Degenerative Disc Disease: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''-&nbsp;[[User:Amanda E Davidson|Amanda E Davidson]] and [[User:Colby Boers|Colby Boers]], [[User:Lisa Pernet|Lisa Pernet]]&nbsp;
'''Original Editor '''[[User:Amanda E Davidson|Amanda E Davidson]], [[User:Colby Boers|Colby Boers]], &[[User:Lisa Pernet|Lisa Pernet]] as part of the [[Vrije Universiteit Brussel Evidence-based Practice Project|Vrije Universiteit Brussel's Evidence-based Practice project]]
 
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;
</div>
== Search Strategy  ==
 
Internet is a gigantic source of knowledge. Databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro or Google Scholar can be useful. Use keywords as ‘Degenerative Disc Disease’, Lumbar Disc Disease, exercise therapy degenerative disc, discogenic pain, etc. For specific information you can use ‘AND’ and add ‘physical therapy’, ‘characteristics’, ‘definition’, 'treatment', depending of the need. To find an appropriate physical therapy the use of books is recommended.
 
<br>


'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} 
</div>
== Definition/Description  ==
== Definition/Description  ==


Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a process in which the intervertebral discs, which provide cushioning between the vertebra of the spine, lose height and hydration. When this occurs, the intervertebral discs are unable to fulfill their primary functions: cushioning and providing mobility between the vertebrae.  
Degenerative disc disease (DDD) represents a wide category of back pain resulting from or associated with the degeneration of [[Biomechanics of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation|intervertebral discs]]<ref>Goel AP, Wang EJ, Bicket MC. Degenerative Disc Disease. In ''Spine Pain Care.'' Cham:Springer, 2020, p181-188.</ref>. It involves a process where the intervertebral discs lose height and hydration. When this occurs, the discs are unable to fulfill their primary functions of cushioning and providing mobility between the vertebrae. Although the exact cause is unknown, it is thought to be associated with the aging process during which the intervertebral discs dehydrate, lose elasticity, and collapse. Despite its name, degenerative disc disease is not so much of a disease, but a natural occurrence that comes with [[Ageing and the Locomotor System|ageing]]<ref>Medical News Today. All about degenerative disc disease. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/266630#diagnosis (Accessed 19 May 202)</ref>. Degenerative disc disease may develop at any level of the [[Spine Segmental Assessment|spine]], but is most common in the cervical and lower lumbar regions.<ref name="i">Peng B. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631950/ Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of discogenic low back pain]. World J Orthop. 2013 April 18; 4(2): 42-52 </ref><ref name="McCormack et al">McCormack BM, Weinstein PR. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1307540/ Cervical spondylosis]. An update. West J Med 1996; 165(1-2): 43-51 </ref>  
 
Although the exact cause of DDD is unknown, it is thought to be associated with the aging process during which the intervertebral discs become dry, lose elasticity, and collapse. Furthermore a degenerative disc disease may develop at any level of the spine, but is most common in the cervical and lower lumbar sections of the spine.<ref name="i">Peng B., Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of discogenic low back pain, World J Orthop 2013 April 18; 4(2): 42-52 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1</ref><ref name="ii">Dr Vanaclocha V., et al, Degeneratieve ziekte van het disc, Clinica Neuros Neurochirurgie, 2010fckLR(http://neuros.net/nl/algemene_degenerative_ziekte_van_disc.php) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5</ref><ref name="McCormack et al">McCormack BM, Weinstein PR. Cervical spondylosis. An update. West J Med 1996; 165(1-2): 43-51 (Level of evidence: 1A)</ref><br><br>
 
== Clinically Relevant Anatomy  ==
== Clinically Relevant Anatomy  ==


Lumbar DDD is a condition that can imply lower back pain, this results from the co-existence of two different time scales: on one hand the slow dynamics of disc degeneration and on the other hand the fast dynamics of pain recurrence. <ref name="Chang-jiang Zheng et al">Chang-jiang Zheng et al.; Disc degeneration implies low back pain; Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling (2015) (Level of evidence: 2C)</ref>  
Lumbar DDD is a condition that maybe a cause of [[Low Back Pain|lower back pain]], which results from the co-existence of two different time scales, the slow dynamics of disc degeneration and the fast dynamics of [[Pain Behaviours|pain]] recurrence. <ref name="Chang-jiang Zheng et al">Zheng CJ, Chen J. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640162/ Disc degeneration implies low back pain]. Theor Biol Med Model. 2015 Nov 9;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s12976-015-0020-3.  </ref>  


Lumbar DDD can also imply radiating pain from damaged discs in the spine. A lumbar spinal disc acts as a shock absorber between two vertebrae and allows the joints and the spine to move easily. The outer portion, the annulus fibrosis, contains the soft inner core of the disc, the nucleus pulposus. Each person’s spinal discs undergo degenerative changes as they age. But not all people will notice symptoms as a result of these changes. One of the ways DDD causes pain is through inflammation of the nerves. When the outer portion of the disc breaks, the inner part can leak out, releasing proteins that can irritate the nerves surrounding from the disc. Another cause is when degenerated discs can’t properly absorb stress. Leading to abnormal movement around the vertebral segment. Back muscles will hereby spasm painfully in order to stabilize the spine. In some cases the segment may collaps so a nerve root gets compressed, leading to radiculopathy. the pain from DDD often goes away with time because the inflammatory proteins will disappear and the disc collaps in a stable position. <ref>Spine-health, Degenerative Disc Disease Health Center, http://www.spine-health.com/conditions/degenerative-disc-disease (asseced 18-05-2016) (level of evidence 5)</ref>  
Lumbar DDD can also imply radiating pain from damaged discs in the spine. A lumbar spinal disc acts as a shock absorber between two vertebrae and allows the joints and the spine to move easily. The outer region of the disc, the annulus fibrosis, surrounds the soft inner core of the disc, the nucleus pulposus. Spinal discs undergo degenerative changes as we age, but not everyone will have symptoms as a result of these changes. Neural inflammation is one such possible cause of pain. When the outer section of the disc ruptures, the inner core can leak out, releasing proteins that irritate the neural tissue. Another cause is when discs can no longer absorb stress as well, leading to abnormal movement around the vertebral segment and causing back muscles spasm as they try to stabilise the spine. In some cases the segment may collapse, causing nerve root compression and [[radiculopathy]]. Pain often reduces with time as the inflammatory proteins dissipate and the disc collapse settles into a stable position. <ref>Spine-health, Degenerative Disc Disease Health Center. Available from: http://www.spine-health.com/conditions/degenerative-disc-disease (Accessed 18 May 2023)</ref>  
'''<u>Intervertebral Discs</u>'''


[[Image:Cervical vertebrae lig flavum.png|thumb|right|200px|Intervertebral Discs]]  
[[Image:Cervical vertebrae lig flavum.png|thumb|right|200px|Intervertebral Discs]]  


<br>
Degenerative Disc Disease is thought to begin with changes to the annulus fibrosis, [[intervertebral disc]], and subchondral bone. The process of degeneration is divided into three classifications: early dysfunction, intermediate instability, and final stabilisation.
 
* Early dysfunction is the start of degenerative changes which can occur as early as 20 years old.
'''<u>Intervertebral Discs</u>'''<br>
* Intermediate instability is classified by a loosening of the annulus fibrosis, which can cause lower back pain.  
 
* Final stabilisation is where fibrosis develops in the posterior structures and osteophytes form. Pain and motion both decrease. <ref name="p1">Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hll; 2008.</ref>  
Dengenerative Disc Disease (DDD) is thought to begin with changes to the annulus fibrosis, intervertebral disc, and subchondral bone. The process of degeneration is divided into three classifications including: early dysfunction, intermediate instability, and final stabilization.&nbsp;
 
Early dysfunction is the classifed as the beginning of degenerative changes which can occur as early as 20 years. Intermediate instability is classified by a loosening of the annulus fibrosis, which can cause back pain. Fibrosis to the posterior structure and formation of osteophytes denotes the final stabilization classification. Pain decreases, and motion descreases. <ref name="1">Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hll; 2008.</ref>  
 
&nbsp;


== Epidemiology /Etiology  ==
== Epidemiology /Etiology  ==
Degenerative disc disease refers to a condition in which the involved disc causes LBP. Lumbar degenerative disc disease is usually the result of a twisting injury to the lower back, such as when a person swings a golf club or rotates to put an object on a surface to the side of or behind them.<ref name="2">Ullrich, P. F. (2006 11 6). Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Retrieved 06 02, 2009, from Degenerative Disc Disease: http://www.spine-health.com/conditions/degenerative-disc-disease/lumbar-degenerative-disc-disease</ref>
[[Image:IVD in situ.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Intervertebral Discs in situ]]  
[[Image:IVD in situ.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Intervertebral Discs in situ]]  


The pain is also frequently caused by simple wear and tear on the spine and comes with the general aging process.
Degenerative disc disease is fairly common and it is estimated that at least 30% of people aged 30-50 years old will have some degree of disc space degeneration, although not all will have pain or ever receive a formal diagnosis.<ref name="p2">Ullrich, P. F. (2006 11 6). Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Retrieved 06 02, 2009, from Degenerative Disc Disease: http://www.spine-health.com/conditions/degenerative-disc-disease/lumbar-degenerative-disc-disease</ref> The pain is frequently caused by simple wear and tear as part of the general ageing process. It can also be as a result of a twisting injury to the lower back.
 
Degenerative disc disease is fairly common, and it is estimated that at least 30% of people aged 30-50 years old will have some degree of disc space degeneration, although not all will have pain or ever receive a formal diagnosis.<ref name="2" />  
 
<br>
 
The process that leads to DDD begins with structural changes. The annulus fibrosis (outer portion of the disc) loses water content over time which will make it increasingly unyielding toward everyday stress and strain on the spine. The loss of compliance in the discs contributes to forces being redirected from the anterior and middle portions of the facets to the posterior aspect, thus causing facet arthritis. Another result is hypertrophy of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the degenerating disc. The overgrowths are known as bony spurs (or osteophytes.)
 
