result in a distribution of the spinal movement across several segments. Also the mechanical stresses on the level of clinical instability are believed to be decreased<ref name="Olson et al" />
* Video over joint mobilisation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn1Ed2SxTx0
'''Strengthening Exercises'''
* Enhances the function of the active subsystem.
* The cervical multifidus may provide stability via segmental attachments to cervical vertebrae.
* The longus colli and capitus provide anterior stability.
* Strengthening the stabilizing muscles may enable those muscles to improve the quality and control of movement occurring within the neutral zone.<ref name=":0" /><ref name="Cook et al" />
* Exercise video: Neck strength and stability [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ldpfUxEv9M www.youtube.com/watch]
'''Proprioception Exercises'''


<u>'''Phase 2'''</u><br>
One of the main goals of the non-surgical treatment is to improve the quality of controlled motion. Therefore proprioception exercises must be used, this will improve the control of movement in the neutral zone.


*Headlift
'''Post-Operative Rehabilitation'''


Start with your head in neutral (chin and forehead lined up), do a chin nod and lift your head, while maintaining your chin tucked. Hold for a count of 5 to 10 seconds and return smoothly with your chin still tucked.  
In a more specific situation such as post-operative rehabilitation the treatment can differ:
* The patient is not required to wear a brace.
* After 6 weeks it is not encouraged to do any lifting more than 4kg as also overhead work.
* The rehabilitation begins at week 6, mostly a basic stability exercises program.  
* No cervical strengthening or ranges of motion exercises are encouraged in the first 6 months.
* The exercises or mainly focused on the neutral postural alignment, were the patients are recommended to us there trunk, hips and chest to produce proper cervical alignment.  


<br>  
== Example of Management Programme ==
Anita R. Gross et al listed an evidence-based home neck care exercise program that can be included if the CCFT test was found positive. It is in 3 progressive phases. These exercises should be judiciously tailored to individual circumstances and applied as indicated based on a clinical examination<ref name="Gross et al">Gross R. et al; Knowledge to action: a challenge for neck pain treatment; J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):351-63 (LOE:5)</ref>


*Isometric neck strength
'''<u>Phase 1</u>'''


Place your hand on your head and resist:  
*Craniocervical flexion- Start with pressure biofeedback inflated to 20 mmHg. Make sure your chin and forehead are lined up. Nod your head, keeping the large neck muscles soft and bringing the reading up to 22 mmHg. Work up to ten 10-second holds. Then progress to 24, 26, and 28 mmHg.
*Neck active range of motion - Start with your head in neutral, then:
*#Tilt backward
*#Bend forward
*#Tilt side to side
*#Turn side to side
*Resisted shoulder extension&nbsp;with elbow flexed - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals and scapulae, then extend your arm with elbows bent backward.
*Resisted shoulder extension with elbow straight - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then extend your arm backward.
*Resisted shoulder shrug -“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then slightly abduct arms and minimally shrug shoulders.
*Resisted elbow exercise - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then:
*#Bend
*#Straighten level 1
*#Straighten level 2 your elbows.
<u>'''Phase 2'''</u>


#Bending  
*Headlift - Start with your head in neutral (chin and forehead lined up), do a chin nod and lift your head, while maintaining your chin tucked. Hold for a count of 5 to 10 seconds and return smoothly with your chin still tucked.
#Tilting backward  
*Isometric neck strength - Place your hand on your head and resist. Hold for a count of 5 to 10 seconds:
#Tilting sideways  
*#Bending  
#Turning your head
*#Tilting backward  
*#Tilting sideways  
*#Turning your head


Hold for a count of 5 to 10 seconds. <br>
*Shoulder stretches - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae hold for 20 seconds.
*#Clasp your hands behind your back and squeeze your scapulae together
*#Hold your arms out in front of you and reach forward feeling a stretch between your scapulae
*#Reach your arms overhead


*Shoulder stretches
*Shoulder stretches - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, hold for 20 seconds.
 
*#With elbows at shoulder level, lean into a corner to feel a stretch in the front of your chest  
“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae,  
*#With elbows at eye level lean into a corner to feel a stretch
 
*Transverse abdominus - Tense your lower abdomen by imagining drawing your hip bones together (or apart if that works better), hold for 10 seconds. Then let the 1 leg fall out over a 10-second count  
#Clasp your hands behind your back and squeeze your scapulae together
#Hold your arms out in front of you and reach forward feeling a stretch between your scapulae
#Reach your arms overhead
 
Hold for 20 seconds.<br>
 
*Shoulder stretches
 
“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae
 
#With elbows at shoulder level, lean into a corner to feel a stretch in the front of your chest  
#With elbows at eye level lean into a corner to feel a stretch
 
Hold for 20 seconds.
 
