Stroke Outcome Measures Overview: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
== EBRSR Review by ICF == | |||
The EBRSR reviewed a selection of outcome measures put together a review that provides the best available information on how outcome measures might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities<ref>Katherine Salter, Nerissa Campbell, Marina Richardson, Swati Mehta, Jeffrey Jutai, Laura Zettler, Matthew Moses, Andrew McClure. Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation. EBRSR, 2013</ref>. | The EBRSR reviewed a selection of outcome measures put together a review that provides the best available information on how outcome measures might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities<ref>Katherine Salter, Nerissa Campbell, Marina Richardson, Swati Mehta, Jeffrey Jutai, Laura Zettler, Matthew Moses, Andrew McClure. Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation. EBRSR, 2013</ref>. | ||
Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
{| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" | {| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Body structure (impairments) | | '''Body structure (impairments)''' | ||
| Activities (limitations to activity–disability)<br> | | '''Activities (limitations to activity–disability)<br>''' | ||
| Participation (barriers to participation--handicap)<br> | | '''Participation (barriers to participation--handicap)'''<br> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
*Beck Depression Inventory | *Beck Depression Inventory | ||
*Behavioral Inattention Test | *Behavioral Inattention Test | ||
*Canadian Neurological Scale | *Canadian Neurological Scale | ||
*Clock Drawing Test | *Clock Drawing Test | ||
*Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test | *Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test | ||
*Fugl-Meyer Assessment | *Fugl-Meyer Assessment | ||
*General Health Questionnaire -28 | *General Health Questionnaire -28 | ||
*Geriatric Depression Scale | *Geriatric Depression Scale | ||
*Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | *Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | ||
*Line Bisection Test | *Line Bisection Test | ||
*Mini Mental State Examination | *Mini Mental State Examination | ||
*Modified Ashworth Scale | *Modified Ashworth Scale | ||
*Montreal Cognitive Assessment | *Montreal Cognitive Assessment | ||
*Motor-free Visual Perception Test | *Motor-free Visual Perception Test | ||
*National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale | *National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale | ||
*Orpington Prognostic Scale | *Orpington Prognostic Scale | ||
*Stroke Rehabiliation Assessment of | *Stroke Rehabiliation Assessment of | ||
*Movement<br> | *Movement<br> | ||
| | | | ||
*Action Research Arm Test | *Action Research Arm Test | ||
*Barthel Index | *Barthel Index | ||
*Berg Balance Scale | *Berg Balance Scale | ||
*Box and Block Test | *Box and Block Test | ||
*Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment Scale | *Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment Scale | ||
*Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory | *Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory | ||
*Clinical Outcome Variables Scale | *Clinical Outcome Variables Scale | ||
*Functional Ambulation Categories | *Functional Ambulation Categories | ||
*Functional Independence Measure | *Functional Independence Measure | ||
*Frenchay Activities Index | *Frenchay Activities Index | ||
*Motor Assessment Scale | *Motor Assessment Scale | ||
*Nine-hole Peg Test | *Nine-hole Peg Test | ||
*Rankin Handicap Scale | *Rankin Handicap Scale | ||
*Rivermead Mobility Scale | *Rivermead Mobility Scale | ||
*Rivermead Motor Assessment | *Rivermead Motor Assessment | ||
*Six Minute Walk Test | *Six Minute Walk Test | ||
*Timed Up and Go | *Timed Up and Go | ||
*Wolf Motor Function Test<br> | *Wolf Motor Function Test<br> | ||
| | | | ||
*Canadian Occupational Performance Measure | *Canadian Occupational Performance Measure | ||
*EuroQol Quality of Life Scale | *EuroQol Quality of Life Scale | ||
*LIFE-H | *LIFE-H | ||
*London Handicap Scale | *London Handicap Scale | ||
*Medical Outcomes Study Short- Form 36 | *Medical Outcomes Study Short- Form 36 | ||
*Nottingham Health Profile | *Nottingham Health Profile | ||
*Reintegration to Normal Living Index | *Reintegration to Normal Living Index | ||
*Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile | *Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile | ||
*Stroke Impact Scale | *Stroke Impact Scale | ||
*Stroke Specific Quality of Life | *Stroke Specific Quality of Life | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | |||
== US Agency for HCP&R by Problem == | |||
The overview below was developed from the "Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral, and Patient Management Quick Reference Guide Number 16", published by the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research<ref>Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin. 1995 May;(16):i-iii, 1-32.</ref>.<br> | The overview below was developed from the "Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral, and Patient Management Quick Reference Guide Number 16", published by the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research<ref>Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin. 1995 May;(16):i-iii, 1-32.</ref>.<br> | ||
{| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" | {| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" |
Revision as of 12:27, 24 November 2014
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Top Contributors - Admin, Sheik Abdul Khadir, Kim Jackson, Simisola Ajeyalemi, Rucha Gadgil, Amrita Patro, Lauren Lopez, Evan Thomas, Naomi O'Reilly and George Prudden
Introduction[edit | edit source]
EBRSR Review by ICF[edit | edit source]
The EBRSR reviewed a selection of outcome measures put together a review that provides the best available information on how outcome measures might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities[1].