<br>


The process that leads to DDD begins with structural changes. The annulus fibrosis loses water content over time which makes it increasingly unyielding toward the daily stresses and strains placed on the spine. The loss of compliance in the discs contributes to forces being redirected from the anterior and middle portions of the facets to the posterior aspect, causing facet arthritis. Hypertrophy of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the degenerating disc also results. These overgrowth are known as bony spurs or osteophytes.
== Characteristics/Clinical Presentation  ==
== Characteristics/Clinical Presentation  ==


{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" align="right" width="40%" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders"
{| class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" align="right" width="40%"
|-
|-
| align="right" |  
| align="right" |  
| {{#ev:youtube|UTBrVj7F6kI|350}} <ref name="3">7SecretsMedical. Degenerative Disc Disease. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBrVj7F6kI [last accessed 03/05/13]</ref>
| {{#ev:youtube|UTBrVj7F6kI|350}}  
|}
|}


DDD commonly occurs with other diagnoses such as:  
'''DDD commonly occurs with other diagnoses such as:'''


*idiopathic low-back pain  
*idiopathic low-back pain  
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Lumbar_Radiculopathy lumbar radiculopathy]  
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Lumbar_Radiculopathy lumbar radiculopathy] .
*myelopathy  
*[[myelopathy]] .
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Spinal_Stenosis lumbar stenosis]  
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Spinal_Stenosis lumbar stenosis.]
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Lumbar_Spondylosis spondylosis<ref name="McCormack et al" />]
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Lumbar_Spondylosis spondylosis]<ref name="McCormack et al" />.
*osteoarthritis  
*[[osteoarthritis]] .
*[http://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php5?title=Facet_Joint_Syndrome zygapophydeal joint degeneration] <ref name="1" />
*zygapophyseal joint degeneration. <ref name="p1" />
 
'''Activities that typically increase pain include:'''
<br>


Activities that typically increase pain include:
*Sitting for extended periods of time.
 
*Rotating, bending, or lifting.
*Sitting for extended periods of time  
'''Activities that typically decrease pain include:'''
*Rotating, bending, or lifting  
* Frequent changes in positions.
*Activities that typically decrease pain include:&nbsp;
* Lying down.
 
*Staying active.<ref name="p4">O'Halloran DM, Pandit AS. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17518718/ Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc]. Tissue Eng 2007; 13(8):1927-1954.</ref>
#Changing positions often
#Lying down  
#Staying active&nbsp;<ref name="4">O'Halloran DM, Pandit AS. Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc. Tissue Eng 2007; 13(8):1927-1954.</ref>


== Differential Diagnosis  ==
== Differential Diagnosis  ==


People with DDD will have low back pain<ref name="3" />; however there are varying levels of severity. Pain is often chronic, but one with DDD can experience varying episodes of exacerbation where pain levels are elevated<ref name="4" />  
People with DDD will often present with low back pain<ref name="p3">7SecretsMedical. Degenerative Disc Disease. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBrVj7F6kI [accessed on 27/11/2023]</ref> with varying levels of severity between individuals. Pain is often chronic, but can also be acute on chronic with varying episodes of exacerbation <ref name="p4" />  


There are different degrees of annular disruption<ref name="i" />. We can classify them into 4 grades, at which grade 0 is added. We differentiate these grades by means of a contrast medium injection.  
There are different degrees of annular disruption<ref name="i" /> which are classified into 5 grades. These grades are differentiated by means of a contrast medium injection.  


*Grade 0: no disruption  
*'''Grade 0:''' no disruption  
*Grade 1: the contrast medium passes into the cartilage endplate through tear  
*'''Grade 1:''' the contrast medium passes into the cartilage endplate through a tear  
*Grade 2: the contrast medium flows into the bony endplate  
*'''Grade 2:''' the contrast medium flows into the bony endplate  
*Grade 3: the contrast medium is going into the cancellous bone of vertebra under endplate  
*'''Grade 3:''' the contrast medium enters into the cancellous bone of vertebra under endplate  
*Grade 4: the contrast medium leaks completely in the cancellous bone.<br>
*'''Grade 4:''' the contrast medium leaks completely in the cancellous bone.


== Diagnostic Procedures  ==
== Diagnostic Procedures  ==


Provocation discography is a diagnostic test to identify a painful disc. To evaluate the degree of disruption, a combination of discogram and CTscan afther discography is used.<ref name="i" /><br>
Provocation discography is a diagnostic test to identify a painful disc. To evaluate the degree of disruption, a combination of discogram and [[CT Scans|CT scan]] after discography is used.<ref name="i" /> <span style="line-height: 1.5em;">[[X-Rays|X-ray]] findings can also be used to diagnose DDD. Anterior-Posterior and lateral views are taken where presence of osteophytes, narrowing of the disc joint space, or a “vacuum sign” is noted. </span><ref name="p5" />  
 
<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">Xray findings are used to diagnose DDD. Anterior-Posterior and lateral views are taken; presence of osteophytes, narrowing of the disc joint space, or a “vacuum sign” is noted. </span><ref name="5">Thompson, J.C. MD. Netter's Concise Atlas of Orthopaedic Anatomy. (2002) Saunders Elsevier. p.36-7</ref>  


== Outcome Measures  ==
== Outcome Measures  ==


None of the analyzed literature has reported a uniform system of outcome measuring. The most common form of outcome measure for DDD is [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Oswestry_Disability_Index Oswestry Disabilty Index (ODI)] in combination with other forms of outcome measure: Short Form 36(or SF-12) questionnaire, self-paced walk, [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Timed_Up_and_Go_Test_(TUG) timed up-and-go test (TUG)],[http://www.physio-pedia.com/Visual_Analogue_Scale Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Roland%E2%80%90Morris_Disability_Questionnaire Roland-Morris disability index (RMDI)]<ref name="Bono et al">Bono, C. M., &amp;amp;amp;amp; Lee, C. K.; Critical Analysis of Trends in Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Over the Past 20 Years: Influence of Technique on Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcome; Spine Volume; 2004; vol. 29; p455-463. (level of evidence: 3A)</ref><ref name="Malhar et al">Malhar N. Kumar, F. J. (2001); Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease; European Spine Journal volume 10; p309-313. (level of evidence: 1B)</ref> (level of evidence 3A,1B). <br>A radomized controle trial (Lars G Johnsen et al., 2013, level of evidence:1B ) analysed the difference between the ODI, the SF6D and the EQ5D. <br>In their research the several outcome measures reached different scores in the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC). The ODI showed a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 85%, the EQ5D a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 79% and the SF6D a sensitivity 93% and specificity 78%. But the EQ5D and the SF6D don’t measure the same constructs and therefore cannot be used interchangeably.<ref name="Lars et al">Lars G Johnsen, Christian Hellum, Øystein P Nygaard, Kjersti Storheim, Jens I Brox , Ivar Rossvoll, Gunnar Leivseth and Margreth Grotle; Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease; BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders; 2013; vol. 14; p148-157. (level of evidence: 1B)</ref>
None of the literature has reported a uniform system of outcome measures. The most common form of outcome measure for DDD is the  [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Oswestry_Disability_Index Oswestry Disabilty Index (ODI)] in combination with other forms of outcome measures, such as: [[12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12)|Short Form 36 (or SF-12)]] questionnaire, self-paced walk, [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Timed_Up_and_Go_Test_(TUG) timed up-and-go test (TUG)], [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Visual_Analogue_Scale Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] and the [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Roland%E2%80%90Morris_Disability_Questionnaire Roland-Morris disability index (RMDI)] <ref name="Bono et al">Bono CM, Lee CK. [https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/abstract/2004/02150/critical_analysis_of_trends_in_fusion_for.19.aspx Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):455-63; discussion Z5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000090825.94611.28.  </ref><ref name="Malhar et al">Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H. [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s005860000207 Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease]. Eur Spine J. 2001 Aug;10(4):309-13. doi: 10.1007/s005860000207. </ref> .  
 
A systematic review tried to evaluate wich outcome measure were suitable for DDD. They found out that the Oswestry Disability Index a good primary outcome measure is for lumbar fusion and nonsurgical interventions for various symptomatic degenerative spine disorders (level of evidence: 3A).<ref name="LY Carreon">LY Carreon, S. G.; Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes; The spine journal; 2007 (Level of evidence: 3A)</ref> Although further research is needed.  


''Carreon'' found that the Oswestry Disability Index is a good primary outcome measure for lumbar fusion and nonsurgical interventions for various symptomatic degenerative spine disorders, <ref name="LY Carreon">Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Howard J. [https://www.thespinejournalonline.com/article/S1529-9430(07)00269-0/fulltext Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes.] Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.013. </ref> although further research is needed.
== Examination  ==
== Examination  ==


It is very important to look at the patient’s history, this is a very valuable tool for identifying the intervertebral disc as the nociceptive source. Patients may present with a history of Chronic LBP, and can experience symptoms into the buttock. They may also state a history of spine stiffness that gets worse with activity and tenderness with palpation over involved area.&nbsp;<ref name="5">Thompson, J.C. MD. Netter's Concise Atlas of Orthopaedic Anatomy. (2002) Saunders Elsevier. p.36-7</ref>&nbsp;
The patient’s history is a valuable tool for identifying the intervertebral disc as the nociceptive source. Patients may present with a history of chronic low back pain as well as symptoms in the gluteal region and stiffness in the spine which worsens with activity and tenderness on palpation over the involved area.<ref name="p5">Thompson, J.C. MD. Netter's Concise Atlas of Orthopaedic Anatomy. (2002) Saunders Elsevier. p.36-7</ref>  


Mood and anxiety disorders were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition/Clinical Version Mood and anxiety disorders were more commonly seen in patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation than in those without herniation. No relationship was detected between pain severity and mood or anxiety disorders. However, mood and anxiety disorders were associated with neurological deficits. <ref name="Kayhan et al">Kayhan F, Albayrak Gezer İ, Kayhan A, Kitiş S, Gölen M. Mood and anxiety disorders in patients with chronic low back and neck pain caused by disc herniation. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2015 Nov 2:1-5. (level of evidence 1B)</ref>  
Mood and anxiety disorders are associated with neurological deficits  and more commonly seen in patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation than in those without herniation.<ref name="Kayhan et al">Kayhan F, Albayrak Gezer İ, Kayhan A, Kitiş S, Gölen M. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13651501.2015.1100314 Mood and anxiety disorders in patients with chronic low back and neck pain caused by disc herniation]. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2016;20(1):19-23. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2015.1100314. </ref> No relationship was detected between pain severity and mood or anxiety disorders, however. These disorders can be diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 