<br>
 
*Transverse abdominus
 
Tense your lower abdomen by imagining drawing your hip bones together (or apart if that works better), hold for 10 seconds<br>Then let the 1 leg fall out over a 10-second count <br>
 
*Wall sit
 
“Set” cervical spine, transverse abdominus, and scapulae, then slide down the wall into a semi-squat position. Hold for as long as you can, working up to 2 minutes.<br>
 
<br>


*Wall sit - “Set” cervical spine, transverse abdominus, and scapulae, then slide down the wall into a semi-squat position. Hold for as long as you can, working up to 2 minutes.
<u>'''Phase 3'''</u>  
<u>'''Phase 3'''</u>  


*Shoulder strength
*Shoulder strength - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae then “hug a tree.”
 
*Shoulder strengthen - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then elevate arms into a “reverse fly.”  
“Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae then “hug a tree.”  
*Resisted neck: craniocervical&nbsp;flexion and oblique flexion - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then
 
*#Nod head  
*Shoulder strengthen
*#Nod head at a slight oblique angle  
 
*Resisted neck extension - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae:
“Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then elevate arms into a “reverse fly.” <br>
*#First nod your head  
 
*#Then tilt your head backward  
*Resisted neck: craniocervical&nbsp;flexion and oblique flexion
*#The focus of extension is in the lower neck
 
*Resisted neck side flexion - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then tilt head to the side.  
“Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then  
*Resisted neck rotation - “Set” cervical spine, transverse abdominus, and scapulae, then rotate head.
 
#Nod head  
#Nod head at a slight oblique angle <br>
 
*Resisted neck extension
 
“Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae:  
 
#First nod your head  
#Then tilt your head backward  
#The focus of extension is in the lower neck<br>
 
*Resisted neck side flexion
 
“Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then tilt head to the side. <br>
 
*Resisted neck rotation
 
“Set” cervical spine, transverse abdominus, and scapulae, then rotate head.  


In the table below you can find the dosage recommendations for the evidence-based home neck care exercise program.  
In the table below you can find the dosage recommendations for the evidence-based home neck care exercise program.  
Line 581: Line 358:
5 min  
5 min  


|}
|}  
 
== Key Research  ==
 
*Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, Rowe LJ. The anterior shear and distraction tests for craniocervical instability. An evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging. Man Ther. 2012 Oct;17(5):416-21. Level of evidence: 1B
*Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M? Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP. Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma: indications and techniques. Injury 2005 Jul;36 Suppl 2:B36-43. Level of Evidence 1A
*Ebraheim N. Posterior lateral mass screw fixation: anatomic and radiographic considerations. The University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal 12: 66-72, 1999. Level of evidence: 1A
*Ralph E. Gay; Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain; Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Volume 30, Issue 4, May 2007, Pages 259–262 Level of evidence: 1B
*Steven J Linton; A cognitive-behavioral group intervention as prevention for persistent neck and back pain in a non-patient population: a randomized controlled trial; Volume 90, Issues 1–2, 1 February 2001, Pages 83–90 Level of evidence: 1B
*Steven J Linton, A cognitive-behavioral group intervention as prevention for persistent neck and back pain in a non-patient population: a randomized controlled trial; Volume 90, Issues 1–2, 1 February 2001, Pages 83–90 Level of evidence: 1B
*P.G. Osmotherly et Al., Knowledge and use of craniovertebral instability testing by Australian physiotherapists, Elsevier, 2011.<sup>&nbsp;</sup>Level of Evidence 2B<br>
 
== Resources <br>  ==
 
- K.A. Olson, D. Joder, Diagnosis and treatment of Cervical Spine Clinical Instability, Journal of Orthopaedic &amp; Sports Physical Therapy, April 2001. <sup>[10] Level of Evidence 4</sup><br>
 
== Clinical Bottom Line  ==
 
Clinical cervical spine instability (CCSI) is controversial and difficult to diagnose. Within the literature, no clinical or diagnostic tests that yield valid and reliable results have been described to differentially diagnose this condition. <sup>[10] </sup><br>The screening by tests for upper cervical instability cannot be done accurately at the moment. <sup>[11] level of Evidence 2B</sup><br>
 
Cervical instability describes a wide range of conditions from neck pain and deformation without any clear proof over little malformations too complete failure of intervertebral connection. Some cause pain, damage/irritation to the spinal cord or nerve roots, while others not. Sometimes this condition can be masked by problemes in other regions of the body.
 