Body structure (impairments) | Activities (limitations to activity–disability) |
Participation (barriers to participation--handicap) |
|
|
|
US Agency for HCP&R by Problem[edit | edit source]
The overview below was developed from the "Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral, and Patient Management Quick Reference Guide Number 16", published by the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research[2].
Type | Name | Approx time to administer | Strengths | Weaknesses |
Level of consciousness | Glasgow Coma Scale | 2 minutes | Simple, valid, reliable. | None observed. |
Stroke deficit scales | NIH Stroke Scale | 2 minutes | Brief, reliable, can be administered by non-neurologists. | Low sensitivity. |
Canadian Neurological Scale | 5 minutes | Brief, valid, reliable. | ||
Global disability scale | Rankin Scale | 5 minutes | Good for overall assessment of disability. | Walking is the only explicit assessment criterion. Low sensitivity. |
Measures of disability/activities of daily living (ADL) | Barthel Index | 5-10 minutes | Widely used for stroke. Excellent validity and reliability. | Low sensitivity for high-level functioning. |
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) | 40 minutes | Widely used for stroke. Measures mobility, ADL, cognition, functional communication. | “Ceiling” and “floor” effects. | |
Mental status screening | Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination | 10 minutes | Widely used for screening. | Several functions with summed score. May misclassify patients with aphasia. |
Neurobehavioral Cognition Status Exam (NCSE) | 10 minutes | Predicts gain in Barthel Index scores. Unrelated to age. | Does not distinguish right from left hemisphere. No reliability studies in stroke. No studies of factorial structure. Correlates with education. | |
Assessment of motor function | Fugl-Meyer | 30-40 minutes Extensively evaluated measure. | Good validity and reliability for assessing sensorimotor function and balance. | Considered too complex and time-consuming by many. |
Motor Assessment Scale | 15 minutes | Good, brief assessment of movement and physical mobility. | Reliability assessed only in stable patients. Sensitivity not tested. | |
Motricity Index | 5 minutes | Brief assessment of motor function of arm, leg, and trunk. | Sensitivity not tested. | |
Balance assessment | Berg Balance Assessment | 10 minutes | Simple, well established with stroke patients, sensitive to change. | None observed. |
Rivermead Mobility Index | 5 minutes | Valid, brief, reliable test of physical mobility. | Sensitivity not tested. | |
Assessment of speech and language functions | Boston Diagnostic & Aphasia Examination | 1-4 hours | Widely used, comprehensive, good standardisation data, sound theoretical rationale. | Time to administer long; half of patients cannot be classified. |
Porch Index of Communicative Ability (PICA) | 1/2-2 hours | Widely used, comprehensive, careful test development and standardisation. | Time to administer long. Special training required to administer. Inadequate sampling of language other than one word and single sentences. | |
Western Aphasia Battery | 1-4 hours | Widely used, comprehensive. | Time to administer long. “Aphasia quotients” and “taxonomy” of aphasia not well validated. | |
Depression scales | Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | 10 minutes | Widely used, easily administered. Norms available. Good with somatic symptoms. | Less useful in elderly and in patients with aphasia or neglect.High rate of false positives. Somatic items may not be due to depression. |
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) | < 15 minutes | Brief, easily administered, useful in elderly, effective for screening in stroke population. | Not appropriate for aphasic patients. | |
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) | 10 minutes | Brief, easy to use with elderly, cognitively impaired, and those with visual or physical problems or low motivation. | High false negative rates in minor depression. | |
Hamilton Depression Scale | < 30 minutes | Observer rated; frequently used in stroke patients. | Multiple differing versions compromise interobserver reliability. | |
Measures of instrumental ADL | PGC Instrumental Activities of Daily Living | 5-10 minutes | Measures broad base of information necessary for independent living. | Has not been tested in stroke patients. |
Frenchay Activities Index | 10-15 minutes | Developed specifically for stroke patients; assesses broad array of activities. | Sensitivity and interobserver reliability not tested; sensitivity probably limited. | |
Family assessment | Family Assessment Device (FAD) | 30 minutes | Widely used in stroke. Computer scoring available. Excellent validity and reliability. Available in multiple languages. | Assessment subjective; sensitivity not tested; “ceiling” and “floor” effects. |
Health status/ quality of life measures | Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey | 10-15 minutes | Generic health status scale SF36 is improved version of SF20. Brief, can be self – administered or administered by phone or interview. Widely used in the United States. | Possible “floor” effect in seriously ill patients (especially for physical functioning), suggests it should be supplemented by an ADL scale in stroke patients. |
Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) | 0-30 minutes | Comprehensive and well-evaluated. Broad range of items reduces “floor” or “ceiling” effects. | Time to administer somewhat long. Evaluates behavior rather than subjective health; needs questions on well-being, happiness, and satisfaction. |
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Katherine Salter, Nerissa Campbell, Marina Richardson, Swati Mehta, Jeffrey Jutai, Laura Zettler, Matthew Moses, Andrew McClure. Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation. EBRSR, 2013
- ↑ Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin. 1995 May;(16):i-iii, 1-32.