<br>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most common used method of specifically assessing intervertebral disc degeneration. Based on proton density, water content an chemical environment MR depicts disc hydratation and morphology which can be visualized on MR images with T2 weighting as hypointense signal. Pfirrmann et al devised a grading system for disc degeneration based on MR signal intensity, disc structure, distinction between nucleus and anulus, and disc height.<ref name="Pfirrmann et al">Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001;26:1873–8 (Level of evidence 2A)</ref> This useful grading system has been accepted and applied clinically  
[[MRI Scans|MRI]] is the most commonly used method of specifically assessing intervertebral disc degeneration. Based on proton density, water content and chemical environment, MRI depicts disc hydration and morphology. ''Pfirrmann et al'' devised a grading system for disc degeneration based on MRI signal intensity, disc structure, distinction between nucleus and annulus, and disc height.<ref name="Pfirrmann et al">Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. [https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/abstract/2001/09010/magnetic_resonance_classification_of_lumbar.11.aspx Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1873-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011.  </ref> This useful grading system has been accepted and applied clinically


The modified system comprises 8 grades for lumbar disc degeneration (Griffith et al. (2007),&nbsp;Table 1). Sagittal T2-weighted images were used for classification as they provide a comprehensive perception of disc structure and good tissue differentiation.The 8 grades represented a progression from normal disc to severe disc degeneration. Grade 1 corresponds to no disc degeneration while Grade 8 corresponds to end-stage degeneration. Beside the 8-grade table there is also an image reference panel (<span style="font-size: 13.28px; line-height: 19.92px;">Griffith et al. (2007),</span><span style="font-size: 13.28px; line-height: 19.92px;">&nbsp;</span><span style="line-height: 1.5em; font-size: 13.28px;">Figure 1).</span><ref name="Griffith et al">Griffith JF et al; Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration; Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):E708-12. ( Level of evidence: 2C)</ref>
The modified system comprises 8 grades for lumbar disc degeneration. <ref name="Griffith et al" /> Sagittal T2 weighted images were used for classification as they provide a comprehensive perception of disc structure and good tissue differentiation. The 8 grades represent a progression from normal disc to severe disc degeneration with Grade 1 corresponding to no disc degeneration and Grade 8 corresponding to end stage degeneration. As well as the 8 grade table there is also an image reference panel. <ref name="Griffith et al">Griffith JF, Wang YX, Antonio GE, Choi KC, Yu A, Ahuja AT, et al. [https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/abstract/2007/11150/modified_pfirrmann_grading_system_for_lumbar.28.aspx Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):E708-12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a59a0. </ref>


== Medical management<br> ==
== Medical management  ==


The preferential treatment for patients with chronic low back pain, caused by disc degeneration, is a conservative method consisting of physical therapy and medications ''(O'Halloran, 2007 (D))''.&nbsp;<ref name="6">O'Halloran DM, Pandit AS. Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc. Tissue Eng 2007; 13(8):1927-1954.</ref> &nbsp;
The preferred treatment protocol for patients with chronic low back pain, as a result of disc degeneration, is conservative management of physical therapy and medication.<ref name="p4" />


Conservative treatment (home or hospital) includes rest, adequate program for motoractivity, regime of physical activity, strengthening of musculature, analgetic medication, physiotherapy, rehabilitation programs and lifestyle adjustments such as weight loss. <ref name="iii">Drazin D., Rosner J., Avalos P., Acosta F., Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease, Advances in orthopedics, volume 2012, 8pg LEVEL OF EVIDENCE = 1</ref><br><br> Medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (e.g., ibuprofen, naproxen, COX-2 inhibitors) and pain relievers like acetaminophen (such as Tylenol) help many patients feel good enough to engage in regular activities. Stronger prescription medications such as oral steroids, muscle relaxants or narcotic pain medications may also be used to manage intense pain episodes on a short-term basis, and some patients may benefit from an epidural steroid injection. Not all medications are right for all patients, and patients will need to discuss side effects and possible factors that would preclude taking them with their physician. Epidural steroid injections can provide low back pain relief by delivering medication directly to the painful area to decrease inflammation.{{#ev:youtube|033ogPH6NNE|250}}<ref name="7">uwaterloo. Waterloo's Dr. Spine, Stuart McGill. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=033ogPH6NNE [last accessed 03/05/13]</ref>  
Conservative treatment includes rest, adequate stimulation for motor activity, regular physical activity, muscle strengthening, analgesic medication, physiotherapy, rehabilitation programs and lifestyle adjustments, such as weight loss. <ref name="iii">Drazin D, Rosner J, Avalos P, Acosta F. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347696/ Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease]. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:961052. doi: 10.1155/2012/961052. </ref>


Lately, successful outcomes were demonstrated by animal experiments with mesenchymal stem cells.<ref name="iii" /><ref name="i" />  
Medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ([[NSAIDs]]) and acetaminophen (e.g. Tylenol) help patients to feel confident enough to engage in their regular activities. Stronger prescription medications such as oral steroids, muscle relaxants or narcotic pain medications may also be used to manage intense pain episodes on a short-term basis only and some patients may benefit from an epidural steroid injection. Epidural steroid injections can provide low back pain relief by delivering medication directly to the painful area to decrease inflammation.{{#ev:youtube|033ogPH6NNE|250}}<ref name="p7">uwaterloo. Waterloo's Dr. Spine, Stuart McGill. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=033ogPH6NNE [Accessed on 03/05/13]</ref>  


Surgical intervention includes disc arthroplasty and lumbar spinei<ref name="i" /><ref name="iii" /> fusion to reduce chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease.<ref name="iv">Phillips F.M., Slosar P.J., Youssef J.A., Andersson G., Papatheofanis F., Lumbar spine fusion for chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease, SPINE Volume 38, Nr 7, Pp. E409-E422, 2013 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE = 1</ref><br>  
Successful outcomes have been demonstrated by animal experiments with mesenchymal stem cells.<ref name="iii" /><ref name="i" /> Surgical intervention include disc arthroplasty and lumbar spine  fusion to reduce the chronic low back pain<ref name="iii" /><ref name="iv">Phillips FM, Slosar PJ, Youssef JA, Andersson G, Papatheofanis F. [https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/abstract/2013/04010/lumbar_spine_fusion_for_chronic_low_back_pain_due.18.aspx Lumbar spine fusion for chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: a systematic review]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):E409-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182877f11.</ref><ref name="i" />.


In some cases another form of chirurgical management is used for treatment of DDD, it is named: Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM). The DIAM is a polyester-encased silicone interspinous dynamic stabilization device that can unload the anterior column and reestablish the functional integrity of the posterior column. This device is designed for preservation of the functional spinal unit. <ref name="Taylor et al">Jean Taylor, M., Patrick Pupin, M., Stephane Delajoux, M., &amp;amp;amp;amp; Sylvain Palmer, M.; Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion: Technique and Initial Results; Neurosurg Focus; 2007; p1-22. (Level of evidence 2B)</ref> (Level of evidence 2B)
The Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM) is another option of chirurgical management for the treatment of DDD. The DIAM is a polyester encased silicone interspinous dynamic stabilisation device that can unload the anterior column and re-establish the functional integrity of the posterior column. This device is designed for preservation of the functional spinal unit. <ref name="Taylor et al">Taylor J, Pupin P, Delajoux S, Palmer S. Device for intervertebral assisted motion: technique and initial results. Neurosurg Focus. 2007 Jan 15;22(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/foc.2007.22.1.6.  </ref>


<br>In some other cases, patients are not responsive to nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD). In that case patients can undergo a lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). Patients presenting with symptomatic single-level lumbar DDD who failed at least 6 months of nonsurgical management were randomly allocated to treatment with an investigational TDR device (also called: TDR activL device) or FDA-approved control devices TDR. After 2 years of research, we can conclude that the single-level activL TDR is safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar DDD. Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) improved mean back back pain. (level of evidence: 2B) <ref name="Garcia et al">Garcia R, Yue JJ, Blumenthal S, Coric D, Patel VV, Leary SP, Dinh DH,fckLRButtermann GR, Deutsch H, Girardi F, Billys J, Miller LE. Lumbar Total DiscfckLRReplacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain: Two-year Outcomes of the activL Multicenter Randomized Controlled IDE Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov 27 (2B)</ref><br>
In cases where patients are not responsive to nonsurgical treatment, a lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is an option. Patients presenting with symptomatic single level lumbar DDD who have failed at least 6 months of nonsurgical management were randomly allocated to treatment with an investigational TDR device (also called: TDR activL device) or FDA approved control devices. After 2 years of research, these devices are deemed to be safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar DDD. <ref name="Garcia et al">Garcia R Jr, Yue JJ, Blumenthal S, Coric D, Patel VV, Leary SP, et al.  [https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/fulltext/2015/12150/lumbar_total_disc_replacement_for_discogenic_low.1.aspx Lumbar Total Disc Replacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain: Two-year Outcomes of the activL Multicenter Randomized Controlled IDE Clinical Trial]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Dec;40(24):1873-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001245. </ref>
== Physical Therapy management  ==