Until there is no existance of a golden standard or acceptable measurement to diagnose cervical instability. Nowadays a combination of clinical findings and X-ray both dynamic and static are used to diagnose cervical instability. <br>The general causes of this condition are: trauma, rheumatoid arthritis or a tumor.<br>
 
The sixteen most related <u>symptoms</u> listed in descending rank of relationship are:
 
#Intolerance to prolonged static postures
#Fatigue and inability to hold head up
#Better with external support, including hands or collar
#Frequent need for self-manipulation
#Feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control
#Frequent episodes of acute attacks
#Sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements
#Head feels heavy
#Neck gets stuck, or locks, with movement
#Better in unloaded position such as lying down
#Catching, clicking, clunking, and popping sensation
#Past history of neck dysfunction or trauma
#Trivial movements provoke symptoms
#Muscles feel tight or stiff
#Unwillingness, apprehension, or fear of movement
#Temporary improvement with clinical manipulation<br>
 
The twelve most observed&nbsp;<u>physical examination findings</u> are:
 
#Poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movement
#Abnormal joint play
#Motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming
#Aberrant movement
#Hypomobility of upper thoracic spine
#Increased muscle guarding, tone, or spasms with test movements
#Palpable instability during test movements
#Jerkiness or juddering of motion during cervical movement
#Decreased cervical muscle strength
#Catching, clicking, clunking, popping sensation heard during movement assessment
#Fear, apprehension, or decreased willingness to move during examination
#Pain provocation with joint-play testing<br>
 
<br>
 
The following tests can be used to identief cervical spine instability:
 
*Transverse ligament stress test
*Sharp-Purser test
*Upper cervical flexion test
*Cervical flexion-rotation test
*Grimmer test
 
<br>
 
The medical management consists in stabilization of the cervical spine. The cervical stability can be received by using posterior fixation such as lateral mass plating, processus spinosus or facet wiring and cervical pedicle screws.
 
The physical therapy management is focused on the strengthening of the deep neck muscles, but further research has to be made to investigate the evidence of the existing exercises (described in the physical therapy management). <br><br>


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed Pubmed])<br>  ==
<div class="researchbox"><rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1R9m212NERpyMp_66xm834NdnQhQNw_US8FenznWOVNw</rss></div>
== References  ==
== References  ==
<references />  
<references />  


<br>
<br>
[[Category:Cervical Conditions]]
[[Category:Cervical Spine - Conditions]]
 
[[Category:Cervical Spine]]

Latest revision as of 11:41, 15 November 2023

Definition/Description[edit | edit source]

Clinical instability of the cervical spine (CICS) is defined as the inability of the spine under physiological loads to maintain its normal pattern of displacement so that there is no neurological damage or irritation, no development of deformity, and no incapacitating pain.[1] While no tools exists for the assessment of upper cervical ligamentous instability, an approach that takes into account risk factors, patient history, and examination results to make judicious decisions about patient management has been recommended[2].

This 7 minute video is provides a good summary of CICS

[3]

Clinically Relevant Anatomy[edit | edit source]

*

The cervical spine consist of 7 separate vertebrae. See Cervical Anatomy also.

  • The first two vertebrae (referred as upper cervical spine) are highly specialised and differ from the other 5 cervical vertebrae (lower cervical) regarding anatomical structure and function.
  • The upper cervical spine is made of the atlas (C1) and the axis (C2) the joint atlanto-occipital joint and the atlanto-axial joint
  • Atlantoaxial joint is responsible for 60% of all cervical rotation
  • Atlanto-occipital joint is responsible for 33% of flexion and extension. [4]
Cervical spine anatomy.jpg

The cervical spine has sacrificed stability for mobility and is therefore vulnerable to injury. The craniocervical junction (atlanto-occipital joint), the lower atlanto-axial joint and other cervical segments are reinforced by internal as well as external ligaments. They secure the spinal stability of the cervical spine as a whole, together with surrounding postural muscles and allow cervical motion. They also provide proprioceptive information throughout the spinal nerve system to the brain.

The spinal stabilising system is divided into 3 functionally integrated subsystems [5][1][6]

  • Passive subsystem – spinal column (vertebrae, facet joints, intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments and joint capsules)
  • Active subsystem – spinal muscles (muscles and tendons)
  • Control subsystem – neural feedback (neural control centers and force transducers located in ligaments, tendons, muscles)

Aetiology[edit | edit source]

Causes include:

  • Trauma (one major trauma or repetitive microtrauma or delayed or missed diagnosis of cervical spine injury after trauma (car accident rugby neck injury) . The traumatic flexion-extension moment exerted on the spine can cause ligamentous disruption with subsequent atlantoaxial instability (AAI) / upper cervical instability[7].
  • Inflammatory arthritides eg.Ankylosing Spondylitis (Axial Spondyloarthritis), Rheumatoid arthritis, due to the progressive destruction of the cervical skeletal structures. The most affected region is the upper cervical spine and C4-C5. [8]
  • Congenital collagenous compromise (e.g. syndromes: Down’s, Ehlers-Danlos, Grisel, Morquio) The atlanto-axial instability (AAI) is considered as a developmental anomaly often occurring in patient with the Down’s Syndrome (DS). It affects 6.8 to 27% of the population with DS.[9] Usually, persons with congenital anomalies do not become symptomatic before midlife adulthood. The spine is assumed to be able to accommodate differing regions of hypermobility and fusions. With time, the degenerative changes occurring in the lower cervical spine increase rigidity and alter the balance. This gradual loss of motion places increasing loads on the atlantoaxial articulation.
  • Recent neck/head/dental surgery.

Clinical Presentation/Examination[edit | edit source]

Symptoms listed in descending rank

  1. Intolerance to prolonged static postures
  2. Fatigue and inability to hold head up
  3. Better with external support, including hands or collar
  4. Frequent need for self-manipulation
  5. Feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control
  6. Frequent episodes of acute attacks
  7. Sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements
  8. Head feels heavy
  9. Neck gets stuck, or locks, with movement
  10. Better in unloaded position such as lying down
  11. Catching, clicking, clunking, and popping sensation
  12. Past history of neck dysfunction or trauma
  13. Trivial movements provoke symptoms
  14. Muscles feel tight or stiff
  15. Unwillingness, apprehension, or fear of movement
  16. Temporary improvement with clinical manipulation

The 12 physical examination findings included:

  1. Poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movemen
  2. Abnormal joint play
  3. Motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming
  4. Aberrant movement
  5. Hypomobility of upper thoracic spine
  6. Increased muscle guarding, tone, or spasms with test movements
  7. Palpable instability during test movements
  8. Jerkiness or juddering of motion during cervical movement
  9. Decreased cervical muscle strength
  10. Catching, clicking, clunking, popping sensation heard during movement assessment
  11. Fear, apprehension, or decreased willingness to move during examination
  12. Pain provocation with joint-play testing

Symptoms can be different but the most frequent clinical findings are[1]:

  • Tenderness in the cervical region
  • Referred pain in the shoulder or paraspinal region
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Cervical myelopathy
  • Headaches
  • Paraspinal muscle spasm
  • Decreased cervical lordosis
  • Neck pain with sustained postures
  • Hypermobility and soft end-feeling in passive motion testing
  • Poor cervical muscle strength (multifidus, longus capitis, longus colli)

Because a definitive diagnostic tool has not been developed, cervical clinical instability will continue to be diagnosed through clinical findings, including history, subjective complaints, visual analysis of active motion quality, and manual examination methods[1].

The following tests can be used to measure cervical instability[10] but little is known about the diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests:

One high quality systematic review by Hutting et al[11] revealed poor diagnostic accuracy for all upper cervical ligament instability tests evaluated. In general, these tests have sufficient specificity and can rule in upper cervical ligamentous instability, but degrees of sensitivity varied.