== Physical management  ==
One of the main aims of physical therapy is to reduce pain. Various physical modalities are used, including heat and cold application, traction, spinal manipulations <ref>Beattie PF. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2008.2768?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed Current understanding of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a review with emphasis upon etiology, pathophysiology, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jun;38(6):329-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2768.(level of evidence 1b)</ref> <ref name=":1">Zhang Y, An HS, Tannoury C, Thonar EJ, Freedman MK, Anderson DG. [https://journals.lww.com/ajpmr/abstract/2008/09000/biological_treatment_for_degenerative_disc.2.aspx Biological treatment for degenerative disc disease: implications for the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;87(9):694-702. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817c1945.  </ref> <ref>Mirza SK, Deyo RA. [https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/abstract/2007/04010/systematic_review_of_randomized_trials_comparing.18.aspx Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):816-23. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259225.37454.38. </ref>, exercise programs and electrical stimulation such as ‘[[Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)|TENS]]’ and ‘pulsed radiofrequency (PRF)’ treatment<ref>Rohof O. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00512.x Intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency application following provocative discography for the management of degenerative disc disease and concordant pain: a pilot study]. Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):342-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00512.x. </ref> and [[Lifestyle Medicine, Behavioural Modification and Self Care for Managing Low Back Pain|lifestyle modifications]] (e.g., weight reduction, smoking cessation).<ref name=":1" /> Amongst exercise approaches, unloaded movement facilitation exercises of [https://www.physio-pedia.com/Mckenzie_Method McKenzie], core strengthening, and core stabilisation exercises are all effective in pain reduction for degenerative disc disease.<ref>Slade SC, Keating JL. [https://www.jmptonline.org/article/S0161-4754(07)00082-6/fulltext Unloaded movement facilitation exercise compared to no exercise or alternative therapy on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review]. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 May;30(4):301-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.010. </ref>  


A part of the physical therapy treatment is aimed at <u>reducing pain</u>. For this purpose, different physical modalities are used, including heat and cold application, traction, spinal manipulations (Beattie P, 2008 (D); Zhang Y (C), 2008; Mirza SK, 2007 (A1))<ref>Beattie P. Current understanding of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a review with emphasis upon etiology, pathophysiology, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings. fckLRJOSPT 2008; 38(6):329-340</ref><ref>Zhang Y. Biological treatment for degenerative disc disease: Implications for the field of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008, fckLR87(9): p.694-702</ref><ref>Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Lumbar Fusion Surgery to Nonoperative Care for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain. Spine 2007; 32(7): 816-823</ref>, exercise programs and electrical stimulation such as ‘TENS’ and ‘pulsed radiofrequency (PRF)’ treatment<ref>Rohof O., Intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency application following provocative discography for the management of degenerative disc disease and concordant pain: a pilot study, Pain practice, 2012, Volume 12, Issue 5, Pg 342-349 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2</ref>&nbsp;and&nbsp;lifestyle modifications (e.g., weight reduction, smoking cessation).<ref name="Zhang">Zhang Y, An HS, Tannoury C, Thonar EJ, Freedman MK, Anderson DG. Biological treatment for degenerative disc disease: implications for the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;87 (level of evidence: 1A)</ref>&nbsp;With this PRF treatment, 56% of 76 patients with discogenic pain had more than 50% pain reduction one year after the first treatment.&nbsp; Among exercise approaches, unloaded movement facilitation exercises of McKenzie, core strengthening, and core stabilization exercises are all effective in pain reduction for degenerative disc disease.<ref>lade SC, Keating JL: Unloaded movement facilitation exercise compared to no exercise or alternative therapy on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:301–11(level of evidence: 1A)</ref><br>
<u>'''Spinal manipulations'''</u> <br> <br>Spinal manipulations have traditionally been used to relieve lower back pain, but the effects are generally only temporary. The HVLA (High-Velocity, Low-amplitude) is a manipulation that includes many different techniques and may involve preliminary preparation of the joint and its surrounding tissues, using stretching, assisted motion and other methods. Loads, both forces and moments, are applied to the joint, and it is moved to its end range of voluntary motion. An impulse is then applied, the effective load is the summation of forces applied by the therapist, with the inertial forces generated by the motion of body segments, and the internally generated tensions from client muscle reactions. <ref>Triano JJ, McGregor, M, Skogsbergh DR. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13902001_Use_of_chiropractic_manipulation_in_lumbar_rehabilitation Use of chiropractic manipulation in lumbar rehabilitation]. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 1997; 34: 394-404. </ref>


<br>  
This technique can immediately improve self-perceived pain, spinal mobility in flexion and hip flexion during the passive SLR test, <ref>Vieira-Pellenz F, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Rodriguez-Blanco C, Heredia-Rizo AM, Ricard F, Almazán-Campos G. [https://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993(14)00367-0/fulltext Short-term effect of spinal manipulation on pain perception, spinal mobility, and full height recovery in male subjects with degenerative disk disease: a randomized controlled trial]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1613-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.002.  </ref>  but ''Paige et al'' reported only moderate improvements in pain and with (transient) minor musculoskeletal harms. <ref>Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Booth MS, Beroes JM, Mardian AS, Dougherty P, et al. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5470352/ Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis]. JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1451-1460. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3086.  </ref> Before Spinal Manipulation Therapy (SMT) can be considered as a treatment option, patients with LBP need to be screened for possible serious pathology. There are two reasons for this: some conditions, such as a fracture, affect the mechanical integrity of the spine and would make SMT clearly dangerous. In other conditions, a failure to recognise the condition delays commencement of more appropriate care. For example, early detection and treatment of spinal malignancy is important to prevent the spread of metastatic disease and the development of further complications such as spinal cord compression. Application of SMT with the presence of any red flags are  considered as contraindications to SMT until further investigation has excluded other pathologies. <br>  


<u>'''Spinal manipulations'''</u> <br> <br>The HVLA is a spinal manipulation that includes many different techniques and may involve preliminary preparation of the joint and its surrounding tissues, using stretching, assisted motion and other methods. Loads, both forces and moments, are applied to the joint, and it is moved to its end range of voluntary motion. An impulse is then applied, the effective load is the summation of forces applied by the operator, with the inertial forces generated by the motion of body segments, and the internally generated tensions from client muscle reactions. (Triano et al, 1997 (level of evidence 3A))<ref>JJ Triano et al, „Use of chiropractic manipulation in lumbar rehabilitation”, Journal of RehabilitationResearch and Development, 1997. (level of evidence 3A)</ref><br> <br>The HVLa is a (High-Velocity, Low-amplitude) SM (Spinal Manipulation) in the lumbosacral joint performed on men with degenerative disc disease. This immediately improves self-perceived pain, spinal mobility in flexion, hip flexion during the passive SLR test, and subjects' full height (Vieira-Pellenz F et al, 2014 (level of evidence 1B)) <ref>Vieira-Pellenz F et al„Short-Term Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Pain Perception, Spinal Mobility, and Full Height Recovery in Male Subjects With Degenerative Disk Disease: A Randomized Controlled Tria”l, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24862763) (level of evidence 1B)</ref>(= full height recovery after high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation (SM) in the Lumbosacral joint (L5-S1)). Before Spinal Manipulation Therapy (SMT) can be considered as a treatment option, patients with LBP need to be screened for possible serious pathology. There are two reasons for this: some conditions, such as a fracture, affect the mechanical integrity of the spine and would make SMT clearly dangerous. In other conditions, a failure to recognize the condition delays commencement of more appropriate care. For example, early detection and treatment of spinal malignancy is important to prevent the spread of metastatic disease and the development of further complications such as spinal cord compression. Application of SMT with the presence of red flags cancer and fracture, should be considered as contraindications to SMT until further investigation has excluded serious pathology. The other red flags would only be contraindications to SMT if more than one were positive. (Hancock MJ et al 2008 (level of evidence 2C)) <br>  
<u>'''Core Stability'''</u><br><br>Strength training aims to enhance core stability by strengthening and improving the coordination between the abdominal and back muscles.<ref>Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A. Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Degeneration. Spine 2003; 28(17):1913-1921 </ref> Stabilisation exercises will increase a patient’s capacity to resist higher loads in the degenerative discs<ref name="p8">Beattie P. Current understanding of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a review with emphasis upon etiology, pathophysiology, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings. 2008; 38(6):329-340  </ref>. This is a key element for prevention and treatment of injury as muscle tissue reduces at a rate of 1 kg/year after the age of 40.<ref>Adam Gąsiorowski et al, Strength training in the treatment of degeneration of lumbar section of vertebral column, Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, Vol 20, No 2, 203–205, 2013 </ref> A posterior dynamic stabilisation programme will have result in a significant improvement in pain and disability.<ref>Zagra A., et al; Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine, Eur Spine J, 2012, 21, suppl 1: S83-S89 </ref> <ref>Canbay S., et al, Posterior dynamic stabilization for the treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease: long-term clinical and radiological results, Turkish Neurosurgery 2013, vol. 23, No. 2, 188-197 </ref> Training exercises performed 1-3 times a week reduces pain and should be continued once pain has subsided and patients are able to return to their jobs and hobbies/activities and are able to cease the use of analgesics.<ref name="Adam Gąsiorowski et al">41. Adam Gąsiorowski et al, Strength training in the treatment of degeneration of lumbar section of vertebral column, Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, Vol 20, No 2, 203–205, 2013 </ref>  


<br>  
Exercises are performed to reduce pain and to ensure stability by strengthening the hip extensors, hip flexors, abdominal muscles and the sacrospinalis muscles.<ref>Johnson Olubusola E. Therapeutic Exercises in the Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain, ISBN: 978-953-51-0599-2, 2012  </ref>Other important exercises include engaging of the pelvis musculature to restore body symmetry, such as the back extensors and abdominal muscles. The Williams method suggests stretching of the back extensors and strengthening of the abdominal muscles to relieve some of the pressure placed on the lumbar intervertebral discs.<ref>Lee M.,The effects of core muscle release technique on lumbar spine deformation and low back pain.J Phys Ther Sci.;27(5):1519-22,  2015  </ref> <ref>Mircea MOLDOVAN, Therapeutic Considerations and Recovery in Low Back Pain: Williams vs McKenzie, Timisoara Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal. Volume 5, Issue 9, 2012  </ref> 


<u>'''Core Stability'''</u><br><br>Other objectives are to enhance the core stability by strengthening and improving the coordination between the abdominal and back muscles through a spinal stabilization program (Brox JI, 2003 (level of evidence A2)).<ref>Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A. Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Degeneration. Spine 2003; 28(17):1913-1921</ref> These <u>stabilization exercises</u> can increase the patient’s capacity to resist higher loads in the degenerative discs(Beattie P, 2008 (level of evidence D))<ref name="8" />. According to studies the load on the vertebral column can be reduced by half thanks to the muscles. The problem is the fact that muscle tissue is reduced with a rate of 1 kg/year after reaching the age of 40.<ref>Adam Gąsiorowski et al, Strength training in the treatment of degeneration of lumbar section of vertebral column, Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, Vol 20, No 2, 203–205, 2013 (level of evidence 3A)</ref>&nbsp;A posterior dynamic stabilization program proved a significant improvement in pain and disability.<ref>Zagra A., et al; Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine, Eur Spine J, 2012, 21, suppl 1: S83-S89 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2</ref><ref>Canbay S., et al, Posterior dynamic stabilization for the treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease: long-term clinical and radiological results, Turkish Neurosurgery 2013, vol. 23, No. 2, 188-197 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2</ref>&nbsp; Strength training exercises performed 1-3 times a week for 3 months reduced the pain of 157 patients. Those patients were able to return to their jobs and hobbies and were able to stop the use of pain killers.<ref name="Adam Gąsiorowski et al" />
'''Sample examples of the Williams flexion exercises plan are:'''  