Magee et al reported poor cervical muscle endurance is one of the clinical findings we find with cervical instability. A good way to test these muscles (the deep cervical flexor muscles, the longus capitis and longus colli) is the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) which is a test of neuromotor control. The main goal of the test is to apply an isometric force on a pressure sensor placed behind the neck without using the superficial cervical flexors. The construct validity of the craniocervical flexion test has ben verified in a laboratory setting[12]

Differential Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

Certain Patients that might present with acute neurologic symptoms that raise alarm for cervical compression or neck pain but without a specific origin should undergo a thorough physical examination and radiographic evaluation to determine the source.
More often than not are the findings nonspecific and can be representative of any number of related conditions. Neck pain, weakness and other characteristics also present in cervical spine instability can also be seen in the following cervical diseases including the following: [13][14]

  • Cervical strain
  • Cervical trauma or fracture
  • Occipital headaches
  • Degenerative disease of the spine
  • Previously undiagnosed syndrome
  • Neurological involvement
  • Progressive neck pain
  • Resistant neck pain
  • Central or lateral disc herniation
  • Guillain-Barré syndrome
  • Cervical spondylosis
  • Pathologic fracture
  • Cervical canal stenosis
  • Facet joint pathologies
  • Infections: discitis, osteomyelitis, etc.

Diagnostic Procedures[edit | edit source]

Evaluation for spinal instability differs in the acute traumatic setting versus the chronic degenerative setting.

Acute setting: Canadian C-spine rule used to determine what patients need cervical spine imaging

Chronic setting: History and physical exam help guide the initial imaging modality, which will often be plain x-rays. However, more advanced detail imaging such as dynamic imaging, MRI, CT and studies with contrast, is often necessary to detect instability.[15]

Cervical instability is a diagnosis based primarily on a patient’s history and reported symptoms.

Imaging

Radiologic Diagnosis of Instability:

  • Cervical radiographs
    • Segmental kyphosis greater than 11 degrees
    • Anterolisthesis greater than 3.5 mm of one vertebral body on another
  • Lateral neutral, flexion and extension xrays
    • Forward displacement of one vertebrae on another: spondylolisthesis
    • Backward displacement of one vertebrae on another: retrolisthesis
    • Narrowing of the intervertebral foramen and loss of disc thickness
    • An abrupt apparent change in pedicle length
  • Anteroposterior xrays with lateral bending
    • Bending to one side or another
    • Decreased bending to one side with loss of both vertebral rotation and tilt with actual opening of the disc on the side to which the patient is bending
    • An abnormal degree of disc closure on the side to which the patient is bending
    • Malalignment of spinous processes and pedicles
    • Lateral translation of one vertebra on another due to an abnormal degree of rotation

Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

These three questionnaires are specific and valid instruments to evaluate the neckpain and dysfunction. [16][17]

Medical Management[edit | edit source]

The current definitions of spine instability are not uniformly accepted nor applied. Therefore, there is no consensus about the timing of conservative versus surgical treatment of CICS. The understandings of spinal biomechanics need improvement to determine and differentiate the relationship and severity between radiographic instability and its clinical manifestation. This gap in knowledge makes it difficult for all disciplines involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients suffering from disorders of spine stability.[15]

In the past few decades nonoperative manoeuvres like traction, cast immobilizations and long periods of bed rest had been replaced by the use of instrumentation to stabilise the spine after a trauma (reducing the risk of negative sequelae of long term bed rest)[18].

The cervical stability can be achieved by using posterior fixation such as lateral mass plating, processus spinosus or facet wiring and cervical pedicle screws. The choice of which fixation is best, can be made by the surgeon after seeing a CT-scan or MRI.

In a retrospective study of Fehlings, the cervical spine stabilisation was successful in 93% off the cases[19].  

The fixation procedure also holds some risks. It is possible that the spinal cord, vertebral artery, spinal nerve and facet joints get injured.

Physical Therapy Management[edit | edit source]

Conservative treatment is indicated when cervical clinical instability does not severely involve or threaten neurological structures. The goal of nonsurgical treatment should be to enhance the function of the spinal stabilising subsystems and to decrease the stresses on the involved spinal segments.

Posture Education and Spinal Manipulation

  • Decreases stresses on the passive subsystem[1]
  • Proper posture: reduces the loads placed on the spinal segments at end-ranges and returns the spine to a biomechanically efficient position[1][5]
  • Spinal manipulation can be performed on hypomobile segments above and below the level of instability, what eventually will result in a distribution of the spinal movement across several segments. Also the mechanical stresses on the level of clinical instability are believed to be decreased[1]
  • Video over joint mobilisation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn1Ed2SxTx0

Strengthening Exercises

  • Enhances the function of the active subsystem.
  • The cervical multifidus may provide stability via segmental attachments to cervical vertebrae.
  • The longus colli and capitus provide anterior stability.
  • Strengthening the stabilizing muscles may enable those muscles to improve the quality and control of movement occurring within the neutral zone.[7][13]
  • Exercise video: Neck strength and stability www.youtube.com/watch

Proprioception Exercises

One of the main goals of the non-surgical treatment is to improve the quality of controlled motion. Therefore proprioception exercises must be used, this will improve the control of movement in the neutral zone.