<br><span style="font-size: 13.28px; line-height: 19.92px;">Excercises are performed to reduce pain and to ensure stability by strengthening the hip extensors, hip flexors, abdominal muscles and the sacrospinalis muscles.</span><ref>Johnson Olubusola E. Therapeutic Exercises in the Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain, ISBN: 978-953-51-0599-2, 2012 (level of evidence 5)</ref><span style="font-size: 13.28px; line-height: 19.92px;">&nbsp;At first the patient has to perform muscle contractions of the abdominal muscles and the m. iliopsoas, this will lead to the relaxation of the paravertebral muscles. These exercises will also help regain some of the lumbar joint suppleness. The movement will also help to feed the disc by absorbing liquid. After two weeks standing excercises can be performed. The previous excercices can still be performed as warming up excercises. Other important excercises include rectification of the pelvis to restore the body symmetry and toning the back extensors and abdominal muscles. By stretching the back extensors and strengthening the abdominal muscles we can redivide some of the pressure placed on the lumbar intervertebral discs.(These excercises are also a part of the Williams method.)</span><ref>Lee M.,The effects of core muscle release technique on lumbar spine deformation and low back pain.J Phys Ther Sci.;27(5):1519-22,  2015 (level of evidence 1B)</ref><ref>Mircea MOLDOVAN, Therapeutic Considerations and Recovery in Low Back Pain: Williams vs McKenzie, Timisoara Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal. Volume 5, Issue 9, 2012 (level of evidence 5)</ref>
*Pelvic tilt - lying on the back with bent knees, the back is pressed  into the floor and held in this position for up to 10 seconds.
 
'''Some examples of Williams' Flexion Exercises are:'''
 
*Pelvic tilt
 
The patient lies on his back with bent knees. He presses his back into the ground and holds this position up to 10 seconds.  


{{#ev:youtube|uNTo0QDP2oc}}  
{{#ev:youtube|uNTo0QDP2oc}}  


*Single or double Knee to chest
*Single or double Knee to chest - Lying on the back with bent knees, one is pulled up to the chest and held for up to 10 seconds. This can be done with one or two knees at a time.
 
The patient lies on his back with bent knees. He pulls one of his knees up to his chest and holds this op to 10 seconds. This can be done with one or two knees at a time.  


{{#ev:youtube|vxvcQChdaZg}}  
{{#ev:youtube|vxvcQChdaZg}}  


*Partial sit-up.
*Partial sit-up - starting in a pelvic tilt position, the  shoulders are then lifted off the floor. This is held for 2-10 seconds for each repetition
 
The patient starts with a pelvic tilt after wich he lifts his shoulders off the floor. He holds this position 2 seconds each time he does this.


{{#ev:youtube|Xyd_fa5zoEU}}  
{{#ev:youtube|Xyd_fa5zoEU}}  


*Hamstring stretch.
*Hamstring stretch  
 
The patient sits with extended knees and reaches out to touch his toes with his hands. He goes as far as possible. Other ways to stretch your hamstrings:


{{#ev:youtube|N_C_SnaUc7M}}  
{{#ev:youtube|N_C_SnaUc7M}}  


*Hip Flexor stretch.
*Hip Flexor stretch  
 
The patient starts with one foot in front of the other. The knee of the front foot is flexed. He bends forward untill his front knee touches his chest. Other ways to stretch the hip flexors:


{{#ev:youtube|yfswfLuW_tI}}  
{{#ev:youtube|yfswfLuW_tI}}  


*Squat
*Squat - performed correctly, this is a good overall exercise for the whole body and trunk control recruitment and lower back strength.
 
The patient is standing with both feet on shoulders width apart. He keeps his back in a neutral position as he bends his knees and hips lowering his body.  


{{#ev:youtube|aPYCiuiB4PA}}  
{{#ev:youtube|aPYCiuiB4PA}}  


<br> In combination with these excercises core stability excercises are recommended. Core stability excercises start with learning how to recruit the abdominal muscles. Abdominal hollowing and branching activates the m. transversus abdominis wich is an important stabilizing muscle. Performing abdominal hollowing and branching excercises prior to abdominal curls facilitates the activation of the transversus abdominis and internal obliques during the abdominal curling excercises.  
<br>In combination with these exercises core stability exercises are recommended. Exercises to facilitate and engage the transversus abdominis are key to creating a stable base for performing other exercises, including strength exercises. <ref name="AKUTHOTA">AKUTHOTA V., Core Stability Exercise Principles Akuthota, Curr. Sports Med. Rep., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 39Y44, 2008 </ref>  {{#ev:youtube|ruBA44wNo8k}} 


<br>M. transversus abdominis recruitment excercise:<br>The patiënt lies on his back and imagines there is a line connecting his two pelvic bones. This is the area he has to focus on. Try contracting the muscles in this area without sucking in or expanding your abdomen. While doing this keep breathing normal. Hold this contraction for at least 10 seconds and repeat this several times.<ref>AKUTHOTA V., Core Stability Exercise Principles Akuthota, Curr. Sports Med. Rep., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 39Y44, 2008 (level of evidence 5)</ref>  
Exercises can be progressed onto: curl ups, side plank, prone plank, bridging and performing alternated leg and arm raises in a four point kneeling position. This can be progressed to raising opposite arm and leg at the same time. During these exercises the spine should be maintained in a neutral position without any compensatory movements and the pelvis should not tilt. <ref name="AKUTHOTA" /> Balance and coordination exercises relevant to an individual's sport can also be added into the programme.<ref name="AKUTHOTA" /> <ref name="COSIO-LIMA">COSIO-LIMA, Effects of Physioball and Conventional Floor Exercises on Early Phase Adaptations in Back and Abdominal Core Stability and Balance in Women. J Strength Cond Res.17(4):721-5. 2003  </ref>  


{{#ev:youtube|ruBA44wNo8k}}
<br>[[Image:Core stability exercises.gif]] 


Once the patient is capable of performing an isolated contraction of the m. transversus abdominis other excercises are allowed. These excercises include the curl up, side plank, prone plank, bridging and performing alternated leg and arm raises in a quadruped position. During these exercises the spine should maintain a neutral position and the pelvis shoud not be tilted. When these excercises are mastered the person can advance to excercises on a physioball. <ref name="AKUTHOTA" />  
In patients with degenerative disc disease it is also advised to add [[Cognitive Behavioural Therapy|behavioural therapy]] to treatment programme due to the psychological effects of the disease, as patients can associate the constant pain and term degeneration with their backs becoming increasingly weak, This additional therapy has been shown to give better results.<ref name="p1" /> These erroneous thoughts often elicit a fear of movement and can lead to the avoidance of movements of the spine. <ref name="p8" /> Education and advice can also improve patient compliance,<ref name="p0">Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Lumbar Fusion Surgery to Nonoperative Care for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain. Spine 2007; 32(7): 816-823 </ref>  helping them to overcome their fears and be adaptive with their coping strategies. Staying active and physical training will not have adverse effects on their spines<ref name="p1" /> and performing low impact aerobic exercises is actually beneficial for the spine, increasing the flow of nutrients and blood to spinal structures and decreases pressure on the intervertebral discs. Prolonged single positions should also be avoided where possible. Back care is a life long process and patients should be encouraged to remain regularly active.<ref name="p8" /><ref name="p1" />  


<br>[[Image:Core stability exercises.gif]]
Extension exercises are given to displace the pressure on the discs anteriorly. Some exercises are:


In the last phase of a core strengthening program emphasis should be placed on balance and coördination excercises. Various unstable surfaces can be used. Before performing any of the standing balance and coördination excercises abdominal branching techniques should be performed to warm up the abdominal muscles. The excercises should be functional and should involve acceleration, deceleration and dynamic stabilisation. Reflexive control and postural regulation excercises should also be included. Examples of these excercises are controlled falling lunges in different directions and jumps on one or two legs. To help create automatic postural control we can blindfold or distract the patient by giving him additional tasks.<ref name="AKUTHOTA" /><ref name="COSIO-LIMA">COSIO-LIMA, Effects of Physioball and Conventional Floor Exercises on Early Phase Adaptations in Back and Abdominal Core Stability and Balance in Women. J Strength Cond Res.17(4):721-5. 2003 (level of evidence 1B)</ref><br>  
*Hollowing the back
*Making a sphinx posture
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNamjanZttM&feature=youtube_gdata Gym ball exercises]
Physical therapies should aim to promote healing in the disc periphery, by stimulating cells, boosting metabolite transport and preventing adhesion and re-injury. Such an approach has the potential to accelerate pain relief in the disc periphery, even if it fails to reverse age-related degenerative changes in the nucleus.<ref name="Adams et al">Adams MA, Stefanakis M, Dolan P. Healing of a painful intervertebral discfckLRshould not be confused with reversing disc degeneration: implications forfckLRphysical therapies for discogenic back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010fckLRDec;25(10):961-71.</ref>  


In patients with degenerative disc disease it is also advised to add <u>behavioral therapy</u> to the usual treatment since it has been shown that the addition of behavioral therapy gives better results (Brox JI, 2003 (level of evidence A2))<ref name="11" />. This is related to the fact that the diagnosis of degenerative disc disease also entails many psychological effects. Many patients assume that degeneration means that their spine is becoming weaker, associated with constant pain. These erroneous thoughts often cause fear of movement (kinesiophobia) and lead to the avoidance of movements of the spine (Beattie P, 2008 (D))<ref name="8" />.  
The use of low-level laser therapy is a further possible option in the conservative treatment of discogenic back pain, with positive clinical results of more than 90% efficacy, not only in the short-term, but also in the long-term, with lasting benefits. In their research, ''Ip and Fu'' conducted three sessions of treatment per week over a 12 week period. 49 of the 50 patients had significant improvement in their Oswestry Disability Index score <ref name="Ip et al">Ip D, Fu NY. Can intractable discogenic back pain be managed by low-level laser therapy without recourse to operative intervention? J Pain Res. 2015 May 26;8:253-6  </ref>, but this still needs more research.<br>