Post-Operative Rehabilitation

In a more specific situation such as post-operative rehabilitation the treatment can differ:

  • The patient is not required to wear a brace.
  • After 6 weeks it is not encouraged to do any lifting more than 4kg as also overhead work.
  • The rehabilitation begins at week 6, mostly a basic stability exercises program.
  • No cervical strengthening or ranges of motion exercises are encouraged in the first 6 months.
  • The exercises or mainly focused on the neutral postural alignment, were the patients are recommended to us there trunk, hips and chest to produce proper cervical alignment.

Example of Management Programme[edit | edit source]

Anita R. Gross et al listed an evidence-based home neck care exercise program that can be included if the CCFT test was found positive. It is in 3 progressive phases. These exercises should be judiciously tailored to individual circumstances and applied as indicated based on a clinical examination[20]

Phase 1

  • Craniocervical flexion- Start with pressure biofeedback inflated to 20 mmHg. Make sure your chin and forehead are lined up. Nod your head, keeping the large neck muscles soft and bringing the reading up to 22 mmHg. Work up to ten 10-second holds. Then progress to 24, 26, and 28 mmHg.
  • Neck active range of motion - Start with your head in neutral, then:
    1. Tilt backward
    2. Bend forward
    3. Tilt side to side
    4. Turn side to side
  • Resisted shoulder extension with elbow flexed - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals and scapulae, then extend your arm with elbows bent backward.
  • Resisted shoulder extension with elbow straight - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then extend your arm backward.
  • Resisted shoulder shrug -“Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then slightly abduct arms and minimally shrug shoulders.
  • Resisted elbow exercise - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then:
    1. Bend
    2. Straighten level 1
    3. Straighten level 2 your elbows.

Phase 2

  • Headlift - Start with your head in neutral (chin and forehead lined up), do a chin nod and lift your head, while maintaining your chin tucked. Hold for a count of 5 to 10 seconds and return smoothly with your chin still tucked.
  • Isometric neck strength - Place your hand on your head and resist. Hold for a count of 5 to 10 seconds:
    1. Bending
    2. Tilting backward
    3. Tilting sideways
    4. Turning your head
  • Shoulder stretches - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae hold for 20 seconds.
    1. Clasp your hands behind your back and squeeze your scapulae together
    2. Hold your arms out in front of you and reach forward feeling a stretch between your scapulae
    3. Reach your arms overhead
  • Shoulder stretches - “Set” your cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, hold for 20 seconds.
    1. With elbows at shoulder level, lean into a corner to feel a stretch in the front of your chest
    2. With elbows at eye level lean into a corner to feel a stretch
  • Transverse abdominus - Tense your lower abdomen by imagining drawing your hip bones together (or apart if that works better), hold for 10 seconds. Then let the 1 leg fall out over a 10-second count
  • Wall sit - “Set” cervical spine, transverse abdominus, and scapulae, then slide down the wall into a semi-squat position. Hold for as long as you can, working up to 2 minutes.

Phase 3

  • Shoulder strength - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae then “hug a tree.”
  • Shoulder strengthen - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then elevate arms into a “reverse fly.”
  • Resisted neck: craniocervical flexion and oblique flexion - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then
    1. Nod head
    2. Nod head at a slight oblique angle
  • Resisted neck extension - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae:
    1. First nod your head
    2. Then tilt your head backward
    3. The focus of extension is in the lower neck
  • Resisted neck side flexion - “Set” cervical spine, abdominals, and scapulae, then tilt head to the side.
  • Resisted neck rotation - “Set” cervical spine, transverse abdominus, and scapulae, then rotate head.

In the table below you can find the dosage recommendations for the evidence-based home neck care exercise program.