<br>The task of the physical therapists includes giving <u>information and advice</u> to improve the compliance rate.(Mirza SK, 2007 (A1))<ref name="10" />. Good communication with patients is of great importance, they have to realize that degeneration of the intervertebral disc is a normal aging process. The physiotherapist must help the patients to identify and overcome their fears and to adapt their coping strategies (Mirza SK, 2007 (A1))<ref name="10" />. It is important that patients understand that they must <u>stay active</u> and that activities of daily life and other moderate physical activity will not cause additional damage or have adverse effects (Brox JI, 2003 (A2))<ref name="11" />. Patients must be encouraged to perform <u>low impact aerobic exercises</u>, such as walking and water aerobics. Low impact aerobic conditioning ensures adequate flow of nutrients and blood to spine structures, and decreases pressure on the discs. They should avoid prolonged static postures as much as possible (Beattie P, 2008 (D); Brox JI, 2003 (A2)).<ref name="8" /><ref name="11" />  
== Occupational Therapy ==
Occupational Therapy may be administered to teach body mechanics and postures. It can help patients gain proper manual handling skills and modify their regular tasks to avoid painful movement. <ref name=":0">australiaot. Occupational Therapy Proforma - Format & Example (Lumbar Disc Bulge) 디스크 [Internet]. Australia OT. 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 10]. Available from: https://australiaot.com/en/occupational-therapy-proforma-format-example-lumbar-disc-bulge-디스크/</ref>


<br>Extension exercises are given to displace the pressure on the discus intevertebralis anteriorly. Some exercises are:
Occupational therapy also can assist in locating essential equipment such as a pick-up stick, lumbar cushion, shower chair, swivel cushion for automobile transfer, and in some severe cases, a lifter and sling. <ref name=":0" />
 
*Hollow the back
*Make a sphinx posture
*Lie with the upper body prone on a table, the legs hang off. Lift the legs against the force of gravity. This is a back strengthening exercise.
*The last exercise can also be carried out on a ball.<ref>Extremiteiten, www.fysio.net, Extensieoefening voor de lumbale wervelkolom in buikligging, 29-10-2009fckLR(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNamjanZttM&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;feature=youtube_gdata) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5</ref><ref>Kielbaso J., Hardcore abs training, Fit4Less4Info, 19oktober2012fckLR(http://fit4lessamsterdam.wordpress.com/2012/10/) (http://fit4lessamsterdam.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/crunchleg-raise.jpg) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5</ref><ref name="ix" /><br>
 
<br>
 
Physical therapies should aim to promote healing in the disc periphery, by stimulating cells, boosting metabolite transport, and preventing adhesions and re-injury. Such an approach has the potential to accelerate pain relief in the disc periphery, even if it fails to reverse age-related degenerative changes in the nucleus. <ref name="Adams et al">Adams MA, Stefanakis M, Dolan P. Healing of a painful intervertebral discfckLRshould not be confused with reversing disc degeneration: implications forfckLRphysical therapies for discogenic back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010fckLRDec;25(10):961-71. (level of evidence 2B)</ref><br>The use of low-level laser therapy is a viable option in the conservative treatment of discogenic back pain, with a positive clinical result of more than 90% efficacy, not only in the short-term but also in the long-term, with lasting benefits. In the research, a wavelength of 810 nm wavelength emitted from a GaAIAs semiconductor laser device with 5.4 J per point and a power density of 20 mW/cm(2) was employed. The treatment regimen consisted of three sessions of treatment per week for 12 consecutive weeks. All (50) but one patient had significant improvement in their Oswestry Disability Index score. This means their disability decreased. <ref name="Ip et al">Ip D, Fu NY. Can intractable discogenic back pain be managed by low-level laser therapy without recourse to operative intervention? J Pain Res. 2015 May 26;8:253-6 (level of evidence: 1B)</ref><br>
 
== Resources <br>  ==
 
add appropriate resources here <br>  


== Clinical Bottom Line  ==
== Clinical Bottom Line  ==


DDD is a is a condition in which the intervertebral discs lose height and hydration. As result the intervertebral discs are unable to fulfill their primary functions. Although the exact cause of DDD is unknown, it is thought to be associated with the aging process. The most common location of this process is situated in the cervical and lower lumbar sections of the spine.  
DDD is a is a condition in which the intervertebral discs lose height and hydration and as a result the discs are unable to fulfill their primary functions. Although the exact cause of DDD is unknown, it is thought to be primarily associated with the aging process. The most common location of this process is situated in the cervical and lower lumbar regions of the spine.  


To diagnose DDD the use of X-rays is needed. To identify the painful disc, the provocation discography test should be used.  
Diagnosis is via X-ray and to accurately identify the painful disc, a provocation discography test is used. Common outcome measures are the Oswestry Disability Index in combination with questionnaires like VAS and SF-36.  


The common outcome measure for DDD is the Oswestry Disability Index, mostly in combination with another questionnaire like VAS or SF-36.
Multiple concepts of medical management are used to treat DDD. When pain persists despite efforts from conservative management, surgical techniques may be considered. A few examples of surgical management are:
 
* DIAM interspinous spacer<ref>Hrabalek L, Machac J, Vaverka M. The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine. Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca. 2009 Oct;76(5):417-23.</ref><ref>Bruneau A, Anderson KM, Lim R, Lange EC, Carls T, Trieu HH, inventors; Warsaw Orthopedic Inc, assignee. Interspinous process brace. United States patent US 8,105,357. 2012 Jan 31.</ref>  
Multiple concepts of medical management are used to treat DDD. <br>Surgical techniques are: <br>The DIAM, <br>● Disc arthroplasty <br>● Lumbar spinei fusion<br>● Total disc replacement<br>But the preferential treatment is conservative technique. This consists of physical therapy and medications (analgesic medication).  
* Disc arthroplasty 
 
* Lumbar [https://www.webmd.com/pain-management/video/spinal-fusion spinal fusion]
<br>The aim of physical therapy for DDD is to reduce pain, to enhance the core stability, provide information and advise about the disease and teach behavioral therapy.<br>For pain reduction heat and cold application, traction, spinal manipulations, electrical stimulation (TENS, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF)) and exercise therapy are the used modalities.<br>To improve stabilization of the back and abdominal muscles, coordination exercises like core stability are the most suitable (see Physical Management: core stability).<br>With the use of behavioral therapy we expect that the patient rejects erroneous thoughts concerning his pathology and enhance his lifestyle.<br>Low-level laser therapy can be used for conservative treatment, but further research is needed.<br><br>  
* [https://www.spine-health.com/video/total-disc-replacement-back-surgery-video Total disc replacement]
 
However, the preferred treatment protocol is conservative management, consisting of physical therapy and analgesic medications. The aim of physical therapy is to reduce pain, to enhance overall strength and core stability and to inform and advise the patient about the disease so that can then effectively self manage for the long term.
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
   
 
<rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1pMPQVclnMMdhoCVXc_6QwikGZ1oJDfw8DH__4CDKu4nrbvM0x|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> <rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1jcCSTNs5ufLgbvB_E4LH4yZzt4a0ktD5ViUIMh5VyqUJQjkEn|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> <rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=16ooSLsIx9qeAalLyyodh3w-tSqfHVVKzfdnn87DcC_P-Li1ho|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> <rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1-KHXJhm35hbwR0UYXkVZjhNASb5b-RjWyFkmfxYo6-ZaVdEW9|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> <rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1ZEzhvEsCLGbIuvYmXIo6xEHcunDWsjfD7C6_2bOnLhZURUEZG|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> <rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1hMQ8bQB8dXT7O4UMxfVfcMjjYIGeLpWzOjsX-ExF6bYCr1kfx|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> <rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1PsNRxjiL269MVconGgUNMELZlAiuh-M_iP9ofPKouYgWJQMZ3|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>
 
  &lt;/div&gt;


== References  ==
== References  ==
References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].


<references />  
<references />  


[[Category:Vrije_Universiteit_Brussel_Project|Template:VUB]] [[Category:MCG_Student_Project]] [[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]] [[Category:Lumbar]]
[[Category:Vrije_Universiteit_Brussel_Project]]  
[[Category:MCG_Student_Project]]  
[[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]]  
[[Category:Lumbar Spine]]
[[Category:Lumbar Spine - Conditions]]
[[Category:Conditions]]
[[Category:Osteoarthritis]]

Latest revision as of 17:54, 9 January 2024

Definition/Description[edit | edit source]

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) represents a wide category of back pain resulting from or associated with the degeneration of intervertebral discs[1]. It involves a process where the intervertebral discs lose height and hydration. When this occurs, the discs are unable to fulfill their primary functions of cushioning and providing mobility between the vertebrae. Although the exact cause is unknown, it is thought to be associated with the aging process during which the intervertebral discs dehydrate, lose elasticity, and collapse. Despite its name, degenerative disc disease is not so much of a disease, but a natural occurrence that comes with ageing[2]. Degenerative disc disease may develop at any level of the spine, but is most common in the cervical and lower lumbar regions.[3][4]

Clinically Relevant Anatomy[edit | edit source]

Lumbar DDD is a condition that maybe a cause of lower back pain, which results from the co-existence of two different time scales, the slow dynamics of disc degeneration and the fast dynamics of pain recurrence. [5]

Lumbar DDD can also imply radiating pain from damaged discs in the spine. A lumbar spinal disc acts as a shock absorber between two vertebrae and allows the joints and the spine to move easily. The outer region of the disc, the annulus fibrosis, surrounds the soft inner core of the disc, the nucleus pulposus. Spinal discs undergo degenerative changes as we age, but not everyone will have symptoms as a result of these changes. Neural inflammation is one such possible cause of pain. When the outer section of the disc ruptures, the inner core can leak out, releasing proteins that irritate the neural tissue. Another cause is when discs can no longer absorb stress as well, leading to abnormal movement around the vertebral segment and causing back muscles spasm as they try to stabilise the spine. In some cases the segment may collapse, causing nerve root compression and radiculopathy. Pain often reduces with time as the inflammatory proteins dissipate and the disc collapse settles into a stable position. [6]

Intervertebral Discs

Intervertebral Discs

Degenerative Disc Disease is thought to begin with changes to the annulus fibrosis, intervertebral disc, and subchondral bone. The process of degeneration is divided into three classifications: early dysfunction, intermediate instability, and final stabilisation.

  • Early dysfunction is the start of degenerative changes which can occur as early as 20 years old.
  • Intermediate instability is classified by a loosening of the annulus fibrosis, which can cause lower back pain.
  • Final stabilisation is where fibrosis develops in the posterior structures and osteophytes form. Pain and motion both decrease. [7]

Epidemiology /Etiology[edit | edit source]

Intervertebral Discs in situ

Degenerative disc disease is fairly common and it is estimated that at least 30% of people aged 30-50 years old will have some degree of disc space degeneration, although not all will have pain or ever receive a formal diagnosis.[8] The pain is frequently caused by simple wear and tear as part of the general ageing process. It can also be as a result of a twisting injury to the lower back.

The process that leads to DDD begins with structural changes. The annulus fibrosis loses water content over time which makes it increasingly unyielding toward the daily stresses and strains placed on the spine. The loss of compliance in the discs contributes to forces being redirected from the anterior and middle portions of the facets to the posterior aspect, causing facet arthritis. Hypertrophy of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the degenerating disc also results. These overgrowth are known as bony spurs or osteophytes.

Characteristics/Clinical Presentation[edit | edit source]

DDD commonly occurs with other diagnoses such as:

Activities that typically increase pain include:

  • Sitting for extended periods of time.
  • Rotating, bending, or lifting.

Activities that typically decrease pain include:

  • Frequent changes in positions.
  • Lying down.
  • Staying active.[9]

Differential Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

People with DDD will often present with low back pain[10] with varying levels of severity between individuals. Pain is often chronic, but can also be acute on chronic with varying episodes of exacerbation [9]

There are different degrees of annular disruption[3] which are classified into 5 grades. These grades are differentiated by means of a contrast medium injection.

  • Grade 0: no disruption
  • Grade 1: the contrast medium passes into the cartilage endplate through a tear
  • Grade 2: the contrast medium flows into the bony endplate
  • Grade 3: the contrast medium enters into the cancellous bone of vertebra under endplate
  • Grade 4: the contrast medium leaks completely in the cancellous bone.

Diagnostic Procedures[edit | edit source]

Provocation discography is a diagnostic test to identify a painful disc. To evaluate the degree of disruption, a combination of discogram and CT scan after discography is used.[3] X-ray findings can also be used to diagnose DDD. Anterior-Posterior and lateral views are taken where presence of osteophytes, narrowing of the disc joint space, or a “vacuum sign” is noted. [11]

Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

None of the literature has reported a uniform system of outcome measures. The most common form of outcome measure for DDD is the Oswestry Disabilty Index (ODI) in combination with other forms of outcome measures, such as: Short Form 36 (or SF-12) questionnaire, self-paced walk, timed up-and-go test (TUG), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Roland-Morris disability index (RMDI) [12][13] .

Carreon found that the Oswestry Disability Index is a good primary outcome measure for lumbar fusion and nonsurgical interventions for various symptomatic degenerative spine disorders, [14] although further research is needed.

Examination[edit | edit source]

The patient’s history is a valuable tool for identifying the intervertebral disc as the nociceptive source. Patients may present with a history of chronic low back pain as well as symptoms in the gluteal region and stiffness in the spine which worsens with activity and tenderness on palpation over the involved area.[11]

Mood and anxiety disorders are associated with neurological deficits and more commonly seen in patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation than in those without herniation.[15] No relationship was detected between pain severity and mood or anxiety disorders, however. These disorders can be diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

MRI is the most commonly used method of specifically assessing intervertebral disc degeneration. Based on proton density, water content and chemical environment, MRI depicts disc hydration and morphology. Pfirrmann et al devised a grading system for disc degeneration based on MRI signal intensity, disc structure, distinction between nucleus and annulus, and disc height.[16] This useful grading system has been accepted and applied clinically.

The modified system comprises 8 grades for lumbar disc degeneration. [17] Sagittal T2 weighted images were used for classification as they provide a comprehensive perception of disc structure and good tissue differentiation. The 8 grades represent a progression from normal disc to severe disc degeneration with Grade 1 corresponding to no disc degeneration and Grade 8 corresponding to end stage degeneration. As well as the 8 grade table there is also an image reference panel. [17]

Medical management[edit | edit source]

The preferred treatment protocol for patients with chronic low back pain, as a result of disc degeneration, is conservative management of physical therapy and medication.[9]

Conservative treatment includes rest, adequate stimulation for motor activity, regular physical activity, muscle strengthening, analgesic medication, physiotherapy, rehabilitation programs and lifestyle adjustments, such as weight loss. [18]

Medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen (e.g. Tylenol) help patients to feel confident enough to engage in their regular activities. Stronger prescription medications such as oral steroids, muscle relaxants or narcotic pain medications may also be used to manage intense pain episodes on a short-term basis only and some patients may benefit from an epidural steroid injection. Epidural steroid injections can provide low back pain relief by delivering medication directly to the painful area to decrease inflammation.

[19]

Successful outcomes have been demonstrated by animal experiments with mesenchymal stem cells.[18][3] Surgical intervention include disc arthroplasty and lumbar spine fusion to reduce the chronic low back pain[18][20][3].

The Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM) is another option of chirurgical management for the treatment of DDD. The DIAM is a polyester encased silicone interspinous dynamic stabilisation device that can unload the anterior column and re-establish the functional integrity of the posterior column. This device is designed for preservation of the functional spinal unit. [21]

In cases where patients are not responsive to nonsurgical treatment, a lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is an option. Patients presenting with symptomatic single level lumbar DDD who have failed at least 6 months of nonsurgical management were randomly allocated to treatment with an investigational TDR device (also called: TDR activL device) or FDA approved control devices. After 2 years of research, these devices are deemed to be safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar DDD. [22]

Physical Therapy management[edit | edit source]

One of the main aims of physical therapy is to reduce pain. Various physical modalities are used, including heat and cold application, traction, spinal manipulations [23] [24] [25], exercise programs and electrical stimulation such as ‘TENS’ and ‘pulsed radiofrequency (PRF)’ treatment[26] and lifestyle modifications (e.g., weight reduction, smoking cessation).[24] Amongst exercise approaches, unloaded movement facilitation exercises of McKenzie, core strengthening, and core stabilisation exercises are all effective in pain reduction for degenerative disc disease.[27]

Spinal manipulations

Spinal manipulations have traditionally been used to relieve lower back pain, but the effects are generally only temporary. The HVLA (High-Velocity, Low-amplitude) is a manipulation that includes many different techniques and may involve preliminary preparation of the joint and its surrounding tissues, using stretching, assisted motion and other methods. Loads, both forces and moments, are applied to the joint, and it is moved to its end range of voluntary motion. An impulse is then applied, the effective load is the summation of forces applied by the therapist, with the inertial forces generated by the motion of body segments, and the internally generated tensions from client muscle reactions. [28]

This technique can immediately improve self-perceived pain, spinal mobility in flexion and hip flexion during the passive SLR test, [29] but Paige et al reported only moderate improvements in pain and with (transient) minor musculoskeletal harms. [30] Before Spinal Manipulation Therapy (SMT) can be considered as a treatment option, patients with LBP need to be screened for possible serious pathology. There are two reasons for this: some conditions, such as a fracture, affect the mechanical integrity of the spine and would make SMT clearly dangerous. In other conditions, a failure to recognise the condition delays commencement of more appropriate care. For example, early detection and treatment of spinal malignancy is important to prevent the spread of metastatic disease and the development of further complications such as spinal cord compression. Application of SMT with the presence of any red flags are considered as contraindications to SMT until further investigation has excluded other pathologies.

Core Stability

Strength training aims to enhance core stability by strengthening and improving the coordination between the abdominal and back muscles.[31] Stabilisation exercises will increase a patient’s capacity to resist higher loads in the degenerative discs[32]. This is a key element for prevention and treatment of injury as muscle tissue reduces at a rate of 1 kg/year after the age of 40.[33] A posterior dynamic stabilisation programme will have result in a significant improvement in pain and disability.[34] [35] Training exercises performed 1-3 times a week reduces pain and should be continued once pain has subsided and patients are able to return to their jobs and hobbies/activities and are able to cease the use of analgesics.[36]

Exercises are performed to reduce pain and to ensure stability by strengthening the hip extensors, hip flexors, abdominal muscles and the sacrospinalis muscles.[37]Other important exercises include engaging of the pelvis musculature to restore body symmetry, such as the back extensors and abdominal muscles. The Williams method suggests stretching of the back extensors and strengthening of the abdominal muscles to relieve some of the pressure placed on the lumbar intervertebral discs.[38] [39]

Sample examples of the Williams flexion exercises plan are:

  • Pelvic tilt - lying on the back with bent knees, the back is pressed into the floor and held in this position for up to 10 seconds.
  • Single or double Knee to chest - Lying on the back with bent knees, one is pulled up to the chest and held for up to 10 seconds. This can be done with one or two knees at a time.
  • Partial sit-up - starting in a pelvic tilt position, the shoulders are then lifted off the floor. This is held for 2-10 seconds for each repetition
  • Hamstring stretch
  • Hip Flexor stretch
  • Squat - performed correctly, this is a good overall exercise for the whole body and trunk control recruitment and lower back strength.