Exercise Equipment used Load (pain-free or low pain) Rep Set Frequency Duration
Specific neck

Craniocervical flexors

4 isometric

4 isotonic

Pressure biofeedback

Head weight/self resist

Rubber tubing

3 levels mmHg

Pain-free range

Yellow/red

10

20

20

1

3

3

3/wk

5 min

15 min

20 min

Postural/upper extremity

Isotonic

Rubber tubing

Green/ blue

20 3

3/wk

12 min

Trunk

Isotonic

Body weight


20 3

3/wk

12 min

Stretch

Specific neck 5

Scapulothoracic 2

N/A

N/A


3

3

1

1

Daily

Daily

10 min

5 min

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 K.A. Olson, D. Joder, Diagnosis and treatment of Cervical Spine Clinical Instability, Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy, April 2001. (LoE:4)
  2. Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK, Altman RD, Beattie P, Boeglin E. Neck Pain: Revision 2017: Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health From the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-83.
  3. Dpt Orthopeadics Cervical Instability Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6hUT1kBoEc&feature=youtu.be (last accessed 4.2.2020)
  4. Windsor, R. “Cervical Spine Anatomy.” Updated april 9, 2013 (http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1948797-overview#a30)
  5. 5.0 5.1 Panjabi, M. M. “The Stabilizing System of the Spine. Part II. Neutral Zone and Instability Hypothesis.” Journal of Spinal Disorders 5, no. 4: 390–397, December 1992 (LoE:5)
  6. M. Takeshi et Al., Soft-Tissue Damage and Segmental Instability in Adult Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Major Bone Injury, Spine Journal, December 2012.fckLR
  7. 7.0 7.1 Yeo, Chang Gi, Ikchan Jeon, and Sang Woo Kim. “Delayed or Missed Diagnosis of Cervical Instability after Traumatic Injury: Usefulness of Dynamic Flexion and Extension Radiographs.” Korean Journal of Spine 12, no. 3 (September 2015): 146–49 (LoE:3B)
  8. Macovei, Luana-Andreea, and Elena Rezuş. “CERVICAL SPINE LESIONS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS.” Revista Medico-Chirurgicală̆ a Societă̆ţ̜ii De Medici Ş̧i Naturaliş̧ti Din Iaş̧i 120, no. 1 (March 2016): 70–76.
  9. Myśliwiec, Andrzej, Adam Posłuszny, Edward Saulicz, Iwona Doroniewicz, Paweł Linek, Tomasz Wolny, Andrzej Knapik, Jerzy Rottermund, Piotr Żmijewski, and Paweł Cieszczyk. “Atlanto-Axial Instability in People with Down’s Syndrome and Its Impact on the Ability to Perform Sports Activities - A Review.” Journal of Human Kinetics 48 (November 22, 2015): 17–24.
  10. Hutting N, Scholten-Peeters GG, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests: a systematic review.Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1686-95. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130186. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
  11. Hutting N, Scholten-Peeters GG, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1686-1695. https://doi.org/10.2522/ ptj.20130186
  12. Jull GA; Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test; J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):525-33.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Cook C, Brismee JM, Fleming R, et al (2005). Identifiers suggestive of clinical cervical spine instability: a Delphi study of physical therapists. Physical Therapy 85(9):895-906. (LoE:5)
  14. Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE,Quillen Ws : Cervical spine in Pathology an intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation p17-63 ,2009, St-Louis, Saunders Elsevier
  15. 15.0 15.1 Vincent Huang, MD, Andrew Lederman, MD Nov 2016 SPINAL INSTABILITY: DEFINITION, THEORY AND ASSESSMENT OF SPINAL COLUMN FUNCTION AND DYSFUNCTION Available from: ☀https://now.aapmr.org/spinal-instability-definition-theory-and-assessment-of-spinal-column-function-and-dysfunction/ (last accessed 4.2.2020)
  16. Ralph E. Gay; Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain; Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. Volume 30, Issue 4, May 2007, Pages 259–262
  17. Steven J Linton, A cognitive-behavioral group intervention as prevention for persistent neck and back pain in a non-patient population: a randomized controlled trial; Volume 90, Issues 1–2, 1 February 2001, Pages 83–90
  18. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M? Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP. Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma: indications and techniques. Injury 2005 Jul;36 Suppl 2:B36-43. Review
  19. Fehlings MG, Cooper PR, Errico TJ. Posterior plates in the management of cervical instability: long-term results in 44 patients. Journal of neurosurgery. 1994 Sep 1;81(3):341-9.
  20. Gross R. et al; Knowledge to action: a challenge for neck pain treatment; J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):351-63 (LOE:5)