In combination with these exercises core stability exercises are recommended. Exercises to facilitate and engage the transversus abdominis are key to creating a stable base for performing other exercises, including strength exercises. [40]

Exercises can be progressed onto: curl ups, side plank, prone plank, bridging and performing alternated leg and arm raises in a four point kneeling position. This can be progressed to raising opposite arm and leg at the same time. During these exercises the spine should be maintained in a neutral position without any compensatory movements and the pelvis should not tilt. [40] Balance and coordination exercises relevant to an individual's sport can also be added into the programme.[40] [41]


Core stability exercises.gif

In patients with degenerative disc disease it is also advised to add behavioural therapy to treatment programme due to the psychological effects of the disease, as patients can associate the constant pain and term degeneration with their backs becoming increasingly weak, This additional therapy has been shown to give better results.[7] These erroneous thoughts often elicit a fear of movement and can lead to the avoidance of movements of the spine. [32] Education and advice can also improve patient compliance,[42] helping them to overcome their fears and be adaptive with their coping strategies. Staying active and physical training will not have adverse effects on their spines[7] and performing low impact aerobic exercises is actually beneficial for the spine, increasing the flow of nutrients and blood to spinal structures and decreases pressure on the intervertebral discs. Prolonged single positions should also be avoided where possible. Back care is a life long process and patients should be encouraged to remain regularly active.[32][7]

Extension exercises are given to displace the pressure on the discs anteriorly. Some exercises are:

Physical therapies should aim to promote healing in the disc periphery, by stimulating cells, boosting metabolite transport and preventing adhesion and re-injury. Such an approach has the potential to accelerate pain relief in the disc periphery, even if it fails to reverse age-related degenerative changes in the nucleus.[43]

The use of low-level laser therapy is a further possible option in the conservative treatment of discogenic back pain, with positive clinical results of more than 90% efficacy, not only in the short-term, but also in the long-term, with lasting benefits. In their research, Ip and Fu conducted three sessions of treatment per week over a 12 week period. 49 of the 50 patients had significant improvement in their Oswestry Disability Index score [44], but this still needs more research.

Occupational Therapy[edit | edit source]

Occupational Therapy may be administered to teach body mechanics and postures. It can help patients gain proper manual handling skills and modify their regular tasks to avoid painful movement. [45]

Occupational therapy also can assist in locating essential equipment such as a pick-up stick, lumbar cushion, shower chair, swivel cushion for automobile transfer, and in some severe cases, a lifter and sling. [45]

Clinical Bottom Line[edit | edit source]

DDD is a is a condition in which the intervertebral discs lose height and hydration and as a result the discs are unable to fulfill their primary functions. Although the exact cause of DDD is unknown, it is thought to be primarily associated with the aging process. The most common location of this process is situated in the cervical and lower lumbar regions of the spine.

Diagnosis is via X-ray and to accurately identify the painful disc, a provocation discography test is used. Common outcome measures are the Oswestry Disability Index in combination with questionnaires like VAS and SF-36.

Multiple concepts of medical management are used to treat DDD. When pain persists despite efforts from conservative management, surgical techniques may be considered. A few examples of surgical management are:

However, the preferred treatment protocol is conservative management, consisting of physical therapy and analgesic medications. The aim of physical therapy is to reduce pain, to enhance overall strength and core stability and to inform and advise the patient about the disease so that can then effectively self manage for the long term.


References[edit | edit source]

  1. Goel AP, Wang EJ, Bicket MC. Degenerative Disc Disease. In Spine Pain Care. Cham:Springer, 2020, p181-188.
  2. Medical News Today. All about degenerative disc disease. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/266630#diagnosis (Accessed 19 May 202)
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Peng B. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of discogenic low back pain. World J Orthop. 2013 April 18; 4(2): 42-52
  4. 4.0 4.1 McCormack BM, Weinstein PR. Cervical spondylosis. An update. West J Med 1996; 165(1-2): 43-51
  5. Zheng CJ, Chen J. Disc degeneration implies low back pain. Theor Biol Med Model. 2015 Nov 9;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s12976-015-0020-3.
  6. Spine-health, Degenerative Disc Disease Health Center. Available from: http://www.spine-health.com/conditions/degenerative-disc-disease (Accessed 18 May 2023)
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hll; 2008.
  8. Ullrich, P. F. (2006 11 6). Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Retrieved 06 02, 2009, from Degenerative Disc Disease: http://www.spine-health.com/conditions/degenerative-disc-disease/lumbar-degenerative-disc-disease
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 O'Halloran DM, Pandit AS. Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc. Tissue Eng 2007; 13(8):1927-1954.
  10. 7SecretsMedical. Degenerative Disc Disease. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBrVj7F6kI [accessed on 27/11/2023]
  11. 11.0 11.1 Thompson, J.C. MD. Netter's Concise Atlas of Orthopaedic Anatomy. (2002) Saunders Elsevier. p.36-7
  12. Bono CM, Lee CK. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):455-63; discussion Z5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000090825.94611.28.
  13. Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H. Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J. 2001 Aug;10(4):309-13. doi: 10.1007/s005860000207.
  14. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Howard J. Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes. Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.013.
  15. Kayhan F, Albayrak Gezer İ, Kayhan A, Kitiş S, Gölen M. Mood and anxiety disorders in patients with chronic low back and neck pain caused by disc herniation. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2016;20(1):19-23. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2015.1100314.
  16. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1873-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Griffith JF, Wang YX, Antonio GE, Choi KC, Yu A, Ahuja AT, et al. Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):E708-12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a59a0.
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Drazin D, Rosner J, Avalos P, Acosta F. Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:961052. doi: 10.1155/2012/961052.
  19. uwaterloo. Waterloo's Dr. Spine, Stuart McGill. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=033ogPH6NNE [Accessed on 03/05/13]
  20. Phillips FM, Slosar PJ, Youssef JA, Andersson G, Papatheofanis F. Lumbar spine fusion for chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):E409-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182877f11.
  21. Taylor J, Pupin P, Delajoux S, Palmer S. Device for intervertebral assisted motion: technique and initial results. Neurosurg Focus. 2007 Jan 15;22(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/foc.2007.22.1.6.
  22. Garcia R Jr, Yue JJ, Blumenthal S, Coric D, Patel VV, Leary SP, et al. Lumbar Total Disc Replacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain: Two-year Outcomes of the activL Multicenter Randomized Controlled IDE Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Dec;40(24):1873-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001245.
  23. Beattie PF. Current understanding of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a review with emphasis upon etiology, pathophysiology, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jun;38(6):329-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2768.(level of evidence 1b)
  24. 24.0 24.1 Zhang Y, An HS, Tannoury C, Thonar EJ, Freedman MK, Anderson DG. Biological treatment for degenerative disc disease: implications for the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;87(9):694-702. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817c1945.
  25. Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):816-23. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259225.37454.38.
  26. Rohof O. Intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency application following provocative discography for the management of degenerative disc disease and concordant pain: a pilot study. Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):342-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00512.x.
  27. Slade SC, Keating JL. Unloaded movement facilitation exercise compared to no exercise or alternative therapy on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 May;30(4):301-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.010.
  28. Triano JJ, McGregor, M, Skogsbergh DR. Use of chiropractic manipulation in lumbar rehabilitation. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 1997; 34: 394-404.
  29. Vieira-Pellenz F, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Rodriguez-Blanco C, Heredia-Rizo AM, Ricard F, Almazán-Campos G. Short-term effect of spinal manipulation on pain perception, spinal mobility, and full height recovery in male subjects with degenerative disk disease: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1613-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.002.
  30. Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Booth MS, Beroes JM, Mardian AS, Dougherty P, et al. Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1451-1460. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3086.
  31. Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A. Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Degeneration. Spine 2003; 28(17):1913-1921
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 Beattie P. Current understanding of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a review with emphasis upon etiology, pathophysiology, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings. 2008; 38(6):329-340
  33. Adam Gąsiorowski et al, Strength training in the treatment of degeneration of lumbar section of vertebral column, Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, Vol 20, No 2, 203–205, 2013
  34. Zagra A., et al; Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine, Eur Spine J, 2012, 21, suppl 1: S83-S89
  35. Canbay S., et al, Posterior dynamic stabilization for the treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease: long-term clinical and radiological results, Turkish Neurosurgery 2013, vol. 23, No. 2, 188-197
  36. 41. Adam Gąsiorowski et al, Strength training in the treatment of degeneration of lumbar section of vertebral column, Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, Vol 20, No 2, 203–205, 2013
  37. Johnson Olubusola E. Therapeutic Exercises in the Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain, ISBN: 978-953-51-0599-2, 2012
  38. Lee M.,The effects of core muscle release technique on lumbar spine deformation and low back pain.J Phys Ther Sci.;27(5):1519-22, 2015
  39. Mircea MOLDOVAN, Therapeutic Considerations and Recovery in Low Back Pain: Williams vs McKenzie, Timisoara Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal. Volume 5, Issue 9, 2012
  40. 40.0 40.1 40.2 AKUTHOTA V., Core Stability Exercise Principles Akuthota, Curr. Sports Med. Rep., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 39Y44, 2008
  41. COSIO-LIMA, Effects of Physioball and Conventional Floor Exercises on Early Phase Adaptations in Back and Abdominal Core Stability and Balance in Women. J Strength Cond Res.17(4):721-5. 2003
  42. Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Lumbar Fusion Surgery to Nonoperative Care for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain. Spine 2007; 32(7): 816-823
  43. Adams MA, Stefanakis M, Dolan P. Healing of a painful intervertebral discfckLRshould not be confused with reversing disc degeneration: implications forfckLRphysical therapies for discogenic back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010fckLRDec;25(10):961-71.
  44. Ip D, Fu NY. Can intractable discogenic back pain be managed by low-level laser therapy without recourse to operative intervention? J Pain Res. 2015 May 26;8:253-6
  45. 45.0 45.1 australiaot. Occupational Therapy Proforma - Format & Example (Lumbar Disc Bulge) 디스크 [Internet]. Australia OT. 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 10]. Available from: https://australiaot.com/en/occupational-therapy-proforma-format-example-lumbar-disc-bulge-디스크/
  46. Hrabalek L, Machac J, Vaverka M. The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine. Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca. 2009 Oct;76(5):417-23.
  47. Bruneau A, Anderson KM, Lim R, Lange EC, Carls T, Trieu HH, inventors; Warsaw Orthopedic Inc, assignee. Interspinous process brace. United States patent US 8,105,357. 2012 Jan 31.